Commentary on popular culture and society, from a (mostly) psychological perspective
posted by Helen at 3:50 PM
haha i posted basically the same thing on my blog
I found your site on BlogHer - I have a blog about training for the 3-Day walk for breast cancer as well as other health/fitness topics - would you be interested in a link or entry exchange?
Bring back the b&w pic.
anonymous 5:41:What the heck is this with people asking me to put back the black and white pic?
Bloomberg is a miserable little shit, a true nannystatist.
Strange thing is the health nuts and average person will pay more for bland food while the foodies and well-heeled will continue to eat real butter. Downside is pastries will have to be smuggled in from Jersey.
that's a shame, Little Italy will now truly be gone from NYC for good...
don't - we like your hot red pj pic...
I'm really torn about this one. While I understand the resistance to heavy-handed government intrusion "for our own good", the truth is this stuff is poison. I've been trying to avoid trans fats ever since I learned what they are in my cell biology class in 1986. It's much easier now, thanks to increased awareness. We now know that butter and lard are less harmful for you than trans fat. And you can make really good fried food with butter or lard, but of course you can't manufacture it in ginormous quantities for cheap, so lard-cooked french fries would be more expensive. Transfats have driven the cost of prepared food way down, and now we are used to cheap cookies/twinkes/french fries, so we condsider it undue intrusion to ban them. But we as a society more or less accept bans on other dangerous substances. Another point (OK, OK, so I am sounding all pro-ban, which maybe I am in this case, even though I tend to be a little more skeptical of the nanny state in most cases) is that trans fats are so prevalent that it is hard to avoid them if you choose to do so. I avoid them by reading lables religiously, shopping at Whole Paycheck (which is trans fat free), mostly cooking my own food, avoiding fast food joints, and avoiding any menu items, like fries, that are higly likely to contain trans fats. But I'm never really sure that my spinach omlette wasn't cooked with trans fat-containing oil. And what about the children-again, one can avoid giving kids trans fats if we prepare all their food for them, but if my kid buys a muffin on the way home from school, she is probably eating greasy poison. At the very least, the stuff should be labeled.The bottom line is that trans fats are unnecessary, and they are unhealthy. Yes, butter and lard are also unhealthy, but not nearly so. And if you have ever had fries or battered fish cooked in lard, you'd never, ever go back to eating stuff cooked in trans fats again.In fact, try this. Go to the store, buy a big potato, slice it up, and cook it in olive oil, or canola oil, or any pure non-manufactured fat source you happen to have, add a little sea salt, some pepper, and eat it. Tastes good, doesn't it? Now, tell me you'd rather go to Burger King.
Actually there is very little scientific evidence that trans fat is bad for you.To my knowledge, there have been no controlled scientific studies examining only the effects of trans fat on heart disease. (And the very few studies that found a correlation have not been reproduced and are quite dubious scientifically.)There have, however, recently been several massive studies of low-fat diets and they all concluded that they didn't reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease, colorectal cancer or invasive breast cancer. Reducing all fat would reduce trans fat. Again, not a direct study, but it does strong suggest that studies finding trans-fat harmful are poorly done or simply junk.
