Sunday, February 25, 2007

Hoplophobia, Homophobia and Political Correctness

Have you noticed how differently those who criticize non-PC issues such as gun rights are treated by the media as opposed to those who dare to make a PC blunder such as saying something politically incorrect about a minority? Under "Today's Picks" on MSN, I saw an article entitled, "Gun Remark Makes Outdoorsman an Outcast." The story links through to a Washington Post article of the same name with a caption: "Criticism of hunters who use assault rifles puts writer’s career in jeopardy." The article describes the plight of "poor misunderstood" writer, Jim Zumbo:

Zumbo's fame, however, has turned to black-bordered infamy within America's gun culture -- and his multimedia success has come undone. It all happened in the past week, after he publicly criticized the use of military-style assault rifles by hunters, especially those gunning for prairie dogs.

"Excuse me, maybe I'm a traditionalist, but I see no place for these weapons among our hunting fraternity," Zumbo wrote in his blog on the Outdoor Life Web site. The Feb. 16 posting has since been taken down. "As hunters, we don't need to be lumped into the group of people who terrorize the world with them. . . . I'll go so far as to call them 'terrorist' rifles."


The article appears to be sympathetic to Zumbo's cause and the Post trots out an "outdoorsman" who basically calls NRA members attack dogs:

Some outdoors writers drew a different lesson from Zumbo's horrible week.

"This shows the zealousness of gun owners to the point of actual foolishness," said Pat Wray, a freelance outdoors writer in Corvallis, Ore., and author of "A Chukar Hunter's Companion."

Wray said that what happened to Zumbo is a case study in how the NRA has trained members to attack their perceived enemies without mercy.

"For so many years, Zumbo has been a voice for these people -- for hunting and for guns -- and they just turned on him in an instant," Wray said. "He apologized all over himself, and it didn't do any good."


Say Uncle has more about the above article and its pitfalls here.

Whether or not you agree or disagree with the above article is not my main point here; it is to compare the media treatment of Jim Zumbo's politically correct position of likening hunters with assault rifles to terrorists to that of someone like Isaiah Washington who made the horrible mistake of daring to criticize a politically correct minority. Rather than treat Washington as the sympathetic character they portray Zumbo as, the media seems to revel in Washington being a pariah who is sent to a treatment facility to "cure" the possibility that he will ever make a homophobic slur again! Take a foul mouthed shot at a minority and one is sent to rehab. Trash a gun owner and liken him or her to a terrorist and you are a sympathetic character who is being attacked by the fringe members of the NRA. I certainly do not condone what Washington said when he called a castmate a sexist slur, yet is it really okay for the The Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation to request an apology (probably yes), try to get him fired and ABC to send Washington to "rehab," all with no one in the MSM saying this might be wrong or at least giving an opposing view as they did with the gun slur? Why is one type of speech seen by the media as okay and worth defending and the other politically incorrect type seen as not worthy of anything but disdain and punishment?

I wonder when guys like Zumbo will be asked to go to rehab to treat their Hoplophobia? Probably when Hell freezes over--as it should be, for freedom of speech is always worth defending no matter whether we are offended by it or not.

Labels: ,

65 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I do not think Zumbo is a hoplophobe at all. He was only expressing the view that certain technological tools, such as large magazine capacity rifles, detract from the sportmanship that for many of us should be an inherent part of hunting. Fact is that given all the advancements in technology today there is not much point in hunting just to get the kill. It is about style, challenge and skill unless you are just hunting for food. Something 99.9% percent of western hunters are not doing anyway.

He probably expressed his views in a wrong way. He used a word that was unappropiate and emotionally loaded. It was a lapse in judgement. Something that the new technology facilitates since it makes the time from writting to publication basically zero and takes away time for reflection. He probably deserves some kind of chastisement but I feel he just got caught in the middle of a political and idelogical minefield and has become a casualty due to that.

10:13 AM, February 25, 2007  
Blogger Helen said...

Anonymous 10:13:

I agree that Zumbo may not be a hoplophobe, just as Isaiah Washington may not be a homophobe for making one or two really stupid, and tacky sexist remarks. It could have been a lapse of judgement but no one will ever give him the benefit of the doubt and the fact that he was sent to a re-education camp is sickening, in my opinion. He was also caught up in the "middle of a political and ideological mindfield and was made a casualty due to that" just as Zumbo was. That is the point of this post--that political correctness is not a reason for the media to defend or not defend someone's speech.

10:23 AM, February 25, 2007  
Blogger Serr8d said...

It does not matter a whit that hunters use guns in their 'sport'; what matters is that Hunting has Nothing to do with the Right to Keep and Bear Arms.

I'm a lifetime NRA member, and had not, until last weekend, ever heard of Jim Zumbo. I did make it to his forum, before it went dark, and left a comment, including this link to a post I made Feb. 12, blasting Rudy Guilani for the same incorrect thinking.

The core belief of left-of-center gun control advocates is to, eventually, remove all guns from the hands of private citizens (another golden brick in their road to their ideal 'nirvana', I suppose); the NRA's stance is that incremental advances in this policy must be challenged, at every step.

Jim Zumbo uses guns, pretty ones? and no matter how 'ugly' black guns are, they are protected under the 2nd Amendment (which is placed as the 2nd amendment for good reason, along with other 'individual' rights protected in the first ten).

So Jim Zumbo caught major grief, and rightly so, from gun bloggers, and others, all across these intertubes.

Unfortunately, the damage has already been done, and the left has another 'bullet' to use against our protected rights.

Again, the NRA wants to see every law on the books prosecuted to the ultimate nth degree, for peeps and perps using guns in incorrect ways. Make example of the hoodies who get, but shouldn't have, guns. Tack 10 years (or more) on sentences where guns were used, and make that without parole. Because, you see, the NRA wants to make it safe for those of us who do legally possess and use guns, to do so safely, and without criminal threats of hoodlums and miscreants.

Everyone hates criminals...

10:56 AM, February 25, 2007  
Blogger Fodder said...

Hello Dr. Helen,
I like your blog and have added your site to my link list.
If you would prefer to not be linked by me, let me know and I'll remove it.
Thanks and like I said, nice blog!

Fodder
Ride Fast & Shoot Straight
[http://ridenshoot.blogspot.com]
rideshootfast@yahoo.com

11:38 AM, February 25, 2007  
Anonymous Nick Kasoff - The Thug Report said...

I'm a life member of the NRA, and own what some might call "a terrorist rifle." Specifically, I own an SKS, an inexpensive Chinese rifle which was popular during the Korean and Vietnamese wars. I took it on my one deer hunting outing, but never had the chance to use it. My choice of rifle was driven by economics - at $100, this was the most suitable rifle of sufficient size for deer hunting, and I'm told it works as well as any other "deer rifle." Just because it was once used in military service doesn't make it an exceptional weapon, though. It's just a rifle, nothing fancy.

The important point here, though, was made by a previous poster: While the NRA strongly opposes regulation of specific types of firearms - which, by the way, is an incremental means by which to regulate all firearms - they strongly support the enforcement of existing gun laws against criminals. There are millions of gun owners who will never violate a law, except perhaps a speeding ticket. To punish them by increased regulation, while armed thugs kill and terrorize with impunity, is just plain wrong. Let the thugs do hard time, and leave the rest of us alone.

