John Hawkins at Right Wing News posts on Blogging While Female-Part 2.
posted by Helen at 9:08 PM
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Contributors
Previous Posts
- Do Bloggers Ever Take a Break?
- Women who kill get light sentences in Tennessee. R...
- Ask Dr. Helen: Are Hybrid Owners All That?
- Where's my refund?
- The Jewish/Israeli Carnival is up--go take a look.
- Is There Really Such a Thing As "Positive Discrimi...
- Picking Locks and Minds
- Are Women Always More Empathetic?
- Are You a Generation Xer?
- Neo's mom takes a walk.
14 Comments:
It seems the same happens on your blog as well, Dr. Helen. The most unpleasant people are almost without fail, of liberal persuasion. Yelling, insulting, acting out. What's that all about?
It begs to be returned in kind, and sometimes I bite.
The biggest thing I do not understand is why they do what they do. As one who is not of that line of thinking, why venture to those types of blogs, and enter to flame the whole place? It does not occur to me to do so. I just have no interest so don't go at all.
The one left of center exception [for me] is Tammy Bruce. Her beliefs and mine often part ways early. However, she does possess common sense (like she says) and is fair minded. She is almost always a good read, and I try to catch her on the radio when I can. And if anyone has seen it from "both sides", it's her.
Michelle Malkin, however, is my favorite in the purely political arena. She does a great job filling in for O'Reilly. Better than he is by a long shot, in my opinion.
But if we are talking about the Blue Ribbon, well that belongs to this blog.
"What's that all about?"
People with a secure attachment history can think while they are upset. Their orbitalfrontal cortex mediates their amygdaala, allowing them to reason.
People with an insecure attachement history have a markedly less developed orbitalfrontal cortex, so they have no brakes for their amygdala. The amygdala is where rage and panic come from.
So with no effective brakes, these poor folks go into a neural hijacking where their fear and rage overwhelm their reason. They literally cannot think when upset.
It is sad. But it is dangerous when people try to act out their abandonment fears on the government by turning the feds into all powerful, all protective mother. The feds are not up to the challenge and those of us with secure attachments who can and prefer to take care of ourselves end up with the intrusive "nanny" state.
I leave it to you to draw conclusions concerning party affiliations and hot button political issues that are poisoned by these poorly integrated limbic/frontal lobe systems.
Trey
Very interesting. I like Mary Katharine Ham. I remember her being on Hugh Hewitt's blog before he joined Townhall. There was a pop that she really liked and was hard to find, I think vanilla coke.
Helen,
Is he going to interview you in a future edition?
As far as mean commentators goes, I used to hang out at the Straight Dope Message Boards: boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/ They are overwhelmingly liberal and pro-gay marriage and I was frequently angry why visiting. Another one I used to visit was: FWIS (it kind of broke off from Bad Astronomy): http://www.loresinger.com/FWIS/index.php There was a mixture of views there, including some really friendly conservative atheists. There seemed to be a strong libertarian tendency. However there was one woman that really ticked me off. She claimed to be a libertarian, but seemed to hate conservatives. I've been reading this blog for probably about 2 years and most of the time I really enjoy being here.
Yeah, I know what you mean, Trey.
Sometimes in extended discussions with liberal types, I blow my hemoflobulator valve and it takes two dreamsicles and a Brisk Lemon Iced tea to calm back down.
BWB, brilliant women blogging.
Or beautiful women blogging, for the non politically correct.
This comment has been removed by the author.
@br549: "The most unpleasant people are almost without fail, of liberal persuasion. Yelling, insulting, acting out."
______________
Burt Prelutsky published a 12-step program to recover from liberalism. I like his Step No. 1: "It is high time that every American be guaranteed the right to speak freely. It is not reserved solely for left-wing college students who wish to take advantage of the First Amendment to shout down conservatives. At the same time, they must not construe the conservative's right to dismiss them as arrogant idiots as censorship."