Actually, there are several studies that show a link between trans fats specifically, and CHD. The problem with the low-fat diet studies, and the whole low-fat movement of the 90's, is that these rarely take into account the kind of fat being consumed, and many processed "low fat" foods actually have trans fats in them. In fact, many manufactured low fat foods actually increase the proportion of trans fats to naturally occurring fats, because they tend to eliminate natural fats in favor of processed foods. Low fat diets call for margerine instead of better. Margerine has trans fats, butter does not. Can't eat steak, but go ahead and have some Snack Wells. Guess which of these two have trans fats. And there is a study that shows that the CHD risk increase per gram of trans fat is significantly greater than per gram of saturated fat (the naturally occurring kind in butter and meat). We need fat. And it tastes good. People on low fat diets aren't getting enough good fat, and they tend to consume more crap-calories from low fat foods than do people that eat balanced diets of lean meats, fruit and veggies, with the occassional indulgence of slab bacon or pastries made with butter. Mmm. If you look back at the low fat diets that people were on 10 years ago, you will see that they stayed away from salmon, but could eat all the pretzels and low fat cookies they wanted. Turns out that the omega-3's and unsaturated fats in salmon actually LOWER the risk of CHD.I understand the general skepticism about nutrition advice in light of the above example. A decade ago we were supposed to eat low fat, now we are supposed to eat low carb, who knows what we will be supposed to do in 2015. But the bigger picture about all of this makes a fair amount of sense. Sugar and fat have been a part of the human diet as long as there have been humans. Our bodies can deal with this-we've been selected for our ability to metabolize naturally occurring sugars and fats (and alcohol, for that matter), but at the cellular level, we don't know what to do with trans fats. It seems we don't turn them over. They stick around. God knows how long.
btw, while I do think that some of the trans fat studies are in fact scientifically sound, one could still argue against them just based on how much better home made french fries taste.On a pragmatic note, though, I would prefer some financial incentive for a phased reduction of trans fats, rather than an outright ban that will surely cause economic upheaval. If the government is going to decide that on one day we can't do something that was perfectly legal the day before, they better be ready to clean up the resulting mess.
New York City bans trans fat in restaurants in an attempt for the Mayor to flex a "watch my second-hand smoke" voter base? Is free space so tight in NYC that more cash generating skinny folks can be "managed" in the same space, kind of like airline seating stratagies on a limited ratio of space/weight/paying customer airplanes? I see a financial boon for the folks in the olive oil importing industry. As always, follow the money. I seem to remember the ridicule suffered by the Mayor at the time when "runny egg yolks" were banned. Obviously he's no longer Mayor with edicts like those!
Boon to the olive oil importing industry? Almost certainly. But is that not one of the many benefits of capitalism? When a door closes, a window opens? Damn, now I want to get a piece of the olive oil importing action!
Hmmm...,OK, perhaps I was a bit too coy with an antiquated euphemism...
http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/2035/Once, the debate about health was to do with how we could provide more and better resources for society, improve technology and provision for all sections in the community - and the best way to organise such a task. With the low horizons of modern political life, however, we seem to be headed toward a situation where we can play out a morality tale of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ people – based on how they eat, drink, smoke, shop, and have sex in an age where we don’t seem to agree upon very much else.
ada47 -- Keep in mind the food-nazis were the ones banning lard and other fats and requiring the switch to trans -- all for 'health'. They have no idea what they're talking about, they're just on a control jag. Poison? You realize bean and alphalfa sprouts contain toxins? Ban them too, I say.
oligoOf course I realize that the food nazis told us to stop eating butter and lard. We now know they were wrong. We just shouldn't eat so much of them. I don't advocate blindly doing what the food nazis say. But once in a while they are right, and they are right about trans fats-independent evidence supports this.As for sprouts, well, yes, most edible sprouts contain canavanine. Fortunately, they taste really yucky, so few people are likely to eat the hundred or so pounds of sprouts it would take to get the toxic 15g of canavanine. Other types of sprouts that contain lathyrogen, which is more toxic at lower levels, are not eaten, probably because they taste really really icky, so you'd be hard pressed to find any place that sells or serves them. If you did, I'd bet you could easily get them banned.The difference between sprouts and trans fat food, other than the fact that trans fat food taste way better than sprouts, is that sprouts contain tiny amounts of toxins and huge amouts of beneficial nutrients. Fries cooked in trans fats contain large amounts of trans fat and no beneficial nutrients. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to cook up some sweet potato fries (vitimin A, C, B6 and manganese) with some olive oil (unsaturated fat) to eat with my poached egg. Yeah, I know the food nazis told us to stop eating eggs, but I didn't listen and it turns out they were wrong about that, too.
