Monday, November 26, 2007

Should Spouses Who Kill their Children be Awarded Alimony?

This court case of a mother who killed her 14-year-old son is troubling (Hat Tip: reader_iam):


Linda Calbi was originally charged with murder, but the charges were later downgraded to aggravated assault, based on expert reports that medical error contributed significantly to the boy's death. She was sentenced last year to three years in prison and won't be eligible for parole until November 2008.

The Calbis were divorced in 2001 after 15 years of marriage. A few months after Matt's death, Chris Calbi fell behind his alimony payments and filed papers in court seeking a reduction or termination of his payment obligations.

"She took the life of her oldest son, scarred her younger son for the rest of his life, and tore the fabric of my soul from me," Chris Calbi wrote in papers filed in Superior Court in Hackensack. "To reward this evil and violent woman by allowing her ... to derive a financial benefit from the family she destroyed ... can only be described as a perversion of our justice system."

A judge ordered him to continue making payments, then later interrupted alimony for the period that Linda Calbi is incarcerated.

But Chris Calbi's arrears had risen to more $40,000 by then, and the judge ordered him to pay $400 a month to his ex-wife's prison account.


I would have to agree with the father's analysis; to be forced to pay this killer (the beating she gave her son caused internal injuries) alimony is truly a perversion of our justice system. No one who kills their child should be rewarded with monetary support from a spouse. More and more, it seems our society rewards horrible acts with money, prestige and sympathy. There has to be a line drawn somewhere. The law should be changed.

115 Comments:

Blogger Paul said...

Is that even a serious question?

Absolute madness!

The Judge should be the one going to jail.

9:35 AM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger dadvocate said...

I was going to post on this but my son kept me busy. I wonder if a wrongful death lawsuit would work here. Sue her for an amount greater than the alimony.

Not only is her continuing to get alimony outrageous, but she only got 3 years in prison for beating her son to death. That's doubly outrageous! People frequently get more time for crimes where no one dies or is even injured.

9:52 AM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Danny said...

This just proves thatthere are a lot of idiots on the Bench all over the country. And a lot of people drunkof the power their Judgeship gives then over the average citizen.

10:02 AM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Danny said...

This just proves thatthere are a lot of idiots on the Bench all over the country. And a lot of people drunkof the power their Judgeship gives then over the average citizen.

10:02 AM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Choey said...

Maybe when she gets out he can sue her for child support for the remaining son.

10:05 AM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Shannon Love said...

We shouldn't be so quick to blame the judge.

We should first ask if the law itself allows the judge to terminate alimony based on the bad acts of the party receiving the alimony. I am willing to bet it does not. The judge may have had no choice based on law in making the ruling he did.

We should be careful in advocating just such a restriction. Extreme cases make for bad law. It's easy to say that the bad act of murder should be grounds for lose of alimony but given the perverse nature of the legal system, the definition of "bad act" will be defined down to the point that getting a speeding ticket will trigger a lawsuit to terminate alimony.

I think a wrongful death suit is exactly the proper response in this circumstance. It will resolve the injustice without endangering the broader legal system.

10:13 AM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Labamigo said...

I am not going to condone or excuse what she did. It was terrible and IMO she got of light . . . but then women always do. They are seldom held responsible for their actions in the manner that men are.

But I note that he was $40,000 behind in alimony payments at the time. I have no knowledge of this woman's mental or financial condition, but I wonder if things would have turned out differently if her ex had not been a deadbeat.

10:14 AM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger dadvocate said...

labamigo - read the article more closely.

The Calbis were divorced in 2001 after 15 years of marriage. A few months after Matt's death, Chris Calbi fell behind his alimony payments and filed papers in court seeking a reduction or termination of his payment obligations.

But, of course, a woman kills and we always want to find a way to blame the innocent man, don't we? A la Andrea Yates.

10:19 AM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Jeff said...

1. Alimony should be abolished altogether. It's mere child support for adults. At best, it should b e a temporary measure until the receiving spouse gets job training.

2. Shannon Love is wrong. Alimony SHOULD be based on good conduct. In particular, it should be contingent on a good faith effort to become financially independent. Murder is prima facia evidence of a failure in kind.

10:20 AM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger RebeccaH said...

The real tragedy is, after she leaves prison, they'll probably give her custody of her younger son again.

10:21 AM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger jamesg1103 said...

The world's finest legal system strikes again.

10:37 AM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Heather said...

As a stay at home mom I'm going to disagree with the, "Alimony should be contingent on a good faith effort to become financially independent." I gave up a career to take care of my kids. If my husband did divorce me then I do feel I would deserve alimony for part of the lost years of my career.

Now, to the woman who killed her kid, jail should be reason enough suspend alimony after all the state is taking care of her now. Why should he?

10:39 AM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger sharinlite said...

Welcome to the "road to hell paved with, not gold, but the "good" intentions of tinfoil hatted leftist loons" in the past forty years. Their philosophy has caused so much havoc with our way of life that I don't recognize much of it anymore. Not that we had a perfect system, far from it, but to tear something down brutally without thought to what comes after is sinful.

10:48 AM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger MikeT said...

We should be careful in advocating just such a restriction. Extreme cases make for bad law. It's easy to say that the bad act of murder should be grounds for lose of alimony but given the perverse nature of the legal system, the definition of "bad act" will be defined down to the point that getting a speeding ticket will trigger a lawsuit to terminate alimony.

Take it away for any felony a woman commits. We do that all the time for the right to keep and bear arms for felons. It is absurd for you to even bring up the possibility of it being taken away over a speeding ticket, unless of course we are talking about one for felony wreckless driving.

11:27 AM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger tomcal said...

No.

11:29 AM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Dave said...

A rather bold example of why those who say that men shouldn't get married because they get nothing from it but the potential for eternal legal misery have, unfortunately, a good point. The whole notion of alimony should go by the wayside. If we live in a society where men and women are equal, the notion that one spouse enjoys enormous legal protections and is entitled to part of the other's income and possessions while the other deserves little more than scorn is completely contrary to that equality.

11:30 AM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Sarah said...

I'm pretty sure whichever person earns less in a marriage is the one who gets alimony. If men and women are equal, this makes perfect sense, and simply monetizes work which one party received from the other.

I'm also with the folks who argue that he should sue for wrongful death. The alimony and child support for the younger son can be part of the damages, you can use your "bad act should invalidate alimony" arguments to your heart's content, and it would even go some way towards ameliorating the frustration of the mother receiving a short sentence.

11:44 AM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger chris said...

I agree with Heather. Marriage often requires significant compromises that affect the earning potential of one spouse. Kids are the most obvious. (My wife earned more than me before she decided on a career change to stay-at-home-mom. Now she's looking to get back to work, and won't make half of what I make, for many years, at least.)

But I have friends who've made other compromises: relocating for the benefit of the husband's career to the detriment of the wife's career, wife takes a no-risk, no-growth job so the husband can take big risks (which didn't pan out, so in a divorce, he'd probably be collecting alimony!), etc.

These compromises within the marriage are made on the assumption that spouses are pooling current and future resources. You can't dissolve the marriage contract without accounting for things like this.

Just because there's a murderer or airhead trophy ex-wife collecting alimony doesn't invalidate the concept of alimony.

12:01 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger BobH said...

To Heather:

Let me introduce you to an engineer what I used to work with. He is married to a woman who graduated from one of the best law schools in the country (University of Michigan). Without going into details, her career trajectory since graduation has been toward positions of less effort, less responsibility and lower compensation until now she is a stay-at-home mother to two children and a third on the way.

The irony of this is that her lifetime earning potential far exceeds his but she wants to be a "stay-at-home mom". Furthermore, he would love to be a househusband but knows that if he pushes the issue too far, she will, at best, become obnoxious and, at worst, divorce him. In other words, he's trapped, at the mercy of yet another female leech.

In other words Heather, in "giving up my career" to care for "my" (not "our") kids, I suspect that you didn't give up a thing. You were just fortunate enough to find a fool that you can exploit.

12:05 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Jeff said...

Heather wrote (and also in reply to Chris), “As a stay at home mom I'm going to disagree with the, "Alimony should be contingent on a good faith effort to become financially independent." I gave up a career to take care of my kids. If my husband did divorce me then I do feel I would deserve alimony for part of the lost years of my career.”

Heather, you don’t deserve it. Here’s why.

When you decided to give up your career, you moved from a state of less utility to a state of more utility. Otherwise, you wouldn’t have done it. This is basic economics. Utility is not necessarily monetary.

Heather, you have already been compensated for your CHOICE (not a “loss”) to give up a career. You preferred a close relationship with your children over a career: you got it. You have been compensated.

Moreover, if you deserve to be compensated for giving up a career, then your ex-husband deserves to be compensated for his loss of deep family relationships. Are you paying him for his loss? No?

Maybe he, like you, moved to a state of higher utility.

12:12 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Spartee said...

"Extreme cases make for bad law. ... [G]iven the perverse nature of the legal system, the definition of 'bad act' will be defined down to the point that getting a speeding ticket will trigger a lawsuit to terminate alimony.

I think a wrongful death suit is exactly the proper response in this circumstance. It will resolve the injustice without endangering the broader legal system."

Pshaw. How about using good old fashioned reasonable judgement? As in, parents who beat their children to death do not get alimony, child support, etc.? I think society can safely stand on *that* slope without slippage. Heck, we can even move down to felony-level child abuse and feel fairly firm ground beneath us.

Also, regarding your second point, the idea that an outrageous result should be redressed by more litigation to "balance the accounts" makes the veins pop out. How about simply dealing with the case at hand, rather than expecting litigants to play the law exam game of "name the all possible actions"? Adjudicate the matter at hand and deliver justice to the extent the law allows, do not duck the hard call and simply hope the litigant has enough money and time to pursue other, less pertinent rememdies to balance the botched decision.

That said, it easily could be that the law is so poorly written the judge had no choice. In that case, shame on the legislators.

12:15 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Ken said...

From the article:

"The panel suspended Chris Calbi's payments until a hearing is held in Hackensack to make that determination. The panel also vacated the father's arrears after Matt's death."

At least the panel who considered the argument had the good sense to say that the arrears after the death of his son were vacated.

Can you imagine anything as obscene as forcing this man to pay for the legal defense of the woman who beat his son to death?

And to respond to Labamigo - it's important, I think, to note that he didn't fall into arrears until AFTER - repeat AFTER - this woman had murdered his son. No information in Dr. Helen's article, or the one from the paper suggest that he had failed to make those payments previously. He was no deadbeat , and your characterization of him as such was I think a bit hasty.

12:20 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger chris said...

bobh, Caveat emptor! Sounds like your former co-worker bought a lemon and now the warranty has expired.

jeff, staying home isn't as simple as that. The trade-off isn't just "time with the kids" vs career. It's a huge bundle of goods exchanged on both sides, and one crucial component is the promise of financial support from one side, and the promise of quality child care (and so much more!) from the other. Every marriage is different, but it's typical that women give up potential money to get family, and men give up real money to get family.

12:55 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Friend of USA said...

To think this is one of the "accomplishments" of feminism...

***shaking head in disbelief***

12:56 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Carthoris said...

The principle in this case is actually consistent. As the Court said, the theoretical concept behind alimony is to equalize the former partners' economic situation without regard to fault or behaviour. Since alimony is in no way conditioned on "good behaviour" it can't be taken away for any kind of moral lapse, or bad behaviour towards the paying party, the children, et cetera.

Where this goes wrong is where the legal system usually goes wrong, in that the principle at play here is in violent contradiction to the principles by which the public actually supports the idea of alimony. It turns out, as we see from the comments above, and as any idiot -- i.e. not a lawyer, who are fonder of their theories than any number of cold facts -- can see, the reasons the public supports alimony are moral, and should be conditioned on good behaviour, both before and after the dissolution.

People generally support alimony only in the sense that it represents "economic damages" suffered by an innocent spouse when the other has somehow violated the marriage covenant. The moral component is essential. That's why people do not support alimony for spouses who behave abominably but happen to make less money than the other spouse. This is, of course, in complete contrast to the law.

Now a good question is: how did the law become so wildly out of step with public mores?

