Friday, August 04, 2006

Selfish or just Realistic?

Reader Jeff sent me this article about the new generation of British women who want the easy life:

A new survey has revealed that a generation of young women are rejecting high-flying careers in favour of a life of ease and luxury. The so-called 'Easy Life Generation' have seen their mothers struggle with demanding jobs while trying to raise families and have no desire to follow in their footsteps.

New Woman magazine discovered they desire wealth and status without the demands of long hours in the workplace, and many hope to marry wealthy partners. Celebrities such as Victoria Beckham, Kate Moss and Big Brother's Chantelle Houghton are their role models. So are the Easy Lifers being naive and selfish, or just realistic? FEMAIL finds out . . .

Wow, I guess this is why women need to keep men working. If the shoe is on the other foot and men decide to opt out, how is this new generation of golddigging leeches--I mean--"easy life generation" of ladies going to make it in the style they have become accustomed to? Afterall, they have their role models (Posh Spice, Kate Moss, etc.) to live up to. What could be more important?


Blogger Mercurior said...

see when women do it, its a good thing, when a man does it its immoral..

if women can do it, then men should be able to. whatever happened to equality.

men are responsiblity without rights, women rights without responsibility.

3:29 PM, August 04, 2006  
Anonymous Mike Doughty said...

What I hope is going to happen is that the slacker females will be left with the slacker males. Sounds like they deserve each other to me.

Mike Doughty

3:54 PM, August 04, 2006  
Blogger dadvocate said...

I wouldn't say this is a new trend. Maybe just a return to the old ways.

A girl I knew in college in 1970 was torn apart because she was dating two guys, one rich and one she loved. Guess which one she decided to marry despite many tears over leaving the other.

4:07 PM, August 04, 2006  
Blogger Jeff said...

My favorite quote from the comments:

"Women like these make it harder for
those of us who paid for their own education then have
and enjoy good careers with a self-earned good
standard of living to get a date with someone with
similar status to ourselves. Thanks girls! - Katrina
Murray, Germany"

The rub is this: "to get a date with someone with
similar status to ourselves".

Anything less would be marrying a freeloader, after all.

4:08 PM, August 04, 2006  
Blogger Rizzo said...

yeah, I'm with dadvocate. This isn't exactly some kind of new trend. When I tried online dating several years ago, this seemed to apply to every woman on the dating sites. I'm not saying all women are like this (my girlfriend certainly isn't), but it's not exactly rare or new.

But I have met plenty of women over the years that I immediately lost interest in when it became apparent that money was their first priority (actually, to be fair, they lost interest in me when they realized I didn't have any).

4:21 PM, August 04, 2006  
Blogger Michele said...

I don't know. It sounds to me like some of these women missed their mothers. I guess the real problem is that they are still not willing to sacrifice some fantasy lifestyle, even though they wish to devote much more time to their children than their own mothers did. I personally don't think I would be a very effective mother if I had to work outside the home, but that is because I am a very poor multi-tasker, and tend to blow up when I'm stressed. I'm very lucky to have fallen in love with a breadwinner. I don't believe men who stay home are freeloaders though. It's an unfortunate double standard. Each couple should define for themselves how they want to divide the labor. If these girls in the article find men who agree with them, then why is it a problem? Or any of my business?

4:26 PM, August 04, 2006  
Blogger Helen said...


I guess the problem I have with it is that they expect some fantasy lifesyle like they had at home from mom and dad, complete with paid for holidays, shopping sprees etc. It seems a bit extravagant--and unlikely to be terribly satisfying. It sounds like they just want a man as a meal ticket--and I think that comes with a price. But like you say, if these women find someone willing to pay for these women's lifestyle, why not? Except that these same women have expectations that even in divorce, etc. they are entitled to big chunks of change to continue this pampered lifestyle. When does it end?

4:32 PM, August 04, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I get the joy of watching this one up close and personal. i have lived with a male roommate for about 2 years now. his wife of almost 9 months was cheating on him with several different people. she abandoned the last of that line of men to marry my roommate because the last guy, the one with "passion" couldn't guarantee that he would make enough money to support her. granted this isn't Posh Spice territory, but it's the same thing. my fiance and i have decided that we will kidnap him and hire him bodyguards (really mean women bodyguards) when she eventually throws him out while demanding half his income in support payments. he's stupid to marry her, but hopefully he will learn his lesson and get a better second wife.

5:57 PM, August 04, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is just about as "old-fashioned girl" as it gets.

These women need a good bracing dose of feminism.

7:19 PM, August 04, 2006  
Blogger BobH said...

The problem with these women's thinking is that (1) many of the highly desirable (i.e., high earning) men are smart enough to at least suspect what's going on (2) the competition for these men is pretty fierce and (3) since men's biological clocks tick slower than women's, men can simply wait out their female contemporaries. This apparently drives women in their 20s nuts, since so many men are completely uninterested in a "committed" relationship until they are in their 30s or even 40s, if then.

Actually it may be cross-cultural since it's apparently even worse in Japan, where men are seriously balking at getting married, then working 60 or 80 hours per week to support their families. In many cases, a woman who mentions wanting to get married is likely to find the relationship ended almost immediately.

I don't know who it was that said, but it seems highly appropriate: "While you're trying to manipulate your environment, your environment is trying to manipulate you."

7:26 PM, August 04, 2006  
Blogger AmericanWoman said...

You asked when it will end, Dr. Helen? It will end when men stop marrying pretty gold diggers. I can't blame or feel sorry for either party.

Most of these women will likely be disappointed in their choice, or be replaced with a younger model, eventually.

8:35 PM, August 04, 2006  
Blogger Dr. Melissa said...

The reverse is also true. I remember a guy in college and the girl who truly loved him. Who'd he choose? The human breasts. Sure, she's selfish. Sure, she has the I.Q. of a mashed potato. Sure, she is a meanie. Who cares? She has beautiful, perky boobs. He got what he deserved.

There is a reverse trend: an associate of mine laments that all she ever wanted was her mom. Her mom was working all the time. Her dad bailed on the family. It bothers her that she is missing out on her kids growing up too because she married a man who just can't find the perfect job after twenty years and twenty jobs trying.

Puhleeze, gender isn't the issue here. Vapid, lazy people are the issue.

10:23 PM, August 04, 2006  
Anonymous JKB said...

These women could probably be attributed to the naivete of youth. At 25 it must seem so easy to find a nice rich man. But at 35, there will be a new crop of 25 year old girls for the rich man to partake of. It use to be when you married a girl you got a dowry, but I guess now, you get a pile of debt given their attitude to spend now, find a rich man to pay later. Are there really that many naive rich men now that the tech bubble has burst?

How terrifying it must be to women such as this to see men building a nice nest egg then choosing to retire early and live off that nest egg. How selfish of these men keeping all that money for themselves rather than taking a self-indulgent wife to keep in the style she believes she should be accustomed to.

