Tuesday, August 15, 2006

Podcast on 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

Do you ever wonder who the nuts are that think the US government caused 9/11? Well, apparently, they are everyday Americans and others with thinking processes that border on the delusional and involve magical thinking which requires some serious grown-up intervention. The intervention manual has been written by the team at Popular Mechanics in their new book, Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts.

Today, we talk with David Dunbar, Executive Editor of Popular Mechanics and his co-editor, Brad Reagan, about their new book that debunks the 9/11 myths using facts and interviews with experts to dispel step by step any government involvement in the tragedy of 9/11. If you want to listen to real experts discuss the reality of what happened that day as opposed to conspiracy theorists who change the facts to fit their pet theories, take a listen.

You can listen to the podcast by clicking here or subscribe via iTunes. You can find an archive of our previous podcasts at the GlennandHelenshow.com. And there's a lo-fi version for dialup users here. Leave questions or comments below.

Oh, and if you've had trouble playing these from my site, try this Flash player and see if it works better.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

I like it. But for all you know, I'm one of the conspirators.

9:45 PM, August 15, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well that's nice, Dr. Helen. Anyone who believes something different from you is pathological. Very Soviet. I guess you shouldn't be blamed, that's the way your whole field is going.

I'll comment further after I've listened to your podcast.

12:29 AM, August 16, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

People whose thinking processes involve magical thinking? You mean like christians?

4:16 AM, August 16, 2006  
Blogger nyomythus said...

I'm ordering, "Six: The Movie" for my university's video collection some time this Fall.

9:03 AM, August 16, 2006  
Blogger Rizzo said...

Anyone who believes something different from you is pathological.

Not necessarily, but someone who creates an idiotic, nonsensical theory that ignores the known facts certainly should be checked out.

People whose thinking processes involve magical thinking? You mean like christians?

What do Christians have to do with any of this? Is Dr. Helen a Christian? I've read her blog for awhile now, and I don't even know. And what about Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, or Jews? Or is it just Christians?

10:10 AM, August 16, 2006  
Blogger ronin1516 said...

Anon 12.29 : Well, you could be considered 'pathological" if you believe something as crazy as the theories that state thet the 9/11 was an 'inside job", or that" it was a big Zionist conspiracy" or that it was "a conspiracy to make the stocks of oil companies and halliburton go higher in the NYSe" or drivel like that. This kind of thinking is no different than the thinking displayed by the disciples of david Koresh, or the followers of Jom Jones ( correct me if i got that "prophet's" name wrong) who drank the kool-aid in Guyana

11:59 AM, August 16, 2006  
Anonymous howard_coward said...

9/11 conspiracy theories have nothing to do with the facts. Come on guys! we watched it on TV! Conspiracy theories have to do with denial and fear of whats happening.

12:47 PM, August 16, 2006  
Blogger Helen said...


Thanks--I hope your university finds it useful.


Good points.

12:48 PM, August 16, 2006  
Anonymous Len said...

Any action comtemplated between two or more people is a conspiracy. Therefore what happened on 9/11 is a conspiracy, no matter who caused it. Now, I have no idea who caused it. I only know that it is physically impossible for it to have occurred the way the US government said it did. You better examine things a little more carefully. Len

1:09 PM, August 16, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Best troll line in this thread -- after an angry denuncation: "I'll comment further after I've listened to your podcast."

Yeah, bud, we're all holding our breaths.

1:18 PM, August 16, 2006  
Anonymous "Eric Blair" said...

Given the topic of conspiracy theory, here we have Andrew Sullivan trumpeting that he believes that the recent UK plot that was foiled---involving both the British and US governments---was a fraud.

Supposedly to move attention away from Ned Lamont?


I think it is time to quit reading Sullivan. He clearly is in the tertiary stages of Bush Derangement Syndrome.

"Eric Blair"

2:37 PM, August 16, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

anonymous 1:18-

Best troll line in this thread -- after an angry denuncation: "I'll comment further after I've listened to your podcast."

Yeah, bud, we're all holding our breaths.

