Saturday, February 17, 2007

Fox News and Non-Verbal Body Language

Do you ever watch the body language of some of the liberal guests on Fox News? Last night, I watched Michelle Malkin hosting the O'Reilly Factor and started to notice all the squirming in their seats and eye darting on the part of her guests of the liberal persuasion. Typically when you see a guest with a liberal point of view on Today, World News Tonight, or any other liberal news program, meaning basically all of them except Fox News, they look rather confident, particularly if they are regular commentators. However, last night, one of the guests of Michelle's, an immigration activist, looked like he was gearing up for a boxing match rather than a discussion. His eyes darted back and forth and he looked quite uncomfortable, and probably with good reason. When your argument for immigration consists of saying something like, "Well, there are hundreds of millions of illegal immigrants all over the world, and the United States only has 6% of them--so what's the problem?" then maybe you should look uncomfortable because you would have to know deep down that your argument lacks the logic to stand up to scrutiny. When Katie Couric bats her eyelashes at you and coos in sympathy to your left leaning cause, you just don't need to get that worked up, but when you are challenged by the likes of Michelle Malkin, the eye darting and seat shifting begin.

In another segment, a Democratic strategist, Julie Roginsky, is talking with Michelle and a Republican strategist about the Edwards blogger fiasco. The Democratic strategist looks like she is geared up for a fight, her eyes are flashing and she looks ready ready to swing--but she also looks out of her element. She is geared up for a challenge and she must realize to some extent that her slanderous excuses for Edward's poor judgement in hiring bloggers will not hold up--her body language gives her away. "Look, McCain hired an anti-semitic blogger for his campaign," she states. Perhaps Roginsky should check her notes again and see that she made a "mistake." If she didn't feel uncomfortable while in the studio, then maybe she will when bloggers rake her over the coals. The time for getting away with any left-leaning statement as if it were fact is over, and maybe the liberals are just starting to figure that out--and thus the discomfort.

So next time you watch Fox News, take a look at the body language of the liberal guests as compared to the conservative guests. You will often see the liberal display a defensive stance, darting eyes and shifting in their seat. The discomfort could just be fear of being challenged, but my guess is, that deep down, many of these people know that their arguments do not hold water and what they can get away with on regular news segments no longer works on Fox News. It's no wonder liberals hate it so much.

48 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'd like to see you and Michelle Malkin host a show together, Dr Helen. You'd rule the airwaves.

7:58 AM, February 17, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Lol. Thanks for yer analysis.
Generalize much?

Speaking of defensive stances, how's that political philosophy coming, y'all were espousing? -- The Bush Doctrine, I think they were calling it. Hmm... speaking of shifty; indeed.

8:19 AM, February 17, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

...and the trolls instantly appear!

Very sad, really.

Dr. Helen, I appreciate your efforts. But you may have to go to a registered nonanonymous system after all.

9:26 AM, February 17, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Anon, let me take some time to analyze your brilliant response. OK, now let me do something important like feed my fish.

Seriously lame and vapid anon. Why go anon to write such drivel? It makes you look chicken and vapid.

Trey

10:03 AM, February 17, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just read about your Tennessee blogger fest.
How come you don't like to be called "Dr. Helen"?
Thanks

10:05 AM, February 17, 2007  
Blogger Cham said...

I'm all for analyzing people's written and spoken words, but body language? I think not.

10:11 AM, February 17, 2007  
Blogger Don Surber said...

Malkin certainly would be a popular show. Conserves would watch. Libs would watch. Hell, I would watch

10:17 AM, February 17, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Body language is not unimportant, as Dr. Helen knows too well from her work as a forensic psycholoist.

I think I understand why she doesn't care to be called Dr. Helen, but we all know her that way, and it id endearing to us.

Dr. Helen, youur thoughts are often so good at helping one's perspectives. Also reassuring, as one gets to wondering, is it just me? Am I really misguided? Thanks.

10:26 AM, February 17, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Taking this idea one step farther, I notice when someone sincerely believes the argument he's making the body language shows this and it doesn't matter with whom he is debating. It may have something to do with his voice, the lower registers seem to disappear along with confidence and sincerity.