While women such as this will be forced to find a new way to the easy life, I believe the real reason everyone is concerned that men are dropping out is that the hyper-competitive at the top sort can't fathom it. "How can you stop? Someone will get ahead of you."

12:52 AM, August 05, 2006  
Anonymous Donna S said...

There is also something missing that I think needs to be addressed. Some of these men are so horribly co-dependent that they don't want a woman who can stand on their own two feet. They have to be the knight in shining armor who rescues these women from their problems. These women, the gold diggers wouldn't exist if there wasn't a "market" out there for them.

I'm lucky because I married a man who A) has a steady job (Military for fifteen years) and B) appreciates that I am just as much of a breadwinner as he is. I don't depend on him to shape my identity and he doesn't have a trophy wife. I don't know how many times I've heard from male friends "I wish I could find a woman like you" but then they go on to date/sleep with/marry these vapid tarts who want nothing else than to live the life of Riley. Sometimes, I hate being lumped in with them just because I have breasts...

I'll get off my soapbox now-sorry!

12:56 AM, August 05, 2006  
Blogger Freeman Hunt said...

I have no problem with stay-at-home moms. In fact, I think it would be better if there were more of them.

But the obsession with materialism? I don't get that.

1:05 AM, August 05, 2006  
Blogger a psychiatrist who learned from veterans said...

As Rick said in Casablanca, "Ilsa, I'm no good at being noble, but it doesn't take much to see that the problems of three little people don't amount to a hill of beans in this crazy world." And as reported in NRO, 'after the Syrian withdrawal, many leaders were assassinated because of their role in the anti-Hezbollah resistance, among them Samir Qassir, George Hawi, and Jebran Tueni, the charismatic leader of the youth and liberal MP.' Meanwile, the BBC seems to be making the world safe for hatred of Israel and others high minded there safe for political correctness. Maybe the dissent of going shopping isn't so bad after all.

1:36 AM, August 05, 2006  
Blogger jw said...

Everyone seems to have soem good points.

I do think that the male slackers are looked down upon a LOT more than the female.

There is a problem wherein men are defined by our wallets and women by their bodies. Oh! Yes, it doesn't apply to everyone ... Yet it does apply often enough that it is a problem.

People are people and should not be defined by "what" but by who they are. This simple message seems to go over the head of too many people.

4:44 AM, August 05, 2006  
Blogger Mercurior said...

men will never stop marrying petty gold diggers, as during the dating the men get what they need, some men cant seperate physical love, from mental love, so if a gold digger jumps a mans bones, he may think its love..

and the comment about japanese men, working 60 -80 hours, when do they have time for themselves, society expects men to be bread winners, and support their wives, and if the woman works she keeps her money..

a sort of whats his is mine, and whats mine is mine. and they wonder why men are rebelling, real relationship is a process of division of labour, not what can i get out of it which is what most modern feminist women want.

and anyway the modern feminist is now all for sahm, etc as it gives them more power, in the press in sympathy.. look at this article, they sort of applaud women for staying in bed lazy, but they complain when men do it.. how can you have one rule for women and one rule for men that are totally the opposite.

6:25 AM, August 05, 2006  
Blogger TheNewGuy said...

God save us from people like the ladies in that article.

I avoided all of that by marrying a fellow physician, and I thank God every day, as she's been a true blessing. I not only found the love-of-my-life, but gained a partner, a friend, a similarly-educated peer, and someone who can commiserate with the demands of the profession.

It's worth pointing out that many men are wise to the gold-digger paradigm, particularly highly-educated men (as opposed to some nouveau riche dot-com types). When I was a young physician, every single colleague of mine had their radar highly attuned to the gold-digger, "Mrs. MD" types (some nurses specialized in this stratagem). They were avoided like the plague. Now, some of my peers still fell for it (or the young ladies got "unexpectedly" pregnant), but most eschewed the trophy wife.

Think about it: after an exhausting, emotionally-draining day of pulling people back from the edge of death, the last thing you want is to walk in the door and hear your partner whine about how she's the only one in her childrens' playgroup without a Mercedes.

Fate worse than death, that.

7:29 AM, August 05, 2006  
Blogger BobH said...

To americanwoman

Actually, given the current U.S. laws surrounding paternity fraud, the solution might be for men to not get married at all. Predicting people's future behavior is notoriously tricky and people do their best to appear attractive at the start of the relationship.

OK, here's where I repeat myself. Sorry! Look up "Irrefutable presumption of paternity in marriage" or, better yet, look for a column by Robyn Blumner for the St. Petersburg (FL) Times on Fathers Day 2000 concerning paternity fraud. (It's on the Internet. Go forth and Google.) Pay particular attention to the quotes by the two female ABA committee chairpeople. Incidentally, the 50 state figure is now down to 46 and the 28.3% figure is from a self-selected sample.

8:22 AM, August 05, 2006  
Blogger Oligonicella said...


Better yet, look at what really happens in court. Women are told to leave men alone all the time. "" is not a slam dunk. True, some men get screwed. Bad stuff.

By the way, Google returned nothing but blog entries.

But, on that topic. Robyn Blumner is an opinion columnist. And?
Her columns are provided here, but only go from 11/2006.
You said it was out there, you provide a link.

10:22 AM, August 05, 2006  
Blogger Mercurior said...

if you can read this article

presumption of guilt, is a male thing

3:15 PM, August 05, 2006  
Blogger BobH said...

3:28 PM, August 05, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Perhaps we need a new coming-of-age ritual for our boys. Sperm bank deposits followed by vasectomy at 15. Hey, parents opt for genital mutilation at 1 month for little reason, they should certainly support something that prevents their child from becoming a slave.

8:09 PM, August 05, 2006  
Blogger Oligonicella said...

bobh: Thank you for the link.

She's an opinion columnist. Again, so? She has her opinion.

As for presumed paternity. That's being overthrown all the time now. Time's a changin'. Inertia cannot be eliminated overnight. It's also easier to do when it's more obvious the woman set a trap.

Also, beware the other side of the legal coin. I recall video footage of a poor child in Wyoming(?) who was being dragged, kicking and screaming from the only father he had ever known and one who wanted him just as much. Why? Some judge decided the boy's actual father -- who had shown no interest before, but now decided he wanted the kid -- should have him.

Absolute stripping of presumed paternity might not be such a great thing.

10:02 AM, August 06, 2006  
Blogger BobH said...


It's interesting that you should frame it that way and leave critical questions completely unanswered. First, did the stepfather assume his role voluntary, with all the facts and possibilities on the table, or was his only mistake believing some blood sucking leech of a woman? Second, where was the mother during this and what was her opinion in this matter? Third, how old was the child? Fourth, why did the father change his mind? Did he have personal demons of his own to conquer before he could be a father? Fifth, will the stepfather be allowed to have any role in the child's life?

