Tuesday, December 13, 2005

Maybe there are Monsters under the Bed

Here is an interesting article looking at how fearful women are of crime in Britain (Thanks to reader Trevor for pointing this out). Single women are keeping knifes, bats and clubs under their bed for protection against burglars or rapists. Seems reasonable to me but the article portrays the women as a bunch of nervous ninnies who have been watching too much television and are worrying needlessly. The Brits seem determined to keep women from exercising any self-defense techniques that might require them to be active in their own protection. Here is some sage advice from a forensic psychologist who apparently would rather see women raped or killed than use a weapon against an intruder:

Question marks in any case surround the wisdom of keeping a weapon close at hand.

"I would want people to think very carefully about exactly what they would do with a weapon and what the costs might be," said Dr Gilchrist. "If they are trying to deal with their fears, there may be more appropriate ways such as contacting local police for advice and information, installing panic alarms, having a mobile phone by your bed or having a light that you turn on to signal to a neighbour to call the police for you.

"If you encounter someone in your bedroom, a pretty high level of violence is needed to be effective and I'm not entirely sure people have thought through the consequences," she said.


Although the article points out that crime is dropping in Britian, others such as Bristish constable, Ben Johnson (who is American), point out that violent crime and break-ins where people are home are common:

Although overall per-capita gun crime is lower in Britain than in the United States, British criminals seem far more bold and less fearful of confrontation, injury or punishment, Johnson said. He attributed it to the fact that Americans are permitted to guard their homes with guns - and would-be burglars know it.

"Here, it's quite common that burglars will break in while people are asleep in bed in the middle of the night," he said. "It is a common thing, which I think does reflect on the legal right to protect your home."

Without the deterrent effect of a homeowner's gun, he added, "there's not that threat to burglars, so we have a much higher rate of home break-ins (with the occupants present), whereas in the States, it's close to zero."


Maybe instead of making fun of women for worrying about monsters under the bed, Britain should take the concern of these intuitive women more seriously. Laws that advocate for criminals would leave anyone feeling insecure and frightened.

Update: And they think the women are paranoid and overreactive in the UK--take a look at this article where police point real guns at a family for having a toy gun in their car--thanks to a commenter for pointing out this article.

52 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dr. Helen:

What is this culture of encouraging people to be victims? I don't get it.

On some days, I half seriously suggest this solution: make all firearms illegal for all males, and mandatory for all females for five years. Then see how things are.

It all comes back to the quote that may or may not be real: God didn't make men equal; Colonel Colt did.

So long as men have overall more brute strength than women, a woman without a weapon is at a horrible disadvantage.

Many folks say, why, the police are there to protect us.

Right.

Sorry to be grumpy about this topic.

"Eric Blair"

6:03 PM, December 13, 2005  
Blogger Helen said...

Mr. Blair,

I agree--the whole thing in Britain where no one has a right to protect themselves leaves a very bad taste in my mouth. I could not stay for long in such a place. I have never understood why many women are against firearms. I guess they represent strength and power--something feminists find unsettling--better to play the victim or use the government as your weapon to get others to do what you want.

6:22 PM, December 13, 2005  
Anonymous dweeb said...

Eric, you can post as "other" and type in your name in the name box - it makes it easier to see who's talking at the top of your comment.

This article is expected. In England, they've been slowly eroding the self defense laws, practically criminalizing self defense, and attempting to remove it as an affirmative defense to assault and murder charges.

6:25 PM, December 13, 2005  
Anonymous Eric Blair said...

Thanks for the advice! I just have a bad taste in my mouth because my youngest son (kindergarten) was defending himself against a bully, and was criticized by a school official for doing so.

I didn't blow my top, but I did point out that I knew of no evidence that bullies *decreased* their bullying toward victims who passively took the abuse.

Oh well.

EB

7:34 PM, December 13, 2005  
Blogger ronin1516 said...

Well, at least in some liberal meccas in the US, you will meet guys who will tell you that they will "rather be a victim than commit a violent act against another person"!! Guy I know said this to me when he found out that I sometimes have a knife on my person. This fellow has been so overwhelmed and brainwashed by the liberal ideology one sees on Univ campuses, that he has managed to convince himself that the only moral option is to willingly be a victim.
I think a lot of women are also brainwashed in this manner.
Wonder what kinds of brainwashing techniques are used, that makes people disregard their natural fight-or-flight instincts. Or have them accept the fact that it is better to suffer and be a victim.

8:18 PM, December 13, 2005  
Anonymous Eric Blair said...

I guess I don't mind when a person makes a moral decision not to fight back against aggression, and is willing to accept the consequences. It doesn't make sense to me, but every person has their own ethical code.

What I mind is when such people insist that *I* share their ethos, by force of law.

8:21 PM, December 13, 2005  
Blogger Assistant Village Idiot said...

My two older sons were raised to be peaceable, but the eventual necessity of defending themselves was never questioned. When bullying happened, we went over the options, and I agreed I would back them up with the school whatever they decided. As they were both bright, they attracted more attention than they might have otherwise.

My two younger sons grew up abused in Romania, and had to defend themselves often at a state orphanage. Their outlook is a little different, though they are also peaceable now. I comment on it on my own blog under "Orphans and Terrorists."