Retread

10:30 AM, February 17, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I suppose it is inevitable that Fox News will be attacked as it is from an opposing point of view. It is the only network on the tube that is not decidedly left leaning. At best, and only at times, center. A little to a lot to the right the rest of the time. Nothing wrong with that, as you won't find it anywhere else. And I lean that way.

Fox does have talking heads on from both sides at the same time on a regular basis. I do appreciate that. Perfect? Well, no. But a much more honest and sincere attempt than anywhere else I have searched.
My biggest rub is that it is commercial television. Meaning, when a point of contention is being heatedly discussed, they have to break for a commercial right in the middle of it. All the steam gets let out. And when they return, a different subject is usually begun.
PBS was a good idea at one time. But it got hi-jacked. In allowing that, we all lost, I believe.

10:31 AM, February 17, 2007  
Blogger Helen said...

Cham,

Body language is very important, as a psychologist and as a layperson, one would do well to learn to interpret body language. It tells us a great deal about what a person thinks, how they feel, if they are telling an untruth etc. In fact, it is so strong an indicator that there are books about it--check out "Telling Lies" by Paul Ekman, an expert in nonverbal communication who analyzes political strategies etc.

HKL:

No, it's not just you, the MSM wants you to believe you are alone with your "weirdo" thoughts that the rest of society tags as abberrant. In reality, it is really the opposite, with many people having a different perspective than that portrayed on the liberal news shows. Remember, Fox News is the number one cable show on TV, some of us have to be listening. I don't agree with everything they say, but it is nice to know they are there.

Terry,

I answered that question in another thread, but at a function for fun, I do not like to think about work! Dr Helen makes it sound like I am "on duty." And it is my blog name. It also reminds me of the mistake I made earlier in life in getting my PHD in psychology.

10:57 AM, February 17, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I also like Tammy Bruce. She seems to come from a place where she applies logic rather than tainted opinion. She's unafraid to part ways with any point of view, and unafraid to stick to her own guns.

She states herself a Democrat. And not necessarily a left leaning individual all the time. But like her site says, common sense. I think she has it, and uses it.

11:02 AM, February 17, 2007  
Blogger Sissy Willis said...

That's what the remote is for, to shut off the sound and look away when that telltale body language and tone of voice come on.

11:51 AM, February 17, 2007  
Blogger knox said...

It's no wonder liberals hate it so much.

...same people who want you to believe unquestioningly that "straight" news coming from George Stephanopolous is objective. They can't even make fluff opinion shows like The View balanced with an equal number of liberal & conservative hosts.

1:36 PM, February 17, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The reason that those on the Left seem shifty and uncomfortable is that they NEVER debate or explain themselves with facts.

The Left will:
- Insult you-
-Laugh at you-
-become enraged-
-Accuse you of being a hater-
-Accuse you of being bribed by special interests-
-Become indignant that you would challenge someone with supreme moral authority-
-Change the subject repeatedly-
-Repeat a tired slogan-
-Cite hopelessly flawed statistics-
-Refer to some unprovable conspiracy-

But they will NEVER EVER argue facts.

In short, ALL of the Left's arguments are either outright falsehoods or they are gimmicked, twisted, or skewed in some way. One will NEVER hear a straight, sincere argument from the Left.

Their rebuttals to this post will prove my point.

1:38 PM, February 17, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

But they will NEVER EVER argue facts.

In short, ALL of the Left's arguments are either outright falsehoods or they are gimmicked, twisted, or skewed in some way.


The Iraq Debacle.
Talk your way out of that one, non-Lefties.
Heh. Indeed. Weasel, Wiggle, Squirm, Blame, Lose.
InstaRepublican circa 2003.

3:17 PM, February 17, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh yeah.

Outspend. Outwit. Outlast.

We're just getting started Mr.Reynolds and Ms.Smith... best buckle up for the long bumpy ride you've got yourselves in for. HehHehIndeed.

3:19 PM, February 17, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This ain't no pleasure boat ride, dahlins.

3:19 PM, February 17, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Maybe the Fox interviewers are just plain obnoxious! Ever think of that?

3:27 PM, February 17, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Um, if we were fully committed to fighting in Iraq and fought it the way the military wanted to fight it, who knows what might happen?


And how are Dr. Helen and Instapundit particularly responsible for the Iraq debacle?

4:07 PM, February 17, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Derve is back, posting as anonymous.