I think that people, especially woman, who try to cast it as "for the benefit of the child" are trying to twist the reality of the situation to hide the obvious truth: what these mothers do is fraud and we should be discussing the length of the their jail terms, not whether some guy should be forced to subsidize his betrayer for years and to the tune of tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Yes, the Blumner piece "opinion", but the quotes are cited and from credible experts. She even phrases the Nikki Bass quote to indicate that the sample is self-selected, which is very important in this case.

I don't think that women realize the risk that they're taking. Paternity fraud is THE evolutionary problem faced by the males in any species where there is significant paternal investment in the offspring and where paternity can be hidden (i.e, mammals and birds). Over tens of thousands of generations, defenses against this threat become part of the emotional biases of the males in these species. Rather than explain badly and briefly what others have explained in depth, I'm going to suggest that you read this:

Wilson and Daly are psychologists at McMasters University who have been studying the evolutionary origins of human social violence for about 30 years.

11:13 AM, August 06, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

*sigh* once more, with feeling people...

Women will stop valuing men primarily as providers when men stop valuing women first and foremost for their sexual attractiveness.

I ain't holding my breath though.

Is it fair for you to be treated like a meal ticket? Hell no. But don't ever forget, it ain't a walk in the park on the other side. You don't hear women whining about it. Or at least they go ahead and play by your rules rather than fighting it. Instead, women go through tremendous amounts of effort to be sexually attractive to men. Makeup, hair coloring and ironing, plucking, waxing, shaving, clothes, surgeries, botox injections. You don't see women in large numbers throwing out their razors and makeup.

Think men shouldn't have to go first in making the change? Well, somebody has to. And since, even if I accept your claims, men have only been "subjected" to women for a few decades, not thousands of years, I don't think it would hurt them to take the high road here.

Again, I ain't holding my breath.

Me? I love men. I enjoy them as friends and sex objects (rarely both at the same time). I don't need one to pay my way. I try now to have zero expectations of men. You don't get as disappointed that way. Of course, the corrolary of that is: I wont tolerate any expectations of me either. I tried marriage once. I worked, did all the cleaning, and any cooking that was done, tried to let him make most of the decisions (because I'm flexible and figured then he'd be happy), etc. while all the while being bored to death sexually (but still trying to do my "duty"). It got me nowhere. So sure, eventually I decided, something's got to give, and eventually I decided that thing was work. But that didn't really solve the problem. I WANT to work. But that means I've got to be an equal partner all the way around. What this ultimately means is: the single life for me! And probably a succession of lovers whom I eventually tire of and become only friends with.

Sheeeet. You don't see me complaining.

4:08 PM, August 06, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Does anyone actually have some documentation describing the "men valuing women primarily for their sexual attractiveness" thing? I keep hearing this from women, but the only time I've actually seen it in play is in the case of perpetual frat-boys who fall under the "tall, dark, and handsome" or some equivalent categorization and who are, thus, more desirable to women.

In my experience, only a fool marries (which is a clear indicator of what a mature man truly values) a woman based on her sexual attractiveness. And that certainly hasn't been the case in my circle of family, relatives, friends, or acquaintances (who don't fall into the perpetual frat-boy group).

Personally, I'm still trying to find a woman who won't lie to me in the first three dates. Another critter only a fool would marry.

5:46 PM, August 06, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


How do you tell if she's lied to you in the first three dates? Usually the liars are pretty good at it.

9:22 AM, August 07, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The ones I run into are not those that lie as a specific tactic (those kinds tend to avoid old geeks in general, thankfully), but those who lie because they've never learned not to and so do so frivolously and without much thought to the consequences. And we're not talking about uneducated youngsters here ... the last one was a 42-year-old MD.

9:34 AM, August 07, 2006  
Blogger Rizzo said...

Instead, women go through tremendous amounts of effort to be sexually attractive to men. Makeup, hair coloring and ironing, plucking, waxing, shaving, clothes, surgeries, botox injections. You don't see women in large numbers throwing out their razors and makeup.

Don't put this stuff on us men. Women do this stuff for other women, or for themselves. With the possible exception of shaving their legs and armpits, guys couldn't care less about this stuff. Hell, I barely pay attention if a women is wearing makeup. Also, tanning is incredibly popular among young women, yet I know of few guys (actually only one, and he's what women would refer to as a "male pig", yet he never seems to have any problem picking up women) who wouldn't date a woman because she's not tan enough. Furthermore, guys don't tell women to carry around Louis Vuitton purses, but you do anyway (actually most guys I know would prefer you didn't).

Sorry, but Cosmo has more influence over what women do than what us guys say or think.

10:10 AM, August 07, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Once again, I wonder why Dr. Helen seems to harbor so much anger towards her own sex. Why is it that when young women hope to snap up a life of ease they are pegged as gold-diggers, while their male counterparts who still live with their parents at age 30 are just reacting logically to a society that despises and undervalues them? I feel sorry for both groups -- how does one live with so few inner resources, so few goals in life? -- but I resist the continual suggestion on this site that it is only women who are to blame for unhappy relationships and hardships in today's life.

12:56 PM, August 07, 2006  
Anonymous Render said...

I don't think the people on this site suggest that only women are to blame for unhappy relationships and hardships. What is being argued against is the pervasive belief that anything associated with men is de facto evil, bad, inappropriate, unacceptable, and wrong, when the same behaviors exhibited by women are judged to be appropriate, proper, and desirable.

To speak to your specific statement, I don't think anyone said that males living at home are reacting logically, I think it was said that it was a logical consequence of society's judgement of them. That is, people who are judged as evil for their virtues will no longer seek to be virtuous (logical consequence) unless they have such an intrasigent mind that they refuse to permit society to determine what is and is not to be considered virtuous, but, instead, judges and condemns society accordingly (logical reaction).

1:13 PM, August 07, 2006  
Anonymous Anon824 said...

I'm 55 and find myself back in the dating game after 25 years.

Fortunately, I'm pretty well off, but I conceal it on the first date, almost to the point of misrepresentation. I dont get many second dates.

I believe women think they are entitled to be supported by "the man" no matter how old they are and where they are in their lives. Its the birthright of their sex.

On the other hand, the women I've met who are already financially set make no bones about their commitment to keep what they have for themselves.

1:37 PM, August 07, 2006  
Blogger Oligonicella said...

It's a well known and highly publicized case.

For a quick once-over. Guy marries gal with boy. Later adopts boy. Raises same for six years (now 9ish). Mom dies and has specifically indicated she wants stepfather to raise her boy. Natural father pokes up his head and wants boy he hasn't lifted finger to see (although able) for six years. Judge drags child from only father he knows and puts him in the hands of an effective stranger.

Why the biofather who signed the adoption papers gets to change his mind six years later is what is important, not why did he change it or what demons he had to fight off. I personally don't give a crap, he signed the papers. Child doesn't know him now.