As much as I hate nanny-statism, I just can't get into the "Save the Transfat" movement. The stuff is garbage and it doesn't taste very good. Any evidence that shows that eating butter is better than eating margarine is fine with me. I believe I was in high school when all the fast food restaurants shifted to their "low cholesterol" French Fries (i.e., transfat fries), and we immediately noticed how much more bland they tasted. So much so, that my friends and I would annoy the workers at various Fast Food restaurants by asking for the "high cholesterol" fries, which they no longer served. They probably spit in our food.And I've been quite skeptical of the low-fat dietary movement since I recognized that people are getting fatter despite supposedly eating less fat. Really, we're eating less saturated fat, and more transfat, and we're getter fatter as a result. So, bring on the fries cooked in lard, I say.
So label the stuff and be done with it. The ban is just a way for the state to worm it's way into our homes through our kitchens. Labeling would give me the info to make an informed choice. And I would avoid transfat. But the state needs to leave me be.Trey
Wow, I'm so glad there are others around to tell me what I should and shouldn't eat. Some of you can't seem to grasp that allowing others to take your rights away is a bad thing. No one is forced to eat anything they don't want. Let the market decide by letting customer's vote with their pocketbooks. Keep giving up pieces of your freedom and see where that leads you. Sheeple!
Oh, come on. Transfat wouldn't even be as prevalent if it weren't for the food nannies previously waging a war on saturated fat. You're fighting for your "right" to continue to eat a substance that the food nannies had already (wrongly) told you that you should be eating. So, who are the sheeple, here?
Um, no. transfat would not be so prevelant if it were no so CHEAP.
Cheapness certainly has something to do with it, but I didn't say it wouldn't be used, I simply said it wouldn't be as prevalent. The fast food restaurants didn't start using it until the "low cholesterol" phase, even though it was available long, long before that.
ada47 -- Don't care what the food cops say, I eat what I wish. People have different tastes and while I cook and like potatoes cooked in butter and canola and olive, I also like fries from fast food joints. Before and after trans. My dispute is not that there are statistics (damn lies) that link trans to coranary problems, my dispute is that food nazis do not get things right by their very nature. They care not what is factual, only what allows them leverage to impose on others. Don't like non-vegans, have Chicago start the crusade by banning patte. Yeesh.Next, they'll be wanting the 2-5% trans fats occurring naturally in the milk and body fat of cows and sheep removed. "For your health", of course.
sorry, oligo, but there again you're wrong. Natural trans fats are recognized and metabolized to conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), which is actually quite good for you. Among the other health benefits of CLA, it seems to actually reduce the amount of fat that we store in our adipose tissue, especially belly fat. In other words, it minimizes uptake of other fats. Synthetic trans fats, not so much.If you want to argue this one based on the principle of government intrusion, go ahead. It is a valid argument. Though I would have to agree with Rizzo that is is really hard to jump on the pro-trans fat bandwagon. But quite a bit of good science exists behind the anti-trans fat movement, so if you're going to go that route, learn the science and don't just assume all statistics are lies. And just because a bunch of self righteous tree huggers say trans fats are bad does not mean that trans fats are not bad.
ada47mI hate to break the news to you but, very little good science exists behind the anti-trans fat movement.I was once a believer, then I tried to find all that good science I was sure existed to support my view. And failed. Badly. It just isn't there.
joe and oligo,what is the standard that must be reached for you to call something good science? What is missing from the current studies that keeps you from believing them? I would not say that the evidence is complete or a slam dunk, but the weight of the existing evidence pretty much supports the claim that trans fats are bad bad bad. I'd like to refure you on this, but I can't begin to do so unless you can tell me what should be done to prove that trans fats are bad.