9:32 PM, December 13, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

@ Eric Blair

"What I mind is when such people insist that *I* share their ethos, by force of law."


Damn right. Speak softly. Big stick.

10:17 PM, December 13, 2005  
Anonymous Teresa said...

"I would want people to think very carefully about exactly what they would do with a weapon and what the costs might be,"

I have news for Dr. Gilchrist... I know exactly what a weapon will do! And the consequences will be that the attacker will be very sorry indeed. Not to mention being physically as disabled as I can make him or her.

Good God - that doctor is a complete moron! How long does he think it takes to commit a crime? Unless the police are sitting right outside the window - the victim is toast. And the prize for very WORST suggestion I've ever seen goes to -

"having a light that you turn on to signal a neighbor to call the police for you"

The sheer stupidity of this one is breathtaking. There is so much wrong with it - there's no where to even begin. That anyone listens to such twaddle seriously... it's too much to contemplate!

12:10 AM, December 14, 2005  
Blogger ronin1516 said...

What bothers me, is that today's schools and colleges ( overrun with uber politically correct/leftist teachers and professors), seem to preach the gospel of victimhood. That is it not OK to stand up for oneself, that it is wrong to take responsibility for one's safety and well being, that one ought notto stand upo and confront adversity. That one ought to become a weak, blubbering fool, and either run to therapy sessions, or expect some agency of the State to come and rescue oneself.
One result of this kind of ideological indoctrination is a phenomnon I see among a lot of folks in this very liberal-leftist Univ town I live in. Most folks here are unable to even grasp the concept that Islamic terrorists ATTACKED US on Sept 11th!!!! That said terrorists killed, injured and maimed our fellow citizens ( including my close friend Todd Ouida!!!! And as a result of that attack, we need to fight off Islamic terrorists at home or abroad. This kind of muddled thinking leads folks to believe that the terrorists were justified in attacking us, and the calls for us to "understand" why the attacks were jsutified. Heck our country was attacked, our fellow citizens were killed in the thousands, and these jackasses are incapable of realising that we are in danger, and that we need to defend ourselves and our society.

2:03 AM, December 14, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just make sure you're actually operating under the true definition of "self-defense" - generally "imminent danger of serious physical injury".

Assaulting someone because you're afraid of the repurcussions of an earlier assault you initiated against them isn't "self-defense" -it's just being a coward who doesn't take responsibility for their actions.

4:30 AM, December 14, 2005  
Blogger Helen said...

anonymous 4:30

Given your logic, I sure hope you don't defend any battered women who kill their husbands without "imminent danger" being present.

Teresa,

I agree with you regarding this moron of a doctor. Again, it is the mental health professional making it pathological to have any normal feelings of fear, paranoia etc. There is this code within our profession that violence of any type is always wrong. It is sickening.

7:07 AM, December 14, 2005  
Blogger BobH said...

Comments on defense and retaliation:

Quite often, when there is an attack-and-defend situation conducted in private, there is a real problem in identifying the aggressor and the defender. Also, in these situations, the level of violence often escalates when the defense is more injurious than the preceeding attack or defense. In these cases, it probably isn't reasonable to "blame" one party or the other.

Also, two individuals or groups engaged in "combat" (I use the term loosely) are very often not very particular about the level of "collateral damage" meaning damage inflicted on non-combatants. One estimate has it that in modern warfare conducted in places like Africa, non-combatants comprise 90% of the casualties. In this situation, the society at large (i.e., the non-combatants) probably wouldn't care who was to blame, they just want the combat to stop, even if that involves depriving people of the a "right of self-defense".

8:05 AM, December 14, 2005  
Blogger Gina said...

bobh,

if the attacker comes into your home who has no business being there , you should be able to make the distinction , or if the attacker is attacking a women out in the street and she happens to fight back you mean to tell me that if the woman harms the attacker more than she was hurt then she could be in trouble ... ?

I have a daughter that takes kick boxing to keep in shape , she has also taken self defense classes , I hope she never has to defend herself , but if she ever has to I pity the fool that tries anything with her .

8:34 AM, December 14, 2005  
Blogger Helen said...

gina,

I'm with you. I have the self-control not to harm anyone even for verbal taunts. However, if someone physically attacks me, anything is fair game. If one is home in bed sleeping and an intruder breaks in, they have made the decision that they may be hurt or killed. This is self-defense.

This should be true even if it is the police who break into a person's bedroom in the middle of the night--but we often think a sleeping person should know the difference. Look at the Corey Maye story--a young father shot a police officer who barged into his house while he was sleeping--now he faces the death penalty in Mississippi.

8:48 AM, December 14, 2005  
Blogger ronin1516 said...

The Corey Maye story is tragic, a result of the "no-knock warrants" that cops execute these days.
However, in the past week, we have seen every death-penalty advocate hanging out side San Quentin prison, trying to convince us that Tookie Williams was some kinda saint who was innocent. lawyers fell over each other trying to get a reprieve for Tookie.
However, I am surprised ( maybe I shouldnt) that none one, not the Innocence project, nor anti-death penalty folks like Sister Helen Prejean and Ed Asner or anyone elase has taken up Corey Maye's case - a clear case of outright injustice if there ever was one.