Well, bud, if Dr. Helen unequivocally states that anyone that disagrees with her thoughts on the subject is pathological that statement in itself can be disputed.

Now this is the best line in the thread so far from Len:

"I only know that it is physically impossible for it to have occurred the way the US government said it did. You better examine things a little more carefully."

Thanks for mentioning that, Len. These "magical thinkers" that think the implosion fairy took down building 7 need some serious adult intervention.

3:49 PM, August 16, 2006  
Blogger SM777 said...

Believe it or not, Dr. Helen, there are individuals out there that will actually tell a lie in order to gain wealth and power at your expense.

No really, it's true.

Nero had Rome burned and blamed the Christians (people whose processes involve "magical" thinking) which increased his hold on power by terrorising his political enemies into supporting him.

Then there was the nazi party's burning of the Reichstag and their subsequent blaming of the Jews. Yep, another excuse for martial law.

Or, that mysterious explosion on the battleship Maine which justified the US govs'. war on Spain approx. 100 years ago.

No honestly, some people really will lie to you in order to obtain money and political support from you when necessary. I know it sounds almost impossible, but it's true.

Just because Peter Jennings/Dan Rather/Tom Brokaw says so, doesn't mean it actally is true. I know you may find this hard to believe, but they are actually paid over 30 million dollars each and every year, to read a script in front of a TV camera.

Do you really think they care what that script says?

Do you really think they would imperil their extraordinary salaries by actually stating what's on their minds?

Why do most women have a tendency to believe absolutely anything someone with alleged "authority" says, no matter how ridiculous, or completely out of touch with reality it may be?

I ask this question because I have a couple of female relatives that believe absolutely anything a person with "authority" says. I am also aware, due to discussions with other men I know, that they have encountered similar situations.

Maybe it has something to do with "I feel this is true" even though the cold hard facts may clearly indicate otherwise.

Kind of like, "I feel that the law of gravity shouldn't apply to me today, maybe I'll go skydiving without a parachute."

6:15 PM, August 16, 2006  
Anonymous JD said...

Len Writes: Any action contemplated between two or more people is a conspiracy. Therefore what happened on 9/11 is a conspiracy, no matter who caused it.

Which means that my post here on this comment thread makes the thread part of the conspiracy! Holy cow, I'd better watch out!

What's scary is how quickly the conspiracy nuts fall into blaming others - Jews, Republicans, and apparently, if you’re SM777 above, women who aren't, er… docile enough.

I’ll admit that I’m an antiwar liberal – but frustration with the left’s refusal to really actively debunk these theories pushed me to conservative blogs for commentary …. If nothing else it gives me hope that there’s something rational people can still all agree on.

10:04 AM, August 17, 2006  
Anonymous dissenter said...

Having listened to the podcast, I'll admit being totally underwhelmed.

As for me, I'd like to learn how Hani Hanjour grew that magnificent head of hair he sported on 9/11, given that he was virtually bald in the ATM photo ... and he must have gotten that Charles Atlas book, while he was at it. I'd like Dr. Helen to explain how Hanjour got on that plane without a ticket (according to the WashPost) -- it would save me bundles on overseas travel. :)

And then, there were the Odigo warnings, the dancing Israeli commandos on the rooftop, the devout Muslim suicide pilot with a weakness for cocaine and pork chops, the call to Mohammed Atta, Sr. on the 12th, the amazing indestructible passport, the seismic evidence showing that Flight 93 crashed in Shanksville at 10:06 AM, et al., ad nauseum....

To say that there are no colorable grounds for suspicion that the official story is a fabrication is to be completely divorced from reality. I agree with anonymous, and respectfully suggest that Dr. Helen should follow the Biblical admonition to heal thyself.

4:11 PM, August 17, 2006  
Blogger SM777 said...

JD, you obviously need to learn reading comprehension. Maybe you should go back to school.

If you could actually use reason and logic, you would notice that my point was women are too docile. They have a tendency to be so docile, in fact, as to believe anything stated by a faceless organization in "authority".