Here in quebec, when the government made it illegal to not wear your seat belt, we knew it was because they were going to introduce the state managed no-fault insurance system...They were the ones who would pay if you had an accident so they forced us to wear our seatbelts, so there'd be less damage/injury to pay for...Could the ban of trans fat indicate that pretty soon New York will introduce a kind of universal "free" healthcare system like we have in here Canada?I hope yours work, ours is a mess...Tiny Belgium has more MRI machines than Canada...that is what "free" universal health care gets you...
ada47,Let's say the so called "science" is correct for now. Experience has shown that it won't always be so. Of course, by then NYC will be devoid of their famous bakeries and bagel shops. Too bad as we're probably heading into a recession and NYC will need the tourist trade they are running off. Let's all check back in 2010 and see the dearth of low and mid priced restaurants and bakeries in NYC. No sandwich shops, no hot dog vendors on the street. Ever wonder what type of fat is in those soft buns that don't go stale overnight?A reasonable option would have been to have the businesses give notice of the presence of trans fats and allow people a choice. Of course, they can't do that as they know the poor stupid peasants will choose badly.
ada47,I agree with pretty much all you said on this topic and for what it is worth,isn't there also evidence that countries where people consume a lot of natural fats ( like olive oil, greeks consume a LOT of olive oil, I think they have the world record ) have less health problems than people in countries like the USA and Canada where there are processed/trans fats in almost everything we eat?Natural fats such as olive oil are better for us and do taste great when you know how to use them, I like my sweet potatoes fried in olive oil just like you! I really don't like the state telling me how to live my life but banning a bad fat is not exactly telling people what they can and can not do; people can still live on french fries, cheeseburgers and Oreo cookies if they want to.In fact they will be able to live on french fries, cheeseburgers and Oreo cookies a little longer now that trans fat will not be in them anymore!
ada47,THERE IS NO SCIENCE.The anti-trans-fat hysteria results from an observed and VERY low correlation from a handful of studies that weren't specifically and narrowly looking at trans-fat. The sampling size of these studies was too small and the methodology terrible.Contrary to this, there have been several very large, well constructed studies specifically examining the effect of low fat diets on heart disease and breast cancer. These diets included trans-fat (though didn't focus on it, unfortunately.) Still, the results found that low-fat diets did not reduce heart disease or incidence of breast cancer.
joe,Wait, wait, wait. You’re telling me all the science is crap, and you cite that one study to back up your contention that there are no adverse health effects of trans fats? That particular study is bad science. Several posts back, I talked about why. This is not just my opinion, this is the consensus from scientists from a wide range of specialties. Scroll back for the details, but the bottom line is that the low fat studies did not look at the type of fat consumed, and based on this alone the study is junk. Low fat dies tend to be higher in trans fats (margerine instead of butter, cooking spray instead of olive oil, etc.) and several controlled and reproduced studies, as well as a host of anecdotal evidence from observations of dietary habits, indicate that several natural fats neutralize the effects of saturated fats. Passing on the “high-fat” salmon and avocado in favor of the “low-fat” cookies made with trans fats is counterproductive to health.The now infamous low-fat diet study that you cite took years to do. Too bad they did it wrong. It will take another 10 years to do a similar study looking at dietary lipid content, rather than just counting grams of “fat”. And it this point, it is unlikely that such a study will be done because most nutritionists would consider it unethical to force someone to be on a high trans fat diet. However I can show you at least 10 smaller studies that come to the unanimous and highly reproducible conclusion that diets high in trans fats raise LDL and lower HDL, thus moving the LDL/HDL ratio into the unhealthy zone. The results are exactly the opposite for diets high in unsaturated fat with minimal trans fats, and diets high in saturated fat have a less extreme effect on the LDL/HDL ratio. LDL/HDL is, for good reason, accepted as the primary indicator of CHD risk. This is backed up by tons of good science and years of medical records. As for the economics, I am of course sympathetic, but I did a little looking into the NY situation. Recently, a self-policing measure was taken, whereby restaurants could voluntarily reduce the amount of trans fats in their food. One year later, there was no significant change in the number of restaurants with significant trans fats in their menu offerings (although a few individual restaurants went trans fat-free). The waitstaff at most restaurants were unable to identify trans fat-containing goods on their menus. Under the current “ban”, they have six months to get trans fats out of their deep fryers, and eighteen, that is eighteen, months to get trans fats out of their baked goods. Of course there is resistance to this, but several restaurant owners have weighted in, saying that simply following the market trends over the last years indicates that such a reduction is warranted, so they are less concerned with negative economics of the ban. This is of course not the universal response, but most reasonable people are not predicting economic collapse.We should fear the nanny state. We should be ever vigilant against government intrusion into our lives. We should question whether any decision by the government is in our long-term interest. But there is a school of thought that suggests that government can and should have a positive and progressive role in correcting market failures. Widespread use of a product that is proven to be bad for us, because it is cheap, is a market failure (is their lead in your house paint? No? Why not? Who took it out?). In a perfect world, an informed populace would drive trans fats off the market by refusing to buy trans fat-laden foods. In some way, this is working, as proper labeling of foods has lead to less widespread commercial use of trans fats. I’d bet that the few restaurants that went trans fat-free and advertised that fact have lines around the corner. There is a demand, but the fact that people don’t know which restaurant foods contain trans fats, and the information about the deleterious health effects of trans fats, which is about as close to scientific consensus as exists on any issue, has not trickled down to the general public, is a market failure.