Also, if I were a judge or legislator, I'd be asking myself how we could bring it back in line right quick, inasmuch as very little is as dangerous to an official as a populace realizing the officials have been enforcing something other than what the public wants enforced. Trees are handy and rope is cheap, you see.

12:57 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Dave said...

I'm pretty sure whichever person earns less in a marriage is the one who gets alimony. If men and women are equal, this makes perfect sense, and simply monetizes work which one party received from the other.

Huh? So all those years of not having to pay rent or utilities or for food or anything don't count? This is what's wrong with the whole concept of alimony: it assumes that what the majority wage-earner (and let's be honest: in most cases, that's men) contributes is meaningless, while what the minority wage earner contributed is somehow worth a significant portion of the other's livelihood and possessions. Should the woman be forced to fork over the thousands and thousands of dollars that were spent on her to house her, feed her, clothe her? Maybe when unmarried relationships end, the woman should have to pay back the man for all those dinners out, gifts, free trips, etc.

I'm being ridiculous for a point here: no one would expect women to pay back for all those things, so why are men expected to pay exorbitant sums for alimony? Personally, I look forward to marriage some day, but I can't blame those men who want nothing to do with it for reasons like this.

1:21 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Heather said...

Dave,
If this is how you see marriage why would you want to be married?

Most of the time when alimony is given it is given to a stay-at- home spouse.

Who in theory at least is contributing to the marriage and advancing the spouse in a non-paying way.

1:44 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger TMink said...

I routinely disagree with people who feel entitled to a free ride.

Heather does not strike me as this type of person at all.

Trey

2:16 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Jeff said...

Chris wrote, "The trade-off isn't just "time with the kids" vs career. It's a huge bundle of goods exchanged on both sides, and one crucial component is the promise of financial support from one side, and the promise of quality child care (and so much more!) from the other."

This is non sequitur, Chris.

The issue at dispute isn't what the parties give up, but the duration of responsibilities under the agreement. Heather claims harm from home-making. I pointed out that men can show harm from career-making. One is compensated and one is not.

Long after men stop receiving the benefits of child care and home-making, they still pay alimony to women.

Legal responsibilities to a child end when they come of age. Legal responsibilities to an ex-spouse should end when the marriage ends, and that's at divorce.

Women are not children; they don't need child support.

2:47 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger GenXmom said...

bobh,

You just called all stay at home mom's "Leaches" You probably meant "leeches".
Baby boomers have shown us how NOT to do the family thing. Mothers are not fathers. We are all equal under the law but we are not the same. Mothers will always be able to meet their childrens emotional needs better than fathers will. Fathers mean well but that area is mostly a blind spot for them. To make them care for children full time is equivalent to forcing me to watch football all weekend and then change the oil in my car. Its an unnatural act.
Bobh, I hope you are not a family man. Let me re-phrase that- I know you are not a family man, but I hope you don't have a wife and children.
My value to an employer has a price tag but my value to my children is priceless.

2:52 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger dadvocate said...

genxmom says - Mothers will always be able to meet their childrens emotional needs better than fathers will.

Ummm, I think not.

I know plenty of women who don't meet anyone's emotional needs and don't care about anyone's emotional needs but their own. I also know women who believe they are meeting their children's emotional needs when they are actually making their children emotional cripples.

I'm not saying men are better, but, unlike you, I'm saying they're just as good. Different perhaps, but just as good.

3:51 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Spartee said...

"Mothers will *ALWAYS* be able to meet their childrens emotional needs *BETTER* than fathers will. Fathers mean well but that area is *MOSTLY A BLIND SPOT* for them. To MAKE them care for children full time is equivalent to *FORCING* me to watch football all weekend and then change the oil in my car. Its an *UNNATURAL* act."

Well, well. That is certainly worthy of a response. Not a polite response, but a response...

3:58 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Dave said...

If this is how you see marriage why would you want to be married?

Most of the time when alimony is given it is given to a stay-at- home spouse.

Who in theory at least is contributing to the marriage and advancing the spouse in a non-paying way.

It has nothing to do with how I see marriage. I have plenty of examples of successful (and unsuccessful) marriages around me to know in general what to seek and what to avoid. It has to do with my opinion of alimony and the American justice system as it relates to divorce: like it or not, it is heavily weighted to benefit women. If the situation were reversed and the man had been the primary caretaker of the child, but had killed said child, would there be even an ounce of sympathy for him legally or elsewhere? Absolutely not, and rightfully so. But because it's a woman, she's looked at as though she's some poor victim of circumstances. While certainly not all or even most divorces are the result of such actions, the general notion of "I'm a poor little victim of a big mean man!" is prevalent throughout the system. Don't like the prenup you had to sign? No problem, lawyers are already lining up to find ways to get you out of it and into his wallet. Men have begun having more success on the front of children, but there's still a way to go.

What I really wish is that more men and women both would take the concept of marriage more seriously. Everyone's probably heard the "marriage is the new dating" line by now, with "starter husbands" and the like. There's the old standby, the women over on Craigslist posting up the "I've had my fun" posts, looking not for lasting love in a meaningful relationship, but a business arrangement and a calming for biological clocks grown loud. And there are the guys who go along with it, who want to have their fun and think if they don't jump on the first woman to show a bit of interest, they have no chance beyond that. Marriage has become almost a fashion statement, like having babies has been for a while now. And when--surprise!--things don't work out in such an ill-conceived relationship...then the money demands come. Pay up, ex-hubby! It's all your fault! While I go out with this new guy over here!

Slanted against women somewhat? Yeah, probably, since I'm a guy and have seen far, far too many of my friends burned with identical scenarios, not to mention the ridiculous divorce rates in this country. If people would take their own relationships more seriously, we wouldn't have to worry about divorce law because half of those married wouldn't be keeping the divorce law field in business.

4:27 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger TullimoreDu said...

Wow. Alimony. So many thoughts here. I’m torn between being a reasonable guy (which is what I am, usually) and being an angry men’s rights activist (which is what I am when I’m not being a reasonable guy).


1) Alimony is a very old concept that was created when the labor market for women was nearly non-existent. Times have changed, and now, just about any woman who wants to work can find a job. The idea of “keeping a woman in the manner to which she is accustomed” is ridiculous.
2) Alimony enables divorce. There is a co-dependency in marriage where the wife depends (or used to) on the husband for economic support and the husband relied on the wife for emotional and maternal (for their children) support. The family court systems ascribe zero value to the latter, so the whole deal ends up being one-sided in favor of the ex-wife.
3) Being a reasonable guy, I could support the assignment of alimony in cases where the primary income earner (lately, the number of women in this situation is growing) leaves the lesser, temporarily, to enable the establishment of an economic footing. But by temporary, I mean no more than six months, maybe a year with appeal to the courts, but no more. But if you’re the poor one, and you choose to leave, then you leave on your own terms and receive no “reward” for your divorce.

Genxmom: “We are all equal under the law but we are not the same.
I’m afraid you’re reading the Constitution, again, deary,. The Fourteenth Amendment doesn’t apply to men. The law as currently written and practiced does not treat men and women equally. I won’t event attempt to list the inequities, but most of them weigh against men.

Mothers will always be able to meet their children’s emotional needs better than fathers will.
I will tell you that you are wrong about this and you will disagree. But here’s my experience and observation of others in my community: Dads meet the emotional needs of their children from about puberty on BETTER than mom does. The needs are different and turn outward at the onset of puberty, and they don’t necessarily look huggy-face and kissy-pie. Sometimes they appear harsh, but the value of knowing the limits at the same time as the strength of support has more value than some acknowledge. Dads are typically less malleable than moms, but it doesn’t mean that their support is less nurturing or valuable.

My value to an employer has a price tag but my value to my children is priceless.
As the primary provider in my family, my time has a pricetag, but my ability to provide for my family is priceless. The cost of a temporary ‘companion’ for the night numbers in dollars, but the value of the companionship that my wife provides is priceless. I’d like to think that the value of my companionship to her is the same, but in all too many cases, I know women who have left their husbands because the take-home pay was too low.

Spouses who seek divorce under the assumption that they will receive alimony and use of the familial home are leeches and deserve nothing unless they’re willing to see that whatever intangibles they took away are also replaced in kind.

4:30 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger GenXmom said...

as far as my generalizations about mothers and fathers go, obviously they are generalizations. Of course, you can always find exceptions that prove the rule. If I leave my kids with my husband all day every day, I know they will be alive when I get home. But I can't be sure they didn't eat fritos and watch cartoons ALL DAY LONG!!!!
And only mothers can read their baby's minds to know what they need before they can talk.
No matter how many boomers try to shame me out of speaking the truth, its still the truth.

4:40 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Helen said...

GenXmom,

I am afraid the research proves you wrong; kids, especially boys, who are raised by fathers often end up better off after divorce. Girls without fathers end up more promiscuous and have more problems whereas boys tend to act out more. Fathers, just like mothers are important in their children's lives. You do a disservice to dads everywhere to compare what they do to you watching football; it does not come close.

4:46 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Labamigo said...

To those of you who corrected me, yes you are right. I should not have been in such a hurry.

4:53 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Spartee said...

"And only mothers can read their baby's minds to know what they need before they can talk."

First bigotry, now claims of psychic powers. This is getting interesting.

"No matter how many boomers try to shame me out of speaking the truth, its still the truth."

If you are feeling shame, maybe it isn't the truth. (Born in 1969, ma'am, just to go on record.)

5:14 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger br549 said...

Should spouses who kill their children be awarded alimony?

Not only no, but hell no. Nor should they have the child / children who are survivors.

genxmom... I do not disagree your value to your kids is priceless. But it is not absolute. I am a father of three kids, who I raised my self. I worked full time, went to school plays, and ball games, helmed birthday parties, taught them how to ride bikes, and a million other things. It cost me 5 career quality jobs and my life savings in order to be there for them. I also watched football and changed the oil - cut the grass, painted the house, cleaned the pool, did the laundry, cooking, and cleaning. And I was there crying like a baby on graduation day. Your view of, and lack of value you place on the father shows your head is so far up your ass that it is poking back out of your neck. Many women think they are special, more special than you truly are. My guess is your biggest fear is the realization that if you didn't have a vagina, a man would have absolutely no use for a person who thinks like you.

5:22 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Ivy said...

The judge must be a greenie. The mother should have self-sterilized, the son should not have been born to save the Earth. The mother was rectifying her sin against Gaia by terminating her son's carbon foot print.

5:25 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger TullimoreDu said...

Genxmom, you seem to be quite biased against the value of fatherhood:
"But I can't be sure they didn't eat fritos and watch cartoons ALL DAY LONG!"

If all your husband did for your kids or your father did for you was see to it that they/you were alive when mom returned, then you truly have been slighted.

I see SOOO many fathers coaching their daughters through soccer and basketball and softball, and leading YMCA Indian Guides outings (well, not since the PC crowd forced cancellation of the program) and Cub Scouts and Boy Scouts. And there is such a dearth of female Girl Scout leaders (they frown, if implicitly, on male leaders) that if you want your daughter to be in Brownies, mom MUST volunteer as a leader (at least that's widely true in central NJ), and not all women can.

And frankly, there are worse things to eat than Fritos.

A father who's paying attention, as most do, will bring a whole different spectrum of experiences to his children's lives than a mother will. Where will your daughter learn what respectful treatment from a man means? What other example of how to treat a woman with respect will your son see if not the way your husband treats you?

And yet the family courts end up treating divorce as purely a business transaction because all of those things are intangible. Dismiss your husband from your life and collect his money, but then you abandon all that isn't so measurable.

5:30 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger GenXmom said...

br549,
Until I read your last sentence, I was pretty much agreeing with you. I think your low blow is meant to shut me up. Do you talk that way to everyone who disagrees with your or just people who are far away and anonymous? I'll bet your are a real treat for waitstaff at restaurants. I am going to ignore you and continue on. I am not talking to you so don't bother reading my posts anymore.

My husband does lots of other things that are priceless. He cooks every night, as did my dad. He is a wonderful father but he is not a mother!

You can't deny biology- kids want and prefer mom. Even if mom is messed up, or if mom doesn't attend as many little league games as dad. You want it your way, but nature made it another way. That is where the feminists lost me such a long long time ago.

5:51 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Cham said...

Genxmom says:

You can't deny biology- kids want and prefer mom. Even if mom is messed up, or if mom doesn't attend as many little league games as dad.