Who knows, maybe there's just too much toxic waste (AKA flouride) in the water, or too much mercury in vaccines, or maybe most people just want to go through life as blind, deaf and dumb sheep.

5:57 PM, August 17, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Don't know if anyone is actually following this thread anymore, but I thought I'd make a couple points:

- I thought the podcast was pretty insulting and unprofessional.

- I wonder if Dr. Helen and her husband have actually watched "Loose Change" - it's here:
(if that link doesn't work there are others that do)

- There are several articles that answer many of the Popular Mechanics arguments, the Scholars for 911 Truth website would be a good place to start:

- As Dr. Helen accuses "conspiracy theorists" (note the argument by definition) of employing "magical thinking", note that there is a lot of magical thinking being employed by supporters of the way the "War on Terror" is being waged. This article addresses how implausible an actual peroxide-based binary liquid bomb would be:

1:41 AM, August 21, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There are good facts delivered by PM's book, however, they did not answer as to why the outward blasts coming from the WTC buildings where right in the center and happened several floors down (meaning that the forced air from the pancake theory would not effect those floors at that instance). Also wWHY DOES THE GOVERNMENT NOT RELEASE THE VIDEOS FOR THE PENTAGON?!?!? THERE IS NO REASON TO KEEP THEM CONFISCATED UNLESS THEY ARE HIDING SOMETHING! PM's book does not address all the issues, just the ones they think can be addressed. Why were non of the passengers on the planes list arabic, and why are 9 of the nineteen hijackers found alive somewhere else? There is still alot that needs to be researched!! I hope the government is not involved but with all the lies and the witholdint of valuable information, we as Americans need to find out what is going on!

4:00 PM, August 24, 2006  
Blogger Mat Ripley said...

Dear Helen

I am CEO of a successful technology company. I studied 8 years at a major university to PHD Level. I believe we went to the moon. I don’t believe in any other conspiracies. I am not a Conspiracy Nut. I appreciate scientific methodology and the process of reason to a very deep level.

After watching Loose Change and doing copious amounts of my own research I am convinced of the following:

1) A plane did not hit the pentagon
2) The Twin Towers and WTC7 were not brought down as in the official story
3) Much evidence has been covered up or withheld for no reason.

Before listening to your podcast my heart was racing. Could this give me the evidence that I wanted to believe? That 911 was not an inside job.

Sadly it didn’t. I am not saying Bush and the Alien Illuminati did this, but it was not done as the official story and your “popular mechanics” claim.

You made so much ridicule of these “outlandish conspiracy theorists” and of non-mainstream media, which is unjustified and illegitimate. There are a whole bunch of fruitcakes and nutcases who believe that 911 was a conspiracy along with blowing up the levees. But not all people. Hundreds of thousands of people around the world believe there are significant inconsistencies with the 911 official account. All are not insane.

I suggest, if you are still interested in the process of scientific enquiry, that you take a methodological approach, on your own, to the evidence. Or you can stay jumping on the mainstream media bandwagon.

The same bandwagon that carried the WMDs across the sands of Iraq.

Best wishes

Mat Ripley

2:46 AM, August 31, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Says it all:

"How can we account for our present situation unless we believe that men high in this government are concerting to deliver us to disaster? This must be the product of a great conspiracy on a scale so immense as to dwarf any previous such venture in the history of man. A conspiracy of infamy so black that, which it is finally exposed, its principals shall be forever deserving of the maledictions of all honest men.…What can be made of this unbroken series of decisions and acts contributing to the strategy of defeat? They cannot be attributed to incompetence.…The laws of probability would dictate that part of…[the] decisions would serve the country’s interest."

-Joseph McCarthy, 1951

Today's left is the militia movement of the nineties: paranoid to the core. Hopefully it doesn't take a McVeigh to snap the paranoids to their senses this time around.


3:11 AM, September 06, 2006  
Blogger quicknthedead said...

Here’s the 9/11 smoking gun.


