The Lone Libertarian
I read with interest a short question and answer session with John Stossel in TownHall magazine on how he became the lone libertarian in broadcast news. One question posed by Mary Katharine Ham asked "Is the media as hostile to conservative ideas as a lot of conservatives seem to think, or does your success belie that idea?"
Stossel replies, "I would say it's as hostile as most believe it is. Remember, I came in as a liberal, and I was trying to be what I thought was objective. I certainly did not do the point-of-view reporting as I do now. I'm the, to my knowledge, lone libertarian in the mainstream media, and I take some heat for that. To my knowledge there are zero conservatives...on the networks."
Wow, zero, that's unbelievable. Imagine what would happen if there were zero women or minorities in broadcast news, what a ruckus that would be. There is already an uproar that there are so few but what if there were....zero. There is no excuse for zero conservatives except censorship and discrimination. There is no other explanation. If you are conservative or libertarian and want to go into broadcast news-- what are your chances? Zero or possibly a tiny percentage being that there is one libertarian. So why bother--but then, isn't that the idea?
Stossel replies, "I would say it's as hostile as most believe it is. Remember, I came in as a liberal, and I was trying to be what I thought was objective. I certainly did not do the point-of-view reporting as I do now. I'm the, to my knowledge, lone libertarian in the mainstream media, and I take some heat for that. To my knowledge there are zero conservatives...on the networks."
Wow, zero, that's unbelievable. Imagine what would happen if there were zero women or minorities in broadcast news, what a ruckus that would be. There is already an uproar that there are so few but what if there were....zero. There is no excuse for zero conservatives except censorship and discrimination. There is no other explanation. If you are conservative or libertarian and want to go into broadcast news-- what are your chances? Zero or possibly a tiny percentage being that there is one libertarian. So why bother--but then, isn't that the idea?
Labels: liberal hypocrisy
posted by Helen at 1:44 PM
35 Comments:
Looks like it's time for a little affirmative action. We could use a little in Academia, too.
Hopefully that will change over time but as long as FOX is viewed as the "Republican" network, it'll be a long hard fight.
There is no excuse for zero conservatives except censorship and discrimination.
Not to mention that the establishment goes out of its way to make sure that every prospective journalist knows what they are in for if they are anything other than leftist/progressive sycophants... thusly encouraging a lot of self-discrimination on the part of those who decide to enter another field, or stick to relatively "safe" beats, like sports reporting... and self-censorship on the part of the remainder.
Fortunately, unlike (say) the medical industry, journalism is one of those things that can be done outside the system.... so long as the First Amendment stands, we can route around the establishment.
Dave: No Farking Thanks. Religious conservatives, who hope to be the beneficiary of such a thing, will be no better than the Left when it comes to that sort of thing, as John Lewis can tell you.
Let the marketplace of ideas remain free, please.
There aren't many atheists in the clergy either.
Could it be that broadcast media, especially the kind represented by the major networks, appeals especially to a kind liberal personality?
Broadcast news anchors are essentially actors, and I imagine the percentage of top liberal actors coincides pretty well with the percentage of top liberal news anchors.
There aren't many atheists in the clergy either.
You would think so, but as a United Methodist pastor, I can tell you otherwise.
Patrick Stephens,
That's not really a fair comparison. The MSM should not be used to spout leftist propaganda without showing other sides. If they want to do so, they should place a warning on each of their broadcasts to let people know that they are showing only one view. Unfortunately, many people do not realize that what they are watching is slanted to only one view --it is only fair that listeners be told in advance that they will not be hearing from any other point of view what is going on in the world. Those with critical thinking skills can figure this out but those without these skills--the majority of the population-- need to be told up front.
There is no excuse for zero conservatives except censorship and discrimination.
It is too bad that 'censorship' has come to mean filtering or selection of any kind by anybody. Censorship, as practiced by a government and enforced by law and force, is something distinctly different than private self-selection of content, employees, partners or associates.
Hey, I hate the liberal media as much as the next guy but comparing political persuasion to gender/race/ethnicity is like comparing apples to something that is nothing like an apple.