Nick Kasoff
The Thug Report

11:43 AM, February 25, 2007  
Anonymous SamC said...

Hi Helen,

Why is one type of speech seen by the media as okay and worth defending and the other politically incorrect type seen as not worthy of anything but disdain and punishment?

The essence of Political Correctness is the supression of politically incorrect speech.

political correctness is not a reason for the media to defend or not defend someone's speech.

You bet it is...for the liberal MSM. They don't actually believe in "free speech".

I think the root of this is in the Left's entwinement with Behaviorism. Even though that doctrine is not as dominant or respectable as it once was, it still is very influential on the Left. I think they think that if the expression of a principle is forbidden the principle itself will wither away sooner or later. (And vice versa). Supress homophobic speech and homophobia will eventually disappear. This trumps free speech for them any day.

12:35 PM, February 25, 2007  
Blogger Steve Skubinna said...

What Zumbo did was stab other gun owners in the back, just because they did not belong to his hunting fraternity. Other posters are correct in stating that anyone supporting the suppression of legal firearms is supporting the eventual ban on all firearms. Black rifles are no more deadly than a bolt action single shot, and in fact the latter are available in larger, more destructive calibers than used by any service rifle.

Zumbo displayed ignorance about another part of the shooting community. Okay, that can be corrected. But he did it in a manner that supports those who would suppress all firearms ownership - including his own. Very stupid move, and somebody in his position need to apply some bullshit filters between his brain and mouth. Or maybe he could get off his high horse and be less bigoted towards those who do not shoot Weatherbys.

12:51 PM, February 25, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have no problem with guns or the second ammendment. However, I do have a problem with the word 'homophobia'. The etymology of this verbal bomb/Orwellian wall come from the Greek language. 'Homo' means same whereas in Latin it means 'man'or 'human being'.
'phobos' means 'fear' or 'fright'

Well, the reality is that I don't know anyone who is afraid of the 'same' or those who love the 'same.' However, I am an individual that rejects that social and sexual phenomenon. I also believe it is an intrinsically disordered lifestyle---and I make no apologies.

These semantical games have been going on for too long in the West and I will say it again----if we truly live in a Plurality wherein 'tolerance' is the goal or standard then we must also tolerate intolerance for if we do not then our tolerance is Orwellian newspeak for uniformity of thought, speach and society.

1:09 PM, February 25, 2007  
Blogger Ken Willis said...

Zumbo has apologized and I accept his apology. He's back in good standing with me. But those gun enthusiasts who became so enraged at Zumbo have shot themselves, and the rest of us who support private gun ownership, in the foot.

The anti-gun media [redundant phrase] is going to be politically correct and we all know that. It's a fact of life. So while those who are angry at Zumbo accuse him of giving aid and comfort to the enemy, they themselves have also given aid and comfort to the MSM with their over-the-top response to Zumbo's comments.

As it turns out, all Zumbo needed was a little reflection to see where he had gone wrong. All the knashing of teeth at him did no good, was not necessary, and as it turns out, was quite harmful to the cause of every gun owner in America.

1:12 PM, February 25, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

He didn't call gun owners terrorists, in a comment about those who hunt small game with assault rifles, he referred to those weapons as "terrorist rifles".

The NRA has unbounded power, and is just as irrational and destructive in using it as the gay, lesbian, feminist, etc. groups are.

1:15 PM, February 25, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Zumbo is nothing new. This kind of "Mom likes me best" elititism has been in the gun owning family for years. It's sibling rivalry. Now he knows his siblings can stand up and holler.

Us siblings will deal with it and then close ranks against those who say really idiot and ignorant things about guns, the NRA, and gun owners.

1:50 PM, February 25, 2007  
Blogger Serr8d said...

Anonymous 1:15, the difference between the NRA and those 'other' groups you list is, we have our own Amendment...

Anonymous 1:09, why don't you submit a list of 'correct' words you would have us choose from, and any word you don't like, we'll ban the thing! No matter what context or document that word is in, we'll take it out.

Better hurry; there are new words coming along every day...

2:48 PM, February 25, 2007  
Anonymous triticale said...

I am curious as to what the first of many anonymi means by the assertion that 99.9% percent of western hunters are not hunting for food. Are we in Wisconsin "western"? Everyone I know here who hunts eats what they shoot, and I know one couple who, between hunting, trapping and fishing harvest almost all the flesh they eat.

As for full capacity magazines, the hunting regulations address that. Shotguns routinely come with a plug to reduce capacity. Is that not good enough for you?

3:21 PM, February 25, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon 1:09 writes

Hey Serr8d,

Good Bait heh? Well just so you know where I stand---I checked out your blog and I just wanted you to know that I support Iran and I am not a muslim nor a Dem nor a Rep----I can see that you have been taken in. I can't wait to see your 'correct' interp of things.

3:28 PM, February 25, 2007  
Blogger Serr8d said...

'Taken in', anon? It's seldom I'm 'taken in' by anything; you should have seen the struggle I put up against my wife, 21 years ago! But I'm glad I've been 'taken in', by her, at least to date.

Nor am I Muslim, Christian, or Athiest, although I do profess to wonder what awaits me on the other side; if anything. I do not think there will be any virgins to speak of...

If you 'support' Iran, then you must support Ahmadman; and his history, including his training of the Basij children .

I'll say this, when you get 'taken in', you do so for teh crazy...

Love your blog, BTW

3:55 PM, February 25, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Triricale:

When I said "for food" I meant "as a form of subsistence" and yes I could be wrong 99.9% is just a guesstimate. What percentage of Western, as in first world, hunters do you think hunt for subsistence?

As for the magazine capacities and all that I am perfectly fine with it do whatever you want to do as long as it is legal in your jurisdiction. I would not use them but I am not going to go around preaching and judging those that do either. It is mr Zumbo who seems to have a problem with it. I just pointed that having a problem with the use of a certain category of firearms for a certain use does not make you a hoplophobe.

4:17 PM, February 25, 2007  
Blogger Mrs. du Toit said...

The Dixie Chicks, film attendance, and now Zumbo's sponsorships have all experienced the result of free action. People are voting with their feet and their conscience.

Now this is good when it involves buying Barbra Streisand records because of her political causes, but bad when it results in sales declines? It's the same action.

Nothing in the First Amendment protects an individual from the consequences of their speech. Only the government is prevented from administering the consequences.

The People may, and much to the angst of the Left, do admister the consequences clue bat.

GREAT! This is just fabulous news and I feel sorry (ok, not really) for the folks who don't see it that way. Haven't we all dreamed of an active, participating citizenry? We're getting there, one person at a time, and they're making decisions based on being informed and connected.

It just pisses off the MSM who thought they had a perpetual stranglehold on the information that was disseminated. They don't... anymore.

Only the top 3 or 4 network news shows have higher ratings than you and your husband's blogs. Compare that to the readership of the top 500 blogs and the MSM doesn't have anything like the audience blogs do. Is that cool, or what?

4:19 PM, February 25, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon 1:09 writes

serr8D...I am happy that you were taken in by your wife if all is amicable. As far as Iran is concerned... I am not blind, there is more here than meets the eye....I will show you the face of who I am against:

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e1842edc4f

They have 'new' friends in Washington and they seek a new hegemony...I would rather be dead than to accept it.