9:03 AM, December 14, 2005  
Blogger Helen said...

ronin1516,

I imagine that Tookie Williams being a gangbanger and a children's bookwriter has something to do with it. Apparently, that is really in style with these politicians and celebrities. A poor African American male who tried to defend himself with a weapon does not hold the same kind of symbolism for the proponents of "justice." That would be admitting that it is ok to defend one's self, even from the police. As long as you go into stores and point a gun at the clerk and shoot them directly in the head--you're a real saint.

Self-defense is never right in these people's book--unless you are a battered woman who walks up and shoots your husband in a bar--then they will rally behind you. I have dealt with these "advocates" in my work and their logic never ceases to amaze me.

10:11 AM, December 14, 2005  
Anonymous Eric Blair said...

I hate to say this again, but the issue is individualism versus the State.

The State wants citiizens to be passive and allow the State to make all major decisions. The responsibility for everything is on the State.

The individual takes responsibility for her or his own actions, makes decisions on that basis, etc.

So we get a culture that is unhappy when a citizen shoots a burglar, or even attempts to defend her or himself against direct aggression.

With dear departed Tookie, the issue is that the State is responsible for his actions, because of being poor, Black, and raised in a bad neighborhood. The Left never gets it: a murderer makes a decision to kill. Tookie sure made that decision, twice, over a two week period.

He took away the lives of four people, and for a small amount of money.

I'm not shedding any tears for the loss of Tookie Williams.

10:27 AM, December 14, 2005  
Blogger dadvocate said...

I don't know about Britian, but in the U.S. women worry much more about attack than men but men are more likely to be attacked. You can check it out at the Dept. of Justice Statistics.

If someone attacks my family I will do everything in my power to make sure "the defense is more injurious than the preceeding attack." I totally disagree with this statement, "it probably isn't reasonable to "blame" one party or the other." So if someone attacks me or my family and I kick his/her ***, no one's to blame. Ridiculous. I am aware that some with grossly misplaced values and perceptions would blame me though.

11:22 AM, December 14, 2005  
Anonymous Auld Pharte said...

Tookie's dead. Good. Moving on...

I once had a lengthy conversation with a {classic CA liberal} female UC Berkeley-trained lawyer regarding self-defense. She ended up in a logical corner, finally admitting that if it came down to a life-or-death situation between her and a domestic intruder, she would passively surrender to lethal force rather than exercise it. And she can vote, too. Scary.

12:27 PM, December 14, 2005  
Anonymous 1charlie2 said...

Gina,
AFAIK, It's generally not a case of 'if the defender harms the attacker more,' but rather 'did the defender stop once the attack ended.' If you keep beating the corpse until the cops arrive, it doesn't look too good to a jury :)

Also, in many jurisdictions, if you are not in your home, you may have a 'duty to retreat' when doing so does not place you in more danger, particularly when the defender knows 'a disparity of force' exists. Example: I'm at a social event, armed, and an ijit approaches and tries to start trouble, I have to ake special precautions. If I stood my ground while unarmed, and answered him provocation for provocation, 'self-defense' might apply if he became violent. But since I'm armed, the disparity of force exists, and in some places I'm expected to exercise greater restraint, perhaps by not answering his insults at all. This generally only applies if I can "see it coming." As I've told students, 'if you have Smith & Wesson with you, leave your ego at home.'

1:03 PM, December 14, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Pre-emptive self-defense" isn't self-defense, its assault so I wouldn't support it. Its just someone making an excuse for what they do. I don't initiate violence against people and leave other people and their property the hell alone, so I don't have a problem following the rules.

All these macho "family defense" scenarios are interesting, but you better be under the legal definition of self-defense, or you are going to be in deep trouble.

1:16 PM, December 14, 2005  
Blogger dadvocate said...

Anonymous 1:16 - You seem to have a problem with someone who thinks and plans ahead to defend themselves. What about those that plan ahead to rob and assualt others?

1:35 PM, December 14, 2005  
Anonymous dweeb said...

"What bothers me, is that today's schools and colleges ( overrun with uber politically correct/leftist teachers and professors), seem to preach the gospel of victimhood"
Of course, and why? because it supports the same approach for the conduct of a nation. Ask yourself, what is the opposite of a "peace activist?" Is it a war activist, i.e. someone who seeks war as an end unto itself? Of course not. It's someone who realizes was is sometimes necessary. Now, we can debate, for a GIVEN war, whether it's necessary and justified IN THAT INSTANCE, but to be a 'generalist' peace advocate is to say there is NOTHING worth EVER fighting for. It's the ultimate manifestation of moral relativism, as best expressed in Lennon's song "Imagine"
Helen, your comment about battered women who kill their husbands absent *imminent* threat raises interesting parallels with the concept of preemptive war. The difference, of course, is that the way we conduct preemptive war is more akin to the woman handcuffing her husband and handing him over to the authorities.

bobh, very often, combat in places like Africa may involve one side defending those collateral persons.
"AFAIK, It's generally not a case of 'if the defender harms the attacker more,' but rather 'did the defender stop once the attack ended."
Define "ended" What is the minimum force necessary. Seems to me, one must not stop until it is safe to do so, i.e. when one is reasonably assured the attack will not resume as soon as one lets one's guard down, and that means incapacitating the assailant. Police don't holster their guns until the suspect is securely handcuffed, remember.