4:08 PM, February 17, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ever notice how the lefties cheer each terrorist success while constantly trying to undermine the troops?

But don't question their patriotism.

4:13 PM, February 17, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

another faceless, nameless anon wrote: "We're just getting started Mr.Reynolds and Ms.Smith... best buckle up for the long bumpy ride you've got yourselves in for. HehHehIndeed."

Wow, now that will scare you. That and the Easter Bunny. Taking yourself a little too seriously lately?

Trey

4:36 PM, February 17, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"The Iraq Debacle.
Talk your way out of that one, non-Lefties."

By debacle do you mean:
-Ridding the world of a maniacal dictator?
-Freeing 30 million Iraqis from bondage?
-Killing thousands of Al-Queda fighters?
-Removing the threat of WMD proliferation?

The "debacle" you speak of has not run its course yet. The war in Iraq is ongoing and we will win it. Shouldn't you wait until there has been an outcome before you pass judgment?
A lot of middle east dictators do not want Iraq to succeed. Their influence is making our job in Iraq tougher but we will win none the less.

4:51 PM, February 17, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's amazing that Dr. Helen is critiquing the body language of "libs" on Fox News.

Look at Dr. Helen's published photos on her web site!

She is a veritable semiotic carnival of ambiguous meanings...

Only, she fully understands the codes of symbolic seduction ...

in minimally tactile environments.

What a smart, smart woman!

6:22 PM, February 17, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

In other words, Dr Helen is hot. Duh.

8:23 PM, February 17, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hmmmm.

1. Not all of Malkin's arguments work out. But if a conservative really annoys liberals, then quite a few secondary and tertiary responses are generated within blogger, print and video media which would expand the potential audience.

Which probably includes liberals who hate Malkin since I've noticed quite a few liberals watch these shows in order to gain either a vicarious experience or to watch dog the show and then complain of any actual or imagined inaccuracies.

2. Frankly I think it is this near incestuous relationship between liberals and the MSM that has brought them down so very very low. If you apply the most basic concepts of the Theory of Evolution to politics then you'd view the political landscape as one of predators and prey. And in politics, where appearance is all, the media is the one with the primary capacity as predator.

In such circumstances then conservatives have the full rigor of journalistic predation to maintain the fitness of the "herd" so to speak. Those that are very able will survive whilst those that are marginal will be quickly weeded out at every level. Drones and culls won't continue with the herd because the predators will ensure that they are removed from competition.

In this sort of worldview the antagonism and partisanship of the MSM actually helps conservatives quite a bit by forcing them to be much more capable than the liberal competition.

Conversely the help the MSM regularly gives to liberals and the partisan way the MSM deliberately avoids culling the less able liberals actually significantly damages the liberal movement. This is exemplified by the great difficulty the liberal-left has in dealing with the more ridiculously insane members. It's also easily seen in the rather thin field presented as the Democratic Presidential candidates in the 2004 election cycle. Any political movement that cannot weed out silly candidates such as Al Sharpton or Dennis Kucinich shows the seriousness of this disability.

This disability is also shown in the self-destructive behavior in academia, jurisprudence and in the media itself. Without a viable mechanism capable of eliminating those that do not add to the overall value of a political organization but who rather simply generate ineffective and valueless "noise", then it is "noise" that will eventually subsume everything as there will be extraordinary difficulty in separating the "noise" from the value.

*shrug* which I, as a conservative, find terribly amusing. The MSM, so dedicated to all things liberal, are in actuality destroying the foundation of the very thing they seek to promote.

The Law of Unintended Consequences is a harsh mistress, but also a delicious one.

12:02 AM, February 18, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There's a lot of excuse making by all those conservative academics here. And lots of anonymous finger pointing too, eh "Greg"?

Yep. Debacle. Maybe "Dr."Helen can blame the women who victimized the American men, and all the whiny academics who contribute? Because we're all waiting to see how Mr.Insta given plenty of time spins this debacle into some kind of success.

Yep, we're waiting and watching. And there's lots of us too. HehHeh. C'mon out "Dr."Trey, seems like there's plenty o' defendin to be doin these days, eh?

5:00 PM, February 18, 2007  
Blogger Helen said...

Anonymous 5:00:

Derve, I have already told you before in a previous thread that you are not welcome to comment here. You are a jerk, you have poor manners and you seem to spend a lot of time harassing people at Althouse's blog. Do not comment here.