Hydrogenated oils, trans fat are man made or more precisely man-processed, and are only about half a century old.There was a bakery industry BEFORE man began to process fat.and there will be a bakery industry after trans fats are gone.The price of other oils/fats will go down as more and more bakers use them.When vitamin E is added food has a longer shelf life, almost as good as with trans fats.The food industry will survive, we will all survive a world without trans fats.
Yes, trans fats are dangerous for everyone--not just New Yorkers.So, if trans fats are dangerous for everyone, why isn't the FDA banning or regulating it?If it isn't dangerous enough to warrant a ban/strict regulation, then NYC shouldn't be doing a thing. Or the FDA.Either way NYC shouldn't have done a job that isn't really theirs to do.
rowena,I disagree entirely.The NY measure is in fact more responsive to democracy. The next mayoral election can see the end of the trans fat ban or the continuation of it, and the voters can be heard about that. Bloomberg's health commissione put the ban in place. People can vote out Bloomberg and make it clear they don't like the ban, so his successor will ease up on the regulation and not try something like this again. Or, they can re-elect Bloomberg, or (does NYC have mayoral term limits? I can't rememver) someone who vows to keep the ban in place and thus voice their approval of it.The FDA, unfortunately, can be politicized in a manner that does not always serve the interests of the people. Farm subsidies ensure that your Big Mac costs less than a salad and a coke costs less than orange juice. Since the FDA is part of the arm of the Federal Gov't, it is less responsive to popular will. There would ahve to be congressional measures, people would have to, like, vote in midterm elections and know who their congressperson voted, and it would take a while.But don't worry, the FDA eventually will ban trans fats. Or, better yet, they won't have to, as trans fats will cease to exist. National chain restaurants will have to adapt to the NY ban by removing trans fats from their products. It will cost too much to do this just for NY, so the will do it nation wide. Some innovative food scientist will come up with something new, it will be mass marketed and soon will be ubiquitous. See, capitalism has its benefits, and federal government control over every aspect of our life has its faults. I would think that conservatives would know this.