4:24 PM, February 25, 2007  
Blogger Serr8d said...

Well, Anon 1:09, I now see why you wish to be anonymous. That was a video that could have used some direction from Leni Riefenstahl; and, given the site's tags "PALESTINE zionists zionism hate jews isreal terrorists terrorism zionist terrorists", I would not really have wanted to visit the thing, had you not insisted.

What I saw was a bunch of teenagers throwing taunts and insults, using foul language, not at all any different than your average hip hop/rap video (unless, of course, you add the element of anti semitism.

I, for one, would not be proud of that link...

5:27 PM, February 25, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Serr8d


And what is anti-semitism? Please define a semite? Semites are also Akkadians, Maronites, Arabs, Copts not just Jews Sir. I think you have been taken in. If Anti-Semitism is exclusively for the Jews and excludes the other Semites than I think we need to think about who the real racists may be. As far as the youth factor goes---in vino veritas---I am sure you said the same with Mel Gibson.

You see, Anti-Semitism means everything and anything, as such it is a slippery word with offensive and defensive characteristics that are always used to thwart inquiry while also causing a sort of guilt. I do not possess that guilt, therefore the word and the conceptions attached to that word mean nothing to me.

Perhaps when you learn about the Holodomor(to use but one example) then we can talk about the extension of guilt and how it is attached to collective memories, words, thoughts and ideas. Until then, sell your Anti-Semitism to somebody else.

6:01 PM, February 25, 2007  
Anonymous Nick Kasoff - The Thug Report said...

To Anonymous @ 6:01 pm: anti-semitism does not mean "opposed to those of semitic origin," it means "One who discriminates against or who is hostile toward or prejudiced against Jews." You don't get to rewrite the dictionary based upon your preferences. And no, the definition isn't part of some secret plot amongst Jewish dictionary writers to overlook the rest of those who can call themselves Semitic.

In fact, the majority of Americans who could be victims of anti-semitism are of east European origin. But words don't always mean what the sum of their parts means - for example, carpet has nothing to do with automobiles or domesticated animals.

To Anonymous @ 1:15 pm: You said, "The NRA has unbounded power." If that is the case, why did the last Congressional election place Nancy Pelosi in the speaker's chair? You could fairly say that they have significant power, but certainly not unbounded.

Nick Kasoff
The Thug Report

6:24 PM, February 25, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nick,

Perhaps you need to remind the Jews of this distinction--you are preaching to the choir.

6:34 PM, February 25, 2007  
Blogger Duck said...

Great post, Helen. I'm not a hunter but I am a gun owner. Zumbo effectively called every military infantryman a terrorist. Assault weapons are just rifles that have been specialized for military use. The AR15, which is the civilian version of the M16, the US standard infantry rifle, is popular with gun owners and may actually be used by hunters, although it is of a smaller caliber than is generally used by deer hunters, but a 7.62 (.30 caliber) version is available. So are US soldiers terrorists because they use assault rifles?

The SKS, as another reader mentioned, and the AK47 are popular because there are many surplus rifles out there and they are cheap and reliable. A new Remington or Winchester bolt action hunting rifle can run anywhere from $700 to $1200 or more. An SKS in good condition can be had for $150 to $250.

Also you can find very cheap ammo for them. I bought a surplus British Lee Enfield rifle of WW II vintage last year for $130 which was a steal, but I have to buy a special caliber of ammo for it. Ammo can get expensive. Standard ammo for modern hunting rifles, 30-06 or Winchester 308 can run $0.75 to $1.00 per round. You can get 7.62x39mm SKS ammo from surplus dealers for around $0.10 per round. That makes a big difference if you like to shoot at the range on a frequent basis.

6:35 PM, February 25, 2007  
Blogger Steve Skubinna said...

Zumbo never called anyone using an AR a terrorist? Not in so many words, but claiming he did not mean it is a distinction without a difference:

"As hunters, we don't need to be lumped into the group of people who terrorize the world with them. . . . I'll go so far as to call them 'terrorist' rifles."

So Anon 1:15, you are arguing like a moron. Please note that I have not "called" you a moron, okay?

6:44 PM, February 25, 2007  
Blogger Duck said...

And to answer your question, they treat the two cases differently because that's the way they think about it. It's human nature. You'll find right wing commentators doing the same thing, just in reverse. They think homophobes are messed up, sick or evil, but anti-gun people are good, courageous people like them. It's their worldview, and it's perfectly natural.

Not many people have the discipine to think "now wait, these gun nuts are just like gay activists in their own way. Zumbo is like Isaiah Washington when you draw the analogy in this way, so I'm going to write my article using the same template." I think it's better for reporters to just write the news the way it looks from their standpoint, and not pretend to come from some universal, neutral viewpoint. That's how terrorists get to be called insurgents or freedom-fighters. That way you can just identify the writer's viewpoint up front and apply the proper "windage" to compensate for their spin.

6:51 PM, February 25, 2007  
Blogger Helen said...

Duck,

"I think it's better for reporters to just write the news the way it looks from their standpoint, and not pretend to come from some universal, neutral viewpoint."

Sure, that would be great if the Washington Post would just admit that they are biased heavily towards the left and they write from their left viewpoint or if NBC news etc. would just announce this prior to each broadcast. The problem is, as you say, they pretend to be neutral and then spin the stories as "facts." I used to think people could tell the difference and didn't need anyone to make this distinction to them, but I realize this is not true. People often cannot tell the difference between spin and facts and thus, need some actual language that clarifies the biased view of the reporter.

7:02 PM, February 25, 2007  
Anonymous Ashley Higgins said...

I got to witness a blog swarm last weekend over Jim Zumbo's foolishness. While it would have been nice if everyone could have discoursed in civil tone, it was nonetheless marvelous. As Kim, viewing things from her porch said: "An Army of Davids, illustrated."

In all of the chatter (including Zumbo's initial remarks) there was one thread, and I think this applies to our culture generally: We have a ready ability to create undefined and arbitrary categories, to allocate items or actions to those categories, and gleefully to pontificate about (or discriminate against) those items or actions we consider bad.

The mainstream media are composed of people who also have this ailment. In fact, they may be the main repository for the virus. An acquaintance of mine who works for a major metropolitan daily wrote prior to the last national election about Red Staters and, specifically, Southerners something like this: They are haters. I hate haters. They should be disenfranchised.

I live on the bank of the lower Mississippi River. I have watched its mainstream. A vast quantity of water mindlessly flows south, sweeping with it whatever may get caught up in the current, simply because it is down hill.

Thus, also, the MSM. They have created their categories, they believe in their categories, and they will happily categorize any person and, if that category happens to be one of their bad ones, sweep him or her to hell, which apparently is the southernmost portion of their route.

7:22 PM, February 25, 2007  
Blogger Duck said...

Helen,
Yes, that is the problem, or has been, but I think the rise of alternate media makes for a more even playing field. Now blogs and conservative web outlets can call the MSM on their bias. The pose can't last forever. Eventually everyone will realize that the Emperor is naked, or biased in this case, and they just won't bother to pretend to be neutral and objective anymore.