5:06 PM, February 18, 2007  
Blogger Helen said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

5:06 PM, February 18, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What are you talking about "excuse making"?

5:21 PM, February 18, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon (is it Derve in Drag?) wrote: "C'mon out "Dr."Trey, seems like there's plenty o' defendin to be doin these days, eh?"

What in the world are you trying to say? I enjoy a good verbal joust as much as anyone, but you need to make some semi-coherent point before I can take aim.

Trey

6:50 PM, February 18, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I knew you'd show up to defend yer lady, eh?

8:37 PM, February 18, 2007  
Blogger Peregrine John said...

Alas: anonymous commenting is permitted again, with its attendant trollery.

If we absolutely must put up with their twitticisms, may I recommend this personal policy: if you go without a name, you go without a response.

5:54 PM, February 19, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

P John, I will try.

Trey

11:56 PM, February 19, 2007  
Blogger Peregrine John said...

It works for my blood pressure, anyway!

1:19 PM, February 20, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

OK, I have decided to ignore trollish anon posts. Sincere and/or thoughtful anon posts are worth responding to. So I am amending my Lenten contract!

Trey

3:33 PM, February 23, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Doctor's analysis of lefty "body language" is right on the money. For those of you who don't think this is important, just look up the word kinesics. Thank you Dr.

9:12 AM, February 24, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Fox tensd to find the dumbest, least articulate dopes for thier liberal guests. Easier to intimidate.

11:10 PM, February 25, 2007  
Blogger Helen said...

Anonymous 11:10:

Perhaps, but liberals probably tend not to do the show due to fear of confrontation etc. and therefore the pickings might be slimmer. This is a mistake in my book, as the liberals on Fox look even more foolish, giving viewers a sense that liberals cannot support their views logically etc.

7:54 AM, February 26, 2007  
Blogger Happy said...

An interesting post:) I'll watch Fox new more carefully next time, but I was never so good at non-verbal things, I've studied some things about eye contact, but no more, so I'll read a bit about non-verbal gesture and then watch:)

1:32 PM, January 16, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

情趣用品,
性感睡衣,
免費視訊聊天,
視訊交友網,
美姬圖影,
情境坊歡愉用品,
花美姬情趣用品,
成人圖片,
臺灣情色網,
嘟嘟情人色網,
色情網站,
情境坊歡愉用品,
徵信,
徵信公司,
徵信,
外遇,
徵信,
徵信,
抓姦,
徵信,
外遇,
徵信,
徵信社,
徵信社,
抓姦,
徵信社,
徵信社,
徵信社,
,
,
整型,
視訊聊天,
視訊交友,
AV女優,
色情,
A片,
A片,
情趣用品,
情色,
A片,
色情影片,
情趣用品,
A片,
AV女優,
視訊聊天室,
聊天,
情趣用品,
情惑用品性易購,
情侶歡愉用品,
A片,
情趣,
情惑用品性易購,
辣妹視訊,
自慰套,
情侶歡愉用品,
寄情築園小遊戲,
aio交友愛情館,
美女視訊,
色情A片,
情趣用品,
徵信社,
情趣用品,
A片,
美女視訊,
色情A片,
AV女優,
A片,
辣妹視訊,
自慰套,
情侶歡愉用品,

6:13 AM, March 15, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

2008真情寫真aa片免費看捷克論壇微風論壇大眾論壇plus論壇080視訊聊天室情色視訊交友90739美女交友-成人聊天室色情小說做愛成人圖片區豆豆色情聊天室080豆豆聊天室 小辣妹影音交友網台中情人聊天室桃園星願聊天室高雄網友聊天室新中台灣聊天室中部網友聊天室嘉義之光聊天室基隆海岸聊天室中壢網友聊天室南台灣聊天室南部聊坊聊天室台南不夜城聊天室南部網友聊天室屏東網友聊天室台南網友聊天室屏東聊坊聊天室雲林網友聊天室大學生BBS聊天室網路學院聊天室屏東夜語聊天室孤男寡女聊天室一網情深聊天室心靈饗宴聊天室流星花園聊天室食色男女色情聊天室真愛宣言交友聊天室情人皇朝聊天室上班族成人聊天室上班族f1影音視訊聊天室哈雷視訊聊天室080影音視訊聊天室38不夜城聊天室援交聊天室080080哈啦聊天室台北已婚聊天室已婚廣場聊天室 夢幻家族聊天室摸摸扣扣同學會聊天室520情色聊天室QQ成人交友聊天室免費視訊網愛聊天室愛情公寓免費聊天室拉子性愛聊天室柔情網友聊天室哈啦影音交友網哈啦影音視訊聊天室櫻井莉亞三點全露寫真集123上班族聊天室尋夢園上班族聊天室成人聊天室上班族080上班族聊天室6k聊天室粉紅豆豆聊天室080豆豆聊天網新豆豆聊天室080聊天室免費音樂試聽流行音樂試聽免費aa片試看免費a長片線上看色情貼影片免費a長片