情趣用品, 性感睡衣, 免費視訊聊天, 視訊交友網, 美姬圖影, 情境坊歡愉用品, 花美姬情趣用品, 成人圖片, 臺灣情色網, 嘟嘟情人色網, 色情網站, 情境坊歡愉用品, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信, 外遇, 徵信, 徵信, 抓姦, 徵信, 外遇, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 趣, 趣, 整型, 視訊聊天, 視訊交友, AV女優, 色情, A片, A片, 情趣用品, 情色, A片, 色情影片, 情趣用品, A片, AV女優, 視訊聊天室, 聊天, 情趣用品, 情惑用品性易購, 情侶歡愉用品, A片, 情趣, 情惑用品性易購, 辣妹視訊, 自慰套, 情侶歡愉用品, 寄情築園小遊戲, aio交友愛情館, 美女視訊, 色情A片, 情趣用品, 徵信社, 情趣用品, A片, 美女視訊, 色情A片, AV女優, A片, 辣妹視訊, 自慰套, 情侶歡愉用品,
本土成人貼圖站大台灣情色網台灣男人幫論壇A圖網嘟嘟成人電影網火辣春夢貼圖網情色貼圖俱樂部台灣成人電影絲襪美腿樂園18美女貼圖區柔情聊天網707網愛聊天室聯盟台北69色情貼圖區38女孩情色網台灣映像館波波成人情色網站美女成人貼圖區無碼貼圖力量色妹妹性愛貼圖區日本女優貼圖網日本美少女貼圖區亞洲風暴情色貼圖網哈啦聊天室美少女自拍貼圖辣妹成人情色網台北女孩情色網辣手貼圖情色網AV無碼女優影片男女情色寫真貼圖a片天使俱樂部萍水相逢遊戲區平水相逢遊戲區免費視訊交友90739免費視訊聊天辣妹視訊 - 影音聊天網080視訊聊天室日本美女肛交美女工廠貼圖區百分百貼圖區亞洲成人電影情色網台灣本土自拍貼圖網麻辣貼圖情色網好色客成人圖片貼圖區711成人AV貼圖區台灣美女貼圖區筱萱成人論壇咪咪情色貼圖區momokoko同學會視訊kk272視訊情色文學小站成人情色貼圖區嘟嘟成人網嘟嘟情人色網 - 貼圖區免費色情a片下載台灣情色論壇成人影片分享免費視訊聊天區微風 成人 論壇kiss文學區taiwankiss文學區
2008真情寫真aa片免費看捷克論壇微風論壇大眾論壇plus論壇080視訊聊天室情色視訊交友90739美女交友-成人聊天室色情小說做愛成人圖片區豆豆色情聊天室080豆豆聊天室 小辣妹影音交友網台中情人聊天室桃園星願聊天室高雄網友聊天室新中台灣聊天室中部網友聊天室嘉義之光聊天室基隆海岸聊天室中壢網友聊天室南台灣聊天室南部聊坊聊天室台南不夜城聊天室南部網友聊天室屏東網友聊天室台南網友聊天室屏東聊坊聊天室雲林網友聊天室大學生BBS聊天室網路學院聊天室屏東夜語聊天室孤男寡女聊天室一網情深聊天室心靈饗宴聊天室流星花園聊天室食色男女色情聊天室真愛宣言交友聊天室情人皇朝聊天室上班族成人聊天室上班族f1影音視訊聊天室哈雷視訊聊天室080影音視訊聊天室38不夜城聊天室援交聊天室080080哈啦聊天室台北已婚聊天室已婚廣場聊天室 夢幻家族聊天室摸摸扣扣同學會聊天室520情色聊天室QQ成人交友聊天室免費視訊網愛聊天室愛情公寓免費聊天室拉子性愛聊天室柔情網友聊天室哈啦影音交友網哈啦影音視訊聊天室櫻井莉亞三點全露寫真集123上班族聊天室尋夢園上班族聊天室成人聊天室上班族080上班族聊天室6k聊天室粉紅豆豆聊天室080豆豆聊天網新豆豆聊天室080聊天室免費音樂試聽流行音樂試聽免費aa片試看免費a長片線上看色情貼影片免費a長片
85cc免費影城 愛情公寓正妹牆川藏第一美女 成人影片 情色交友網 美女視訊 美女視訊 視訊情人高雄網 JP成人影城 383成人影城 aa片免費a片下載 a片線上看aa片免費看 ※a片線上試看※sex520免費影片※ aa片免費看 BT成人論壇 金瓶影片交流區 自拍美女聊天室 aa片免費a片下載 SEX520免費影片 免費a片 日本美女寫真集 sex520aa免費影片 sex520aa免費影片 BT成人網 Hotsee免費視訊交友 百分百貼影片區 SEX520免費影片 免費視訊聊天室 情人視訊高雄網 星光情色討論版 正妹牆 383成人影城 