I lost most of the respect I had for Michelle Malkin when she avoided dealing with Vox Day's rebuttals of the points in her book on the Japanese internment, and then tried to pass it off as some sort of "I had already addressed his points, moving on..." She is actually not nearly as good or intellectually honest as her supporters think she is, which is why I find it ironic that she is idolized by so many.
They alluded to the point that liberal women are some of the prime culprits for the abuse, but let's face it. Female liberal bloggers are some of the nastiest women you'll ever see online. They only get a free pass from other liberals because they are liberals. No other group would associate with writers as vitriolic and in-your-face as some of the writers at blogs like Feministe, Pandagon and Feministing.
As mentioned in Hawkins' interview, there probably are just not as many women blogging as men. Is that a bad thing, though? Just because you can express yourself on a blog doesn't mean you should.
This is the link to the article Trust mentioned:
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/BurtPrelutsky/2008/03/07/a_12_step_program_for_recovering_liberals?page=full&comments=true
Well, Trey, if you're reading, you've got my gears turning (again).
I am now wondering if those who want a nanny state, most being left wing, most being liberal - as those are the one's who want a nanny state - were "latch key kids" growing up. Even at my age, many children I knew in school had both parents working, and were told to go home from school, go into the house and lock the doors and stay there 'til mommy or daddy got home. Don't let anyone in, don't go out to play, don't answer the phone. And if the parents were divorced and mommy was working, it was even worse.
Before school and after school programs that are really baby sitting by gov't began in those days as well. In the suburban neighborhood I grew up in divorce was not a common thing. If it did occur (I'm sure it did) the family moved, as the house needed to be sold. Plus only a few of the mothers worked. Most, like my own, never worked. I went to a neighborhood school in elementary years, and so was only exposed to my own settled neighborhood. Going to middle and high school later on is where the "mix" started showing up. More mixtures of various backgrounds and family lives. More bullies and "loose girls", if you will. Regardless of race or ethnic background, the bullies and "loosies" came from broken homes and poorer neighborhoods.
Perhaps this is old news to most people. Or perhaps I've led a sheltered life.
A片-無碼援交東京熱一本道aaa免費看影片免費視訊聊天室微風成人ut聊天室av1688影音視訊天堂85cc免費影城亞洲禁果影城微風成人av論壇sex520免費影片JP成人網免費成人視訊aaa影片下載城免費a片 ut交友成人視訊85cc成人影城免費Ａ片aa的滿18歲影片小魔女免費影片小魔女免費影城免費看 aa的滿18歲影片sex383線上娛樂場kk777視訊俱樂部aa的滿18歲影片85cc免費影片a片免費看A片-sex520視訊做愛聊天室plus論壇sex520免費影片avdvd-情色網qq美美色網ut13077視訊聊天85cc免費影片aaa片免費看短片aa影片下載城aaaaa片俱樂部影片aaaaa片俱樂部aa的滿18歲影片小魔女免費影片台灣論壇免費影片後宮0204movie免費影片免費卡通影片線上觀看線上免費a片觀看85cc免費影片免費Ａ片aa影片下載城ut聊天室辣妹視訊UT影音視訊聊天室 日本免費視訊aaaa 片俱樂部aaa片免費看短片aaaa片免費看影片aaa片免費看短片免費視訊78論壇情色偷拍免費Ａ片免費aaaaa片俱樂部影片av俱樂部aaaa彩虹頻道免費影片 杜蕾斯成人免費卡通影片線上觀看85cc免費影片線上觀賞免費線上歐美A片觀看免費a片卡通aaa的滿18歲卡通影片sex520免費影片免費 a 片
視訊做愛視訊美女無碼A片情色影劇kyo成人動漫tt1069同志交友網ut同志交友網微風成人論壇6k聊天室日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞UT視訊美女交友..........................
聊天室ilover99聊天室13060免費聊天室13060免費ut13077視訊聊天聊天室13060免費聊天室13060免費聊天室13060免費聊天室入口聊天室入口聊天室入口聊天室入口聊天室入口聊天室交友pixnet聊天室交友pixnet激情網愛聊天室交友pixnet聊天室交友pixnet聊天室交友pixnet聊天室080聊天室080
Post a Comment
<< Home