8:40 PM, February 25, 2007  
Blogger TheNewGuy said...

I don't have a big problem with Zumbo, now that he's actually come out and apologized. Incidently, he wrote a much more step-to-the-plate apology on one of Ted Nugent's forums (no, I'm not a member or even a hunter... just followed a link to it). He's also offered to educate himself, purchase one of these "terrorist" rifles, and write about it.

Mr. Zumbo has had a very bad week, and while I resent the hell out of being tangentially characterized as a terrorist, I'm also willing to take the man's apology at face value, provided he does what he can to make it right. He's recognized his error, and is willing to pay penance.

Who hasn't done something incredibly dumb and/or offensive? (whether tired, intoxicated, whatever) Zumbo could very easily have become embittered and joined Sarah Brady, but he seems to be doing his level best... what more can anyone expect a man to do?

9:35 PM, February 25, 2007  
Blogger Purple Avenger said...

such as large magazine capacity rifles

What is one of those? I know of only a very few rifles with fixed large cap mags. You can get a light weight 5 round mag for an AK-47.

The SKS, a "good gun" which fires the same round, has a fixed 10 round mag.

Personally, I'm offended by people who drive sports cars, because clearly nobody has any need for a sports car, when a Yugo will do.

I'm also offended by the color blue, because white will do just fine. Nobody needs a blue colored anything.

11:23 PM, February 25, 2007  
Anonymous CaptDMO said...

Best I can tell-
The VAST majority of directly interlaced folk conducted the recent SELF-POLICING of one of their own that commited a SERIOUS "Oh shit!" in a community that DEMANDS "one oh shit negates a lifetime of atta boys" (lifted from a forum). As has been mentioned above, this was done via the blazing white light of the internet/web, by folks voting with their feet and wallets instead of chanting for "new laws". An ASTOUNDING amount of folk weighed in with a "Too bad, he was very good in his specific field". The offence was weighed, measured, and resolved.

The MSM turned sensationist tabloids, in an effort to maintain
control as "information source of choice" did their best to wrest authority,spin it, but to no avail. They were out of the picture overnight. Kinda like the phenomina in Durham, only faster.

When it comes to "givin 'em what they want" and catering to folk with no real dog in the fight in the interest of selling commercial
ad space, AS WELL AS attempting to manipulate public opinion in order to maintain the ever fickle doyen status, the basest supermarket tabloids and other publications of "page three" ilk can still claim the highest circulation with no fear of extinction.

No accusations, misquotes, "out of context", mis-understood "irony", typos, false claims, twisted or ambigious weasle words, or non-appologies stood up unclarified for more than a half hour-and no quarter afforded to a gross violation of an alliance, presumed to bridge any eliteism.

Any question as to why the move is on to co-opt what "is" is on the new opiate of the masses? Sites of questionable (IMHO, as well as academias' recently)reputation such as wikipedia? (to name JUST ONE) come to mind, and it certainly seems to be disingenuous motive at work.

Yes, I have a dog in THIS fight. I'm glad the way it turned out. Mostly because the "Your services are not needed here." message sent to legislators and editors- so fond of piling on

12:10 AM, February 26, 2007  
Anonymous CaptDMO said...

*sheesh*
Jeff Cooper coined hoplophobia!
Makes perfect sense.

12:17 AM, February 26, 2007  
Blogger Mrs. du Toit said...

If someone who made their living as an insurance salesman claimed ignorance of the Original Intent of the Second Amendment, I think gun owners would be more than willing to show patience. That is because an insurance saleman's public remarks would carry no weight in the gun arena. They aren't making themselves out as an expert or authority in the gun world.

I can also (somewhat) understand that the MSM may be ignorant of the gun issue, and may not realize that "Assault" weapon is an artificial construct. The Assault Weapons Ban is arbitrary, having nothing to do with a rifle's mechanics. Two rifles of identical capabilities are not treated equally. One that is scary looking is banned and one that is pretty isn't banned.

The Black rifle stuff was Zumbo repeating that nonsense. A Black rifle is one made of a composite stock (not wood) and is ugly, but there isn't any difference between these rifles mechanically. An Zumbo didn't know that???? How is that possible?

Zumbo was not someone who made his living selling insurance. He spent over 40 years in the gun community. He claimed to be an ardent supporter of the NRA and soldiers, yet he knew NOTHING of the concept of the unorganized militia, or what the words "shall not be infringed" meant?

Ted Nugent said he's been brought into the fold. Great.

However there is a lingering bad taste in the mouth in all of this... something about leading, a horse, and water.

9:34 AM, February 26, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think the comment made was a little misguided but don't think it was worth all this fuss. Perhaps some people will realize the consequences of throwing the word "terrorist" around.

And about this "self-policing", "free action", etc: I hope people realize that when they cross the line into crimes and torts that they are criminally and civilly liable. Yes, there is a right to free speech but there is no right to libel, slander, defame, etc. anyone.

And if you're going to engage in this have the guts to make your statements directly to the person you are criticizing. Claiming that you have a right to free speech but are afraid to say something to someone directly or to their face is cowardice. In other words show some guts instead of being a cowardly, whispering e-mob. Claiming that you are "policing" by whispering behind someone's back like schoolgirls is nothing of the sort. It is plain cowardice.

10:21 AM, February 26, 2007  
Anonymous Jack said...

Basically the MSM endorses free speech for those they agree with, but is 'skeptical' or such claims by those they disagree with.

As Jim Kuypers has observed, the US media is effectively anti-democratic. When you get to specifics they, as a body, will always betray principle to advantage their favored outcome.

10:59 AM, February 26, 2007  
Blogger Serr8d said...

Well, Anonymous 10:21, your comment certainly fits your own bill of 'cowardice', given your own anonymity. Also see 'hypocrisy'.

There was an excellent open forum on the very subject of Internet Privacy right vs. privlelges on Protein Wisdom over the weekend. Given Jeff Goldstein's well-documented internet issues, the forum has drawn some interesting commentary.

8:43 PM, February 26, 2007  
Blogger Steve Skubinna said...

Beat me to it, serr8d. Why in the world would I take seriously an anonymous comment complaining of a "cowardly, whispering e-mob."

Yeah, right. I post under my own name, anonymous boy, and don't whisper. I stand up for what I believe in, and stand behind what I say. Who's the coward again?

11:19 PM, February 26, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

serr8d is anonymous too.

8:16 AM, February 27, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

serr8d & steve skubinna-

I wasn't badmouthing anyone in particular or claiming I was "policing" anyone.

If you two have the guts to communicate with someone directly when you have a problem with them -good. Then what I said doesn't apply to you.

10:30 AM, February 27, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"[F]reedom of speech is always worth defending no matter whether we are offended by it or not." Indeed, as an individual's right to bear firearms is worth defending.

The NRA serves a useful function under the First Amendment. Not everyone is blessed with the combination of brains and balls that it takes to go about one's business unarmed. The NRA should not be muzzled in its advocacy of the rights of those who are deficient in either aspect (or both).

11:43 AM, February 27, 2007  
Anonymous TMink said...

Yeah, sometimes the anons post a thoughtful post and I respond. Other times the anon just trolls and I go get a drink of water and move on.