Gender/race/ethnicity are "accidents of birth" and political persuasion is a choice and not an immutable charcteristic. There's no benefit in starting the argument for balance in media coverage from a moot point.
Isn't the point that conservatives don't want to be liberals? Liberals are the ones who impose hiring restrictions and quotas. Conservatives roll their eyes and get their news elsewhere. Television news is a business and will respond to market forces. Why whine? Just shut off the TV.
Seerak has a good point that you can go outside the system in journalism, which is what the internet is about.
Not to change the subject, but the medical industry is by far the worst, most parasitical industry in the U.S. Unlike journalism, its monopoly is legally mandated. It is illegal to go outside of it. This fact alone makes it clear that it is inherently a criminal enterprise.
The FDA, AMA, and licensure of MD's should be abolished. The AMA and medical licensing boards should be declared criminal enterprises and their leaders should be imprisoned for life.
I believe that the medical industry is the single largest albatross around the necks of Americans. It is far, far more parasitical than the media, academia, or even the federal government itself.
That is why Fox News does so well, even though only half the people on Fox are conservatives.
Fox does have a monopoly on a large audience, something the leftist networks are foolishly letting them enjoy.
"Those with critical thinking skills can figure this out but those without these skills--the majority of the population-- need to be told up front."
How is does this fit into a conservative philosopy? This sounds like nannying to me. What's next a junk food tax for people who can't resist Twinkies?
The liberal bias on network news is nothing new nor is it an unknown problem. I have not watched any network news programs for years for that very reason. If the reports of declining ratings for network news and declining circulation for newspapers and magazines are accurate, it could well because a lot of people like me decided not to use their products any more.
Speaking as someone near the end of her career in (print) journalism, I will tell you that there are almost NO conservatives in the newsroom -- ANY newsroom -- at least openly.
Since there are no contrary views, the "baseline" has moved left dramatically over the 35 years I've done this thing. Conversation about political matters is commonplace, but any dissent is in the degrees of disparagement of Bush, America, people of faith, red staters.
News people now just assume that that's just the way everyone thinks. Pauline Kael didn't know anyone who voted for Nixon in 1972, and nothing's changed at the New York Times in 2008. What's changed is that it's now the reality inside every newspaper, TV station and wire service bureau.
Zelda,
Since when is telling people something nannyism? The equivalent would be taxing people who watch the MSM. Where have I proposed that? What about just being like Rush Limbaugh and admitting what you are?
What I find troubling is that these MSM news outlets don't admit that they lean left. They try to hide it by being subtle and trying to pretend they are centrists. They aren't. Most research done shows that they lean left and pretty heavily so. Why not just say, we lean left and are proud? We don't hire conservatives--we don't believe conservatives have the right to speak on the airwaves. Then at least they would be honest.
I understand why the national TV media is leftist. It is centered in Manhattan, and the views of the news networks merely match that of the Manhattan population from which they spawned. This also explains Hollywood's liberalism.
But I don't know why newspapers across the US heartland and small towns are left-wing. A newspaper in Texas or Arizona does not cater to a left-wing audience, so why are the journalists far more left-wing than the population?
How are you going to get networks to run those warnings without making it enforceable by law? It doesn't have to be a tax to be nannyism. I don't think its government's responsibility to protect the gullible from the liberal media.
Anti-liberalism is not the same as conservatism and fighting fire with fire is not likely to yield desired results.
Could it be that media is about selecting the information that some deem important for others? The very thought that some people are smart enough to decide what other people should believe or do is a very "liberal" idea, in the modern sense of the word.
What's "broadcast news"?
Well, if nothing else, zelda, it'd be nice if they'd admit their biases when asked. I am in the media business (print, at small-town paper), and I've seen the dirty tricks they use to pretend they aren't listing heavily to the left. I've also witnessed the shocked lack of comprehension when someone voices an opinion outside of the MSM line. My one venture into MSM work (a Gannett owned mid-sized daily), ended ignominiously, but since it was only a temporary contract, they didn't have to specify why I was the one target of "company cutbacks." But I digress.