8:28 AM, March 22, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

85cc免費影城 愛情公寓正妹牆川藏第一美女 成人影片 情色交友網 美女視訊 美女視訊 視訊情人高雄網 JP成人影城 383成人影城 aa片免費a片下載 a片線上看aa片免費看 ※a片線上試看※sex520免費影片※ aa片免費看 BT成人論壇 金瓶影片交流區 自拍美女聊天室 aa片免費a片下載 SEX520免費影片 免費a片 日本美女寫真集 sex520aa免費影片 sex520aa免費影片 BT成人網 Hotsee免費視訊交友 百分百貼影片區 SEX520免費影片 免費視訊聊天室 情人視訊高雄網 星光情色討論版 正妹牆 383成人影城 線上85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 ※免費視訊聊天室※ ※免費視訊聊天室※ 免費視訊聊天室 85cc免費影片 85cc免費影片 080苗栗人聊天室 080苗栗人聊天室 080中部人聊天室 080中部人聊天室 免費a片下載 免費a片 AA片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 日本av女優影片 av女優 av女優無碼影城 av女優 av女優 百分百成人圖片 百分百成人圖片 視訊情人高雄網 電話交友 影音電話交友 絕色影城 絕色影城 夜未眠成人影城 夜未眠成人影城 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 免費色咪咪貼影片 免費色咪咪貼影片 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 影音視訊交友網 視訊交友網 080視訊聊天室 ※免費視訊聊天室※ ※免費視訊聊天室※ 視訊聊天室 成人影音視訊聊天室 ut影音視訊聊天室 ※免費視訊聊天室※ 視訊ukiss聊天室視訊ukiss聊天室 視訊交友90739 視訊交友90739 情人視訊網 168視訊美女 168視訊美女 168視訊美女 視訊美女館 視訊美女館 免費視訊美女網 小高聊天室 小高聊天室 aio交友聊天室 aio交友聊天室 交友聊天室 交友聊天室 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 免費線上a片 免費線上a片 嘟嘟成人網站 成人漫畫 情色文學 嘟嘟成人網 成人貼圖區 情色文學成人小說 微風成人區 情色貼圖區 免費視訊聊天 免費成人圖片區 愛情公寓 愛情公寓聊天室 寄情築園小遊戲 免費aa片線上看 aa片免費看 情色SXE聊天室 SEX情色遊戲 色情A片 免費下載 av女優 俱樂部 情色論壇 辣妹視訊 情色貼圖網 免費色情 聊天室 情人視訊聊天室 免費a片成人影城 免費a片-aa片免費看 0204貼圖區 SEX情色 交友聊天-線上免費 女優天堂 成人交友網 成人情色貼圖區 18禁 -女優王國 080視訊美女聊天室 080視訊聊天室 視訊交友90739 免費a片 aio 視訊交友網 成人影城-免費a片※免費視訊聊天※85cc免費影片日本線上免費a片 免費色咪咪影片免費色咪咪影片aaa片免費看影片aaa片免費看成人影城免費色咪咪影片