No one has debunked this yet…and it’s not a “theory”—just the facts.
“Plane Impact” Times: Incriminating Evidence of 9/11 Coverup & Complicity

“Seismic Proof – 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Version II)”
Link: http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/Seismic_Proof___9.11_Was_An_Inside_Job.doc
By Craig T. Furlong & Gordon Ross, Scholars for 9/11 Truth: http://www.st911.org

The official times for plane "impact" [precise to the second] as declared by the US Government, from both the 9/11 Commission and from NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), are different and yet both are true and accurate times. What can this factual contradiction mean? Looking exclusively at WTC1, there is found the indisputable causal link:

One World Trade, September 11, 2001
American Airlines Flight 11 “impact” time:
8:46:30 UTC, per LDEO seismic data (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2005)
8:46:40 UTC, per FAA last primary radar contact (9/11 Commission Final Report, 2004)

Q- What caused the 8:46:30 seismic event that occurred 10 seconds before the actual aircrash at 8:46:40?
A- The only possibility is huge explosions, as corroborated by many eyewitnesses at the time.
Q- Who caused these explosions before the plane hit?

In 2004, the 9/11 Commission avoided addressing the earlier seismic event time (which had been, in error, attributed by Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, originally in 2001 as “plane impact”).
In 2005, NIST avoided addressing the 9/11 Commission’s later time for the aircraft’s actual impact.
Both the 9/11 Commission and NIST avoided addressing the many witnesses who testified of explosions in the basements before the plane crashed.

This precision data has yet to be refuted by anyone. It is from the two highest governmental entities charged with looking into what happened on 9/11, and both declared these times as accurate, and in doing so they corroborate William Rodriguez and the many eyewitnesses the morning of 9/11 who testified of explosions in the sub-basements of WTC1 before American Airlines Flight 11 struck the building. This is indicting evidence of governmental coverup, and thus implication of complicity.

Before it is too late, demand a new 9/11 investigation, except this time a real one.
Justice waits...{and there is no statute of time limitation on murder}

4:34 PM, November 12, 2006  
Anonymous stinker said...

Be sure to check out the book “Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory” due out in March by Dr. David Ray Griffin.



6:29 PM, January 24, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Where did you find it? Interesting read levaquin http://www.mature-wife-naked.info/big-tits-small-chicks.html Q website design hosting Medicalprescription drug ultram project management training under 24100 hard drive enclosure Advanced education in general dentistry management of aggresive behaviors trainings in georgia antidepressant Toyota avalon body kit

4:55 PM, March 06, 2007  
Blogger MorganSea said...

ha ha ha, well I guess when the guys from Popular Economics Magazine write a book debunking profits made on 9/11 going to a handful of powerful americans I'll stop being a "nut" and fall back in line.

4:51 PM, December 31, 2007  
Blogger MorganSea said...

oh yeah and nothing helps debunk conspiracy theories better than asking officials what the official answers are.

"oh well we talked to people who are both experts and witnesses who work at the pentagon... and I was suprised when they told me it was an inside job afterall..."

4:55 PM, December 31, 2007  
Blogger look said...


12:26 AM, March 15, 2009  
Blogger mmbox said...

2008真情寫真aa片免費看捷克論壇微風論壇大眾論壇plus論壇080視訊聊天室情色視訊交友90739美女交友-成人聊天室色情小說做愛成人圖片區豆豆色情聊天室080豆豆聊天室 小辣妹影音交友網台中情人聊天室桃園星願聊天室高雄網友聊天室新中台灣聊天室中部網友聊天室嘉義之光聊天室基隆海岸聊天室中壢網友聊天室南台灣聊天室南部聊坊聊天室台南不夜城聊天室南部網友聊天室屏東網友聊天室台南網友聊天室屏東聊坊聊天室雲林網友聊天室大學生BBS聊天室網路學院聊天室屏東夜語聊天室孤男寡女聊天室一網情深聊天室心靈饗宴聊天室流星花園聊天室食色男女色情聊天室真愛宣言交友聊天室情人皇朝聊天室上班族成人聊天室上班族f1影音視訊聊天室哈雷視訊聊天室080影音視訊聊天室38不夜城聊天室援交聊天室080080哈啦聊天室台北已婚聊天室已婚廣場聊天室 夢幻家族聊天室摸摸扣扣同學會聊天室520情色聊天室QQ成人交友聊天室免費視訊網愛聊天室愛情公寓免費聊天室拉子性愛聊天室柔情網友聊天室哈啦影音交友網哈啦影音視訊聊天室櫻井莉亞三點全露寫真集123上班族聊天室尋夢園上班族聊天室成人聊天室上班族080上班族聊天室6k聊天室粉紅豆豆聊天室080豆豆聊天網新豆豆聊天室080聊天室免費音樂試聽流行音樂試聽免費aa片試看免費a長片線上看色情貼影片免費a長片