1:38 PM, December 14, 2005  
Blogger Helen said...

anonymous 1:16:

I sure wouldn't want to count on you for much--you sound like the type who would bail out or just stand there if someone were in trouble.

I have a friend like that--and like auld pharte stated above--she is one of those types who states she will not fight for anything. She would rather die or see her whole family killed before her than raise one hand that might leave someone to question whether what she did was right or wrong. She is so afraid of responsiblity that she chooses to live as a coward, in my book.

That is fine--but I make sure I do not have to rely on her for protection in any way such as at work etc. Not wishing to be responsible and giving your own life for a martyrish cause is fine--but no one has the right to cross the line into telling other people that they cannot defend themselves. I understand that self-defense means only using force if one is in imminent danger but the wording of your comment implies that you don't quite believe that people have a right to even basic self-defense.

1:45 PM, December 14, 2005  
Blogger BobH said...

Do people who don't want to defend themselves believe in having police departments and paid bodyguards? Really, what is the difference between defending yourself and hiring somebody else to defend you, assuming that you're rich?

Supposedly the police are "impartial" although it might be hard to convince Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton of that.

2:32 PM, December 14, 2005  
Blogger Helen said...

bobh,

The difference is you don't have to do the dirty work yourself. It's like people who hire hitmen to some degree--the solicitors of murder don't think they have done anything wrong and do not feel guilty if someone is killed by a hitman. Of course, I am not saying that citizens who want to use the police or bodyguards for protection are like solicitors but the psychological reasoning is the same. I can make someone else take care of the bad stuff so I do not have to do it. But, of course, the police are under no obligation to protect any particular individual--people do not seem to understand this fact.

2:44 PM, December 14, 2005  
Blogger ronin1516 said...

Dr Helen - remember a few comments back, I had talked about my friend hee in Ann Arbor, who said he would rather allow himself to be victimised, than do violence aginst another person? Well, guess what? My buddy managed to get hisself arrested early this morning around 3pm. Seems he had a few brewskys to drink at the local gay bar, and then he and his metrosexual band of merry grad students went around his neighborhood ( mostly populated by the hip, liberal,GLBT grad students) throwing snowballs at other peoples' cars, bedroom windows etc. Someone who was studying for finals, got annoyed, and came out with his housemates to confront my friend and his 'gang". A fight ensued - kind of an effeminate fight, with my friend being one of the main perpetrators, until the cops came and put on the stainless steel bracelets and took them away to the drunk tank!!!!! Hypocrisy of the highest order. Here a couple of days back he was talking like he is more of a pacifist than Gandhi himself, but last ight he physically attacks someone who protested becasue my friend started the incident by throwing snowballs.
I guess I will have a good time now ridiculing him mercilessly!!!!

3:25 PM, December 14, 2005  
Blogger Helen said...

ronin1516,

That is too funny. I always watch out for those people who go on about not being violent---they are usually harboring intense amounts of rage which either comes out in passive-aggressive ways or just plainly aggressive ways like your friend. Have fun abusing him--sounds like he deserves it.

3:49 PM, December 14, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

(1:16)

dadvocate-

I don't have a problem with people that make plans or preparations to defend themselves, as long as they aren't committing a crime or tort. I have a problem with people that commit crimes and torts that clearly aren't in true legal self-defense, but try to use self-defense as an excuse. Often its a controversy that the person trying to claim "self-defense" started in the first place. Sort of a situation like: "I'll bully, harass, and/or abuse you to see if I can get away with it. If I can, great. But if you get angry and don't put up with it I can run to everyone and say that I'm 'scared' of you."

It's kind of strange to claim that you're "afraid" of the dog that you've been viciously, repeatedly, and continually poking with a sharp stick. Basically, it says that you're a cowardly fraud trying to get away with abusing and committing crimes and torts against someone.

dweeb-

The "handcuffing" example is bogus unless the husband was actually involved in a crime. That's why force is limited to self-defense, so people can't assault people for things that aren't crimes. Your scenario could just as easily be a stalker or her family "arresting" an innocent ex that rejected her for dating someone new. Then it's false imprisonment, assault, fraud, false claims, etc, etc, etc.....

helen-

I think you're misunderstanding my position. I am a strong supporter of self-defense, both as a principle and a legal doctrine. I was merely stating that it shouldn't be used as an excuse to initiate force when it doesn't really apply. Otherwise you would have nanny-state wackos advocating "preventive" force against people they don't like or even worse, have opinions they don't like.

Would you want some nut assaulting one of your sons (don't know what kind of kids you have) because he had consensual sex with the nut's daughter and the nut thought your son "took it too far" and claimed he was "defending his family"?

6:50 PM, December 14, 2005  
Blogger Helen said...

anonymous 6:50-

Thanks for clarifying your position--I was speaking of an imminent threat being present such as someone breaking in while one is asleep. I certainly would not advocate force in the example that you used.

8:34 PM, December 14, 2005  
Blogger ronin1516 said...