I disagree with you on that. Kids will gravitate to the saner calmer parent, be it mom or dad.

5:56 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Heather said...

I agree fathers can be just as good primary caretakers as moms.

As for alimony, I do believe that me staying home material helps my husband’s career as it hurt mine. In the event of a marriage breakup and asset re-allocation to what am I entitled. It is not a matter of, “keeping me in a lifestyle I’ve become accustom to”.

Why are spouses insured for more than funeral expenses if I don’t add value to the marriage?

I tend the think that the person who walks away from a marriage in not entitled to support.

That being said, there are very valid reasons to not grant or resend alimony; new live in relationship, career advancement, illegal activity, etc.

5:57 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger serket said...

but the charges were later downgraded to aggravated assault, based on expert reports that medical error contributed significantly to the boy's death.

I wasn't sure about this statement at first, but does it mean the doctors/paramedics supposedly made a mistake?

6:05 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger br549 said...

As you wish. My point of view, as well as your head, remain in their respective positions.

6:17 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger GenXmom said...

Discuss amongst yourselves:
When people become foster parents, they get trained on how to develop trust with their new foster children. Part of what needs to happen is that the mother of the family has to be built up as the most reliable and loving person on the planet. How dad treats her is a big part of that. She has to be percieved as almost superhuman in order to help these children trust her. There is a syndicated columnist, Jennifer Roback Morse, who writes on this exact issue (she is a foster mother).

I suppose I should address the original topic of Dr. Helen's post- the mother getting alimony. OF course I think she is entitled to nothing, except maybe being pushed off a cliff.

In terms of alimony in general, I would have to say it depends. If a woman saw her role as a traditional one and made sacrifices for her husband that ended up impoverishing her when he left, then alimony is called for. Sacrifices such as giving birth to 12 children and ruining her physical health.

In terms of men getting alimony from women, if he has custody of the children, he is entitled to a portion of her salary.

6:18 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger chris said...

Jeff: "The issue at dispute isn't what the parties give up, but the duration of responsibilities under the agreement."

I was referring the duration or responsibilities when I said that the trade-off includes a promise of financial support. The stay-at-home mom gives up future earning potential for the promise of future financial support. You seem to think that termination of the marriage contract terminates other agreements within the marriage such as this one. I disagree.

Now, I've got reservations about the proper amount and duration of alimony, particularly in cases like this one. But I support the concept of alimony basically as enforcement of a contract.

6:37 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger pockosmum said...

"The idea of “keeping a woman in the manner to which she is accustomed” is ridiculous."

Yes it is...she throws out the man(and most divorces are initiated by women), she should also forfeit the lifestyle that came with him.

6:54 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Virtue said...

Alimony, palimony, child-support, and welfare.

Why should anyone be given something they havent earned.

PS.

If you qualify being a stay at home mom as earning alimony, or childsupport they have a word for that.

its called prostitution.

7:24 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger br549 said...

Hopefully, the surviving younger brother will not be placed with the mother. He wouldn't be sleeping at night, unless he had at least one eye open. And who knows, perhaps if the younger brother is angry enough, she might have to sleep with one drunken eye open also.

Reading the article, there may be a possibility neither parent is what I would call "ideal".

If the boy had fought back with the same ferocity as placed on him, he'd likely be in juvenile hall instead of where he is now. Hard to imagine that being a better place than home.

8:15 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger HeatherRadish said...

advancing the spouse in a non-paying way

Oh yeah.

Maybe I only see it because I've always worked in a cubicle in large companies, but the men who never have to leave early or take time off from their job for car maintenance, taking children to routine checkups, running errands to places only open between 9-5, etc etc etc and never have to stay up late to do the laundry or pack lunches and can spend an hour in the evening reading industry mags instead of making dinner and washing the dishes do far, far better in the workplace than men and women who have those impediments in the way of a 60-hr workweek. The corporate world still revolves around people who have someone else to manage their household. And just try to find a "prosititute" who'll manage your home for remuneration of only "rent, food, and health care."

You really CAN put a monetary value on a spouse who supports a breadwinner.

THAT said, I understand the various state alimony laws don't treat a helpful partner who devoted her life to her family but still got traded in for a younger woman with perky boobs any differently than the "soaps and bonbons" dead weight that y'all seem to have married. I don't know how you write legislation to address that.


...damn shame I'm not sexually attracted to women; I could really use a wife like Heather. :P

9:43 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Michael Lee said...

Most women, like most men, seek advantage dressed up like redress.

While a woman is married, she claims her unpaid economic contributions to the marriage are "priceless." As soon as she has a lawyer, the price becomes all the law will allow. The hypocritical tension between female contempt for economic measurement and female avarice is what's really priceless.

You're a stupid woman if you "give up" a career for a husband and family and rely on a judge to wave his magic wand and make it all better when divorce breaks through denial.

Alimony is bad for you. As a divorced woman, you need to struggle for a while to grow up. Alimony prevents the spiritual growth you need to get to the point where you're not a whiny pain in everyone else's bohind.

Few women "give up" a career for family. That's a face-saving rationalization. Work sucks. Women have memorized their Cliff Notes rationalizations for refusing to do any.

Women who can pull it off retire early with a sigh of relief and wasted educations. Then they claim outsized amorphous spiritual contributions to home and hearth. Deep inside they know they're slackers. Saying "I'm priceless" is just Desperate Housewives handwaving to distract from their real lack of productivity. I'm not saying men wouldn't do the same if we could.

As far as that spiritual contribution thing goes, if most moms got reviewed for actual performance, they would get fired and their kids would be better off. (If the shoe doesn't fit, you're not Cinderella and you shouldn't be offended by this. But if you're a mom who doesn't acknowledge that most other moms are incompetent, you're one of them.)

The only games women win are the ones that men let them win. Ladies, you forget this at your dire peril. It's not just golf or basketball but the game of Life. The glass ceiling is blown from your own limitations. Your only path to success in a world run by men who have evolved to run the world is to keep making men want to let you win whenever it suits you. Being bitchy and demanding will only take you so far except with a man you don't want anyway, except as a torment-toy. No wonder you end up bitter.

Bark less, wag more.

11:37 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Mary said...

It's alimony helen.

Not like she's asking him to pay child support for the kid...

:-)

11:46 PM, November 26, 2007  
Blogger Darleen said...

No, this murderer should have to legally forfeit her alimony. And she should be forever stripped of her parental rights to the surviving son.

However, I don't think this is about "woman's rights" as (re possible future custody) about "blood" rights. She's the bio mom so somehow she has "rights".

IMO something this heinous invalidates any bio-tie.

Now about alimony in general... I had to calm down because reading the woman-haters on this thread ("leeches"?) almost cost me my laptop.

Most mature couples make agreements on family structure - will they be two-earner? Have kids? How many? Day care? Home care?

It can be the man or the woman...but whoever stays home full time should receive alimony upon divorce. I'd like to see some sort of "fault" returned so bad behavior is not rewarded .. if it is the SAH then reduced alimony, if its the other then full pop.

I can cite just as many male "leech" stories ... guys whose wives worked long hours while they got their law/medical/phd, all while promising her she'd get to go back to school as soon as he got into the job market...he lands the job and hands her the divorce papers. He has no student loans and she has no degree.

Isn't that special?

and SIX MONTHS of alimony would be 'enough' "rehabilitation"??

Uh. No.

1:46 AM, November 27, 2007  
Blogger Darleen said...

most other moms are incompetent

The only games women win are the ones that men let them win

how thick are those scabs on your knuckles, mikey?

1:51 AM, November 27, 2007  
Blogger JG said...

The Internet is odd because people say things that they normally wouldn't say on a face-to-face basis. Some prevalent ideas pop up from a number of people - and you would never have known that a lot of other people really thought that way without the anonymity of the Internet.

I have always wondered why men want to pay for some housewife. Yes, they stay home because it beats working. On top of it, housewives can turn into petty, greedy, bossy tyrants who spend their time being condescending to people who have less than them, and envious of people who have more than them (more = more things that the husband bought). Oh, and don't forget to watch Oprah.

With regard to the argument that she is helping her husband's career: Well, not always. I have seen friends and co-workers who have a dragon at home. You can't be at your best at work when your stomach is churning from the constant nagging. Aside from that, when I was working horrific hours, I was NEVER FRIGGIN' HOME to mess up my place. There simply wasn't much work to do myself. If the housewife is sitting home all day, maybe most of what she is cleaning is her own mess.

Having said that, though, I don't really care if this guy has to pay alimony or if other men who want housewives have to pay alimony. That's the price of having a sit-at-home princess. These types of men sometimes brag about what they have to pay for the demanding bitch (meaning their housewife), so I guess they can continue to be proud about paying her alimony. They must truly be great, rich men to pay that out, so I say continue to allow them that.

2:23 AM, November 27, 2007  
Blogger JG said...

Whenever anyone says that housewives may be anything other than selfless angels who are the bestest people in the world, and who deserve far more than the man could ever pay in alimony ... the insults and shaming language start popping up (from these innocent houswives, no less).

You are not a real man if you don't support a housewife. You can't get laid and you probably have a small penis. You should never be a family man, well I know you are not a family man, but ...

Must be touching a nerve.

2:26 AM, November 27, 2007  
Blogger jw said...

This is the law of the land in Canada. No amount of bad-behavior on the part of the spouse receiving spousal support can interfere with their right to receive spousal support. There have been several test cases and the law has been upheld.

4:11 AM, November 27, 2007  
Blogger br549 said...

The internal injuries received by the boy that caused his death, seems to me, would have had to have been caused by getting kicked. So I am assuming he was down when receiving these blows. It was not immediate, as if a bullet or blade was used. But it was murder. The woman beat her son to death.

The perp's rights are now forfeit, and hard time is due. A debt to society is to be paid. It only makes sense that the agreement reached in the divorce settlement should also be re-visited.

6:55 AM, November 27, 2007  
Blogger Cham said...

If I may give a few words of advice regarding anyone who wishes to receive alimony. Don't file for a divorce in Maryland because you ain't getting any here. The law in this state regarding alimony is first the spouse has to prove he/she has no marketable skill. Then one might get it for a maximum 2 years, and only while attending an education program that will give one that marketable skill. I have an acquaintance here who had some big pie in the sky ideas about leaving her husband and getting a big monthly check, until I told her to get a lawyer and check things out. She's still with that husband but living in a separate bedroom and fighting like cats and dogs. I feel sorry for the kids.

6:57 AM, November 27, 2007  
Blogger Mary said...

If for whatever reason a woman has not enough education or skills to support herself after a divorce, would you rather have the ex pay in a "you helped make that bed sleep, now sleep in it" or have the costs of supporting the spouse fall to society. Meaning you and me the taxpayer?

Sorry. I'm all for the family law trend that encourages working and independence after divorce (and no alimony is becoming more and more common in the younger generations where women are expected to be educated and work).

But if Joe BigShot wants a divorce to go on and acquire a newer model family, why should taxpayers and not him have to pay for the social costs he's leaving behind in terms of a spouse unable to compete in the marketplace?

Same thing with child support. If you don't get the non-custodial parent to pay it, and we can boo-hoo all we like about the poor men who have to actually pay, why should the rest of society have to bear the costs (financial and social) of raising his children?

I think in defending "mens' rights", Helen misses this. Who actually steps in to pay for getting the job done. If it's the State, well that's financed by intact families like yours and mine, folks. You can see it in the schools now -- all those non-intact families who are now desperate for male "role models" in the classroom because there's none at home, or calling for more vigorous physical activities for those who act out, presumably because they're not getting enough outside of classtime and haven't been taught to distinguish between in-class behaviour and the type of things you're out doing with your family after school hours and weekends.

Sadly for so many from divorced households, I suspect the boys sit in front of the computer or otherwise are tied to the house, and don't get out much outside of classtime. And everybody's kids pay for this in classtime, because there's so much to compensate for that the State is now expected to provide. Your divorces and split families cost us all, fellas. That's why I can't jump on the pity party mentality: You chose her. You made that bed... why should I pay for it, when you were the one sleeping in it?

9:11 AM, November 27, 2007  
Blogger M said...

Gee, I'd be so proud if there was a huge debate about who was going to support me - parents, husband or taxpayers - while I lie on the couch and watch Oprah.