It is for Lent.

Trey

2:58 PM, February 27, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What an egregious comparison! As a psychologist you no doubt know that many people are naturally gay, so the question is, how bad was it for Washington to criticize people with characteristics that they were born with.

Gun ownership is quite different. Opponents have the right to try and repeal the 2nd amendment. Similarly, there are reasonable discussions about exactly what rights to arms we should have even among people who support the 2nd amendment: assault rifles? flamethrowers? tanks? thermonuclear weapons? You simply have to draw the line somewhere.

It's hard to think that the author isn't simply looking to promote her belief, rather than making a genuine inquiry.

5:22 PM, February 27, 2007  
Blogger Helen said...

Anonymous 5:22:

As a psychologist, I should know that people are "naturally gay" and this means they cannot be criticized? Thirty years ago, my profession diagnosed homosexuality as a disease, so forgive me if I don't follow along with the party line 100% of the time. Your argument is weak, pedophiles and racism have been considered to be genetic by some, should we never criticize those who express these traits? But this is all beside the point. My post is on the media giving a pass to those who criticize gun owners and applauding when a guy like Washington is basically told to head to a treatment center to hold on to his job. This is absurd and smacks of Stalinism. But the MSM is too busy pushing its socialist agenda in regards to what speech is acceptable to notice--it should concern all of us. And frankly, you could use a logic class.

6:05 AM, February 28, 2007  
Blogger trogdor said...

The root question here is whether or not we should consider it legitimate to criticize the individuals/groups in question. Is it okay to criticize people who advocate the use of military-style assault weapons for hunting? Of course: it's a political issue, and we can have a logical discourse about it.

But is it okay to criticize people for being homosexual? That depends on your view of the issue. If homosexuality comes from "nurture," then criticism is legitimate; you can argue about whether or not homosexuality is a bad thing, and then about how to eliminate homosexuality, etc--the same way the vast majority of people would argue about pedophilia and racism. (The vast majority of scholars consider pedophilia and racism functions of social development, and the minority who disagree only consider genetics to be one of many factors.)

However, if homosexuality is based on genetics, then criticism of people for being homosexual is inappropriate, even if you consider it to be a "flaw." (Nobody would defend the actions of someone who made slurs against someone with a developmental disorder.)

So Anonymous 5:22's argument makes logical sense; he simply has different assumptions than you do. Insofar as you can lump the mainstream media into one group, "they" have the same assumptions. Shouldn't you be attacking the MSM for having those assumptions, rather than accusing them of a "Stalinist" witchhunt?

11:22 AM, February 28, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Homophobia is bigotry, whereas an educated opinion about assault rifles is just that. It *is* egregious to complain that the MSM treats one differently than the other.

4:24 PM, February 28, 2007  
Blogger Helen said...

Anonymous 4:24:

Yes, it's just an "educated opinion" to liken gun owners to terrorists. Your choice of what defines bigotry is laughable. And sending Washington to the Gulag for treatment *is* egregious.

6:12 PM, February 28, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Plainly Zumbo has an educated opinion about firearms! He's an authority. It seems silly to deny that even if you don't agree with him.

Homophobia is certainly bigotry. Hoplophobia -- the irrational fear of weapons -- is not, as the object of bigotry is persons. You might say that intolerance of, say, the NRA is bigotry, but that's an abuse of the word. More accurately, such a person hates guns.

I didn't say Washington should be sent to the Gulag (IMO he should speak his mind). My sole point is that you are comparing apples and oranges to prove that the MSM is biased against firearms and homophobes. I happen to believe that the MSM is biased in this way, incidentally.

7:40 PM, February 28, 2007  
Anonymous Kristopher said...

I see that the "nuclear weapon" strawman has been brought out as an excuse to ban nasty looking rifles.

There is a bit of a difference between WMDs and a militiaman's basic weapons.

You cannot even store a WMD without endangering your neighbors. The consequences of a negligent discharge could wipe out an entire city.

A militia rifle properly secured or used endangers no one else.

11:38 AM, March 06, 2007  
Blogger serket said...

anonymous @ 5:22 pm said "Gun ownership is quite different. Opponents have the right to try and repeal the 2nd amendment."

This is outrageous that you would support altering the 2nd most important amendment. What other amendments would you dispose of? Perhaps you should move to a country with malleable laws.

2:13 PM, April 03, 2007  
Blogger look said...

情趣用品,
性感睡衣,
免費視訊聊天,
視訊交友網,
美姬圖影,
情境坊歡愉用品,
花美姬情趣用品,
成人圖片,
臺灣情色網,
嘟嘟情人色網,
色情網站,
情境坊歡愉用品,
徵信,
徵信公司,
徵信,
外遇,
徵信,
徵信,
抓姦,
徵信,
外遇,
徵信,
徵信社,
徵信社,
抓姦,
徵信社,
徵信社,
徵信社,
,
,
整型,
視訊聊天,
視訊交友,
AV女優,
色情,
A片,
A片,
情趣用品,
情色,
A片,
色情影片,
情趣用品,
A片,
AV女優,
視訊聊天室,
聊天,
情趣用品,
情惑用品性易購,
情侶歡愉用品,
A片,
情趣,
情惑用品性易購,
辣妹視訊,
自慰套,
情侶歡愉用品,
寄情築園小遊戲,
aio交友愛情館,
美女視訊,
色情A片,
情趣用品,
徵信社,
情趣用品,
A片,
美女視訊,
色情A片,
AV女優,
A片,
辣妹視訊,
自慰套,
情侶歡愉用品,

6:22 AM, March 15, 2009  
Blogger selina said...

福~
「朵
語‧,最一件事,就。好,你西.........................................................................................................................................................................................

8:56 AM, March 16, 2009  
Blogger selina said...

福~
「朵
語‧,最一件事,就。好,你西.........................................................................................................................................................................................

8:57 AM, March 16, 2009  
Blogger mmbox said...

本土成人貼圖站大台灣情色網台灣男人幫論壇A圖網嘟嘟成人電影網火辣春夢貼圖網情色貼圖俱樂部台灣成人電影絲襪美腿樂園18美女貼圖區柔情聊天網707網愛聊天室聯盟台北69色情貼圖區38女孩情色網台灣映像館波波成人情色網站美女成人貼圖區無碼貼圖力量色妹妹性愛貼圖區日本女優貼圖網日本美少女貼圖區亞洲風暴情色貼圖網哈啦聊天室美少女自拍貼圖辣妹成人情色網台北女孩情色網辣手貼圖情色網AV無碼女優影片男女情色寫真貼圖a片天使俱樂部萍水相逢遊戲區平水相逢遊戲區免費視訊交友90739免費視訊聊天辣妹視訊 - 影音聊天網080視訊聊天室日本美女肛交美女工廠貼圖區百分百貼圖區亞洲成人電影情色網台灣本土自拍貼圖網麻辣貼圖情色網好色客成人圖片貼圖區711成人AV貼圖區台灣美女貼圖區筱萱成人論壇咪咪情色貼圖區momokoko同學會視訊kk272視訊情色文學小站成人情色貼圖區嘟嘟成人網嘟嘟情人色網 - 貼圖區免費色情a片下載台灣情色論壇成人影片分享免費視訊聊天區微風 成人 論壇kiss文學區taiwankiss文學區

8:34 AM, March 22, 2009  
Blogger mmbox said...