One example of what happens when folks dont take self-defense seriously has been displayed in Ann Arbor, Mi this year. In ANn Arbor, the main campus is in the middle of town, there isnt a clear line demarking campus and town. And Ann Arbor, generally has a reputation of being a safe town. So, most students and townies are rather lax about security issues. They leave doors in their homes unlocked, women walk around campus alone late at night, etc. So from about early spring, attacks began to occur around the campus and the surrounding areas. groups of black gangbaners would follow people walking alone or in small groups, attack them, and run off with their wallets/purses, laptops, cell phones and other valuables. This gang also committed a few car-jackings in University and city parking structures. And I think this gang is still active, they h ave committed about 50 crimes since about April. Police had to fly planes trailing big messages saying things like "lock your doors", or " dont walk alone around campus or the downtown area".
When a couple of the gangbangers were arrested in mid-November, they said that they could go about their merry way in Ann Arbor, becasue, (1)students in Ann Arbor at the Univ of Michigan were richer and carried more valuables, and (2) that they did not carry weapons, (3) they usually never fought back. Also they said they never picked on guys who looked like ROTC cadets, becasue those guys usually not afraid to fight back!!!!
Well, hopefully the cops will get the rest fo the gang soon. But,when surveyed, students, most of them being of the liberal-left persuasion, said the most ridiculous things. Like - they actually said that the gang-bangers were not at fault - they were "oppressed people lashing out against the people oppressing them!!!!" or something ridiculous like that.
So, the attacks continue, because, student and townies refuse to take the necessary precautions.

6:42 AM, December 15, 2005  
Blogger Helen said...

ronin1516,

These idiot students deserve what they get--who wouldn't take advantage of such ignorance. The problem becomes that they leave the rest of the town vulnerable to these gangs because they not only don't stand up to anyone but actively encourage more violence. My guess is that at some point, the gang will injure one of these prima donnas to the point where it becomes imperative to deal with them. Sorry you have to live in such a town.

8:50 AM, December 15, 2005  
Blogger ronin1516 said...

Dr Helen - hope the folks in Volunteer-land are saner than folks in Wolverine-land. BTW, the attacks continue in only those neighborhoods that are populated by the more leftist, more PC type of students and townies.

2:07 PM, December 15, 2005  
Blogger pst314 said...

Dr Helen and Ronin1516:

"rather be a victim than commit a violent act against another person"

I'm curious if these people would report a crime to the police. If so, that's just palming off all responsibility to someone else who IS willing to use violence to stop crime. Sort of like the steak-eater to despises butchers.

2:24 PM, December 17, 2005  
Anonymous triticale said...

Many years ago at a party I got into a discussion with someone who was such a "good person" that he wouldn't commit the evil of resorting to violence to keep his wife from being raped. She didn't get it either when I told her that this constituted grounds for divorce.

I would like to point out to the first anonymous that it wasn't only Colonel Colt who made people equal. It was Señor Rossi, or more specifically one of his Smith & Wesson revolver clones, which made the woman I married equal to the man who kicked in the door of her apartment. A couple of .32 rounds in his general direction and he decided that whatever he had in mind wasn't worth it.

11:53 PM, December 17, 2005  
Anonymous "gunner" said...

dr. helen, i happened across your blog while browsing the net, i'm a retired armed professional, (not a police officer) and i agree completly with your remarks on women and self defense. one of the first things i did after getting married nearly 40 years ago was to buy a pistol for my wife and teach her how to use it, later as our daughter grew up she got her gun and began her training. now my grand daughter is 10 years old and she will be getting her first .22 training pistol, (a SIG "mosquito") and will follow in her mother and grandmother's footsteps. i may not be able to be there to protect my ladies at all times but that does not mean they should be helpless victims in my absence, or unable to lend a hand when i am there, and if i go down the perp's next problem should, and will be an angry widow with a gun.

8:58 PM, February 07, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Enjoyed a lot! How to oil change mercedes ml 320 hair loss organin Google allegra update Porsche radio cosmetic surgery tv commercials Information venlafaxine Voice over ip business high speed internet access 70s tv comedy shows Mature slumber party water filter rating call center outsourcing How to set popup blocker on yahoo dsl Scrabble graj Skin care with vitamin c Graphics card for a computer

8:11 PM, April 23, 2007  
Blogger xji4ek6 1j4 said...

海鮮餐廳,花蓮餐廳,美食餐廳,好吃餐廳,美食玩家,美食,海產店,花蓮海產店,花蓮美食,海鮮餐廳,花蓮餐廳,美食餐廳,好吃餐廳,美食玩家,美食,海產店,花蓮海產店,花蓮美食,海鮮餐廳,花蓮餐廳,美食餐廳,好吃餐廳,美食玩家,美食,海產店,花蓮海產店,花蓮美食,花蓮海產店,海鮮餐廳,美食餐廳,好吃餐廳,美食玩家,美食,海產店,花蓮餐廳,花蓮美食,花蓮海產店,花蓮餐廳,美食餐廳,好吃餐廳,美食玩家,美食,海產店,海鮮餐廳,花蓮美食,花蓮海產店,花蓮餐廳,美食餐廳,好吃餐廳,美食玩家,美食,海產店,海鮮餐廳,花蓮美食,花蓮海產店,花蓮餐廳,美食餐廳,好吃餐廳,美食玩家,美食,海產店,海鮮餐廳,花蓮美食,花蓮海產店,花蓮餐廳,美食餐廳,好吃餐廳,美食玩家,美食,海產店,海鮮餐廳,花蓮美食,花蓮海產店,花蓮餐廳,美食餐廳,好吃餐廳,美食玩家,美食,海產店,海鮮餐廳,花蓮美食,花蓮海產店,花蓮餐廳,美食餐廳,好吃餐廳,美食玩家,美食,海產店,海鮮餐廳,花蓮美食

12:09 PM, February 22, 2009  
Blogger selina said...