I got tossed out of the house at age 18 and worked through college as a roofer (among other things). Any job you can get. But housewives CAN'T work, because they're housewives.

Housewives rock!

9:41 AM, November 27, 2007  
Blogger Darleen said...

Goodness, more lovely comments about those awful, stupid, bloodsucking "housewives"...

btw: women don't marry the house. do y'll still use "coloreds" to refer to African-Americans?

such shrill bigotry is a sight to behold.

10:01 AM, November 27, 2007  
Blogger Helen said...

I am not sure why a few people here talk as if a housewife cannot get some type of job. Anyone can go out and work at something to bring in enough to live. If one cannot do that because of disability, they can sign up through the state to get disability payments or get private insurance to assure some type of income. Some commenters here are acting like women are incapable of supporting themselves--as if they are kids under 14-- who must accept a childlike allowance from daddy to make it. Sorry, I don't buy it.

10:07 AM, November 27, 2007  
Blogger Mary said...

In most states helen, that's exactly why there's no more alimony entitlements anymore.

But in the cases where you've got an older women in their 60s and 70s finding themselves divorced with no education or job experiences except motherhood to fall back on... I'd sure support alimony for those older types who fell into that traditional model of marriage, rather than the State payin 100% of her survival needs.

11:12 AM, November 27, 2007  
Blogger Mary said...

If one cannot do that because of disability, they can sign up through the state ...


Well, in actuality helen, it takes a lot more than just "signing up". Thank heavens-- Remember, the State here making those disability payments is actually taxpayers like you and me.

11:17 AM, November 27, 2007  
Blogger Heather said...

Helen,

Some commenters here are acting like women are incapable of supporting themselves--as if they are kids under 14-- who must accept a childlike allowance from daddy to make it. Sorry, I don't buy it.


If god forbid my marriage fell apart. I would go back to work, I intend to go back at least part time when the kids are in school. But I was raised by a single mom who worked full-time and I would hate that for my young children.

I do have problems with some of the venom aimed at me for a decision that my husband not only agreed with but encouraged. I’m not a saint, I never watch daytime talk shows. I might spend too much time reading Instapundit.

We discussed child raising before we were married and my husband was adamant that if we had kids one parent would stay home. Before we had kids we talked and agreed that I should stay home. As I said, it’s not a matter of if I can or would work. I agreed not to work outside the home in return he agreed to financially support me while I take care of the kids. We have insurance in case on both of us in case something happens, so one of us can take care of the kids.

Now, if my husband intentionally renegades on the agreement by running off with his, “soul mate.” I would have no problem demanding payment for any my loss of earning potential or asking him to keep to the agreement.

Btw, my husband is a total wonderful person who would never do that. But, I know of a few guys who have. Likewise, I know men who were totally screwed during a divorce because she ran off with her “soul mate.”

11:27 AM, November 27, 2007  
Blogger Michael Lee said...

Darleen, in this case, the more the shoe pinches, the better it fits.

The vast majority of women, and I include you in this generalization, are so enmeshed in and feel so entitled to their special privileges and protections that there's no talking to them about it. It's exactly the same as when men considered their privileges to be so much the natural order of things that any attack on those privileges shocked them so much they couldn't think or respond reasonably.

For a few years now, as I've become increasingly aware of how ridiculously American women behave, I get asked relatively frequently, You don't like women do you? I used to say, No, I like women, it's just this and that....

I've stopped qualifying and now answer honestly, No, as a pampered, privileged class, I don't much like women who act like typical members of that class, and you're acting like that right now.

11:49 AM, November 27, 2007  
Blogger PermagrinGirl said...

Wow. I guess my household is the exception to the rule. My husband is equally effective at meeting the needs (both emotional and developmental) of our son, and right now, I work from home full time, and he stays at home full time to take care of the kiddo. My job is a lot more flexible than his is, so keeping my job, while he quit his was the logical decision.

Once I have another child, we'll switch, and I'll quit work to look after the kids, and he'll be the primary income-earner. I don't fool myself into thinking that my children need mommy with them all the time, they need a parent with them, that's all.

As to alimony, I don't need it. He'd be on the hook for half the cost of supporting our kids, but supporting me?? Sheesh. With regards to the example of a woman with 'no marketable skills' who was suddenly left out in the cold, there's a remarkable amount of similarity between running a household, and managing an office or working as a receptionist - maybe not the highest paying jobs, but certainly a good place to start.

11:54 AM, November 27, 2007  
Blogger Friend of USA said...

Helene said,

Some commenters here are acting like women are incapable of supporting themselves--as if they are kids under 14-- who must accept a childlike allowance from daddy to make it

And that has been the problem with feminism from day one; they claim they are strong and do not need men for anything but they need men to support them financially .

If they want us to take them seriously they should make up their mind;

are they strong independent and equal to men,

or are they weak little things that can not do anything on their own and that men ( and goverment ) must support and protect?

Because decades of feminism have shown us that feminists only care about issues that will get them more money.

More money from their ex husband,
more money from the state...

There is no money in defending Muslim women who get treated worse than cattle so feminists simply stay away from such inconvenient facts.

Feminism is all about money and a little about power, but mostly about money.

Feminists are gold diggers under a different name.

1:12 PM, November 27, 2007  
Blogger Cham said...

I am a feminist, please don't tell for which issues I stand.

3:03 PM, November 27, 2007  
Blogger Mary said...

With regards to the example of a woman with 'no marketable skills' who was suddenly left out in the cold, there's a remarkable amount of similarity between running a household, and managing an office or working as a receptionist - maybe not the highest paying jobs, but certainly a good place to start.

That's wonderful. But in reality, especially for the older women who have been out of the workplace for decades with no degree, just getting the job is the hard part.

Both looks and computer skills are often called for in receptionist jobs.

Not making excuses, but the rich men who leave these women (in their 60s and 70s) who were counting on his salary to maintain their lifestyle should get alimony or a decent settlement I think, and not have to rely solely on government programs for their support.

And I'm not sure if the older group who went the traditional route caring for the home and family all though years should be lumped in the "feminist" category, when we're blaming feminism for society's ills.

I know a guy in his early 60s who "hid" his pension, or structured it so that the mother of his son and grandchild couldn't touch it legally. How sad. Even if you can see the marriage is over not because she cheated but for the crime of becoming "old" and "boring", wouldn't you want to provide for her, especially considering you have plenty?

He lost my respect the day he was telling me how crafty his financial structuring was...

7:36 PM, November 27, 2007  
Blogger Mary said...

Oh and yes, he was an attorney, fwiw.

Sad...

7:37 PM, November 27, 2007  
Blogger Jeff said...

I'm shocked that this hasn't come up, but I was just waiting to see how long it was before the "it's so hard to find a good man" comment came up. Translated, to most women that means "it's so hard to find a sucker."

This attitude of entitlement is why, ladies, it's hard to find a su...man to marry you and save you from the horrible indignity of working for a living. What also hasn't been discussed is the childless divorces in which alimony is STILL DEMANDED. What is the rationalization for that one? Ever heard the phrase "husbandly duties"? Ever heard used the gender appropriate equivalent? No, because to suggest that women have a duty to sexual accomadation of their husbands, to paraphrase Andrea Dworkin, is equivalent to rape. Why on earth would a man get married in these times?

As men speak to one another and watch the news, it's become impossible to ignore that the risk/benefit analysis for marriage for men is extremely high on the risk side and the converse on the benefit side. That is why many of us have decided against it entirely. I can still have kids if I choose to. I was adopted and would gladly pay the favor forward, with the added benefit that should any woman I'm involved with turn out to be a shrew, I don't have to be worried about loosing the child I chose to have.

Michael Lee has a great point. In general, I like women and I believe firmly in their equality. But "as a pampered, privileged class, I don't much like women who act like typical members of that class..." and the real truth is that it's difficult in the US to find a woman who doesn't fit that description.

12:19 AM, November 28, 2007  
Blogger Cham said...

I would bet that many of these inequities between the sexes would go away with the simple passage of an Equal Rights Amendment but I don't see any men screaming for that as a solution. Many men want things to be equal among the sexes but maybe not that equal.

8:41 AM, November 28, 2007  
Blogger SGT Ted said...

Cham,

Maybe it's because, having been burned by other, ostensibly "Equal Rights" laws that go only one way, men aren't buying the sales pitch?

We theoretically have equal rights under the 14th Amendment already, but the courts have perverted that unchecked in respect to divorce and "family" court. Why would a new amendment make any difference?

2:26 PM, November 28, 2007  
Blogger Cham said...

The ERA would read:

"Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex."

The 14th amendment addresses citizenship but doesn't necessarily make things plain and clear regarding gender. Which means no preferentially treatment in a court. It also means that the ladies get drafted and become active in combat, that was the big hold-up back in the 70s when the ERA got volleyed around. But now we see that the ladies do pretty well in combat and Israel has been drafting women for years without issues, so I think we can put those challenges aside. The big beef MRAs have is this courtroom bias toward mothers, the ERA could easily be applied to quash the bias. But not a peep out of those vocal and easily agitated MRAs about that amendment approval which makes me think they are all whine and no action.

5:11 PM, November 28, 2007  
Blogger Oligonicella said...

How about "Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state."

The simple act of layering on some group designation makes me suspicious.

9:27 PM, November 28, 2007  
Blogger jw said...

cham: I'd say the reason for the silence is distrust. Too many have been burned by 'equality' which is NOT equality.

We have the same problems in Canada. Equality is for females ...

How do you get around that?

5:46 AM, November 29, 2007  
Blogger Cougar said...

So, once again, the family court hits the headlines. Instead of getting lost in the details and offering opinions that do not matter one iota,,,,, let's examine the family court system.

First, it is run by lawyers. There is no incentive for lawyers to remedy their client’s issues in an expeditious manner at the exorbitant rates they charge. It would simply be a conflict of interest. Therefore,, they hand out raw deals for repeat business. Sometimes they even get free headlines for advertising.

It is my opinion that they are societal leeches. They may begin their career as someone with a conscious but after a short time; they must choose either a conscious or a career. By that time, they have been entwined into a financial world. Conscious looses. Callous minds develop and greed happens generally at the expense of the children. Oh,,,,,, yeah,,,,,,, what about the kids??? I doubt that they give a damn.

There is no money in complete resolve,,,,,,,Therefore, the lopsidedness of the system. Currently it is for the women. It used to be for the men. Somehow the pendulum has never been in the middle. Hmmmmmm

I have given up on getting justice in the family court. I refuse to feed them.

If you think for one nano second that those folks are stupid or ignorant,,,,, If you think that for one minute that they don't know what's going on or unaware of the travesty,,,,, you are a fool. Wake up.

There is no recourse against false allegations for a reason. Look at the hundreds of lives ruined by the “Nappy Headed Ho” that levied the false charges against the Duke University lacrosse team. She wasn’t even publicly reprimanded. Zero charges filed. The judge let her go because, “She may actually believe those things happened.” Yeah, and, the Easter Bunny jumped over the moon. Numerous cases of false allegations abound in the news. When proven false there is no recourse against the accuser for a reason. The message is,,,,, the attorneys are soaking up the gravy.

As long as the attorneys can get their financial anatomy up your bank account,,,, they'll keep it there for as long as it's a pleasurable experience.

My response is,,,,, don't feed the attorneys. Starve them out of business.

8:29 AM, November 29, 2007  
Blogger br549 said...

No argument out of me, cougar.

The ones I ended up "hating" in my situation were the lawyers. I was paying one to slit my throat (my ex's lawyer) and another to stem the bleeding (my lawyer). After they BOTH bled me dry, they both disappeared. My own lawyer wouldn't even return my phone calls.

6:43 PM, November 29, 2007  
Blogger Phucked Up! said...

This is amazing, terrible!
The more people who know about this, the more likely that something might be done about it!

Here are other references:

Mother Kills son and then receives alimony

www.groups.google.com/group/soc.men/browse_thread/thread/7df1b7810a7a9153

2:17 PM, December 03, 2007  
Blogger sexy said...