線上85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 ※免費視訊聊天室※ ※免費視訊聊天室※ 免費視訊聊天室 85cc免費影片 85cc免費影片 080苗栗人聊天室 080苗栗人聊天室 080中部人聊天室 080中部人聊天室 免費a片下載 免費a片 AA片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 日本av女優影片 av女優 av女優無碼影城 av女優 av女優 百分百成人圖片 百分百成人圖片 視訊情人高雄網 電話交友 影音電話交友 絕色影城 絕色影城 夜未眠成人影城 夜未眠成人影城 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 免費色咪咪貼影片 免費色咪咪貼影片 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 影音視訊交友網 視訊交友網 080視訊聊天室 ※免費視訊聊天室※ ※免費視訊聊天室※ 視訊聊天室 成人影音視訊聊天室 ut影音視訊聊天室 ※免費視訊聊天室※ 視訊ukiss聊天室視訊ukiss聊天室 視訊交友90739 視訊交友90739 情人視訊網 168視訊美女 168視訊美女 168視訊美女 視訊美女館 視訊美女館 免費視訊美女網 小高聊天室 小高聊天室 aio交友聊天室 aio交友聊天室 交友聊天室 交友聊天室 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 免費線上a片 免費線上a片 嘟嘟成人網站 成人漫畫 情色文學 嘟嘟成人網 成人貼圖區 情色文學成人小說 微風成人區 情色貼圖區 免費視訊聊天 免費成人圖片區 愛情公寓 愛情公寓聊天室 寄情築園小遊戲 免費aa片線上看 aa片免費看 情色SXE聊天室 SEX情色遊戲 色情A片 免費下載 av女優 俱樂部 情色論壇 辣妹視訊 情色貼圖網 免費色情 聊天室 情人視訊聊天室 免費a片成人影城 免費a片-aa片免費看 0204貼圖區 SEX情色 交友聊天-線上免費 女優天堂 成人交友網 成人情色貼圖區 18禁 -女優王國 080視訊美女聊天室 080視訊聊天室 視訊交友90739 免費a片 aio 視訊交友網 成人影城-免費a片※免費視訊聊天※85cc免費影片日本線上免費a片 免費色咪咪影片免費色咪咪影片aaa片免費看影片aaa片免費看成人影城免費色咪咪影片
免費視訊聊天 ut聊天室辣妹視訊UT影音視訊聊天室 吉澤明步QQ美女視訊秀 85cc免費影片aa影片下載城sex免費成人影片aaa片免費看短片美女視訊 sex383線上娛樂場av969 免費短片日本免費視訊aa影片下載城視訊網愛聊天室影音視訊交友 咆哮小老鼠分享論壇sex520免費影片aa免費影片下載城aio辣妺視訊 aio辣妹交友愛情館 jp成人影片aio交友愛情館馬子免費影片免費線上a片18成人85cc影城0204movie免費色咪咪視訊網pc交友s383視訊玩美女人34c高雄視訊聊天jp成人免費視訊辣妹 kk777視訊俱樂部xxxpandalive173影音視訊聊天室 sex520-卡通影片成人免費視訊 完美女人13060 免費視訊聊天sexy girl video movie辣妹妹影音視訊聊天室UT視訊美女交友視訊情色網百事無碼a片dvd線上aa片免費看18禁成人網ut聊天室kk俱樂部視訊激情網愛聊天 情人小魔女自拍卡通aa片免費看夜未眠成人影城aio性愛dvd辣妹影片直播拓網視訊交友視訊聊天室ggoo168論壇視訊辣妹love104影音live秀 美女show-live視訊情色yam交友辣妹妹影音視訊聊天室s383情色大網咖視訊aaa俱樂部台灣情色網無碼avdvdsexy diamond sex888入口Show-live視訊聊天室