Warning labels aren't necessary, nor desired, but it'd be nice if they didn't tell outright lies -- like praising Nixon and Reagan after they die -- to attract conservative's trust, while consistently biasing news copy against still-living conservatives and Republicans.
The media should be in the tank for leftys. It is a good idea.
They brought us the Big O didn't they? In a year when most folks thought the Rs were doomed.
When you only get one side of a story your views get warped. You miss important stuff.
Heh.
The liberal definition of free speech is exercising their right to shout down those who disagree with them.
The liberal definition of censorship is someone dismissing their ideas.
>>Why not just say, we lean left and are proud?
They literally can't.
For starters, they really don't believe that their world view is anything other than centrist, and the way it ought to be. Even if they had some inkling that might be the case, admitting it would shatter the illusion, and be wildly inconsistent with their view that they are the enlightened and unbiased ones acting on high levels of journalistic integrity.
To admit otherwise would pull the thread that unravels the whole thing.
And speaking of journalistic integrity, it's pretty rare that the press will outright ~lie~.
They deceive by other means. The main three are these:
* They will relentlessly repeat little tidbits that support their view of the world.
* They will fail to report truly alternative viewpoints.
* They will quote other organizations who have their sympathy, who lie for them.
For a concrete example, they will report on an organization spouting typical Lefty tropes such as "the rich/evil corporations don't pay their fair share of taxes". For so called "balance", they might briefly mention the apparent opposite of the position, that such people/corps provide jobs and the basis of prosperity. What they !won't! mention is the fact that (leeway please, these are rough figures from memory) something like 85% of the tax dollars collected are paid by people who make more than 100k, which isn't really that hard for any family with two professionals in it, which comprises something like 15% or 30% of the tax base population.
Similarly, whenever a new supreme court justice comes up for confirmation, all the press wants to talk about is Roe v. Wade, which is apparently the end-all-be-all of Constitutional jurisprudence. This is, of course, one of the Big Red Herrings to distract attention from the generally shabby state of Constitutional degeneracy in which we live.
We simply can't have too many people asking "where in the Constitution does it say you can do ~that~, now can we?
All I can say is if you have deeply studied a body of knowledge about a controversial topic, (in my case, gun rights, history, and economics) and then compare that deep knowledge against the treatment of those topics by the MSM, the contrast will reveal striking, ideologically driven discrepancies.
To that end, of course, I suggest that people not take my word for it.
I invite people to deeply study a body of knowledge for themselves, and to replicate my experiments.
Oh come on, there are definitely a FEW conservatives in the mainstream media. And conservatives get their fair share in those one side vs. another things. See, I think the television media is kind of balanced when you take out FOX; although most of it seems more left leaning than right.
Remember, a media that appeals to both sides has more viewers. There is a cost in shoving your opinion down others throats-- one that many broadcasters are willing to take to a slight degree, just as you're willing to pay for the cost of an apple at the store-- and that is losing a lot of people who disagree with you. FOX News has actually turned their cost into a benefit by appealing to a sect of society.
If the mainstream media starts leaning more toward one side, we'll see more stations pop up that lean the other way. It's too bad that, IMO, mainstream conservatives are no better than mainstream liberals in their dearth of intelligence. And libertarians (who, minus the Randians, are collectively extremely smart) are non-existent in the real world; you could never profit a lot from a libertarian news station, unless you keep the libertarianism to a minimum and make it, in general, simply economically right and socially left, which the majority (and I don't mean plurality, thank you) of Americans are.
Related: I once really ticked off a liberal by saying that there should be academic affirmative action for conservatives so students are exposed to a diversity of views. Heh.
The main problem, IMO, is that most journalists aren't actually trained in anything other than journalism. They know how to write, how to ask questions, and in the case of broadcast news, how to inflect their voice correctly and look pretty, but ask one of them to intelligently dissect foreign policy, the economy, et. al and they wouldn't have a clue. Without any sort of intellectual study/critical thinking ability in a given field, like a lot of people, they simply accept what sounds good: liberalism. Maybe part of their education should, you know, actually focus on a few of the topics they're consistently shaping opinion and commenting on so that they wouldn't think government intervention is the panacea to all the world's problems.
