Blog Juice
Well, apparently everyone is taking a look at their ranking on the new Blog Juice Calculator that determines one's blog rank by the number of Blogline subscribers, links, Technorati and Alexa ranking. Okay, so my blog does not have the highest ranking (why the heck would it? I work off a free blogger site, post less than most and have some odd ideas according to some) but it is not the worse. A Blog Juice score of 5.5--I'll take that.
posted by Helen at 10:24 AM
10 Comments:
I bet my score is much much worse than yours. lol
yep 3.4 for me
Interesting how they weight scoring
Bloglines subscribers 40%
Alexa 15%
Technorati 30%
Links 15%
Mark K. Sprengel,
Yes, the high percentage for bloglines is interesting. It would seem to come out differently if yahoo or another RSS reader was used. Hey 3.4 isn't bad either.
These kind of rankings always confuse me. Like politics, it seems the parameters are set to get the desired result. Seven of my nineteen favorites are on the list, of course you being one of my favorites. I look at your blog as one of quality over quantity and I look at your site everyday. It is always nice to read a blog that educates or expands the mind. I do not go to blogs to read filler. If I did I would read newspapers or watch tv instead.
I'd give you a ten just based on that photo. Rrrowrrr!
I would like to point out that most computer people in the know block alexa and by and large consider alexa spyware and therefore find ways of blocking them and similar tracking companies.
Ha! I've got ALL of you beat. A whopping, large, undeniably popular score of. . .
0.2
It is done Letterman style, right? Start with number 10 and end with number one? So that means I beat Daily Kos and a bunch of others? Right?
Right?
Okay. . .maybe not.
Hmmm...
This is interesting. Speaking as a rationalist, I must ask:
How did they arrive at this formula?
I wonder whose doing the selling and the buying?
Hey, call me Mr. Suspicious. My father's spent 35 years doing public policy health research and my background is in journalism.
Any time I stare at a data set or qualitative analysis promoting X over Y, I tend to get curious as to who will benefit if X beats Y.
BJ looks a little fishy to me.
Mine is 0.1 (do they have a zero rating?).
視訊做愛視訊美女無碼A片情色影劇kyo成人動漫tt1069同志交友網ut同志交友網微風成人論壇6k聊天室日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞UT視訊美女交友..........................
台灣kiss台灣美眉討論區性愛視訊交友無碼a片高雄美女視訊kiss168下載akiss168kiss168成人免費情人視訊kiss911kiss911貼圖片區kiss168下載first kiss台灣kiss倩色網免費ava片線上看a 免費影片線上直播小魔女a自拍大眾論壇成人用品維納斯yam天空影音18禁成人網成人光碟taiwankiss免費視訊聊天
Post a Comment
<< Home