情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,A片,視訊聊天室,聊天室,視訊,視訊聊天室,080苗栗人聊天室,上班族聊天室,成人聊天室,中部人聊天室,一夜情聊天室,情色聊天室,視訊交友網a片,a片


免費A片,AV女優,美女視訊,情色交友,免費AV,色情網站,辣妹視訊,美女交友,色情影片,成人影片,成人網站,A片,H漫,18成人,成人圖片,成人漫畫,情色網,日本A片,免費A片下載,性愛

A片,色情,成人,做愛,情色文學,A片下載,色情遊戲,色情影片,色情聊天室,情色電影,免費視訊,免費視訊聊天,免費視訊聊天室,一葉情貼圖片區,情色,情色視訊,免費成人影片,視訊交友,視訊聊天,視訊聊天室,言情小說,愛情小說,AIO,AV片,A漫,avdvd,聊天室,自拍,情色論壇,視訊美女,AV成人網,色情A片,SEX,成人論壇

情趣用品,A片,免費A片,AV女優,美女視訊,情色交友,色情網站,免費AV,辣妹視訊,美女交友,色情影片,成人網站,H漫,18成人,成人圖片,成人漫畫,成人影片,情色網


情趣用品,A片,免費A片,日本A片,A片下載,線上A片,成人電影,嘟嘟成人網,成人,成人貼圖,成人交友,成人圖片,18成人,成人小說,成人圖片區,微風成人區,成人文章,成人影城,情色,情色貼圖,色情聊天室,情色視訊,情色文學,色情小說,情色小說,臺灣情色網,色情,情色電影,色情遊戲,嘟嘟情人色網,麗的色遊戲,情色論壇,色情網站,一葉情貼圖片區,做愛,性愛,美女視訊,辣妹視訊,視訊聊天室,視訊交友網,免費視訊聊天,美女交友,做愛影片

av,情趣用品,a片,成人電影,微風成人,嘟嘟成人網,成人,成人貼圖,成人交友,成人圖片,18成人,成人小說,成人圖片區,成人文章,成人影城,愛情公寓,情色,情色貼圖,色情聊天室,情色視訊,情色文學,色情小說,情色小說,色情,寄情築園小遊戲,情色電影,aio,av女優,AV,免費A片,日本a片,美女視訊,辣妹視訊,聊天室,美女交友,成人光碟

情趣用品.A片,情色,情色貼圖,色情聊天室,情色視訊,情色文學,色情小說,情色小說,色情,寄情築園小遊戲,情色電影,色情遊戲,色情網站,聊天室,ut聊天室,豆豆聊天室,美女視訊,辣妹視訊,視訊聊天室,視訊交友網,免費視訊聊天,免費A片,日本a片,a片下載,線上a片,av女優,av,成人電影,成人,成人貼圖,成人交友,成人圖片,18成人,成人小說,成人圖片區,成人文章,成人影城,成人網站,自拍,尋夢園聊天室

1:06 AM, December 29, 2008  
Blogger 徵信社robin said...

徵信社, 感情挽回, 挽回感情, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 捉姦, 徵信公司, 通姦, 通姦罪, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 捉姦, 監聽, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 外遇問題, 徵信, 捉姦, 女人徵信, 外遇問題, 女子徵信, 外遇, 徵信公司, 徵信網, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇蒐證, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 感情挽回, 挽回感情, 外遇沖開, 徵信, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 外遇蒐證, 外遇, 通姦, 通姦罪, 贍養費, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信, 徵信社

11:52 AM, February 04, 2009  
Blogger our said...

搬家 搬家 搬家公司 徵信社 徵信 彩妝造型 新娘秘書 票貼 室內設計 室內設計 徵信 徵信社 外遇 徵信 徵信社 外遇 搬家 搬家 花蓮民宿 花蓮民宿 免費a片 a片 免費av 色情影片 情色 情色網 色情網站 色情 成人網 成人圖片 成人影片 18成人 av av女優 情慾 走光 做愛 sex H漫 免費a片 a片 免費av 色情影片 情色 情色網 色情網站 色情 成人網 成人圖片 成人影片 18成人 av av女優 情慾 走光 做愛 sex H漫 a片 アダルト アダルト アダルトサイト アダルトサイト 離婚 抓姦 外遇蒐證 外遇抓姦 外遇 侵權 仿冒 應收帳款 工商徵信 Shade sail nike shoes 水泵 电动隔膜泵 自吸泵 离心泵 磁力泵 螺杆泵 化工泵 水泵 电动隔膜泵 自吸泵 离心泵 磁力泵 螺杆泵 化工泵 水泵 电动隔膜泵 自吸泵 离心泵 磁力泵 螺杆泵 化工泵 隔膜泵 气动隔膜泵 隔膜泵 气动隔膜泵 隔膜泵 气动隔膜泵 a片 成人網站 成人影片 寵物用品 情趣用品 情趣用品 MBA 在职研究生 在职博士 補習班 花店 花店 補正下着 中古車買賣 貸款 婚紗 婚紗攝影 補習班 留學 情色 情色 百家乐 轮盘 21点 德州扑克 百家乐系统 真人娱乐场 百家乐 足球 德州扑克 电子游戏 英格兰超级联赛 德国甲组联赛 意大利甲组联赛 西班牙甲组联赛 法国甲组联赛欧冠杯 英超 足球比分 足球彩票 体育彩票 即时比分 堆高機 婚禮佈置 宜蘭民宿推薦 寵物用品 情趣用品 情趣用品 坐月子 植牙 牙齒矯正 租屋 催眠 房屋出租 租房子 xo醬 牛軋糖 牛嘎糖 代償 房屋貸款 信用貸款 失眠 減肥 眼鏡 金門高梁酒 變頻洗衣機 票貼 借款 關鍵字廣告 租車 派報 漆彈 減重 高雄花店 學英文 糖尿病 花店 呼吸照護 勞工體檢 安養中心 飾品批發 窈窕 雞腳凍 自行車褲 自行車帽 自行車衣

3:33 AM, February 06, 2009  
Blogger 徵信 said...

劈腿 劈腿測驗劈腿剖析劈腿調查 劈腿大剖析 外遇捉姦 徵信社 通姦 通姦罪 抓猴 捉猴 外遇 外遇剖析 外遇調查 外遇案例 外遇諮詢 偷情 第三者外遇話題 外遇發洩 感情挽回 徵信社 外遇心態 外遇 通姦 通姦罪 徵信徵信社偵探外遇 外遇 抓姦徵信協會徵信公司 外遇 徵信 包二奶 跟蹤 監控 夫妻 徵信社 徵信 徵信社 大愛徵信 離婚 抓姦 離婚 抓姦 婚姻 婚前徵信 前科 查址 個人資料 外遇 第三者 徵信社 偵探社 抓姦 外遇 離婚 通姦 偵探社
偵探

9:55 PM, February 15, 2009  
Blogger kevio said...

威創牙醫診所除了提供優質的植牙技術外還提供假牙|矯正|牙周病治療,是值得您信賴的牙醫診所

獅王紋身工作室提供專業的無痛刺青技術,獅王紋身在世界TATTOO大賽中,獲獎無數,獅王紋身給您最時尚的作品。

陳駿逸皮膚科診所提供了治療痘痘的服務,皮膚雷射權威,包括柔膚雷射鑽石微雕黑斑等,讓您回復青春蘋果臉。

ck皮件處理棧提供專業洗包包|洗鞋子|各式皮件修理保養疑難雜症都有服務,清洗包包專門店讓您的包包、鞋子、永遠保持最新的況態唷。

杏儒中醫診所提供了糖尿病的治療。

9:01 AM, February 16, 2009  
Blogger pco said...

白蟻
除白蟻
白蟻防治
跳蚤
除跳蚤
跳蚤防治
蛀蟲
除蛀蟲
蛀蟲防治
白蟻
除白蟻
白蟻防治
跳蚤
除跳蚤
跳蚤防治
蛀蟲
除蛀蟲
蛀蟲防治
除蟲
除蟲

9:19 AM, February 18, 2009  
Blogger 情趣用品 欣怡 said...

情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,美國aneros,rudeboy,英國rudeboy,英國Rocksoff,德國Fun Factory,Fun Factory,英國甜筒造型按摩座,甜筒造型按摩座,英國Rock Chic ,瑞典 Lelo ,英國Emotional Bliss,英國 E.B,荷蘭 Natural Contours,荷蘭 N C,美國 OhMiBod,美國 OMB,Naughti Nano ,音樂按摩棒,ipod按摩棒,美國 The Screaming O,美國TSO,美國TOPCO,美國Doc Johnson,美國CA Exotic,美國CEN,美國Nasstoy,美國Tonguejoy,英國Je Joue,美國Pipe Dream,美國California Exotic,美國NassToys,美國Vibropod,美國Penthouse,仿真按摩棒,矽膠按摩棒,猛男倒模,真人倒模,仿真倒模,PJUR,Zestra,適趣液,穿戴套具,日本NPG,雙頭龍,FANCARNAL,日本NIPPORI,日本GEL,日本Aqua Style,美國WET,費洛蒙,費洛蒙香水,仿真名器,av女優,打炮,做愛,性愛,口交,吹喇叭,肛交,魔女訓練大師,無線跳蛋,有線跳蛋,震動棒,震動保險套,震動套,TOY-情趣用品,情趣用品網,情趣購物網,成人用品網,情趣用品討論,成人購物網,鎖精套,鎖精環,持久環,持久套,拉珠,逼真按摩棒,名器,超名器,逼真老二,電動自慰,自慰,打手槍,仿真女郎,SM道具,SM,性感內褲,仿真按摩棒,pornograph,hunter系列,h動畫,成人動畫,成人卡通,情色動畫,情色卡通,色情動畫,色情卡通,無修正,禁斷,人妻,極悪調教,姦淫,近親相姦,顏射,盜攝,偷拍,本土自拍,素人自拍,公園露出,街道露出,野外露出,誘姦,迷姦,輪姦,凌辱,痴漢,痴女,素人娘,中出,巨乳,調教,潮吹,av,a片,成人影片,成人影音,線上影片,成人光碟,成人無碼,成人dvd,情色影音,情色影片,情色dvd,情色光碟,航空版,薄碼,色情dvd,色情影音,色情光碟,線上A片,免費A片,A片下載,成人電影,色情電影,TOKYO HOT,SKY ANGEL,一本道,SOD,S1,ALICE JAPAN,皇冠系列,老虎系列,東京熱,亞熱,武士系列,新潮館,情趣用品,情趣,情趣商品,情趣網站,跳蛋,按摩棒,充氣娃娃,自慰套,G點,性感內衣,情趣內衣,角色扮演,生日禮物,生日精品,自慰,打手槍,潮吹,高潮,後庭,情色論譠,影片下載,遊戲下載,手機鈴聲,音樂下載,開獎號碼,統一發票號碼,夜市,統一發票對獎,保險套,做愛,減肥,美容,瘦身,當舖,軟體下載,汽車,機車,手機,來電答鈴,週年慶,美食,徵信社,網頁設計,網站設計,室內設計,靈異照片,同志,聊天室,運動彩券,大樂透,威力彩,搬家公司,除蟲,偷拍,自拍,無名破解,av女優,小說,民宿,大樂透開獎號碼,大樂透中獎號碼,威力彩開獎號碼,討論區,痴漢,懷孕,美女交友,交友,日本av,日本,機票,香水,股市,股市行情, 股市分析,租房子,成人影片,免費影片,醫學美容,免費算命,算命,姓名配對,姓名學,姓名學免費,遊戲,好玩遊戲,好玩遊戲區,線上遊戲,新遊戲,漫畫,線上漫畫,動畫,成人圖片,桌布,桌布下載,電視節目表,線上電視,線上a片,線上掃毒,線上翻譯,購物車,身分證製造機,身分證產生器,手機,二手車,中古車,法拍屋,歌詞,音樂,音樂網,火車,房屋,情趣用品,情趣,情趣商品,情趣網站,跳蛋,按摩棒,充氣娃娃,自慰套, G點,性感內衣,情趣內衣,角色扮演,生日禮物,精品,禮品,自慰,打手槍,潮吹,高潮,後庭,情色論譠,影片下載,遊戲下載,手機鈴聲,音樂下載,開獎號碼,統一發票,夜市,保險套,做愛,減肥,美容,瘦身,當舖,軟體下載,汽車,機車,手機,來電答鈴,週年慶,美食,徵信社,網頁設計,網站設計,室內設計,靈異照片,同志,聊天室,運動彩券,,大樂透,威力彩,搬家公司,除蟲,偷拍,自拍,無名破解, av女優,小說,民宿,大樂透開獎號碼,大樂透中獎號碼,威力彩開獎號碼,討論區,痴漢,懷孕,美女交友,交友,日本av ,日本,機票,香水,股市,股市行情,股市分析,租房子,成人影片,免費影片,醫學美容,免費算命,算命,姓名配對,姓名學,姓名學免費,遊戲,好玩遊戲,好玩遊戲區,線上遊戲,新遊戲,漫畫,線上漫畫,動畫,成人圖片,桌布,桌布下載,電視節目表,線上電視,線上a片,線上a片,線上翻譯,購物車,身分證製造機,身分證產生器,手機,二手車,中古車,法拍屋,歌詞,音樂,音樂網,借錢,房屋,街頭籃球,找工作,旅行社,六合彩,整型,整型,珠海,雷射溶脂,婚紗,網頁設計,水噹噹,台中隆鼻,果凍隆乳,改運整型,自體脂肪移植,新娘造型,婚禮顧問,下川島,常平,常平,珠海,澳門機票,香港機票,貸款,貸款,信用貸款,宜蘭民宿,花蓮民宿,未婚聯誼,網路購物,婚友,婚友社,未婚聯誼,交友,婚友,婚友社,單身聯誼,未婚聯誼,未婚聯誼, 婚友社,婚友,婚友社,單身聯誼,婚友,未婚聯誼,婚友社,未婚聯誼,單身聯誼,單身聯誼,白蟻,白蟻,除蟲,老鼠,減肥,減肥,在家工作,在家工作,婚友,單身聯誼,未婚聯誼,婚友,交友,交友,婚友社,婚友社,婚友社,大陸新娘,大陸新娘,越南新娘,越南新娘,外籍新娘,外籍新娘,台中坐月子中心,搬家公司,搬家公司,中和搬家,台北搬家,板橋搬家,新店搬家,線上客服,網頁設計,線上客服,網頁設計,植牙,關鍵字,關鍵字,seo,seo,網路排名,自然排序,網路排名軟體,交友,越南新娘,婚友社,外籍新娘,大陸新娘,越南新娘,交友,外籍新娘,視訊聊天,大陸新娘,婚友社,婚友,越南新娘,大陸新娘,越南新娘,視訊交友,外籍新娘,網路排名,網路排名軟體,網站排名優化大師,關鍵字排名大師,網站排名seo大師,關鍵字行銷專家,關鍵字,seo,關鍵字行銷,網頁排序,網頁排名,關鍵字大師,seo大,自然排名,網站排序,網路行銷創業,汽車借款,汽車借錢,汽車貸款,汽車貸款,拉皮,抽脂,近視雷射,隆乳,隆鼻,變性,雙眼皮,眼袋,牙齒,下巴,植牙,人工植牙,植髮,雷射美容,膠原蛋白,皮膚科,醫學美容,玻尿酸,肉毒桿菌,微晶瓷,電波拉皮,脈衝光,關鍵字,關鍵字,seo,seo,網路排名,自然排序,網路排名軟體,汽車借款,汽車借款,汽車借款,汽車貸款,汽車貸款,借錢,借貸,當舖,借款,借貸,借錢,週轉,學英文,英文社團,英語俱樂部,學習英文,英語會話,英文演講,English Club,學英語,學英文,美語社團,英語社團,英文讀書會,Toastmasters,Toastmaster,英語讀書會,拍樂得批發,拍樂得飾品,拍樂得化妝品批發,