But why bother trying to enter broadcast journalism, or print journalism, when their stars are falling and those of the New Media -- the Internet and talk radio -- are rising?
The Old Media will retain some influence for years to come, but present trends continuing, theirs is a losing game. The modern news-consumer wants to select and tailor his own sources, something to which the Old Media are irrevocably hostile for ideological reasons: They demand the absolute privilege of shaping the public's perceptions according to their priorities and preferences.
That attitude was sustainable before the narrowcasting and Internet revolutions. Today it's the anvil around the Old Media's collective neck. They have only two alternatives: continue on as they've done to date, which will doom them in only another couple of decades, or cease to insist upon their unchallengeable position as the "agenda-setters" for the nation, in which case their lag behind the New Media will compel them to allow us within their gates.
So, Old Media: either accept defeat or become what you detest. Lovely choices, aren't they?
#44...Yes, journalism degrees are worthless. Take it from someone who was briefly in a graduate journalism program and dropped out.
Journalism is a trade like plumbing or carpentry, and most journalists, truly, are afraid to get their hands dirty. For most "reporters," the job involves rewriting press releases, taking down notes from friendly sources, and rehashing stuff other people have written to update stories. (Check out Robt. Novak's new autobiography "Prince of Darkness." He's frank about all the deadwood in the D.C. press corps.)
And, #44, most reporters don't know how to write. Been there, I know.
Watergate was what truly destroyed the profession. Every high school kid saw the Robert Redford movie and wanted to be a glamorous Volvo-driving investigative reporter.
That, plus the end of the isolation of newsrooms. If the newsroom is a profit center, it has two choices: a) Become non-controversial (to please advertisers), which means following the lead of the NYT; or b) Become a screaming muckraker (like the British press), but that means you have to depend more heavily on circulation to drive revenue, not ads. Since circ. is declining, option (a) has been the way to go.
The internet is reviving journalism, but now the problem is that eight million bloggers are content to comment on what they see in the NYT and not do their own reporting. All it takes is enough ad revenue or other revenue streams and a blogger could theoretically replace a local newspaper. It will happen once the price of gas goes to $10 gas.
That will be next Thursday, I think.
Some states are wanting to lower the voting age. They say it is because of freedom, military elgibility, etc. But I suspect the real reason is younger voters are far more liberal, so they want to increase this vote. The younger someone is, the less wisdom they have, and the more they tend to vote liberal.
It's applicable to this story because it is what liberals often do. Rather than discuss and persuade, they push their agenda through one-sided channels like education and media, and fill the ranks (be it hiring only liberals or expanding liberal voting blocks) while at the same time trying to hinder opposing channels(i.e., the fairness doctrine).
Who is realy more fair, a liberal reporter slanting news to promote their agenda under the guise of unbiased "journalism," or Rush Limbaugh who openly acknowledges he is a conservative and welcomes those who disagree to challenge his views?
Talking heads. You have to be good looking enough not to offend a viewer's senses so(s)he does not change the channel, and you have to be able to read. Anything else?
I used to actually watch the dinosaur media. I simply can't stand it anymore, and I haven't been able to for close to seven years now.
The whole state of affairs makes me sick. It would be different if conservatives weren't portrayed as stupid in the MSM and if there was at least SOME discussion of the conservative point of view.
I really feel for conservative kids growing up today. They have to endure 12 years or more of indoctrination via the education system.
Lindsey
Glenn Beck on Headline News seems to be the only non liberal on the liberal news waves. Although I like Glenn, I can't quite figure out how he got there. I remember watching one of his shows where as he was speaking, a moving bar came across the base of the screen stating that what he was saying was NOT the opinion of CNN Headline News.
I can't remember who wrote it, but I was reading an article where the author stated the media has always been left leaning; biased. They just never talked about it or said so during the days they basically went unchallenged. Seen any old Walter Cronkite newscasts lately?