2008真情寫真aa片免費看捷克論壇微風論壇大眾論壇plus論壇080視訊聊天室情色視訊交友90739美女交友-成人聊天室色情小說做愛成人圖片區豆豆色情聊天室080豆豆聊天室 小辣妹影音交友網台中情人聊天室桃園星願聊天室高雄網友聊天室新中台灣聊天室中部網友聊天室嘉義之光聊天室基隆海岸聊天室中壢網友聊天室南台灣聊天室南部聊坊聊天室台南不夜城聊天室南部網友聊天室屏東網友聊天室台南網友聊天室屏東聊坊聊天室雲林網友聊天室大學生BBS聊天室網路學院聊天室屏東夜語聊天室孤男寡女聊天室一網情深聊天室心靈饗宴聊天室流星花園聊天室食色男女色情聊天室真愛宣言交友聊天室情人皇朝聊天室上班族成人聊天室上班族f1影音視訊聊天室哈雷視訊聊天室080影音視訊聊天室38不夜城聊天室援交聊天室080080哈啦聊天室台北已婚聊天室已婚廣場聊天室 夢幻家族聊天室摸摸扣扣同學會聊天室520情色聊天室QQ成人交友聊天室免費視訊網愛聊天室愛情公寓免費聊天室拉子性愛聊天室柔情網友聊天室哈啦影音交友網哈啦影音視訊聊天室櫻井莉亞三點全露寫真集123上班族聊天室尋夢園上班族聊天室成人聊天室上班族080上班族聊天室6k聊天室粉紅豆豆聊天室080豆豆聊天網新豆豆聊天室080聊天室免費音樂試聽流行音樂試聽免費aa片試看免費a長片線上看色情貼影片免費a長片

8:34 AM, March 22, 2009  
Blogger nini said...

85cc免費影城 愛情公寓正妹牆川藏第一美女 成人影片 情色交友網 美女視訊 美女視訊 視訊情人高雄網 JP成人影城 383成人影城 aa片免費a片下載 a片線上看aa片免費看 ※a片線上試看※sex520免費影片※ aa片免費看 BT成人論壇 金瓶影片交流區 自拍美女聊天室 aa片免費a片下載 SEX520免費影片 免費a片 日本美女寫真集 sex520aa免費影片 sex520aa免費影片 BT成人網 Hotsee免費視訊交友 百分百貼影片區 SEX520免費影片 免費視訊聊天室 情人視訊高雄網 星光情色討論版 正妹牆 383成人影城 線上85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 ※免費視訊聊天室※ ※免費視訊聊天室※ 免費視訊聊天室 85cc免費影片 85cc免費影片 080苗栗人聊天室 080苗栗人聊天室 080中部人聊天室 080中部人聊天室 免費a片下載 免費a片 AA片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 日本av女優影片 av女優 av女優無碼影城 av女優 av女優 百分百成人圖片 百分百成人圖片 視訊情人高雄網 電話交友 影音電話交友 絕色影城 絕色影城 夜未眠成人影城 夜未眠成人影城 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 免費色咪咪貼影片 免費色咪咪貼影片 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 影音視訊交友網 視訊交友網 080視訊聊天室 ※免費視訊聊天室※ ※免費視訊聊天室※ 視訊聊天室 成人影音視訊聊天室 ut影音視訊聊天室 ※免費視訊聊天室※ 視訊ukiss聊天室視訊ukiss聊天室 視訊交友90739 視訊交友90739 情人視訊網 168視訊美女 168視訊美女 168視訊美女 視訊美女館 視訊美女館 免費視訊美女網 小高聊天室 小高聊天室 aio交友聊天室 aio交友聊天室 交友聊天室 交友聊天室 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 免費線上a片 免費線上a片 嘟嘟成人網站 成人漫畫 情色文學 嘟嘟成人網 成人貼圖區 情色文學成人小說 微風成人區 情色貼圖區 免費視訊聊天 免費成人圖片區 愛情公寓 愛情公寓聊天室 寄情築園小遊戲 免費aa片線上看 aa片免費看 情色SXE聊天室 SEX情色遊戲 色情A片 免費下載 av女優 俱樂部 情色論壇 辣妹視訊 情色貼圖網 免費色情 聊天室 情人視訊聊天室 免費a片成人影城 免費a片-aa片免費看 0204貼圖區 SEX情色 交友聊天-線上免費 女優天堂 成人交友網 成人情色貼圖區 18禁 -女優王國 080視訊美女聊天室 080視訊聊天室 視訊交友90739 免費a片 aio 視訊交友網 成人影城-免費a片※免費視訊聊天※85cc免費影片日本線上免費a片 免費色咪咪影片免費色咪咪影片aaa片免費看影片aaa片免費看成人影城免費色咪咪影片

3:56 PM, April 05, 2009  
Blogger 天天看正妹 said...

85cc免費影城aa的滿18歲影片85cc免費影片aaa免費看影片aaaaa片俱樂部影片免費 a 片85cc免費影片aa影片下載城微風成人av論壇免費a片aaa片免費看影片aaa片免費看短片小魔女免費影片免費視訊聊天 a片免費看a 免費影片觀賞免費視訊聊天室微風成人85cc免費影片85cc成人影城免費成人視訊亞洲禁果影城aa的滿18歲影片A片-sex女優王國aaaaa片俱樂部免費卡通影片線上觀看線上免費a片觀看A片-sex女優王國情色偷拍免費A片免費A片免費看 aa的滿18歲影片aaa影片下載城日本免費視訊av俱樂部後宮0204movie免費影片免費 a 片ut聊天室辣妹視訊情色美女視訊聊天室免費卡通影片線上觀看 ut交友成人視訊免費A片av1688影音視訊天堂aaa的滿18歲卡通影片s383情色大網咖視訊美女館aaaa 片俱樂部免費a片卡通aaaa片免費看影片aaa片免費看短片 杜蕾斯成人UT影音視訊聊天室 免費視訊78論壇免費aaaaa片俱樂部影片aaaa彩虹頻道免費影片aa影片下載城色漫畫帝國kk777視訊俱樂部美女視訊5278論壇ut聊天室aio交友愛情館免費視訊聊天成人a圖片區小說頻道彩虹頻道免費影片jp成人小魔女免費影城免費 aa 片試看情色文學A片-無碼援交東京熱一本道亞洲東洋影片gay片免費下載卡通aa片免費看成人影片分享小魔女免費影片視訊高雄情人聊天室34c卡通美女a片免費試看av免費影片,視訊聊天go2av免費影片情色 網站sex女優王國高中生援交偷拍自拍限制級色情 片plus論壇080情人網免費av影片免費a片卡通浪漫月光論壇免費aa片avdvd無碼影音視訊交友 免費視訊辣妹情人視訊網免費視訊辣妹 免費視訊78論壇台灣kiss情色貼圖區sex免費看影片彩虹論壇免費視訊聊天室 咆哮小老鼠分享論壇月宮貼圖色妹妹嘟嘟情人色網日本美女寫真集,kk視訊成人情色 視訊21sexsexy辣妹視訊百分百成人情色圖片ut辣妹哈啦視訊聊天室 素人自拍免費影片線上觀賞論壇男人的最愛中國性愛城avdvd無碼aaa免費看影片bt電影下載,免費成人片免費a片卡通dudu sex

9:12 AM, April 08, 2009  
Blogger 天天看正妹 said...