"Yes, the Blumner piece "opinion", but the quotes are cited and from credible experts."
Yes, and there are experts on the "other" side. Also, experts tend to be behind the time curve as to what's happening right now. Like I said, men are winning these kind of cases more and more. The date of her article puts the opinions therein at six years old. Things change.

"I...30 years."
That was a bit condescending. You presume me to be igorant of the current ideas relating to this issue. I'm not. I have a differing view than yours, perhaps.

4:14 PM, August 07, 2006  
Blogger BobH said...

To Oligonicella

I wasn't trying to be condescending. I was trying to introduce Wilson and Daly. The issues raised in their paper aren't exactly mainstream.

However, if you have knowledge about this area, I'd appreciate if you actually demonstrated it. So far, all you've done is say that these other people and I are incorrect without actually saying what you feel is correct.

First, where is there an online account of this case? (I will admit that if the father formally waived his parental rights, he probably shouldn't have been allowed to change his mind.)

Second, who are your experts on the other side and how can we get access to their opinions?

Third, what are the other "current ideas" on this issue?

8:22 PM, August 07, 2006  
Blogger Rizzo said...

Why is it that when young women hope to snap up a life of ease they are pegged as gold-diggers, while their male counterparts who still live with their parents at age 30 are just reacting logically to a society that despises and undervalues them?

I personally have no problem with a woman wanting a guy who is financially successful. Why wouldn't or shouldn't she? Anyone can have any qualifications they wish for whom they date. Of course, the more qualifications, the greater chance you end up alone, but if you're willing to take that chance, so be it (nothing wrong with being alone either). Although, there is a fine line between wanted a partner who is financially successful and "gold-digging". I'm not sure where the line is, but if you expect a $20,000 engagement ring, you've probably crossed it.

Likewise, I have no problem if a guy puts beauty above all else, either (although if he ends up with a gold-digger, which he likely will, don't complain about it).

However, I think the difference between a gold-digging woman and a man who lives with his parents when he's 30, is that the man only has one recourse to better his situation: his own hard work and motivation. A woman in a similar situation has an additional option: get married. Somehow, when a 30 year old man lives with his parents, it's a big societal problem. If a women does it, it usually just means she's not married yet. Nothing to see here, move along. A guy cannot expect to better his financial situation through marriage. In fact, if he wants to be better off financially, he should refrain from marriage altogether, and should definitely avoid having children.

Anyway, I'm personally less bothered by 30 year old men who live with their parents than gold-digging women because I don't have to deal with the former, whereas I used to have to deal with latter quite extensively. Other than his/her parents, who does a 30 year old living at home affect? A gold-digger affects every man in her dating pool that's roughly her age or willing to date someone her age.

10:54 AM, August 08, 2006  
Blogger Oligonicella said...

I'd appreciate if you actually demonstrated it.
Of course you're not being condescending.

On-line link? Don't really know. I watched the episode unfold on national TV a few years ago. It was a reference to the fact that the issue is multi-layered and more than just the natural father have valid views and considerations.

The link you provided is a good demonstration of the difference in views. It presupposes the instincts that H.sapiens has are strong. I promote they are fairly weak.

Men take a proprietary view of women’s sexuality and reproductive capacity.
Their definition -- By “proprietary,” we mean first that men lay claim to particular women as songbirds lay claim to territories, as lions lay claim to a kill, or as people of both sexes lay claim to valuables.

Before I disagree with what they meant, I would like to point out they've drawn some false analogies.
The drive for songbirds to stake a territory is to prove their worth as mates. Large area, stonger mate. Typically male-driven.
Lions laying claim to a kill come in two forms; the females stake their claim to feed their pride and keep other scavangers at bay, the males eat their fill and leave. The females share, the males don't. Hard to equate that to the songbirds. Unless you want to twist the roles quite a bit (songbirds don't take down prey for the clan).
Same for men and women collecting 50,000 different bottlecaps, say (what they find valuable).

Their point seems to be that men are instinctually driven to see women as a reproductive acquisition. I would say the numbers of men, young and old, actively seeking to avoid women's reproductive capacity belies this. Sexual, sure, everyone (including women) likes to screw. But, reproductive, no. Not too strong instinctually, anyway.

And, that really, is my contention. I see these kinds of things as deep but fairly weak motivators. Yes, they're there. Yes, they bubble up. No, they aren't horribly strong. My opinion through a lifetime of study and personal observation of humans behaving in contra-"instinctual" ways.

10:59 AM, August 08, 2006  
Blogger Rizzo said...

I don't know if anyone saw this article in the New York Times about single men in their 40's, but it has some good stuff in it:

It also has some idiocy, such as this:

As a response to some of these trends, many women with limited education have turned theirs sights on “marrying up,” choosing men who may be older, more established and more educated.

"As a response"? Women have always married up. That's the reason that these men in the article exist in the first place. If women were willing to marry down, there would be no need for the article to be written. The fact of the matter is, as women obtain a greater number of the college degrees, and as a result, higher paying jobs, they are going to have to start marrying down, or there's going to be many more guys like those featured in the article, and many more successful, single women.

Then, this made me laugh:

“Why would you want to be in a stable relationship with somebody who is unstable?” asked Ketny Jean-Francois, a never-married 30-something from the Bronx who has supported her 3-year-old son on her unemployment check and food stamps since leaving her job as a security guard a year ago. “It’s a myth that all women want to marry.”

So, a women who is unstable herself, who is living off of food stamps and unemployment, and who could be working but quit her job, refuses to marry a guy who isn't financially stable.

That just about sums up the whole situation, doesn't it?

Although, I'm guessing that the real reason she doesn't want to marry has more to do with the fact that a 30 year old, unemployed single mother isn't exactly a prime catch in the dating world, than any personal aversion to marriage on her part.

11:39 AM, August 08, 2006  
Blogger Mercurior said...

ok anonymous 12.56.

you make a point **Why is it that when young women hope to snap up a life of ease they are pegged as gold-diggers,** thats the point, they want a life of ease, its not about the man its about what they want. imagine if you can, a man marrying a rish woman and having a life of ease. what would you call him?.

this site isnt about anti women, its about pro man, because of the pervavsive atmosphere of men are worthless and worth less than women is the fault of women.

as one poster said, men have less options, than women, women can stay home, get married, work, have kids, and so on, men if men want to stay home they are lazy, if men dont want to get married then they are unstable, if men want to stay home with their kids, they are looked on as perverts. the only option men have is essentially to work, but even this they just see the man as a walking wallet.

mens worth to these women is as a bank, a sort of whats yours is mine, and whats mine is mine. this is why men are rebelling, women marry up, that statement shows how superficial those women are, love or money, they marry up for money, then usually have affairs for love.

5:53 AM, August 09, 2006  
Blogger Graham Strouse said...

What's good for the gander, eh?

I'm 33, SWM, got my degree from the honors college of Florida, started a newspaper there, eventually did some MA work. I had my first big-paper byline published in the St. Pete Times & had Internships at the Poynter Institute (not my favorite people these days) & the Sarasota Herald-Tribune.