福~
「朵
語‧,最一件事,就。好,你西.................

5:16 AM, March 14, 2009  
Blogger look said...

情趣用品,
性感睡衣,
免費視訊聊天,
視訊交友網,
美姬圖影,
情境坊歡愉用品,
花美姬情趣用品,
成人圖片,
臺灣情色網,
嘟嘟情人色網,
色情網站,
情境坊歡愉用品,
徵信,
徵信公司,
徵信,
外遇,
徵信,
徵信,
抓姦,
徵信,
外遇,
徵信,
徵信社,
徵信社,
抓姦,
徵信社,
徵信社,
徵信社,
,
,
整型,
視訊聊天,
視訊交友,
AV女優,
色情,
A片,
A片,
情趣用品,
情色,
A片,
色情影片,
情趣用品,
A片,
AV女優,
視訊聊天室,
聊天,
情趣用品,
情惑用品性易購,
情侶歡愉用品,
A片,
情趣,
情惑用品性易購,
辣妹視訊,
自慰套,
情侶歡愉用品,
寄情築園小遊戲,
aio交友愛情館,
美女視訊,
色情A片,
情趣用品,
徵信社,
情趣用品,
A片,
美女視訊,
色情A片,
AV女優,
A片,
辣妹視訊,
自慰套,
情侶歡愉用品,

11:24 PM, March 14, 2009  
Blogger mmbox said...

本土成人貼圖站大台灣情色網台灣男人幫論壇A圖網嘟嘟成人電影網火辣春夢貼圖網情色貼圖俱樂部台灣成人電影絲襪美腿樂園18美女貼圖區柔情聊天網707網愛聊天室聯盟台北69色情貼圖區38女孩情色網台灣映像館波波成人情色網站美女成人貼圖區無碼貼圖力量色妹妹性愛貼圖區日本女優貼圖網日本美少女貼圖區亞洲風暴情色貼圖網哈啦聊天室美少女自拍貼圖辣妹成人情色網台北女孩情色網辣手貼圖情色網AV無碼女優影片男女情色寫真貼圖a片天使俱樂部萍水相逢遊戲區平水相逢遊戲區免費視訊交友90739免費視訊聊天辣妹視訊 - 影音聊天網080視訊聊天室日本美女肛交美女工廠貼圖區百分百貼圖區亞洲成人電影情色網台灣本土自拍貼圖網麻辣貼圖情色網好色客成人圖片貼圖區711成人AV貼圖區台灣美女貼圖區筱萱成人論壇咪咪情色貼圖區momokoko同學會視訊kk272視訊情色文學小站成人情色貼圖區嘟嘟成人網嘟嘟情人色網 - 貼圖區免費色情a片下載台灣情色論壇成人影片分享免費視訊聊天區微風 成人 論壇kiss文學區taiwankiss文學區

6:23 AM, March 22, 2009  
Blogger mmbox said...

2008真情寫真aa片免費看捷克論壇微風論壇大眾論壇plus論壇080視訊聊天室情色視訊交友90739美女交友-成人聊天室色情小說做愛成人圖片區豆豆色情聊天室080豆豆聊天室 小辣妹影音交友網台中情人聊天室桃園星願聊天室高雄網友聊天室新中台灣聊天室中部網友聊天室嘉義之光聊天室基隆海岸聊天室中壢網友聊天室南台灣聊天室南部聊坊聊天室台南不夜城聊天室南部網友聊天室屏東網友聊天室台南網友聊天室屏東聊坊聊天室雲林網友聊天室大學生BBS聊天室網路學院聊天室屏東夜語聊天室孤男寡女聊天室一網情深聊天室心靈饗宴聊天室流星花園聊天室食色男女色情聊天室真愛宣言交友聊天室情人皇朝聊天室上班族成人聊天室上班族f1影音視訊聊天室哈雷視訊聊天室080影音視訊聊天室38不夜城聊天室援交聊天室080080哈啦聊天室台北已婚聊天室已婚廣場聊天室 夢幻家族聊天室摸摸扣扣同學會聊天室520情色聊天室QQ成人交友聊天室免費視訊網愛聊天室愛情公寓免費聊天室拉子性愛聊天室柔情網友聊天室哈啦影音交友網哈啦影音視訊聊天室櫻井莉亞三點全露寫真集123上班族聊天室尋夢園上班族聊天室成人聊天室上班族080上班族聊天室6k聊天室粉紅豆豆聊天室080豆豆聊天網新豆豆聊天室080聊天室免費音樂試聽流行音樂試聽免費aa片試看免費a長片線上看色情貼影片免費a長片

6:24 AM, March 22, 2009  
Blogger nini said...