Yeah, trust. Rush is straight up. I love his sense of humor. The left really picks on Fox News, which is one network against, well, all the others. Of course they are going to have more concentration of viewers. It's the only place on the boob tube you can go to in order to get a non left view. That ain't rocket science.
軒軒成人影城軒軒成人影城軒軒成人影城軒軒成人影城軒軒成人影城影音視訊聊天室影音視訊聊天室影音視訊聊天室影音視訊聊天室影音視訊聊天室影音視訊聊天室影音視訊聊天室影音視訊聊天室影音視訊聊天室影音視訊聊天室環球av成人影城環球av成人影城環球av成人影城環球av成人影城環球av成人影城環球av成人影城環球av成人影城環球av成人影城環球av成人影城環球av成人影城壞朋友論壇fliendo壞朋友論壇fliendo壞朋友論壇fliendo壞朋友論壇fliendo壞朋友論壇fliendo壞朋友論壇fliendo壞朋友論壇fliendo壞朋友論壇fliendo壞朋友論壇fliendo壞朋友論壇fliendo黑色豪門企業娛樂綜合論壇黑色豪門企業娛樂綜合論壇黑色豪門企業娛樂綜合論壇黑色豪門企業娛樂綜合論壇黑色豪門企業娛樂綜合論壇黑色豪門企業娛樂綜合論壇黑色豪門企業娛樂綜合論壇黑色豪門企業娛樂綜合論壇黑色豪門企業娛樂綜合論壇黑色豪門企業娛樂綜合論壇免費成人影片免費成人影片免費成人影片免費成人影片免費成人影片免費成人影片免費成人影片免費成人影片免費成人影片免費成人影片AV78情色貼圖AV78情色貼圖AV78情色貼圖AV78情色貼圖AV78情色貼圖AV78情色貼圖AV78情色貼圖AV78情色貼圖AV78情色貼圖AV78情色貼圖波波線上小遊戲網波波線上小遊戲網波波線上小遊戲網波波線上小遊戲網波波線上小遊戲網波波線上小遊戲網波波線上小遊戲網波波線上小遊戲網波波線上小遊戲網波波線上小遊戲網好玩遊戲區好玩遊戲區好玩遊戲區好玩遊戲區好玩遊戲區好玩遊戲區好玩遊戲區好玩遊戲區好玩遊戲區好玩遊戲區百分百無碼A片網百分百無碼A片網百分百無碼A片網aa片免費看微風論壇080哈啦聊天室6k聊天室成人聊天室上班族捷克論壇大眾論壇plus論壇080視訊聊天室520視訊聊天室尋夢園上班族聊天室成人聊天室上班族 a片a片影片免費情色影片免費a片觀看小弟第貼影片區免費av影片免費h影片試看 H漫 - 卡通美女短片小魔女貼影片免費影片觀賞無碼a片網美女pc交友相簿美女交友-哈啦聊天室中文a片線上試看免費電影下載區免費試看a短片免費卡通aa片觀看女優影片無碼直播免費性感a片試看日本AV女優影音娛樂網日本av女優無碼dvd辣妹視訊 - 免費聊天室美女交友視訊聊天室080免費視訊聊天室尋夢園聊天室080苗栗人聊天室a片下載日本免費視訊美女免費視訊聊天