7:39 AM, March 22, 2009  
Blogger mmbox said...

本土成人貼圖站大台灣情色網台灣男人幫論壇A圖網嘟嘟成人電影網火辣春夢貼圖網情色貼圖俱樂部台灣成人電影絲襪美腿樂園18美女貼圖區柔情聊天網707網愛聊天室聯盟台北69色情貼圖區38女孩情色網台灣映像館波波成人情色網站美女成人貼圖區無碼貼圖力量色妹妹性愛貼圖區日本女優貼圖網日本美少女貼圖區亞洲風暴情色貼圖網哈啦聊天室美少女自拍貼圖辣妹成人情色網台北女孩情色網辣手貼圖情色網AV無碼女優影片男女情色寫真貼圖a片天使俱樂部萍水相逢遊戲區平水相逢遊戲區免費視訊交友90739免費視訊聊天辣妹視訊 - 影音聊天網080視訊聊天室日本美女肛交美女工廠貼圖區百分百貼圖區亞洲成人電影情色網台灣本土自拍貼圖網麻辣貼圖情色網好色客成人圖片貼圖區711成人AV貼圖區台灣美女貼圖區筱萱成人論壇咪咪情色貼圖區momokoko同學會視訊kk272視訊情色文學小站成人情色貼圖區嘟嘟成人網嘟嘟情人色網 - 貼圖區免費色情a片下載台灣情色論壇成人影片分享免費視訊聊天區微風 成人 論壇kiss文學區taiwankiss文學區

7:39 AM, March 22, 2009  
Blogger nini said...

85cc免費影城 愛情公寓正妹牆川藏第一美女 成人影片 情色交友網 美女視訊 美女視訊 視訊情人高雄網 JP成人影城 383成人影城 aa片免費a片下載 a片線上看aa片免費看 ※a片線上試看※sex520免費影片※ aa片免費看 BT成人論壇 金瓶影片交流區 自拍美女聊天室 aa片免費a片下載 SEX520免費影片 免費a片 日本美女寫真集 sex520aa免費影片 sex520aa免費影片 BT成人網 Hotsee免費視訊交友 百分百貼影片區 SEX520免費影片 免費視訊聊天室 情人視訊高雄網 星光情色討論版 正妹牆 383成人影城 線上85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 ※免費視訊聊天室※ ※免費視訊聊天室※ 免費視訊聊天室 85cc免費影片 85cc免費影片 080苗栗人聊天室 080苗栗人聊天室 080中部人聊天室 080中部人聊天室 免費a片下載 免費a片 AA片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 日本av女優影片 av女優 av女優無碼影城 av女優 av女優 百分百成人圖片 百分百成人圖片 視訊情人高雄網 電話交友 影音電話交友 絕色影城 絕色影城 夜未眠成人影城 夜未眠成人影城 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 免費色咪咪貼影片 免費色咪咪貼影片 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 影音視訊交友網 視訊交友網 080視訊聊天室 ※免費視訊聊天室※ ※免費視訊聊天室※ 視訊聊天室 成人影音視訊聊天室 ut影音視訊聊天室 ※免費視訊聊天室※ 視訊ukiss聊天室視訊ukiss聊天室 視訊交友90739 視訊交友90739 情人視訊網 168視訊美女 168視訊美女 168視訊美女 視訊美女館 視訊美女館 免費視訊美女網 小高聊天室 小高聊天室 aio交友聊天室 aio交友聊天室 交友聊天室 交友聊天室 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 免費線上a片 免費線上a片 嘟嘟成人網站 成人漫畫 情色文學 嘟嘟成人網 成人貼圖區 情色文學成人小說 微風成人區 情色貼圖區 免費視訊聊天 免費成人圖片區 愛情公寓 愛情公寓聊天室 寄情築園小遊戲 免費aa片線上看 aa片免費看 情色SXE聊天室 SEX情色遊戲 色情A片 免費下載 av女優 俱樂部 情色論壇 辣妹視訊 情色貼圖網 免費色情 聊天室 情人視訊聊天室 免費a片成人影城 免費a片-aa片免費看 0204貼圖區 SEX情色 交友聊天-線上免費 女優天堂 成人交友網 成人情色貼圖區 18禁 -女優王國 080視訊美女聊天室 080視訊聊天室 視訊交友90739 免費a片 aio 視訊交友網 成人影城-免費a片※免費視訊聊天※85cc免費影片日本線上免費a片 免費色咪咪影片免費色咪咪影片aaa片免費看影片aaa片免費看成人影城免費色咪咪影片