85cc免費影城aa的滿18歲影片85cc免費影片aaa免費看影片aaaaa片俱樂部影片免費 a 片85cc免費影片aa影片下載城微風成人av論壇免費a片aaa片免費看影片aaa片免費看短片小魔女免費影片免費視訊聊天 a片免費看a 免費影片觀賞免費視訊聊天室微風成人85cc免費影片85cc成人影城免費成人視訊亞洲禁果影城aa的滿18歲影片A片-sex女優王國aaaaa片俱樂部免費卡通影片線上觀看線上免費a片觀看A片-sex女優王國情色偷拍免費A片免費A片免費看 aa的滿18歲影片aaa影片下載城日本免費視訊av俱樂部後宮0204movie免費影片免費 a 片ut聊天室辣妹視訊情色美女視訊聊天室免費卡通影片線上觀看 ut交友成人視訊免費A片av1688影音視訊天堂aaa的滿18歲卡通影片s383情色大網咖視訊美女館aaaa 片俱樂部免費a片卡通aaaa片免費看影片aaa片免費看短片 杜蕾斯成人UT影音視訊聊天室 免費視訊78論壇免費aaaaa片俱樂部影片aaaa彩虹頻道免費影片aa影片下載城色漫畫帝國kk777視訊俱樂部美女視訊5278論壇ut聊天室aio交友愛情館免費視訊聊天成人a圖片區小說頻道彩虹頻道免費影片jp成人小魔女免費影城免費 aa 片試看情色文學A片-無碼援交東京熱一本道亞洲東洋影片gay片免費下載卡通aa片免費看成人影片分享小魔女免費影片視訊高雄情人聊天室34c卡通美女a片免費試看av免費影片,視訊聊天go2av免費影片情色 網站sex女優王國高中生援交偷拍自拍限制級色情 片plus論壇080情人網免費av影片免費a片卡通浪漫月光論壇免費aa片avdvd無碼影音視訊交友 免費視訊辣妹情人視訊網免費視訊辣妹 免費視訊78論壇台灣kiss情色貼圖區sex免費看影片彩虹論壇免費視訊聊天室 咆哮小老鼠分享論壇月宮貼圖色妹妹嘟嘟情人色網日本美女寫真集,kk視訊成人情色 視訊21sexsexy辣妹視訊百分百成人情色圖片ut辣妹哈啦視訊聊天室 素人自拍免費影片線上觀賞論壇男人的最愛中國性愛城avdvd無碼aaa免費看影片bt電影下載,免費成人片免費a片卡通dudu sex

9:12 AM, April 08, 2009  
Blogger 天天看正妹 said...

免費視訊聊天
ut聊天室辣妹視訊
kk777視訊俱樂部
UT影音視訊聊天室
吉澤明步
85cc免費影片
立花里子無碼
aaa片免費看短片
美女視訊
台南視訊,080情人網
日本免費視訊
aa片免費看
視訊網愛聊天室
影音視訊交友
咆哮小老鼠分享論壇
sex520免費影片
aio辣妺視訊
百事無碼a片
jp成人影片
免費av成人 情色
免費視訊美女色美眉部落格
168論壇視訊辣妹
免費色咪咪視訊網pc交友
s383視訊玩美女人
34c高雄視訊聊天
yam交友辣妹妹影音視訊聊天室
aaa俱樂部
jp成人
Show-live視訊聊天室
免費視訊辣妹
QQ美女視訊秀
live173影音視訊聊天室
真人視訊交友
辣妹妹影音視訊聊天室
倉井空免費影片
UT視訊美女交友
視訊美女 寫真
視訊情色網
亞洲東洋影片avdvd
ut聊天室kk俱樂部視訊
激情網愛聊天
秘密情人影音視訊網
av無碼,一夜情,偷拍,免費影片下載
色漫畫帝國sex888免費看影
拓網視訊交友
34c視訊網愛聊天室
xxx383美女寫真迷愛聊天
sex999免費影片兼職援交
辣妹視訊網
免費視訊78論壇
情色香港論壇
我愛78論壇情色情趣 商品
美女show-live視訊情色
美眉共和國080情人網
s383情色大網咖視訊
aaa免費看影片
kk777視訊俱樂部
小魔女影城
sexy diamond sex888入口
104免費成人情色文學小說
免費成人影片,g點
彩虹無碼av女優
成人免費視訊 完美女人
美女短片免費試看
tw33 影片交流
南台灣視訊網愛聊天室
sex888movie影城
18 禁亞洲名模瘋情
洪爺免費線上歐美A片段觀看
情人辣妹影片視訊直播
QQ美女視訊秀
hi5 tv免費影片sex貼片網
新浪視訊
日本視訊小魔女自拍
美女交友影音視訊聊天室
domain hilive.tv限制級
sex888免費看影片波霸美女寫真
love104影音live秀
甜心寶貝直播貼片自慰
捷克論壇
桃園援交小魔女自拍天堂
裸體高雄援交妹
gogo2sex桃園視訊妹
85cc情色視訊交友
視訊妹迷愛聊天
34c情人視訊網愛聊天室
南台灣視訊貓貓論壇
視訊美女
21sex美女視訊交友
34c美女寶貝視訊
免費a片線上觀看s383視訊
視訊交友90739,限制級,777美女dvd
免費成人影片,日本美女寫真集
080情人網,本土自拍貼圖
ut同志交友網
禁地論壇比基尼辣妹
dvd線上aa片免費看
show-live名模視訊
情人小魔女自拍
視訊自拍美女聊天室

9:12 AM, April 08, 2009  
Blogger 天天看正妹 said...