3:51 PM, April 05, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

广州托盘复合托盘食品托盘天津木托盘胶合板托盘蜂窝纸托盘塑木托盘熏蒸木托盘木制托盘广东塑料托盘钢托盘钢制托盘栈板塑料栈板木栈板垫仓板托盘包装求购托盘天津托盘温州托盘山东托盘北京托盘上海木托盘塑胶托盘卡板纸卡板塑料卡板手推车推车机场手推车好孩子手推车液压手推车超市手推车医用手推车康贝手推车不锈钢手推车平板车电动平板车老虎车静音手推车平板手推车小推车模具架置物架堆垛架巧固架整理架物料整理架挂板架整理柜零件柜零件整理柜文件整理柜仓储笼仓库笼料箱塑料箱钢制料箱货箱整理箱塑料整理箱周转箱塑料周转箱防静电周转箱求购周转箱物流箱物料盒零件盒塑料零件盒卡板箱周转筐塑料周转筐周转箩登高车物流台车台车密集架档案密集架文件柜办公文件柜北京文件柜广州文件柜上海文件柜南京文件柜深圳文件柜钢制文件柜铁皮文件柜档案柜文件柜厂底图柜档案柜鞋柜储物柜更衣柜防火防磁柜防磁柜防火防磁文件柜图书架资料柜工具柜

5:28 AM, April 13, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

免費視訊聊天 ut聊天室辣妹視訊UT影音視訊聊天室 吉澤明步QQ美女視訊秀 85cc免費影片aa影片下載城sex免費成人影片aaa片免費看短片美女視訊 sex383線上娛樂場av969 免費短片日本免費視訊aa影片下載城視訊網愛聊天室影音視訊交友 咆哮小老鼠分享論壇sex520免費影片aa免費影片下載城aio辣妺視訊 aio辣妹交友愛情館 jp成人影片aio交友愛情館馬子免費影片免費線上a片18成人85cc影城0204movie免費色咪咪視訊網pc交友s383視訊玩美女人34c高雄視訊聊天jp成人免費視訊辣妹 kk777視訊俱樂部xxxpandalive173影音視訊聊天室 sex520-卡通影片成人免費視訊 完美女人13060 免費視訊聊天sexy girl video movie辣妹妹影音視訊聊天室UT視訊美女交友視訊情色網百事無碼a片dvd線上aa片免費看18禁成人網ut聊天室kk俱樂部視訊激情網愛聊天 情人小魔女自拍卡通aa片免費看夜未眠成人影城aio性愛dvd辣妹影片直播拓網視訊交友視訊聊天室ggoo168論壇視訊辣妹love104影音live秀 美女show-live視訊情色yam交友辣妹妹影音視訊聊天室s383情色大網咖視訊aaa俱樂部台灣情色網無碼avdvdsexy diamond sex888入口Show-live視訊聊天室

9:51 PM, April 13, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

小魔女免費影城免費看 aa的滿18歲影片sex383線上娛樂場kk777視訊俱樂部aa的滿18歲影片85cc免費影片a片免費看A片-sex520視訊聊天室v6 0plus論壇sex520免費影片avdvd-情色網qq美美色網ut13077視訊聊天A片-無碼援交東京熱一本道aaa免費看影片免費視訊聊天室微風成人免費視訊聊天 ut聊天室av1688影音視訊天堂免費 a 片85cc免費影城亞洲禁果影城微風成人av論壇sex520免費影片JP成人網免費成人視訊aaa影片下載城免費a片 ut交友成人視訊85cc成人影城免費A片aa的滿18歲影片小魔女免費影片85cc免費影片aaa片免費看短片aa影片下載城aaaaa片俱樂部影片aaaaa片俱樂部aa的滿18歲影片小魔女免費影片台灣論壇免費影片後宮0204movie免費影片免費卡通影片線上觀看線上免費a片觀看85cc免費影片免費A片aa影片下載城ut聊天室辣妹視訊UT影音視訊聊天室 日本免費視訊aaaa 片俱樂部aaaa片免費看影片免費視訊78論壇情色偷拍免費A片免費aaaaa片俱樂部影片aa影片下載城色漫畫帝國av俱樂部aaaa彩虹頻道免費影片 杜蕾斯成人免費卡通影片線上觀看85cc免費影片線上觀賞免費線上歐美A片觀看免費a片卡通aaa的滿18歲卡通影片sex520免費影片免費 a 片

9:51 PM, April 13, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

視訊做愛視訊美女無碼A片情色影劇kyo成人動漫tt1069同志交友網ut同志交友網微風成人論壇6k聊天室日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞UT視訊美女交友..........................

10:27 PM, May 19, 2009  

Post a Comment

<< Home