2:18 PM, April 05, 2009  
Blogger 123456 said...


5:07 AM, April 13, 2009  
Blogger 天天看正妹 said...

免費視訊聊天 ut聊天室辣妹視訊UT影音視訊聊天室 吉澤明步QQ美女視訊秀 85cc免費影片aa影片下載城sex免費成人影片aaa片免費看短片美女視訊 sex383線上娛樂場av969 免費短片日本免費視訊aa影片下載城視訊網愛聊天室影音視訊交友 咆哮小老鼠分享論壇sex520免費影片aa免費影片下載城aio辣妺視訊 aio辣妹交友愛情館 jp成人影片aio交友愛情館馬子免費影片免費線上a片18成人85cc影城0204movie免費色咪咪視訊網pc交友s383視訊玩美女人34c高雄視訊聊天jp成人免費視訊辣妹 kk777視訊俱樂部xxxpandalive173影音視訊聊天室 sex520-卡通影片成人免費視訊 完美女人13060 免費視訊聊天sexy girl video movie辣妹妹影音視訊聊天室UT視訊美女交友視訊情色網百事無碼a片dvd線上aa片免費看18禁成人網ut聊天室kk俱樂部視訊激情網愛聊天 情人小魔女自拍卡通aa片免費看夜未眠成人影城aio性愛dvd辣妹影片直播拓網視訊交友視訊聊天室ggoo168論壇視訊辣妹love104影音live秀 美女show-live視訊情色yam交友辣妹妹影音視訊聊天室s383情色大網咖視訊aaa俱樂部台灣情色網無碼avdvdsexy diamond sex888入口Show-live視訊聊天室

1:51 AM, April 14, 2009  
Blogger 天天看正妹 said...

免費 a 片aaaaa片俱樂部影片aaaaa片俱樂部dodo豆豆聊天室sex520網路自拍美女聊天室天堂免費線上avdvd援交av080影片aa影片下載城aaa片免費看短片成人圖片區18成人avooogo2av免費影片sexdiy影城免費線上成人影片bonbonsex0951影片下載日本av女優sex888免費看影片免費視訊78論壇辣妹有約辣妹no31314視訊dudu sex免費影片avdvd情色影片免費色咪咪影片網av080免費試看日本美女寫真集辣妹脫衣麻將視訊聊天室性福免費影片分享日本美女寫真集,kk視訊aio交友愛情館免費成人美女視訊bt論壇色情自拍免費a片卡通tw 18 net卡通18美少女圖色情漫畫777美女小護士免費 aa 片試看百分百成人情色圖片a片免費觀賞sexy girls get fuckedsexy girl video movie情色文學成人小說sex888免費看eyny 伊莉論壇sexdiy影城自拍情色0204movie免費影片aio免費aa片試看s383情色大網咖sexy girl video movie草莓牛奶AV論壇台灣論壇18禁遊戲區環球辣妹聊天室 90691拓網aio交友愛情館拓網學生族視訊777美女 sex888影片分享區hi5 tv免費影片aa的滿18歲卡通影片sex383線上娛樂場sexdiy影城免費a片線上觀看真人美女辣妹鋼管脫衣秀比基尼辣妹一夜情視訊aio交友愛情館

1:51 AM, April 14, 2009  
Blogger 天天看正妹 said...