I've never turned down a job although I'm more chary, because 10 years of irregular hours, irregular work & eventually a deal where I was working for three publications in three states and survived the 40 hour rolling deadlines on (legal) ephedra. Didn;t want to, but a deadline is a deadline. Get your story in or your dead. Incidentally, as a freelancer in Florida I was shot at only once, but there were those three "no comments" via shotgun and about a half-dozen very large dogs who, unlike there owners, had all kinds of things to say to me.)

I've got maybe 600 professional bylines, have worked as a busboy, a tutor, both privately & at the Boletieri Academy. I was a third shift clerk at a Florida service station (I was putting in 20 there and 40 at my intership at the Sarasota Herald-Tribune). I worked at video store, as a sales solicitor, a life model & every manner of odd job, labor especially, because I'm physically strong.

My career never worked out. I did my best. Now I'm 33, one ball short of a full sack (that pesky cancer), which went the day after my best friend killed herself. In the last two years I've lost one friend to cancer, two more to medical malfeasance. Oh, and my cat, who I'd had since I was 14 died. Family relationships are strained to say the least. Both parental units are divorced, each re-married, and stepmothers/fathers tend to be bad news for adult children of previous marriages.

But the way it works now, as a never-married man with no other means of health coverage in PA, I work I lose my state health coverage, which I can't, because the anti-fatigue dope is expensive & I can't afford the regular cancer & blood screenings otherwise.

The state "loans" me 215 bucks a day & 124 bucks in electronic food stamps. This is against future disability earnings, which I have to keep applying for. And if I opt out, even if I find a real job, I have to pay the state back

I believe the Italian Mafia calls this sort of thing "shylocking." The Feds call it "extortion."

But hey, I still look good, even with my damage, can count to six on my abs, love kids, even kids from previous marriages & yes, my hair is going, but I'm one of six white guys on the planet who look good bald. I've got two bad knees, two bad ankles and a damaged nerve in my left shoulder. I look strong-willed, rational women with wit who can think for themselves. Divorced or never married? Not a problem. High-paying careers that dwarf my meager income? I can cope. I can shop, too. I'll handle the parent-teacher conferences. I'll take 'em to ballet or basketball lessons. I'll keep my boy-toy body up to snuff as best I can. I'll read the bedtime stories, so long as bedtime is very early, because I'm hard up & have much catching up to do.

I clean up well, am bohemian-presentable, would like to be able to devote my efforts to something worthwhile, preferably for pay, if not full-time, which is a dicey proposition for me at this point. instead of spending all my time. And I am a sticker & I don't expect perfection in women.

I do favor redheads. I like women my own age, give or take a bit, but that's all negotiable.


This isn't generally an option, is it? Women play the marriage lotto all the time. Quite often it backfires on them.

I blame "Sex in the City." Carrie Bradshaw is not an upgrade on Murphy Brown. And I'm guessing Mr. Big turned out to have a mistress, a boy toy, is a sexual sadist & packed off the lady of yesterday's moment with two kids and a gap in her career she'll never recover.

And men tend to treat divorced & single women with kids roughly the same way that women treat men with limited earning power.

She & me, we're both treated like lepers. In a way, we make the same mistake. I was willing to gamble everything on a low-paying, over-crowded profession that is not terribly man-friendly, to say the least, below the publisher and outside sports & op-ed. I didn't know until it was too late. Maybe she did, maybe not.

Carrie B., she tried to have it all in general, Mr. Big in particular & now she's probably a waitress at a Waffle House, hoping Bill Clinton comes along & can overlook Mr. Big's parting gift to her, besides the kids. Genital warts, I'm thinking. Could be wrong.

Ladies, don't gamble on the marriage lottery. Everyone loses.

Those tall, dark self-assured CEOs with the 911 Turbos, endless charm & a will to win at all costs get to where they are because, by and large, they're completely self-absorbed, ruthless, more glib then smart, and smart in ways you won't like later on. You're a bauble. You're looking for the Prince, what you get is the Pumpkin. And if you're really Cinderalla and have proof of provenance I guarantee he went straight home and put your show up for sale on eBay. There's your glam.

Me, maybe I could cope with being a bit of a bauble. But it's a bit different for guys, especially as we age. Us gents, we hold our looks, by traditional standards, anyway, much longer then ladies, even if our bodies creak a bit here & there from high school sports injuries. So the bargaining power is a bit closer to even.

Wish it was otherwise.

Like Maggie says in MDB, "Is that enough truth to suit you?"

5:49 PM, August 10, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

graham strouse:

you may have said a bunch of other stuff elsewhere that pissed me off. can't remember. will have to review prior posts. but...

single professional lady with access to health insurance seeks bauble. marriage unnecessary.

you had me at, "I'm 33 [and] one ball short of a full sack."

interested? send pictures of abs and bald head.

2:13 AM, August 11, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree with an earlier commenter, these girls seem to have missed their mothers and want to enjoy being with their children. Is that so bad? Sure, they are flip and silly and have too much credit-card debt and want everything. If they weren't, they wouldn't have been featured in the article. Eventually they'll realize they have to choose between the extra things and their kids and they will make that choice. There are always extra things, no matter how rich your partner is.

What is so terrible about wanting to have a stable partner in life? If you're a person with kids the last thing you need is an unstable partner, male or female. I am comfortable asserting if you, male or female, can't hold a job you are an unstable person. If you, male or female, won't hold a job when the family situation demands it you are a jerk. If we were having to dip into retirement to fund my self-improvment projects while I didn't work my husband would have something to say about it. He promises.

These girls seemed to have watched their mothers and fathers give a lot of energy to *strangers* for money, more money than was needed for a reasonable life. Isn't there a thread somewhere in this blog about how video games desensitize children to violence? Why wouldn't living a life of material things, where those things are obviously the priority and magically appear, desensitize these young girls to the necessity of work (SAHM without help is work) and the importance of loving relationships?

Seek therapy.

12:40 AM, August 12, 2006  
Blogger Rowena Hullfire said...

What's gross is the cult of celebrity, that ordinary people think they are as fabulous as Posh Spice and Kate Moss and deserve a high market value male when they haven't established themselves as high market females. They should go out and accomplish something, like Kate Moss and Posh Spice, earn some money so they know what it is, and be or become as top end beautiful as models and pop stars, then they can have the high market value to bargain with for the rich guys. LOL

People want high lifestyles like celebrities and think they deserve it. Their wants are outrageous.

If these women said, I'm not going to work because I want to stay home with my children, I missed my parents...that would be a fine and decent thing, it's better for children. BUT to tack on I also want a wealthy celebrity indulgent lifestyle and so must have a rich man, shows them to be the greedy parasites that they are.

My mom used to tell me, it's just as easy to marry a rich man as a poor one. I responded, yeah, worked for you! Mom was engaged to a rich man when she met my Dad, and fell in love, true soul partner style. She made the right choice. From humble beginnings, they did very well for themselves, as partners. That's why I think a partnership is the only way to go, like the good doctor above.