免費 a 片aaaaa片俱樂部影片aaaaa片俱樂部dodo豆豆聊天室sex520網路自拍美女聊天室天堂免費線上avdvd援交av080影片aa影片下載城aaa片免費看短片成人圖片區18成人avooogo2av免費影片sexdiy影城免費線上成人影片bonbonsex0951影片下載日本av女優sex888免費看影片免費視訊78論壇辣妹有約辣妹no31314視訊dudu sex免費影片avdvd情色影片免費色咪咪影片網av080免費試看日本美女寫真集辣妹脫衣麻將視訊聊天室性福免費影片分享日本美女寫真集,kk視訊aio交友愛情館免費成人美女視訊bt論壇色情自拍免費a片卡通tw 18 net卡通18美少女圖色情漫畫777美女小護士免費 aa 片試看百分百成人情色圖片a片免費觀賞sexy girls get fuckedsexy girl video movie情色文學成人小說sex888免費看eyny 伊莉論壇sexdiy影城自拍情色0204movie免費影片aio免費aa片試看s383情色大網咖sexy girl video movie草莓牛奶AV論壇台灣論壇18禁遊戲區環球辣妹聊天室 90691拓網aio交友愛情館拓網學生族視訊777美女 sex888影片分享區hi5 tv免費影片aa的滿18歲卡通影片sex383線上娛樂場sexdiy影城免費a片線上觀看真人美女辣妹鋼管脫衣秀比基尼辣妹一夜情視訊aio交友愛情館
小魔女免費影城免費看 aa的滿18歲影片sex383線上娛樂場kk777視訊俱樂部aa的滿18歲影片85cc免費影片a片免費看A片-sex520視訊聊天室v6 0plus論壇sex520免費影片avdvd-情色網qq美美色網ut13077視訊聊天A片-無碼援交東京熱一本道aaa免費看影片免費視訊聊天室微風成人免費視訊聊天 ut聊天室av1688影音視訊天堂免費 a 片85cc免費影城亞洲禁果影城微風成人av論壇sex520免費影片JP成人網免費成人視訊aaa影片下載城免費a片 ut交友成人視訊85cc成人影城免費Ａ片aa的滿18歲影片小魔女免費影片85cc免費影片aaa片免費看短片aa影片下載城aaaaa片俱樂部影片aaaaa片俱樂部aa的滿18歲影片小魔女免費影片台灣論壇免費影片後宮0204movie免費影片免費卡通影片線上觀看線上免費a片觀看85cc免費影片免費Ａ片aa影片下載城ut聊天室辣妹視訊UT影音視訊聊天室 日本免費視訊aaaa 片俱樂部aaaa片免費看影片免費視訊78論壇情色偷拍免費Ａ片免費aaaaa片俱樂部影片aa影片下載城色漫畫帝國av俱樂部aaaa彩虹頻道免費影片 杜蕾斯成人免費卡通影片線上觀看85cc免費影片線上觀賞免費線上歐美A片觀看免費a片卡通aaa的滿18歲卡通影片sex520免費影片免費 a 片
外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 外遇 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿喜帖囍帖卡片外遇外遇 外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇剖析 外遇調查 外遇案例 外遇諮詢 偷情 第三者外遇話題 外遇發洩 感情挽回 徵信社 外遇心態 外遇 通姦 通姦罪 外遇徵信社徵信社外遇 外遇 抓姦徵信協會徵信公司 包二奶 徵信社 徵信 徵信社 徵信社 徵信社 徵信社 徵信 徵信 婚姻 婚前徵信 前科 個人資料 外遇 第三者 徵信社 偵探社 抓姦 偵探社 偵探社婚 偵探社 偵探社偵探家事服務家事服務家電維修家事服務家事服務家事服務家事服務家事服務持久持久持久持久持久持久持久離婚網頁設計徵信社徵信社徵信徵信社外遇離婚協議書劈腿持久持久持久持久持久劈腿剖析徵信徵信社外遇外遇外遇外遇徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿
視訊做愛視訊美女無碼A片情色影劇kyo成人動漫tt1069同志交友網ut同志交友網微風成人論壇6k聊天室日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞UT視訊美女交友..........................
Post a Comment