A片-無碼援交東京熱一本道aaa免費看影片免費視訊聊天室微風成人ut聊天室av1688影音視訊天堂85cc免費影城亞洲禁果影城微風成人av論壇sex520免費影片JP成人網免費成人視訊aaa影片下載城免費a片 ut交友成人視訊85cc成人影城免費Ａ片aa的滿18歲影片小魔女免費影片小魔女免費影城免費看 aa的滿18歲影片sex383線上娛樂場kk777視訊俱樂部aa的滿18歲影片85cc免費影片a片免費看A片-sex520視訊做愛聊天室plus論壇sex520免費影片avdvd-情色網qq美美色網ut13077視訊聊天85cc免費影片aaa片免費看短片aa影片下載城aaaaa片俱樂部影片aaaaa片俱樂部aa的滿18歲影片小魔女免費影片台灣論壇免費影片後宮0204movie免費影片免費卡通影片線上觀看線上免費a片觀看85cc免費影片免費Ａ片aa影片下載城ut聊天室辣妹視訊UT影音視訊聊天室 日本免費視訊aaaa 片俱樂部aaa片免費看短片aaaa片免費看影片aaa片免費看短片免費視訊78論壇情色偷拍免費Ａ片免費aaaaa片俱樂部影片av俱樂部aaaa彩虹頻道免費影片 杜蕾斯成人免費卡通影片線上觀看85cc免費影片線上觀賞免費線上歐美A片觀看免費a片卡通aaa的滿18歲卡通影片sex520免費影片免費 a 片
ドルチェ&ガッバーナDOLCE & GABBANAドルチェ&ガッバーナ バッグドルチェ&ガッバーナ 財布ドルチェ&ガッバーナ ネックレスドルチェ&ガッバーナ サングラスドルチェ&ガッバーナ リングドルチェ&ガッバーナ 香水ドルチェ&ガッバーナ シューズドルチェ&ガッバーナ アウタードルチェ&ガッバーナ インナードルチェ&ガッバーナ シャツドルチェ&ガッバーナ ジーンズドルチェ&ガッバーナ 時計ドルチェ&ガッバーナ Tシャツグッチgucciグッチ バッググッチ 財布グッチ ネックレスグッチ サングラスグッチ リンググッチ 香水グッチ シューズグッチ アウターグッチ シャツグッチ ジーンズグッチ 時計グッチ Tシャツグッチ アウターグッチ インナーディオールChristian Diorディオール バッグディオール 財布ディオール ネックレスディオール サングラスディオール リングディオール 香水ディオール シューズディオール アウターディオール シャツディオール ジーンズディオール Tシャツディオール 時計ディオール インナーヴィトンLOUIS VUITTONヴィトン バッグヴィトン 財布ヴィトン ネックレスヴィトン サングラスヴィトン リングヴィトン シューズヴィトン アウターヴィトン シャツヴィトン ジーンズヴィトン Tシャツヴィトン 時計シャネルCHANELシャネル バッグシャネル 財布シャネル ネックレスシャネル サングラスシャネル リングシャネル 香水シャネル シューズシャネル アウターシャネル シャツシャネル ジーンズシャネル Tシャツシャネル 時計シャネル インナープラダpradaプラダ バッグプラダ 財布プラダ ネックレスプラダ サングラスプラダ リングプラダ 香水プラダ シューズプラダ アウタープラダ シャツプラダ ジーンズプラダ Tシャツプラダ 時計フェラガモSALVATORE FERRAGAMOフェラガモ バッグフェラガモ 財布フェラガモ ネックレスフェラガモ サングラスフェラガモ リングフェラガモ 香水フェラガモ シューズフェラガモ アウターフェラガモ シャツフェラガモ ジーンズフェラガモ Tシャツフェラガモ 時計セリーヌCELINEセリーヌ バッグセリーヌ 財布セリーヌ ネックレスセリーヌ サングラスセリーヌ リングセリーヌ 香水セリーヌ シューズセリーヌ アウターセリーヌ シャツセリーヌ ジーンズセリーヌ TシャツボッテガBOTTEGA VENETAボッテガ バッグボッテガ 財布ボッテガ ネックレスボッテガ サングラスボッテガ リングボッテガ 香水ボッテガ シューズボッテガ アウターボッテガ シャツボッテガ ジーンズボッテガ TシャツコーチCOACHコーチ バッグコーチ 財布コーチ ネックレスコーチ サングラスコーチ リングコーチ 香水コーチ シューズコーチ アウターコーチ シャツコーチ ジーンズコーチ Tシャツコーチ 