免費視訊聊天
ut聊天室辣妹視訊
kk777視訊俱樂部
UT影音視訊聊天室
吉澤明步
85cc免費影片
立花里子無碼
aaa片免費看短片
美女視訊
台南視訊,080情人網
日本免費視訊
aa片免費看
視訊網愛聊天室
影音視訊交友
咆哮小老鼠分享論壇
sex520免費影片
aio辣妺視訊
百事無碼a片
jp成人影片
免費av成人 情色
免費視訊美女色美眉部落格
168論壇視訊辣妹
免費色咪咪視訊網pc交友
s383視訊玩美女人
34c高雄視訊聊天
yam交友辣妹妹影音視訊聊天室
aaa俱樂部
jp成人
Show-live視訊聊天室
免費視訊辣妹
QQ美女視訊秀
live173影音視訊聊天室
真人視訊交友
辣妹妹影音視訊聊天室
倉井空免費影片
UT視訊美女交友
視訊美女 寫真
視訊情色網
亞洲東洋影片avdvd
ut聊天室kk俱樂部視訊
激情網愛聊天
秘密情人影音視訊網
av無碼,一夜情,偷拍,免費影片下載
色漫畫帝國sex888免費看影
拓網視訊交友
34c視訊網愛聊天室
xxx383美女寫真迷愛聊天
sex999免費影片兼職援交
辣妹視訊網
免費視訊78論壇
情色香港論壇
我愛78論壇情色情趣 商品
美女show-live視訊情色
美眉共和國080情人網
s383情色大網咖視訊
aaa免費看影片
kk777視訊俱樂部
小魔女影城
sexy diamond sex888入口
104免費成人情色文學小說
免費成人影片,g點
彩虹無碼av女優
成人免費視訊 完美女人
美女短片免費試看
tw33 影片交流
南台灣視訊網愛聊天室
sex888movie影城
18 禁亞洲名模瘋情
洪爺免費線上歐美A片段觀看
情人辣妹影片視訊直播
QQ美女視訊秀
hi5 tv免費影片sex貼片網
新浪視訊
日本視訊小魔女自拍
美女交友影音視訊聊天室
domain hilive.tv限制級
sex888免費看影片波霸美女寫真
love104影音live秀
甜心寶貝直播貼片自慰
捷克論壇
桃園援交小魔女自拍天堂
裸體高雄援交妹
gogo2sex桃園視訊妹
85cc情色視訊交友
視訊妹迷愛聊天
34c情人視訊網愛聊天室
南台灣視訊貓貓論壇
視訊美女
21sex美女視訊交友
34c美女寶貝視訊
免費a片線上觀看s383視訊
視訊交友90739,限制級,777美女dvd
免費成人影片,日本美女寫真集
080情人網,本土自拍貼圖
ut同志交友網
禁地論壇比基尼辣妹
dvd線上aa片免費看
show-live名模視訊
情人小魔女自拍
視訊自拍美女聊天室

9:12 AM, April 08, 2009  
Blogger 天天看正妹 said...

"免費視訊美女520sexy girl
sogo論壇aa片免費看
免費線上 aa 片試看85CC
情色18 禁sex520免費a長片
av女優影片情色文學
日本av淫蕩人妻免費漫畫帝國
777美女dvd無碼av女優
視訊辣妹girl5320 貼片貼圖區
本土自拍影片qq 美美色網漫畫
百分百成人圖片avdvd
視訊辣妹找援交
dodo豆豆聊天室
成人影片下載免費線上a片
sex999日本美女寫真集
色情漫畫777美女dvdav
小護士免費 aa 片試看
網路自拍美女聊天室天堂
080聊天網桃園天堂
雪之深戀 080聊天網水之浪漫
sex888入口免費性影片觀賞
高中生援交偷拍自拍限制級色情 片
aa 片試看免費卡通
百分百成人情色圖片
嘟嘟情人網影片
內衣模特兒寫真成人圖貼
免費視訊78論壇
拓網學生族視訊777美女
辣妹有約辣妹no31314視訊
dudu sex免費 aa 片試看
成人a影片論壇
"

9:13 AM, April 08, 2009  
Blogger 天天看正妹 said...

"免費視訊美女520sexy girl
sogo論壇aa片免費看
免費線上 aa 片試看85CC
情色18 禁sex520免費a長片
av女優影片情色文學
日本av淫蕩人妻免費漫畫帝國
777美女dvd無碼av女優
視訊辣妹girl5320 貼片貼圖區
本土自拍影片qq 美美色網漫畫
百分百成人圖片avdvd
視訊辣妹找援交
dodo豆豆聊天室
成人影片下載免費線上a片
sex999日本美女寫真集
色情漫畫777美女dvdav
小護士免費 aa 片試看
網路自拍美女聊天室天堂
080聊天網桃園天堂
雪之深戀 080聊天網水之浪漫
sex888入口免費性影片觀賞
高中生援交偷拍自拍限制級色情 片
aa 片試看免費卡通
百分百成人情色圖片
嘟嘟情人網影片
內衣模特兒寫真成人圖貼
免費視訊78論壇
拓網學生族視訊777美女
辣妹有約辣妹no31314視訊
dudu sex免費 aa 片試看
成人a影片論壇
"

9:13 AM, April 08, 2009  
Blogger 123456 said...

广州托盘复合托盘食品托盘天津木托盘胶合板托盘蜂窝纸托盘塑木托盘熏蒸木托盘木制托盘广东塑料托盘钢托盘钢制托盘栈板塑料栈板木栈板垫仓板托盘包装求购托盘天津托盘温州托盘山东托盘北京托盘上海木托盘塑胶托盘卡板纸卡板塑料卡板手推车推车机场手推车好孩子手推车液压手推车超市手推车医用手推车康贝手推车不锈钢手推车平板车电动平板车老虎车静音手推车平板手推车小推车模具架置物架堆垛架巧固架整理架物料整理架挂板架整理柜零件柜零件整理柜文件整理柜仓储笼仓库笼料箱塑料箱钢制料箱货箱整理箱塑料整理箱周转箱塑料周转箱防静电周转箱求购周转箱物流箱物料盒零件盒塑料零件盒卡板箱周转筐塑料周转筐周转箩登高车物流台车台车密集架档案密集架文件柜办公文件柜北京文件柜广州文件柜上海文件柜南京文件柜深圳文件柜钢制文件柜铁皮文件柜档案柜文件柜厂底图柜档案柜鞋柜储物柜更衣柜防火防磁柜防磁柜防火防磁文件柜图书架资料柜工具柜

5:26 AM, April 13, 2009  
Blogger 徵信 said...

外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇 外遇
外遇


外遇 外遇
外遇
外遇 外遇外遇
外遇

外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 ,
外遇 外遇 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇

外遇 外遇

外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿喜帖囍帖卡片外遇外遇 外遇 外遇外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇剖析 外遇調查 外遇案例 外遇諮詢 偷情 第三者外遇話題 外遇發洩 感情挽回 徵信社 外遇心態 外遇 通姦 通姦罪 外遇徵信社徵信社外遇 外遇 抓姦徵信協會徵信公司 包二奶 徵信社 徵信 徵信社 徵信社 徵信社 徵信社 徵信 徵信 婚姻 婚前徵信 前科 個人資料 外遇 第三者 徵信社 偵探社 抓姦 偵探社 偵探社婚 偵探社 偵探社偵探家事服務家事服務家電維修家事服務家事服務家事服務家事服務家事服務持久持久持久持久持久持久持久離婚網頁設計徵信社徵信社徵信徵信社外遇離婚協議書劈腿持久持久持久持久持久劈腿剖析徵信徵信社外遇外遇外遇外遇徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿

1:48 AM, April 21, 2009  
Blogger 1314 said...

視訊做愛視訊美女無碼A片情色影劇kyo成人動漫tt1069同志交友網ut同志交友網微風成人論壇6k聊天室日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞UT視訊美女交友..........................

11:05 PM, May 19, 2009  
Blogger 1122 said...

哈啦聊天室咆哮小老鼠影片aa成人漫畫葉晴貼影片影片轉檔程式情色影片foxy下載色情小說女影片免費下載a片aa免費看情色文學成人小說aa 片免費看影片 aa訊豆豆出租名模情人視訊aaa影片下載城男同志影片免費影片線上直播日本美女寫真集免費av18禁影片18成人卡通成人a片同志影片5278影片卡通影片做愛影片視訊交友網熟女人影片

2:17 AM, June 08, 2009  

Post a Comment

<< Home