85cc免費影城 愛情公寓正妹牆川藏第一美女 成人影片 情色交友網 美女視訊 美女視訊 視訊情人高雄網 JP成人影城 383成人影城 aa片免費a片下載 a片線上看aa片免費看 ※a片線上試看※sex520免費影片※ aa片免費看 BT成人論壇 金瓶影片交流區 自拍美女聊天室 aa片免費a片下載 SEX520免費影片 免費a片 日本美女寫真集 sex520aa免費影片 sex520aa免費影片 BT成人網 Hotsee免費視訊交友 百分百貼影片區 SEX520免費影片 免費視訊聊天室 情人視訊高雄網 星光情色討論版 正妹牆 383成人影城 線上85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 ※免費視訊聊天室※ ※免費視訊聊天室※ 免費視訊聊天室 85cc免費影片 85cc免費影片 080苗栗人聊天室 080苗栗人聊天室 080中部人聊天室 080中部人聊天室 免費a片下載 免費a片 AA片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 日本av女優影片 av女優 av女優無碼影城 av女優 av女優 百分百成人圖片 百分百成人圖片 視訊情人高雄網 電話交友 影音電話交友 絕色影城 絕色影城 夜未眠成人影城 夜未眠成人影城 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 免費色咪咪貼影片 免費色咪咪貼影片 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 影音視訊交友網 視訊交友網 080視訊聊天室 ※免費視訊聊天室※ ※免費視訊聊天室※ 視訊聊天室 成人影音視訊聊天室 ut影音視訊聊天室 ※免費視訊聊天室※ 視訊ukiss聊天室視訊ukiss聊天室 視訊交友90739 視訊交友90739 情人視訊網 168視訊美女 168視訊美女 168視訊美女 視訊美女館 視訊美女館 免費視訊美女網 小高聊天室 小高聊天室 aio交友聊天室 aio交友聊天室 交友聊天室 交友聊天室 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 免費線上a片 免費線上a片 嘟嘟成人網站 成人漫畫 情色文學 嘟嘟成人網 成人貼圖區 情色文學成人小說 微風成人區 情色貼圖區 免費視訊聊天 免費成人圖片區 愛情公寓 愛情公寓聊天室 寄情築園小遊戲 免費aa片線上看 aa片免費看 情色SXE聊天室 SEX情色遊戲 色情A片 免費下載 av女優 俱樂部 情色論壇 辣妹視訊 情色貼圖網 免費色情 聊天室 情人視訊聊天室 免費a片成人影城 免費a片-aa片免費看 0204貼圖區 SEX情色 交友聊天-線上免費 女優天堂 成人交友網 成人情色貼圖區 18禁 -女優王國 080視訊美女聊天室 080視訊聊天室 視訊交友90739 免費a片 aio 視訊交友網 成人影城-免費a片※免費視訊聊天※85cc免費影片日本線上免費a片 免費色咪咪影片免費色咪咪影片aaa片免費看影片aaa片免費看成人影城免費色咪咪影片

12:57 PM, April 05, 2009  
Blogger 123456 said...

广州托盘复合托盘食品托盘天津木托盘胶合板托盘蜂窝纸托盘塑木托盘熏蒸木托盘木制托盘广东塑料托盘钢托盘钢制托盘栈板塑料栈板木栈板垫仓板托盘包装求购托盘天津托盘温州托盘山东托盘北京托盘上海木托盘塑胶托盘卡板纸卡板塑料卡板手推车推车机场手推车好孩子手推车液压手推车超市手推车医用手推车康贝手推车不锈钢手推车平板车电动平板车老虎车静音手推车平板手推车小推车模具架置物架堆垛架巧固架整理架物料整理架挂板架整理柜零件柜零件整理柜文件整理柜仓储笼仓库笼料箱塑料箱钢制料箱货箱整理箱塑料整理箱周转箱塑料周转箱防静电周转箱求购周转箱物流箱物料盒零件盒塑料零件盒卡板箱周转筐塑料周转筐周转箩登高车物流台车台车密集架档案密集架文件柜办公文件柜北京文件柜广州文件柜上海文件柜南京文件柜深圳文件柜钢制文件柜铁皮文件柜档案柜文件柜厂底图柜档案柜鞋柜储物柜更衣柜防火防磁柜防磁柜防火防磁文件柜图书架资料柜工具柜

1:57 AM, April 13, 2009  
Blogger 天天看正妹 said...

免費視訊聊天 ut聊天室辣妹視訊UT影音視訊聊天室 吉澤明步QQ美女視訊秀 85cc免費影片aa影片下載城sex免費成人影片aaa片免費看短片美女視訊 sex383線上娛樂場av969 免費短片日本免費視訊aa影片下載城視訊網愛聊天室影音視訊交友 咆哮小老鼠分享論壇sex520免費影片aa免費影片下載城aio辣妺視訊 aio辣妹交友愛情館 jp成人影片aio交友愛情館馬子免費影片免費線上a片18成人85cc影城0204movie免費色咪咪視訊網pc交友s383視訊玩美女人34c高雄視訊聊天jp成人免費視訊辣妹 kk777視訊俱樂部xxxpandalive173影音視訊聊天室 sex520-卡通影片成人免費視訊 完美女人13060 免費視訊聊天sexy girl video movie辣妹妹影音視訊聊天室UT視訊美女交友視訊情色網百事無碼a片dvd線上aa片免費看18禁成人網ut聊天室kk俱樂部視訊激情網愛聊天 情人小魔女自拍卡通aa片免費看夜未眠成人影城aio性愛dvd辣妹影片直播拓網視訊交友視訊聊天室ggoo168論壇視訊辣妹love104影音live秀 美女show-live視訊情色yam交友辣妹妹影音視訊聊天室s383情色大網咖視訊aaa俱樂部台灣情色網無碼avdvdsexy diamond sex888入口Show-live視訊聊天室

2:31 AM, April 14, 2009  
Blogger 天天看正妹 said...