時計ダンヒルdunhillダンヒル バッグダンヒル 財布ダンヒル カフスボタンダンヒル サングラスダンヒル リングダンヒル 香水ダンヒル シューズダンヒル アウターダンヒル シャツダンヒル ジーンズダンヒル Tシャツダンヒル 時計ロエベLOEWEロエベ バッグロエベ 財布ロエベ ネックレスロエベ サングラスロエベ キーホルダーロエベ 香水ロエベ シューズロエベ アウターロエベ シャツロエベ ジーンズロエベ TシャツディーゼルDIESELディーゼル バッグディーゼル 財布ディーゼル ネックレスディーゼル サングラスディーゼル リングディーゼル 香水ディーゼル シューズディーゼル アウターディーゼル シャツディーゼル ジーンズディーゼル Tシャツディーゼル 時計ディーゼル インナーデリヘル 大阪仙台 デリヘル仙台 風俗仙台 デリヘル仙台 風俗仙台 デリヘル仙台 風俗家族葬滋賀 賃貸葬儀 費用滋賀県の賃貸滋賀の賃貸アダルト SEO被リンク相互リンク茶道具 買取絵画 買取レザー革小物クレジットカード 現金化現金化ショッピング枠 現金化クレジットカード 現金化現金化ショッピング枠 現金化FXFX 比較FX 初心者脱毛 大阪埋没 大阪わきが 大阪オーロラ 大阪クリニックエスニックタウンサーチ探偵 大阪浮気調査 大阪素行調査 大阪別れさせ 大阪吹田 美容室エステ 尼崎キャッシング大阪 賃貸中古車 販売ルームウェア大阪 マンション賃貸マンション 神戸中古 ゴルフクラブクールビズフィットネスクラブ大阪府 司法書士クレジット 申し込みベビードール矯正歯科 東京ホワイトニング 東京大阪 ラブホテルリサイクルショップ不動産カードローン投資 信託下着即日 キャッシング三井住友銀行神戸市 中央区 税理士FX消費者金融ローン引越し生命保険ジェルネイル人材派遣ネット証券アフィリエイト格安航空券ウィークリーマンションレンタカーSEOオフィス家具合宿免許ペット用品高速バスデリヘルキャバクラ派遣コラーゲン化粧品インテリアウェディング結婚相談投資物件留学貸事務所 大阪経営コンサルティング工芸品高級品自動車保険ホテヘルレストランウェディングバイク買取運転免許ベビーカー外反母趾圧力鍋腕時計フェラガモデリヘルキャバクラセレブプラセンタカルシウム青汁ブルーベリー家具脱毛クリーム除毛クリームコスト削減 大阪弁護士 大阪車買取 大阪バイク買取 大阪エステ 大阪リフォーム 大阪
大阪 歯科派遣 大阪アルバイト 大阪転職 大阪大阪 住宅大阪 専門学校グルメ 大阪ホテル 大阪一戸建て 大阪大阪 宿泊大阪 マンションデリヘル 大阪印刷 大阪不動産 大阪賃貸 大阪ブライダル 大阪リサイクルアダルト SEO賃貸SEO 大阪イベント コンパニオン 大阪転職 大阪大阪 ラブホペット ショップ 大阪豆腐京都 不動産運転免許 合宿ヘアアイロンダイエットダイエットデリヘルキャバクラシャンパン老人ホーム精力剤大阪 ラブホテルブランド品 買取ワイン京都 不動産ペットリサイクルショップ歯科求人結婚式場バイク便動物病院美容整形外科エルメスダイエットダイエット食品腕時計ヘアアイロンクレイツアイビルa