The other problem is that when you marry a rich man, you end up married to a rich man. Like Graham's description of Carrie and Mr. Big.

(Of course, y'all realize that Sex and the City is homosexual fantasy? Picture the women as gay men, and it makes sense. I don't know ANY women like those crazy shrews.)

The true partnership thing is hard for me to find though, living in Appalachia, it's a different culture and they believe more in the man=dominator model with woman as household slave. Yuck.

WIFE is an acronym...wash, iron, f*ck, etc. LOL

Graham...I too am a cancer survivor, healthy except for too many cells in my bloodstream, with a zest for life, a redhead, but 41, too old? I'm not having babies. Ever visit Appalachia? LOL

Yeah, the cancer survivor thing changes things a lot, too. People are scared of the C word even though I'm healthy. Most guys I have dated seem to end up preferring someone younger who has never had a health issue (or experience, opinions, her own profession and means, for that matter). Not prejudice, just seeing who they end up with, the blank slate type.

5:33 AM, August 12, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

hey, rowena hullfire, hands off my kool-aid! you wanna fight me for 'im? *puts up her dukes*

hehe. just kidding.

the first part of your post reminds me of a song by the Left-Wing Fascists (don't ask, long time ago) called "You're Not Good-Looking Enough to be a Bitch".

i liked the WIFE acronym. never heard that one before.

1:07 PM, August 12, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

[QUOTE] Women do makeup, hair coloring and ironing... for themselves, not to be sexually attractive to men. Sorry, but Cosmo has more influence over what women do than what us guys say or think. [QUOTE]

Sorry Rizzo, I don't agree with what you've said. Men just don't know they are unconsciously influencing women to look sexy.

I've always had many male friends, but I used to be plain before I got a cosmetic surgery. After the surgery I look a lot better on the outside. I can tell you this: The frequency of men showing interest in me has increased since then. Now, do you say this is pure coincidence or what? Male strangers started striking conversations with me in the mall, at coffee shops, even cars stopping at the red light...

I don't mean to break your bubbles, but men UNCONSCIOUSLY see women's sexual attractiveness as important. Trust me, women naturally have intuition... they know this even without men saying it.


4:34 PM, August 12, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Spanky's comment just above is absolutely right. It's no coincidence that guys strike up conversations with her after her cosmetic surgery. Guys will pay a lot more attention to an attractive woman.

I've talked to a lot of attractive female friends when this topic has come up. Surprisingly, most of the women I've talked to don't realize the extent to which guys will be much friendlier to attractive women. I assume this is generally because they would like to see whether the woman will go out with them. Almost all of the women will say, "Oh, he was just being friendly." I'm certainly not saying this is somehow inappropriate; I'm just saying that most women don't seem to realize it.

11:39 AM, August 13, 2006  
Blogger Mercurior said...

its not that she is looking better, but she has confidence, thats the true beauty, you may look a million dollars, yet had the confidence of a eggplant, i have known some "plain" women, but they were confident, strong, and they were beautiful.

your mistaking self confidence, with physical beauty.. thats all plastic surgeons do, give you the self confidence in your self, even if you dont need it, its all about how you feel, before and after..

2:52 PM, August 13, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

oh don't mind rizzo. he's being ridiculous. even, i hate to say it, but intellectually dishonest.

no honest man would dispute that a woman's sexually attractiveness is very important to them. men are visually stimulated. and, though i'm sure there are a few weird exceptions, they are for the most part not looking at porn involving ugly, fat, old women.

sure, a man would be just fine if the woman were gorgeous WITHOUT makeup, botox, hair color, sexy clothes, etc. say, elle mcpherson for example. sure, she's gonna look good when she rolls out of bed in a pair of sweats.

but most of us, unfortunately, do not look that good. we want to keep up with the elle mcpherson's though, give the men as close to that as we can. so it requires makeup, etc.

10:27 PM, August 13, 2006  
Blogger Mercurior said...

as i said its about self confidence

**but I used to be plain before I got a cosmetic surgery**

and after, you changed , you became more outgoing, more self confident. dont you think that could be the reason why you are getting so many more men after you.

i love my fiancee, because of who she is, it just so happens i think she has the sexiest body, i would take her over any model, and elle mcpherson. she has a self knowledge ans self confidence, that makes her truly beautiful.

people mistake, physical changes that means better, but its the psychological changes that occur after the surgery that cause the attraction

3:53 AM, August 14, 2006  
Blogger Rizzo said...

oh don't mind rizzo. he's being ridiculous. even, i hate to say it, but intellectually dishonest.

no honest man would dispute that a woman's sexually attractiveness is very important to them.

I'm hardly being intellecutally dishonset. I never said that a woman's sexual attractiveness is not important to men. It obviously is. In fact, I've often argued, to the consternation of women, in defense of men being attracted to the physical attributes of women (But what about her personality? Well, you can't see her personality from across the room.)

What I mean is that, the best way for a man to ensure that his wife/girlfriend does not lose weight or have plastic surgery is to suggest, even politely, that she might benefit from it. You'd have a better chance of ending up on Dr. Phil than having your wife/girlfriend take your advice.

Women obviously go through a bunch of activities that they think will make them more attractive to men. Some of them men care about (e.g., weight), some of them they don't so much (e.g., tanning). But not every dollar that women spend on their appearance is done to impress men. To many men, women who go through botox injections look ridiculous (have you seen pictures of Meg Ryan lately?).

I'm not sure why you want to convince me that you women work so hard to become physically appealing to men. Not only do I believe that not to be true, it would kind of make you seem slightly ridiculous if it were (not to mention that I'd have less respect for women in general).

And sorry, most men really don't care about makeup. A common complaint I hear from men, and I've made myself, is when certain women wear too much makeup. I rarely hear a guy say, "Yeah, she looks allright, but she could benefit from some more lipstick or eye shadow." It just doesn't happen. Besides, us guys kind of see makeup as false advertising.

Also, to spanky:
I don't mean to break your bubbles, but men UNCONSCIOUSLY see women's sexual attractiveness as important.

Men CONSCIOUSLY see women's sexual attractiveness as important, and I never said otherwise. So you're not breaking any bubbles with me. I'm just arguing that what women think men find attractive and what men actually do find attractive aren't always the same things, and that women don't always do these things to attract or keep men around.

10:11 AM, August 14, 2006  
Blogger Rizzo said...

Also, one more thing spanky:

After the surgery I look a lot better on the outside. I can tell you this: The frequency of men showing interest in me has increased since then.

But did you get the plastic surgery to make yourself more physically pleasing to men, or did you do it to make yourself feel better? Or some combination of the two? But I don't doubt that you get more attention from men now.

And could it be that, rather than men unconsciously influencing women to go through all these beauty related procedures that, perhaps, women go through these procedures to unconsciously manipulate men?