10:49 PM, February 22, 2009  
Blogger yimeier.2008 said...

汽車旅館
消費券優惠
motel
消費券
薇閣
住宿券
廣交會
廣州飯店
廣州
广州
广交会
广州酒店
Canton Fair
Guangzhou Hotel
Guangzhou
広州
広州の交易会
広州のホテル

9:36 PM, February 23, 2009  
Blogger 机器猫 said...

免費a片 a片 免費av 色情影片 情色 情色網 色情網站 色情 成人網 成人圖片 成人影片 18成人 av av女優 av av女優 情慾 走光 做愛 sex H漫 情色 情趣用品 情趣用品 情色 a片 a片 成人網站 成人影片 情趣用品 情趣用品 離婚 抓姦 外遇蒐證 外遇抓姦 アダルト アダルト アダルトサイト アダルトサイト 百家乐 轮盘 21点 德州扑克 百家乐系统 真人娱乐场 百家乐 足球 德州扑克 电子游戏 英格兰超级联赛 德国甲组联赛 意大利甲组联赛 西班牙甲组联赛 法国甲组联赛欧冠杯 英超 足球比分 足球彩票 体育彩票 即时比分

10:17 PM, February 24, 2009  
Blogger emba said...

看房子,買房子,建商自售,自售,台北新成屋,台北豪宅,新成屋,豪宅,美髮儀器,美髮,儀器,髮型,EMBA,MBA,學位,EMBA,專業認證,認證課程,博士學位,DBA,PHD,在職進修,碩士學位,推廣教育,DBA,進修課程,碩士學位,網路廣告,關鍵字廣告,關鍵字,廣告,課程介紹,學分班,文憑,牛樟芝,段木,牛樟菇,日式料理, 台北居酒屋,燒肉,結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,台北住宿,國內訂房,台北HOTEL,台北婚宴,飯店優惠,台北結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,住宿,訂房,HOTEL,飯店,造型系列,學位,牛樟芝,腦磷脂,磷脂絲胺酸,SEO,婚宴,捷運,學區,美髮,儀器,髮型,牛樟芝,腦磷脂,磷脂絲胺酸,看房子,買房子,建商自售,自售,房子,捷運,學區,台北新成屋,台北豪宅,新成屋,豪宅,學位,碩士學位,進修,在職進修, 課程,教育,學位,證照,mba,文憑,學分班,網路廣告,關鍵字廣告,關鍵字,SEO,关键词,网络广告,关键词广告,SEO,关键词,网络广告,关键词广告,SEO,台北住宿,國內訂房,台北HOTEL,台北婚宴,飯店優惠,住宿,訂房,HOTEL,飯店,婚宴,台北住宿,國內訂房,台北HOTEL,台北婚宴,飯店優惠,住宿,訂房,HOTEL,飯店,婚宴,台北住宿,國內訂房,台北HOTEL,台北婚宴,飯店優惠,住宿,訂房,HOTEL,飯店,婚宴,結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,台北結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,台北結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,台北結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,居酒屋,燒烤,美髮,儀器,髮型,美髮,儀器,髮型,美髮,儀器,髮型,美髮,儀器,髮型,小套房,小套房,進修,在職進修,留學,證照

2:32 AM, February 26, 2009  
Blogger 海盜 said...

成人網站,av女優,成人網站,a片,成人影片,h漫,成人電影,成人電影,色情,成人影片,免費A片,色情,成人影片,色情,免費A片,微風成人,情色,成人網站,av女優,成人網站,a片,成人影片,h漫,色情,成人電影,色情,成人電影,色情,成人影片,免費A片,成人影片,免費A片,情色,微風成人,成人網站,av女優,成人網站,a片,成人影片,h漫,成人電影,成人電影,色情,成人影片,免費A片,色情,成人影片,色情,免費A片,





微風成人,情色,成人網站,av女優,成人網站,a片,成人影片,h漫,色情,成人電影,色情,成人電影,色情,成人影片,免費A片,成人影片,免費A片,情色,微風成人,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,打卡鐘,跳蛋,持久液,成人網站,成人網站,成人網站,成人網站,色情網站,色情網站,色情網站,色情網站,av女優,av女優,av女優,av女優,色情,色情,色情,色情,h漫,h漫,h漫,h漫,sex,sex,sex,sex,成人影片,成人影片,成人影片,成人影片,成人電影,成人電影,成人電影,成人電影,av女優,a片,a片,a片,a片,成人網站,







成人網站,成人網站,成人網站,成人影片,成人影片,成人影片,成人影片,av女優,av女優,av女優,av女優,色情,色情,色情,色情,h漫,h漫,h漫,h漫,sex,sex,sex,sex,情色,情色,情色,情色,黃金回收,黃金回收,黃金回收,黃金回收,借錢,借錢,借錢,借錢,植牙,植牙,植牙,牙醫,牙醫,牙醫,a片,a片,a片,a片,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,成人網站,成人網站,成人網站,成人網站,成人影片,成人影片,



成人影片

,成人影片,av女優,av女優,av女優,av女優,色情,色情,色情,色情,h漫,h漫,h漫,h漫,sex,sex,sex,sex,情色,情色,情色,情色,黃金,黃金,黃金,黃金,黃金價格,黃金價格,黃金價格,黃金價格,黃金買賣,黃金買賣,黃金買賣,黃金買賣,當舖,當舖,當舖,當舖,鑽石價格,鑽石價格,鑽石價格,鑽石價格,鑽石回收,鑽石回收,鑽石回收,鑽石回收,鑽石買賣,鑽石買賣,鑽石買賣,鑽石買賣,黃金存摺,黃金存摺,黃金存摺,







黃金存摺,辣妹視訊,辣妹視訊,辣妹視訊,辣妹視訊,080視訊聊天室,080視訊聊天室,080視訊聊天室,080視訊聊天室,美女交友,美女交友,美女交友,美女交友,情色視訊,情色視訊,情色視訊,情色視訊,哈啦聊天室,哈啦聊天室,哈啦聊天室,哈啦聊天室,ut聊天室,ut聊天室,ut聊天室,ut聊天室,聊天室,聊天室,聊天室,打卡鐘,火鍋吃到飽,創業加盟,賺錢,吃到飽麻辣鍋

2:58 PM, February 26, 2009  
Blogger 小怡 said...

花蓮租車
花東旅遊
花蓮旅遊
花蓮租車
花蓮租車旅遊網
花蓮租車
花蓮租車
花蓮旅行社
花蓮租車
花蓮租車
租車花蓮
花蓮旅行社
花蓮租車
花蓮租車旅遊網
租車旅遊網
花蓮旅遊
花蓮租車
花蓮租車
花蓮旅遊景點
花蓮旅遊行程
花蓮租車
租車
花蓮旅遊
花蓮賞鯨泛舟溯溪
花蓮租車資訊
花蓮租車
花蓮租車
花蓮租車
花蓮旅遊地圖
花蓮黃頁網路電話簿
花蓮入口網
花蓮民宿黃頁
花蓮租車
花東旅遊
花蓮旅遊
花蓮租車
花蓮旅遊
花蓮租車
花蓮租車
花蓮租車
租車花蓮
花蓮租車
花蓮包車
花蓮租車旅遊網
花蓮旅遊
花蓮租車
花蓮租車
花蓮旅遊景點
花蓮旅遊行程
花蓮租車
租車
花蓮賞鯨泛舟溯溪
花蓮租車資訊
花蓮租車
花蓮租車
花蓮租車
花蓮旅遊地圖

11:03 AM, February 27, 2009  
Blogger xiaoxiao said...

This blog is really a love

.| .|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|==|??|·| ……|*|·||*|·|*|#|·||……||%|*||+|·|%|||||R|·|#|%|#|·|#|……|·|·|#|……|·|……|%|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|. |T. |. |. |. |. |. |. |. |. |. |. |. |. |. |. |.|. |. |. |……|……|#|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|·|

4:37 AM, March 04, 2009  
Blogger shuqian said...

~「朵語‧,最一件事,就。好,你西光的交替之中瀟灑獨行。

8:40 AM, March 04, 2009  
Blogger SEO said...