アドストバッグネイルアクセンツヘアアイロンクレイツシャンプーアイビルジェルネイル育毛剤ドライヤーアゲハ嬢ダイエットサプリリサイクルショップ 大阪リサイクルショップ 東京リサイクルショップ 名古屋fx 口座開設fx 資料請求FX 比較大阪 不動産不動産 投資不動産 比較投資 信託 大阪投資 信託 初心者下着 女性下着 男性下着 ブログ消費者金融 審査消費者金融 ランキング消費者金融 大阪ローン 比較ローン 自動車ローン 金利引っ越し 比較引っ越し 口コミ引っ越し 挨拶保険 資料請求保険 比較保険 ランキングジェルネイル やり方ジェルネイル デザインジェルネイル 激安人材派遣 関西人材派遣 仕組みネット証券 選び方ネット証券 初心者ネット証券 手数料アフィリエイト 初心者アフィリエイト 稼ぐアフィリエイト 比較国内格安航空券格安航空券 海外格安航空券 沖縄ウィークリーマンション 東京ウィークリーマンション 大阪ウィークリーマンション 福岡レンタカー 格安レンタカー 沖縄レンタカー 東京オフィス家具 中古オフィス家具 激安オフィス家具 買取合宿免許 激安合宿免許 沖縄合宿免許 大型ペット用品 激安ペット用品 犬ペット用品 通販高速バス 時刻表高速バス 名古屋高速バス 大阪デリヘル 仙台デリヘル 大阪デリヘル 東京キャバクラ 求人キャバクラ 東京キャバクラ 大阪圧力鍋 歴史圧力鍋 構造圧力鍋 ランキングフェラガモ バッグフェラガモ 靴フェラガモ 財布セレブ 海外セレブ ファションセレブ ゴシップ青汁 ランキング青汁 効果青汁 口コミブルーベリー 栽培ブルーベリー 利用ブルーベリー 生産家具 イケア家具 ニトリ家具 イームズ脱毛クリーム 永久脱毛クリーム 男性脱毛クリーム 比較除毛クリーム ランキング除毛クリーム 男性除毛クリーム トラブル弁護士 大阪 制度弁護士 大阪 費用弁護士 大阪 トラブル車買取 大阪 相場車買取 大阪 査定車買取 大阪 比較エステ 大阪 フェイシャルエステ 大阪 求人エステ 大阪 メンズリフォーム 大阪 キッチンリフォーム 大阪 マンションリフォーム 大阪 外壁大阪 歯医者 ランキング大阪 歯医者 料金大阪 歯医者 矯正派遣 大阪 求人派遣 大阪 短期派遣 大阪 ランキングアルバイト 大阪 検索アルバイト 大阪 短期アルバイト 大阪 口コミ転職 大阪 求人転職 大阪 ランキング転職 大阪 女性大阪 住宅 検索大阪 住宅 ローン大阪 住宅 中古専門学校 大阪 美容専門学校 大阪 看護専門学校 大阪 調理大阪 グルメ カフェ大阪 グルメ お好み焼き大阪 グルメ たこ焼きホテル 大阪 シティホテルホテル 大阪 ビジネスホテルホテル 大阪 モーテル大阪 一戸建て 検索大阪 一戸建て 口コミ大阪 一戸建て ランキング大阪 宿泊 格安大阪 宿泊 高級大阪 宿泊 口コミ大阪 マンション 新築大阪 マンション 中古大阪 マンション 賃貸大阪 デリヘル 人妻大阪 デリヘル ＯＬ大阪 デリヘル 3Ｐ印刷 大阪 チラシ印刷 大阪 名刺印刷 大阪 格安大阪 不動産 検索大阪 不動産 分譲大阪 不動産 比較大阪 賃貸 学生大阪 賃貸 格安大阪 賃貸 マンションブライダル 大阪 ホテルブライダル 大阪 ヘアブライダル 大阪 プランナーリサイクルショップ 東京リサイクルショップ 大阪リサイクルショップ 比較アダルト ＳＥＯ 方法アダルト ＳＥＯ 大阪アダルト ＳＥＯ 口コミ賃貸 検索賃貸 大阪賃貸 学生
視訊做愛視訊美女無碼A片情色影劇kyo成人動漫tt1069同志交友網ut同志交友網微風成人論壇6k聊天室日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞UT視訊美女交友..........................
聊天室ilover99聊天室13060免費聊天室13060免費ut13077視訊聊天聊天室13060免費聊天室13060免費聊天室13060免費聊天室入口聊天室入口聊天室入口聊天室入口聊天室入口聊天室交友pixnet聊天室交友pixnet激情網愛聊天室交友pixnet聊天室交友pixnet聊天室交友pixnet聊天室080聊天室080
Post a Comment
<< Home