10:20 AM, August 14, 2006  
Blogger Cham said...

I'll jump in here. I think their is a place in this world for a gold-digging trophy bride. Don't assume these ladies are going to sit on their sofas filing their nails for a second. Beauty takes time and effort, and lots of money.

Plastic surgery is not painless, a good color job takes hours. Then there are the hair extensions, the teeth whitening, and the wax jobs. After you get done with all that, dinner still needs to be put on the table and the cleaning service needs supervision. The social schedule also needs to be arranged.

Once dinner is through, hubby is going to look forward to a nightime romp and Ms. Gold Digger better be ready and enthusiastic because the excuse "I've worked all day too and I'm tired" doesn't fly. The next day the process starts all over again.

On another comment on this blog someone mentioned that all men want is to get laid and they get married to ensure that will happen. Some men like to work long hours without complaints from their wives. Some men like extracurricular activity and a good Gold Digger might be willing to ignore the obvious.

In conclusion, Gold Diggers serve a purpose, some men find them very enticing and they do fulfill a need. However, some men and women like to be partners and equals, and that is good too.

I wish everyone luck with whatever they want.

5:34 PM, August 15, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

2008真情寫真aa片免費看捷克論壇微風論壇大眾論壇plus論壇080視訊聊天室情色視訊交友90739美女交友-成人聊天室色情小說做愛成人圖片區豆豆色情聊天室080豆豆聊天室 小辣妹影音交友網台中情人聊天室桃園星願聊天室高雄網友聊天室新中台灣聊天室中部網友聊天室嘉義之光聊天室基隆海岸聊天室中壢網友聊天室南台灣聊天室南部聊坊聊天室台南不夜城聊天室南部網友聊天室屏東網友聊天室台南網友聊天室屏東聊坊聊天室雲林網友聊天室大學生BBS聊天室網路學院聊天室屏東夜語聊天室孤男寡女聊天室一網情深聊天室心靈饗宴聊天室流星花園聊天室食色男女色情聊天室真愛宣言交友聊天室情人皇朝聊天室上班族成人聊天室上班族f1影音視訊聊天室哈雷視訊聊天室080影音視訊聊天室38不夜城聊天室援交聊天室080080哈啦聊天室台北已婚聊天室已婚廣場聊天室 夢幻家族聊天室摸摸扣扣同學會聊天室520情色聊天室QQ成人交友聊天室免費視訊網愛聊天室愛情公寓免費聊天室拉子性愛聊天室柔情網友聊天室哈啦影音交友網哈啦影音視訊聊天室櫻井莉亞三點全露寫真集123上班族聊天室尋夢園上班族聊天室成人聊天室上班族080上班族聊天室6k聊天室粉紅豆豆聊天室080豆豆聊天網新豆豆聊天室080聊天室免費音樂試聽流行音樂試聽免費aa片試看免費a長片線上看色情貼影片免費a長片

7:36 AM, March 22, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

本土成人貼圖站大台灣情色網台灣男人幫論壇A圖網嘟嘟成人電影網火辣春夢貼圖網情色貼圖俱樂部台灣成人電影絲襪美腿樂園18美女貼圖區柔情聊天網707網愛聊天室聯盟台北69色情貼圖區38女孩情色網台灣映像館波波成人情色網站美女成人貼圖區無碼貼圖力量色妹妹性愛貼圖區日本女優貼圖網日本美少女貼圖區亞洲風暴情色貼圖網哈啦聊天室美少女自拍貼圖辣妹成人情色網台北女孩情色網辣手貼圖情色網AV無碼女優影片男女情色寫真貼圖a片天使俱樂部萍水相逢遊戲區平水相逢遊戲區免費視訊交友90739免費視訊聊天辣妹視訊 - 影音聊天網080視訊聊天室日本美女肛交美女工廠貼圖區百分百貼圖區亞洲成人電影情色網台灣本土自拍貼圖網麻辣貼圖情色網好色客成人圖片貼圖區711成人AV貼圖區台灣美女貼圖區筱萱成人論壇咪咪情色貼圖區momokoko同學會視訊kk272視訊情色文學小站成人情色貼圖區嘟嘟成人網嘟嘟情人色網 - 貼圖區免費色情a片下載台灣情色論壇成人影片分享免費視訊聊天區微風 成人 論壇kiss文學區taiwankiss文學區

7:36 AM, March 22, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

85cc免費影城 愛情公寓正妹牆川藏第一美女 成人影片 情色交友網 美女視訊 美女視訊 視訊情人高雄網 JP成人影城 383成人影城 aa片免費a片下載 a片線上看aa片免費看 ※a片線上試看※sex520免費影片※ aa片免費看 BT成人論壇 金瓶影片交流區 自拍美女聊天室 aa片免費a片下載 SEX520免費影片 免費a片 日本美女寫真集 sex520aa免費影片 sex520aa免費影片 BT成人網 Hotsee免費視訊交友 百分百貼影片區 SEX520免費影片 免費視訊聊天室 情人視訊高雄網 星光情色討論版 正妹牆 383成人影城 線上85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 ※免費視訊聊天室※ ※免費視訊聊天室※ 免費視訊聊天室 85cc免費影片 85cc免費影片 080苗栗人聊天室 080苗栗人聊天室 080中部人聊天室 080中部人聊天室 免費a片下載 免費a片 AA片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 日本av女優影片 av女優 av女優無碼影城 av女優 av女優 百分百成人圖片 百分百成人圖片 視訊情人高雄網 電話交友 影音電話交友 絕色影城 絕色影城 夜未眠成人影城 夜未眠成人影城 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 免費色咪咪貼影片 免費色咪咪貼影片 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 影音視訊交友網 視訊交友網 080視訊聊天室 ※免費視訊聊天室※ ※免費視訊聊天室※ 視訊聊天室 成人影音視訊聊天室 ut影音視訊聊天室 ※免費視訊聊天室※ 視訊ukiss聊天室視訊ukiss聊天室 視訊交友90739 視訊交友90739 情人視訊網 168視訊美女 168視訊美女 168視訊美女 視訊美女館 視訊美女館 免費視訊美女網 小高聊天室 小高聊天室 aio交友聊天室 aio交友聊天室 交友聊天室 交友聊天室 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 免費線上a片 免費線上a片 嘟嘟成人網站 成人漫畫 情色文學 嘟嘟成人網 成人貼圖區 情色文學成人小說 微風成人區 情色貼圖區 免費視訊聊天 免費成人圖片區 愛情公寓 愛情公寓聊天室 寄情築園小遊戲 免費aa片線上看 aa片免費看 情色SXE聊天室 SEX情色遊戲 色情A片 免費下載 av女優 俱樂部 情色論壇 辣妹視訊 情色貼圖網 免費色情 聊天室 情人視訊聊天室 免費a片成人影城 免費a片-aa片免費看 0204貼圖區 SEX情色 交友聊天-線上免費 女優天堂 成人交友網 成人情色貼圖區 18禁 -女優王國 080視訊美女聊天室 080視訊聊天室 視訊交友90739 免費a片 aio 視訊交友網 成人影城-免費a片※免費視訊聊天※85cc免費影片日本線上免費a片 免費色咪咪影片免費色咪咪影片aaa片免費看影片aaa片免費看成人影城免費色咪咪影片