這一家租屋網免費刊登不用錢耶,超好康的想出租房子快來吧!
專業搬家公司,服務第1,顧客至上,是你值得托負終生的好伙伴!精緻搬家公司主要是在為大家服務搬家為目的,本網站服務項目以,搬家公司、回頭車,家庭搬家,工廠搬遷,為主要,服務地區台中搬家,台北搬家公司,全省搬家公司,歡迎洽詢

順便介紹一下室內設計在國內的發展,已到了一個急待突破的瓶頸階段。雖然,在裝潢學界,我們已建立了從高中、高職、五專、二技、四技、大學到研究所相當完整的室內設計相關專業教育體系,在業界,相關從業人員至少也在數萬人以上,而民間人士對於住宅、商空、辦公室等各類空間室內設計之需求也隨著經濟的不斷成長與社會進步而日益殷切。表面上看來,室內設計似乎蓬勃發展、坦途在望,但事實並非如此。此一領域至今仍有許多問題急待克服與解決,而其中最主要的問題之一是官方一直將「室內設計」視為是依附在建築之下的附屬品,而非一獨立之專業。這種情形,我們從內政部所公布施行的建築物室內裝修管理辦法之內容便可清楚看出。



此一未與學界、業界充分溝通即匆促制訂、且施行後成效不彰的室內設計管理辦法可說問題重重,值得深入檢討,以謀徹底改善之道。



  官方對於「室內設計」未能正確定位可說是問題的主要根源之一。此一瓶頸如無法突破,則室內設計將永遠只是附屬於建築底下的一個妾身未明、專業地位未受尊敬與肯定的灰色領域。這種情形對多年來努力建立室內設計專業教育體系的學界、以及辛勤接受室內設計各級專業教育的諸多莘莘學子而言,真是情何難堪。何以同樣在中華民國教育制度下,一樣的修業年限,一樣具備完整的專業教育體系,建築、土木等領域的畢業生就有機會取得官方對其專業地位的認定,其權利能受法律保障,而修習室內設計公司的室內設計者就只能參加建築物室內裝修專業技術人員之講習與測驗,還需在建築師、建築公會或其他相關專業團體之審核查驗下夾縫求生?這對室內設計領域是不公平的。如果不是其他專業領域之專業知識與技能未能完全涵蓋、不足以有效處理室內設計相關問題,何以有室內設計存在的空間?又何需大費周章建立從高中到研究所的專業教育體系?可見室內設計有其存在的必要與價值,也有其獨具的(與其他專業有所區隔的)專業知能。
再談談網站優化SEO方案的優勢和效果保證:




網路行銷管理顧問的專業實力決定了在網站優化方案及實施方面具有獨特的優勢,主要表現在下列方面:



領先的網路行銷導向網站建設理論和系統的網站優化思想指導;

作為中國中國互聯網協會網站建設指導規範的主要起草人,對網站規範(網站優化是網站規範的基本組成部分)的認識更為深刻;

對利用國際WEB標準實施網站重構有著豐富的經驗;

從網站運營策略層面進行整體網站優化,是網站運營導向的網站優化方案而不僅僅是為了搜尋引擎排名,單純的搜尋引擎排名效果是局部的、短暫的,也可能是後患無窮的;
需要找健身中心幫你健身嗎?會變瘦唷! 喝茶葉也會被瘦呀!不信你看看A片的女生都好瘦
 


SEO不等於網站優化,不提供片面的,實踐表明只有系統的網站優化才能達到最好的、持久的搜尋引擎優化效果;

基於用戶行為的研究,通過網站SEO優化為用戶提供最有價值的信息和服務,為瀏覽者轉化為顧客奠定基礎;

為眾多不同規模的企業網站及電子商務網站提供網站優化方案、實施及運營維護,豐富的網路行銷實踐經驗,讓網站優化深入到網站運營的每個細節,這是網站優化得以成功的基本保證。
好了說完了,以下幾個站點不錯,累的話來去motel休息一下吧!有空能去看看

優質站點介紹:led手電筒,棧板,二胎,隔熱紙,照明,健身,a383,a383,兼職小姐,二手家具,a383有人要 去嗎?
美美的led胸章好美唷,放在車燈上面照的很亮

文山搬家


南港搬家

大安區搬家

松山搬家

中山區搬家

大同區搬家

中正區搬家

士林搬家

萬華搬家

台北搬家 公司



台北搬家公司
客人來看看唷!最新網路行銷方式
情趣用品這一款超好用的說!
情趣用品好好用!

11:22 AM, March 05, 2009  
Blogger fasdfasfasf said...

看房子,買房子,建商自售,自售,台北新成屋,台北豪宅,新成屋,豪宅,美髮儀器,美髮,儀器,髮型,EMBA,MBA,學位,EMBA,專業認證,認證課程,博士學位,DBA,PHD,在職進修,碩士學位,推廣教育,DBA,進修課程,碩士學位,網路廣告,關鍵字廣告,關鍵字,廣告,課程介紹,學分班,文憑,牛樟芝,段木,牛樟菇,日式料理, 台北居酒屋,燒肉,結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,台北住宿,國內訂房,台北HOTEL,台北婚宴,飯店優惠,台北結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,住宿,訂房,HOTEL,飯店,造型系列,學位,牛樟芝,腦磷脂,磷脂絲胺酸,SEO,婚宴,捷運,學區,美髮,儀器,髮型,牛樟芝,腦磷脂,磷脂絲胺酸,看房子,買房子,建商自售,自售,房子,捷運,學區,台北新成屋,台北豪宅,新成屋,豪宅,學位,碩士學位,進修,在職進修, 課程,教育,學位,證照,mba,文憑,學分班,網路廣告,關鍵字廣告,關鍵字,SEO,关键词,网络广告,关键词广告,SEO,关键词,网络广告,关键词广告,SEO,台北住宿,國內訂房,台北HOTEL,台北婚宴,飯店優惠,住宿,訂房,HOTEL,飯店,婚宴,台北住宿,國內訂房,台北HOTEL,台北婚宴,飯店優惠,住宿,訂房,HOTEL,飯店,婚宴,台北住宿,國內訂房,台北HOTEL,台北婚宴,飯店優惠,住宿,訂房,HOTEL,飯店,婚宴,結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,台北結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,台北結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,台北結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,居酒屋,燒烤,美髮,儀器,髮型,美髮,儀器,髮型,美髮,儀器,髮型,美髮,儀器,髮型,小套房,小套房,進修,在職進修,留學,證照,MBA,EMBA,留學,MBA,EMBA,留學,進修,在職進修,牛樟芝,段木,牛樟菇,住宿,民宿,飯宿,旅遊,住宿,民宿,飯宿,旅遊,住宿,民宿,飯宿,旅遊,住宿,民宿,飯宿,旅遊,住宿,民宿,飯宿,旅遊,住宿,民宿,飯宿,旅遊,住宿,民宿,飯宿,旅遊,美容,美髮,整形,造型,美容,美髮,整形,造型,美容,美髮,整形,造型,美容,美髮,整形,造型,美容,美髮,整形,造型,美容,美髮,整形,造型,美容,美髮,整形,造型,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA,住宿,民宿,飯店,旅遊,美容,美髮,整形,造型,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA

1:36 AM, March 07, 2009  
Blogger ★〃漫步〃★ said...

花蓮租車,花蓮租車旅遊資訊網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮旅行社,花東旅遊,花蓮包車,租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮一日遊,租車服務,花蓮租車公司,花蓮包車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,租車花蓮,租車服務,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,租車花蓮,租車服務,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,租車花蓮,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,租車花蓮,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊租車,花蓮租車網,花蓮租車,花蓮一日遊,租車花蓮,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車旅遊,花蓮租車












花蓮租車,花蓮租車旅遊資訊網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮旅行社,花東旅遊,花蓮包車,租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮一日遊,租車服務,花蓮租車公司,花蓮包車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,租車花蓮,租車服務,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,租車花蓮,租車服務,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,租車花蓮,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,租車花蓮,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊租車,花蓮租車網,花蓮租車,花蓮一日遊,租車花蓮,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車旅遊,花蓮租車

7:04 AM, March 10, 2009  
Blogger month128 said...

嘻哈論壇|
Taiwan City|
you tube中文版|
skype中文版下載
kmplayer繁體中文版
迅雷5下載
bt程式下載
cs1.6主程式下載
winrar免費下載
nds遊戲下載
KMPlayer下載
無蝦米正式版xp
海賊王漫畫連載
emule繁體中文版
directx9.0免費下載
office 2007下載
無蝦米vista正式版
爆爆王無敵程式
rmvb播放程式下載
遊戲天堂楓之谷
生份證產生器
最新線上遊戲排行榜
photoimpact下載
kmplayer繁體中文版
戰鎚online官方網
sao突襲online=========================================

10:20 PM, March 10, 2009  
Blogger month128 said...

嘻哈論壇|
Taiwan City|
you tube中文版|
skype中文版下載
kmplayer繁體中文版
迅雷5下載
bt程式下載
cs1.6主程式下載
winrar免費下載
nds遊戲下載
KMPlayer下載
無蝦米正式版xp
海賊王漫畫連載
emule繁體中文版
directx9.0免費下載
office 2007下載
無蝦米vista正式版
爆爆王無敵程式
rmvb播放程式下載
遊戲天堂楓之谷
生份證產生器
最新線上遊戲排行榜
photoimpact下載
kmplayer繁體中文版
戰鎚online官方網
sao突襲online=========================================

10:20 PM, March 10, 2009  
Blogger month128 said...

==============================================================

10:20 PM, March 10, 2009  
Blogger Happy New Year 2009! said...

室內設計,室內設計,室內設計,裝潢,室內設計,室內設計室內設計公司
,搬家公司,搬家公司,台北搬家公司,搬家公司,室內設計
這一家租屋網免費刊登不用錢耶
搬家公司,健身,茶葉A片,SEO,SEO,SEO,motel,led手電筒,棧板,二胎,隔熱紙,照明,健身,a383,a383,,二手家具,a383,胸章,車燈,
文山搬家
,兼職小姐,南港搬家,大安區搬家,松山搬家,中山區搬家,八里搬家,
五股搬家,
泰山搬家,大同區搬家,中正區搬家,士林搬家,萬華搬家,

台北搬家公司,台北搬家公司,客人,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,加油棒,台中搬家公司,台北市搬家公司,台北縣搬家公司

9:30 AM, March 13, 2009  
Blogger Happy New Year 2009! said...

室內設計,室內設計,室內設計,裝潢,室內設計,室內設計室內設計公司
,搬家公司,搬家公司,台北搬家公司,搬家公司,室內設計
這一家租屋網免費刊登不用錢耶
搬家公司,健身,茶葉A片,SEO,SEO,SEO,motel,led手電筒,棧板,二胎,隔熱紙,照明,健身,a383,a383,,二手家具,a383,胸章,車燈,
文山搬家
,兼職小姐,南港搬家,大安區搬家,松山搬家,中山區搬家,八里搬家,
五股搬家,
泰山搬家,大同區搬家,中正區搬家,士林搬家,萬華搬家,

台北搬家公司,台北搬家公司,客人,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,加油棒,台中搬家公司,台北市搬家公司,台北縣搬家公司

9:31 AM, March 13, 2009  
Blogger mmbox said...

2008真情寫真aa片免費看捷克論壇微風論壇大眾論壇plus論壇080視訊聊天室情色視訊交友90739美女交友-成人聊天室色情小說做愛成人圖片區豆豆色情聊天室080豆豆聊天室 小辣妹影音交友網台中情人聊天室桃園星願聊天室高雄網友聊天室新中台灣聊天室中部網友聊天室嘉義之光聊天室基隆海岸聊天室中壢網友聊天室南台灣聊天室南部聊坊聊天室台南不夜城聊天室南部網友聊天室屏東網友聊天室台南網友聊天室屏東聊坊聊天室雲林網友聊天室大學生BBS聊天室網路學院聊天室屏東夜語聊天室孤男寡女聊天室一網情深聊天室心靈饗宴聊天室流星花園聊天室食色男女色情聊天室真愛宣言交友聊天室情人皇朝聊天室上班族成人聊天室上班族f1影音視訊聊天室哈雷視訊聊天室080影音視訊聊天室38不夜城聊天室援交聊天室080080哈啦聊天室台北已婚聊天室已婚廣場聊天室 夢幻家族聊天室摸摸扣扣同學會聊天室520情色聊天室QQ成人交友聊天室免費視訊網愛聊天室愛情公寓免費聊天室拉子性愛聊天室柔情網友聊天室哈啦影音交友網哈啦影音視訊聊天室櫻井莉亞三點全露寫真集123上班族聊天室尋夢園上班族聊天室成人聊天室上班族080上班族聊天室6k聊天室粉紅豆豆聊天室080豆豆聊天網新豆豆聊天室080聊天室免費音樂試聽流行音樂試聽免費aa片試看免費a長片線上看色情貼影片免費a長片

9:48 AM, March 22, 2009  
Blogger mmbox said...