小魔女免費影城免費看 aa的滿18歲影片sex383線上娛樂場kk777視訊俱樂部aa的滿18歲影片85cc免費影片a片免費看A片-sex520視訊聊天室v6 0plus論壇sex520免費影片avdvd-情色網qq美美色網ut13077視訊聊天A片-無碼援交東京熱一本道aaa免費看影片免費視訊聊天室微風成人免費視訊聊天 ut聊天室av1688影音視訊天堂免費 a 片85cc免費影城亞洲禁果影城微風成人av論壇sex520免費影片JP成人網免費成人視訊aaa影片下載城免費a片 ut交友成人視訊85cc成人影城免費A片aa的滿18歲影片小魔女免費影片85cc免費影片aaa片免費看短片aa影片下載城aaaaa片俱樂部影片aaaaa片俱樂部aa的滿18歲影片小魔女免費影片台灣論壇免費影片後宮0204movie免費影片免費卡通影片線上觀看線上免費a片觀看85cc免費影片免費A片aa影片下載城ut聊天室辣妹視訊UT影音視訊聊天室 日本免費視訊aaaa 片俱樂部aaaa片免費看影片免費視訊78論壇情色偷拍免費A片免費aaaaa片俱樂部影片aa影片下載城色漫畫帝國av俱樂部aaaa彩虹頻道免費影片 杜蕾斯成人免費卡通影片線上觀看85cc免費影片線上觀賞免費線上歐美A片觀看免費a片卡通aaa的滿18歲卡通影片sex520免費影片免費 a 片

1:51 AM, April 14, 2009  
Blogger 徵信 said...

外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇 外遇

外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇外遇

外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 ,
外遇 外遇 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇

外遇 外遇

外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿喜帖囍帖卡片外遇外遇 外遇 外遇外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇剖析 外遇調查 外遇案例 外遇諮詢 偷情 第三者外遇話題 外遇發洩 感情挽回 徵信社 外遇心態 外遇 通姦 通姦罪 外遇徵信社徵信社外遇 外遇 抓姦徵信協會徵信公司 包二奶 徵信社 徵信 徵信社 徵信社 徵信社 徵信社 徵信 徵信 婚姻 婚前徵信 前科 個人資料 外遇 第三者 徵信社 偵探社 抓姦 偵探社 偵探社婚 偵探社 偵探社偵探家事服務家事服務家電維修家事服務家事服務家事服務家事服務家事服務持久持久持久持久持久持久持久離婚網頁設計徵信社徵信社徵信徵信社外遇離婚協議書劈腿持久持久持久持久持久劈腿剖析徵信徵信社外遇外遇外遇外遇徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿

4:38 AM, April 20, 2009  
Blogger 1314 said...

視訊做愛視訊美女無碼A片情色影劇kyo成人動漫tt1069同志交友網ut同志交友網微風成人論壇6k聊天室日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞UT視訊美女交友..........................

10:56 PM, May 19, 2009  
Blogger 1122 said...

ut正妹 聊天室倉井空免費a影片伊莉論壇tw 18 net18禁成人網免費性愛影片aa 片俱樂部 免費avsexy girl video moviea片18禁地少女遊戲嘟嘟成人網洪爺後官電影院辣妺視訊線上 aa 片試看黑澀會美眉容瑄sex520免費電影sexy girl video moviesex520免費影片線上 aa 片試看嘟嘟h成人夜色sex999免費影片性愛貼圖區

11:37 PM, June 07, 2009  

Post a Comment

<< Home