2:16 PM, April 05, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


5:08 AM, April 13, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

免費視訊聊天 ut聊天室辣妹視訊UT影音視訊聊天室 吉澤明步QQ美女視訊秀 85cc免費影片aa影片下載城sex免費成人影片aaa片免費看短片美女視訊 sex383線上娛樂場av969 免費短片日本免費視訊aa影片下載城視訊網愛聊天室影音視訊交友 咆哮小老鼠分享論壇sex520免費影片aa免費影片下載城aio辣妺視訊 aio辣妹交友愛情館 jp成人影片aio交友愛情館馬子免費影片免費線上a片18成人85cc影城0204movie免費色咪咪視訊網pc交友s383視訊玩美女人34c高雄視訊聊天jp成人免費視訊辣妹 kk777視訊俱樂部xxxpandalive173影音視訊聊天室 sex520-卡通影片成人免費視訊 完美女人13060 免費視訊聊天sexy girl video movie辣妹妹影音視訊聊天室UT視訊美女交友視訊情色網百事無碼a片dvd線上aa片免費看18禁成人網ut聊天室kk俱樂部視訊激情網愛聊天 情人小魔女自拍卡通aa片免費看夜未眠成人影城aio性愛dvd辣妹影片直播拓網視訊交友視訊聊天室ggoo168論壇視訊辣妹love104影音live秀 美女show-live視訊情色yam交友辣妹妹影音視訊聊天室s383情色大網咖視訊aaa俱樂部台灣情色網無碼avdvdsexy diamond sex888入口Show-live視訊聊天室

4:54 AM, April 14, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

免費 a 片aaaaa片俱樂部影片aaaaa片俱樂部dodo豆豆聊天室sex520網路自拍美女聊天室天堂免費線上avdvd援交av080影片aa影片下載城aaa片免費看短片成人圖片區18成人avooogo2av免費影片sexdiy影城免費線上成人影片bonbonsex0951影片下載日本av女優sex888免費看影片免費視訊78論壇辣妹有約辣妹no31314視訊dudu sex免費影片avdvd情色影片免費色咪咪影片網av080免費試看日本美女寫真集辣妹脫衣麻將視訊聊天室性福免費影片分享日本美女寫真集,kk視訊aio交友愛情館免費成人美女視訊bt論壇色情自拍免費a片卡通tw 18 net卡通18美少女圖色情漫畫777美女小護士免費 aa 片試看百分百成人情色圖片a片免費觀賞sexy girls get fuckedsexy girl video movie情色文學成人小說sex888免費看eyny 伊莉論壇sexdiy影城自拍情色0204movie免費影片aio免費aa片試看s383情色大網咖sexy girl video movie草莓牛奶AV論壇台灣論壇18禁遊戲區環球辣妹聊天室 90691拓網aio交友愛情館拓網學生族視訊777美女 sex888影片分享區hi5 tv免費影片aa的滿18歲卡通影片sex383線上娛樂場sexdiy影城免費a片線上觀看真人美女辣妹鋼管脫衣秀比基尼辣妹一夜情視訊aio交友愛情館

4:54 AM, April 14, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

小魔女免費影城免費看 aa的滿18歲影片sex383線上娛樂場kk777視訊俱樂部aa的滿18歲影片85cc免費影片a片免費看A片-sex520視訊聊天室v6 0plus論壇sex520免費影片avdvd-情色網qq美美色網ut13077視訊聊天A片-無碼援交東京熱一本道aaa免費看影片免費視訊聊天室微風成人免費視訊聊天 ut聊天室av1688影音視訊天堂免費 a 片85cc免費影城亞洲禁果影城微風成人av論壇sex520免費影片JP成人網免費成人視訊aaa影片下載城免費a片 ut交友成人視訊85cc成人影城免費A片aa的滿18歲影片小魔女免費影片85cc免費影片aaa片免費看短片aa影片下載城aaaaa片俱樂部影片aaaaa片俱樂部aa的滿18歲影片小魔女免費影片台灣論壇免費影片後宮0204movie免費影片免費卡通影片線上觀看線上免費a片觀看85cc免費影片免費A片aa影片下載城ut聊天室辣妹視訊UT影音視訊聊天室 日本免費視訊aaaa 片俱樂部aaaa片免費看影片免費視訊78論壇情色偷拍免費A片免費aaaaa片俱樂部影片aa影片下載城色漫畫帝國av俱樂部aaaa彩虹頻道免費影片 杜蕾斯成人免費卡通影片線上觀看85cc免費影片線上觀賞免費線上歐美A片觀看免費a片卡通aaa的滿18歲卡通影片sex520免費影片免費 a 片

4:54 AM, April 14, 2009  
Blogger 徵信 said...

外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇 外遇

外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇外遇

外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 ,
外遇 外遇 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇

外遇 外遇

外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿喜帖囍帖卡片外遇外遇 外遇 外遇外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇剖析 外遇調查 外遇案例 外遇諮詢 偷情 第三者外遇話題 外遇發洩 感情挽回 徵信社 外遇心態 外遇 通姦 通姦罪 外遇徵信社徵信社外遇 外遇 抓姦徵信協會徵信公司 包二奶 徵信社 徵信 徵信社 徵信社 徵信社 徵信社 徵信 徵信 婚姻 婚前徵信 前科 個人資料 外遇 第三者 徵信社 偵探社 抓姦 偵探社 偵探社婚 偵探社 偵探社偵探家事服務家事服務家電維修家事服務家事服務家事服務家事服務家事服務持久持久持久持久持久持久持久離婚網頁設計徵信社徵信社徵信徵信社外遇離婚協議書劈腿持久持久持久持久持久劈腿剖析徵信徵信社外遇外遇外遇外遇徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿

4:28 AM, April 20, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

視訊做愛視訊美女無碼A片情色影劇kyo成人動漫tt1069同志交友網ut同志交友網微風成人論壇6k聊天室日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞UT視訊美女交友..........................

10:54 PM, May 19, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

aio交友愛情館tt1069同志交友網情色交友0401成人交友拓網交友pc交友小魔女免費影片sex383線上娛樂場xvediox免費A片 - 微風成人日本美女寫真集咆哮小老鼠影片分享區免費成人電影小魔女自拍天堂av1688影音娛樂網成人交友0204movie免費影片咆哮小老鼠論壇85cc免費影城85ccfoxy免費音樂下載成人視訊交友免費視訊免費影片成人影城

11:30 PM, June 07, 2009  

Post a Comment

<< Home