本土成人貼圖站大台灣情色網台灣男人幫論壇A圖網嘟嘟成人電影網火辣春夢貼圖網情色貼圖俱樂部台灣成人電影絲襪美腿樂園18美女貼圖區柔情聊天網707網愛聊天室聯盟台北69色情貼圖區38女孩情色網台灣映像館波波成人情色網站美女成人貼圖區無碼貼圖力量色妹妹性愛貼圖區日本女優貼圖網日本美少女貼圖區亞洲風暴情色貼圖網哈啦聊天室美少女自拍貼圖辣妹成人情色網台北女孩情色網辣手貼圖情色網AV無碼女優影片男女情色寫真貼圖a片天使俱樂部萍水相逢遊戲區平水相逢遊戲區免費視訊交友90739免費視訊聊天辣妹視訊 - 影音聊天網080視訊聊天室日本美女肛交美女工廠貼圖區百分百貼圖區亞洲成人電影情色網台灣本土自拍貼圖網麻辣貼圖情色網好色客成人圖片貼圖區711成人AV貼圖區台灣美女貼圖區筱萱成人論壇咪咪情色貼圖區momokoko同學會視訊kk272視訊情色文學小站成人情色貼圖區嘟嘟成人網嘟嘟情人色網 - 貼圖區免費色情a片下載台灣情色論壇成人影片分享免費視訊聊天區微風 成人 論壇kiss文學區taiwankiss文學區

9:48 AM, March 22, 2009  
Blogger nini said...

85cc免費影城 愛情公寓正妹牆川藏第一美女 成人影片 情色交友網 美女視訊 美女視訊 視訊情人高雄網 JP成人影城 383成人影城 aa片免費a片下載 a片線上看aa片免費看 ※a片線上試看※sex520免費影片※ aa片免費看 BT成人論壇 金瓶影片交流區 自拍美女聊天室 aa片免費a片下載 SEX520免費影片 免費a片 日本美女寫真集 sex520aa免費影片 sex520aa免費影片 BT成人網 Hotsee免費視訊交友 百分百貼影片區 SEX520免費影片 免費視訊聊天室 情人視訊高雄網 星光情色討論版 正妹牆 383成人影城 線上85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 ※免費視訊聊天室※ ※免費視訊聊天室※ 免費視訊聊天室 85cc免費影片 85cc免費影片 080苗栗人聊天室 080苗栗人聊天室 080中部人聊天室 080中部人聊天室 免費a片下載 免費a片 AA片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 日本av女優影片 av女優 av女優無碼影城 av女優 av女優 百分百成人圖片 百分百成人圖片 視訊情人高雄網 電話交友 影音電話交友 絕色影城 絕色影城 夜未眠成人影城 夜未眠成人影城 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 免費色咪咪貼影片 免費色咪咪貼影片 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 影音視訊交友網 視訊交友網 080視訊聊天室 ※免費視訊聊天室※ ※免費視訊聊天室※ 視訊聊天室 成人影音視訊聊天室 ut影音視訊聊天室 ※免費視訊聊天室※ 視訊ukiss聊天室視訊ukiss聊天室 視訊交友90739 視訊交友90739 情人視訊網 168視訊美女 168視訊美女 168視訊美女 視訊美女館 視訊美女館 免費視訊美女網 小高聊天室 小高聊天室 aio交友聊天室 aio交友聊天室 交友聊天室 交友聊天室 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 免費線上a片 免費線上a片 嘟嘟成人網站 成人漫畫 情色文學 嘟嘟成人網 成人貼圖區 情色文學成人小說 微風成人區 情色貼圖區 免費視訊聊天 免費成人圖片區 愛情公寓 愛情公寓聊天室 寄情築園小遊戲 免費aa片線上看 aa片免費看 情色SXE聊天室 SEX情色遊戲 色情A片 免費下載 av女優 俱樂部 情色論壇 辣妹視訊 情色貼圖網 免費色情 聊天室 情人視訊聊天室 免費a片成人影城 免費a片-aa片免費看 0204貼圖區 SEX情色 交友聊天-線上免費 女優天堂 成人交友網 成人情色貼圖區 18禁 -女優王國 080視訊美女聊天室 080視訊聊天室 視訊交友90739 免費a片 aio 視訊交友網 成人影城-免費a片※免費視訊聊天※85cc免費影片日本線上免費a片 免費色咪咪影片免費色咪咪影片aaa片免費看影片aaa片免費看成人影城免費色咪咪影片

6:22 AM, April 06, 2009  
Blogger 123456 said...

广州托盘复合托盘食品托盘天津木托盘胶合板托盘蜂窝纸托盘塑木托盘熏蒸木托盘木制托盘广东塑料托盘钢托盘钢制托盘栈板塑料栈板木栈板垫仓板托盘包装求购托盘天津托盘温州托盘山东托盘北京托盘上海木托盘塑胶托盘卡板纸卡板塑料卡板手推车推车机场手推车好孩子手推车液压手推车超市手推车医用手推车康贝手推车不锈钢手推车平板车电动平板车老虎车静音手推车平板手推车小推车模具架置物架堆垛架巧固架整理架物料整理架挂板架整理柜零件柜零件整理柜文件整理柜仓储笼仓库笼料箱塑料箱钢制料箱货箱整理箱塑料整理箱周转箱塑料周转箱防静电周转箱求购周转箱物流箱物料盒零件盒塑料零件盒卡板箱周转筐塑料周转筐周转箩登高车物流台车台车密集架档案密集架文件柜办公文件柜北京文件柜广州文件柜上海文件柜南京文件柜深圳文件柜钢制文件柜铁皮文件柜档案柜文件柜厂底图柜档案柜鞋柜储物柜更衣柜防火防磁柜防磁柜防火防磁文件柜图书架资料柜工具柜

7:31 AM, April 13, 2009  
Blogger 天天看正妹 said...

免費視訊聊天 ut聊天室辣妹視訊UT影音視訊聊天室 吉澤明步QQ美女視訊秀 85cc免費影片aa影片下載城sex免費成人影片aaa片免費看短片美女視訊 sex383線上娛樂場av969 免費短片日本免費視訊aa影片下載城視訊網愛聊天室影音視訊交友 咆哮小老鼠分享論壇sex520免費影片aa免費影片下載城aio辣妺視訊 aio辣妹交友愛情館 jp成人影片aio交友愛情館馬子免費影片免費線上a片18成人85cc影城0204movie免費色咪咪視訊網pc交友s383視訊玩美女人34c高雄視訊聊天jp成人免費視訊辣妹 kk777視訊俱樂部xxxpandalive173影音視訊聊天室 sex520-卡通影片成人免費視訊 完美女人13060 免費視訊聊天sexy girl video movie辣妹妹影音視訊聊天室UT視訊美女交友視訊情色網百事無碼a片dvd線上aa片免費看18禁成人網ut聊天室kk俱樂部視訊激情網愛聊天 情人小魔女自拍卡通aa片免費看夜未眠成人影城aio性愛dvd辣妹影片直播拓網視訊交友視訊聊天室ggoo168論壇視訊辣妹love104影音live秀 美女show-live視訊情色yam交友辣妹妹影音視訊聊天室s383情色大網咖視訊aaa俱樂部台灣情色網無碼avdvdsexy diamond sex888入口Show-live視訊聊天室

6:02 AM, April 14, 2009  
Blogger 天天看正妹 said...

免費 a 片aaaaa片俱樂部影片aaaaa片俱樂部dodo豆豆聊天室sex520網路自拍美女聊天室天堂免費線上avdvd援交av080影片aa影片下載城aaa片免費看短片成人圖片區18成人avooogo2av免費影片sexdiy影城免費線上成人影片bonbonsex0951影片下載日本av女優sex888免費看影片免費視訊78論壇辣妹有約辣妹no31314視訊dudu sex免費影片avdvd情色影片免費色咪咪影片網av080免費試看日本美女寫真集辣妹脫衣麻將視訊聊天室性福免費影片分享日本美女寫真集,kk視訊aio交友愛情館免費成人美女視訊bt論壇色情自拍免費a片卡通tw 18 net卡通18美少女圖色情漫畫777美女小護士免費 aa 片試看百分百成人情色圖片a片免費觀賞sexy girls get fuckedsexy girl video movie情色文學成人小說sex888免費看eyny 伊莉論壇sexdiy影城自拍情色0204movie免費影片aio免費aa片試看s383情色大網咖sexy girl video movie草莓牛奶AV論壇台灣論壇18禁遊戲區環球辣妹聊天室 90691拓網aio交友愛情館拓網學生族視訊777美女 sex888影片分享區hi5 tv免費影片aa的滿18歲卡通影片sex383線上娛樂場sexdiy影城免費a片線上觀看真人美女辣妹鋼管脫衣秀比基尼辣妹一夜情視訊aio交友愛情館

6:02 AM, April 14, 2009  
Blogger 天天看正妹 said...

小魔女免費影城免費看 aa的滿18歲影片sex383線上娛樂場kk777視訊俱樂部aa的滿18歲影片85cc免費影片a片免費看A片-sex520視訊聊天室v6 0plus論壇sex520免費影片avdvd-情色網qq美美色網ut13077視訊聊天A片-無碼援交東京熱一本道aaa免費看影片免費視訊聊天室微風成人免費視訊聊天 ut聊天室av1688影音視訊天堂免費 a 片85cc免費影城亞洲禁果影城微風成人av論壇sex520免費影片JP成人網免費成人視訊aaa影片下載城免費a片 ut交友成人視訊85cc成人影城免費A片aa的滿18歲影片小魔女免費影片85cc免費影片aaa片免費看短片aa影片下載城aaaaa片俱樂部影片aaaaa片俱樂部aa的滿18歲影片小魔女免費影片台灣論壇免費影片後宮0204movie免費影片免費卡通影片線上觀看線上免費a片觀看85cc免費影片免費A片aa影片下載城ut聊天室辣妹視訊UT影音視訊聊天室 日本免費視訊aaaa 片俱樂部aaaa片免費看影片免費視訊78論壇情色偷拍免費A片免費aaaaa片俱樂部影片aa影片下載城色漫畫帝國av俱樂部aaaa彩虹頻道免費影片 杜蕾斯成人免費卡通影片線上觀看85cc免費影片線上觀賞免費線上歐美A片觀看免費a片卡通aaa的滿18歲卡通影片sex520免費影片免費 a 片

6:02 AM, April 14, 2009  
Blogger 徵信 said...

外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇 外遇
外遇


外遇 外遇
外遇
外遇 外遇外遇
外遇

外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 ,
外遇 外遇 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇

外遇 外遇

外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿喜帖囍帖卡片外遇外遇 外遇 外遇外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇剖析 外遇調查 外遇案例 外遇諮詢 偷情 第三者外遇話題 外遇發洩 感情挽回 徵信社 外遇心態 外遇 通姦 通姦罪 外遇徵信社徵信社外遇 外遇 抓姦徵信協會徵信公司 包二奶 徵信社 徵信 徵信社 徵信社 徵信社 徵信社 徵信 徵信 婚姻 婚前徵信 前科 個人資料 外遇 第三者 徵信社 偵探社 抓姦 偵探社 偵探社婚 偵探社 偵探社偵探家事服務家事服務家電維修家事服務家事服務家事服務家事服務家事服務持久持久持久持久持久持久持久離婚網頁設計徵信社徵信社徵信徵信社外遇離婚協議書劈腿持久持久持久持久持久劈腿剖析徵信徵信社外遇外遇外遇外遇徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿

4:42 AM, April 21, 2009  
Blogger 1314 said...

視訊做愛視訊美女無碼A片情色影劇kyo成人動漫tt1069同志交友網ut同志交友網微風成人論壇6k聊天室日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞UT視訊美女交友..........................

11:43 PM, May 19, 2009  
Blogger 1122 said...

情色交友色情遊戲情色視訊色情色情網站非常好色天下第一色站免費視訊辣妹色色辣妺視訊免費線上a片85cc免費影片絕色影城hinet遊戲網嘟嘟成人網h漫avhello成人電影院h大奶妹做愛影片視訊做愛百分百成人av圖片aa片免費看影片

3:37 AM, June 08, 2009  

Post a Comment

<< Home