免費 a 片aaaaa片俱樂部影片aaaaa片俱樂部dodo豆豆聊天室sex520網路自拍美女聊天室天堂免費線上avdvd援交av080影片aa影片下載城aaa片免費看短片成人圖片區18成人avooogo2av免費影片sexdiy影城免費線上成人影片bonbonsex0951影片下載日本av女優sex888免費看影片免費視訊78論壇辣妹有約辣妹no31314視訊dudu sex免費影片avdvd情色影片免費色咪咪影片網av080免費試看日本美女寫真集辣妹脫衣麻將視訊聊天室性福免費影片分享日本美女寫真集,kk視訊aio交友愛情館免費成人美女視訊bt論壇色情自拍免費a片卡通tw 18 net卡通18美少女圖色情漫畫777美女小護士免費 aa 片試看百分百成人情色圖片a片免費觀賞sexy girls get fuckedsexy girl video movie情色文學成人小說sex888免費看eyny 伊莉論壇sexdiy影城自拍情色0204movie免費影片aio免費aa片試看s383情色大網咖sexy girl video movie草莓牛奶AV論壇台灣論壇18禁遊戲區環球辣妹聊天室 90691拓網aio交友愛情館拓網學生族視訊777美女 sex888影片分享區hi5 tv免費影片aa的滿18歲卡通影片sex383線上娛樂場sexdiy影城免費a片線上觀看真人美女辣妹鋼管脫衣秀比基尼辣妹一夜情視訊aio交友愛情館

2:31 AM, April 14, 2009  
Blogger 天天看正妹 said...

小魔女免費影城免費看 aa的滿18歲影片sex383線上娛樂場kk777視訊俱樂部aa的滿18歲影片85cc免費影片a片免費看A片-sex520視訊聊天室v6 0plus論壇sex520免費影片avdvd-情色網qq美美色網ut13077視訊聊天A片-無碼援交東京熱一本道aaa免費看影片免費視訊聊天室微風成人免費視訊聊天 ut聊天室av1688影音視訊天堂免費 a 片85cc免費影城亞洲禁果影城微風成人av論壇sex520免費影片JP成人網免費成人視訊aaa影片下載城免費a片 ut交友成人視訊85cc成人影城免費A片aa的滿18歲影片小魔女免費影片85cc免費影片aaa片免費看短片aa影片下載城aaaaa片俱樂部影片aaaaa片俱樂部aa的滿18歲影片小魔女免費影片台灣論壇免費影片後宮0204movie免費影片免費卡通影片線上觀看線上免費a片觀看85cc免費影片免費A片aa影片下載城ut聊天室辣妹視訊UT影音視訊聊天室 日本免費視訊aaaa 片俱樂部aaaa片免費看影片免費視訊78論壇情色偷拍免費A片免費aaaaa片俱樂部影片aa影片下載城色漫畫帝國av俱樂部aaaa彩虹頻道免費影片 杜蕾斯成人免費卡通影片線上觀看85cc免費影片線上觀賞免費線上歐美A片觀看免費a片卡通aaa的滿18歲卡通影片sex520免費影片免費 a 片

2:31 AM, April 14, 2009  
Blogger 徵信 said...

外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇 外遇
外遇


外遇 外遇
外遇
外遇 外遇外遇
外遇

外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 ,
外遇 外遇 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇

外遇 外遇

外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿喜帖囍帖卡片外遇外遇 外遇 外遇外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇剖析 外遇調查 外遇案例 外遇諮詢 偷情 第三者外遇話題 外遇發洩 感情挽回 徵信社 外遇心態 外遇 通姦 通姦罪 外遇徵信社徵信社外遇 外遇 抓姦徵信協會徵信公司 包二奶 徵信社 徵信 徵信社 徵信社 徵信社 徵信社 徵信 徵信 婚姻 婚前徵信 前科 個人資料 外遇 第三者 徵信社 偵探社 抓姦 偵探社 偵探社婚 偵探社 偵探社偵探家事服務家事服務家電維修家事服務家事服務家事服務家事服務家事服務持久持久持久持久持久持久持久離婚網頁設計徵信社徵信社徵信徵信社外遇離婚協議書劈腿持久持久持久持久持久劈腿剖析徵信徵信社外遇外遇外遇外遇徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿

11:25 PM, April 19, 2009  
Blogger aaa俱樂部 said...

A片-無碼援交東京熱一本道視訊聊天室免費視訊聊天室微風成人成人聊天室-情色視訊ut聊天室av1688影音視訊天堂免費 a 片85cc免費影城亞洲禁果影城微風成人av論壇sex520免費影片aio交友愛情館免費成人視訊aaa影片下載城免費a片 ut交友成人視訊85cc成人影城免費A片aa的滿18歲影片小魔女免費影片小魔女免費影城免費看 aa的滿18歲影片sex383線上娛樂場kk777視訊俱樂部aa的滿18歲影片85cc免費影片a片免費看A片-sex520視訊做愛聊天室plus論壇sex520免費影片avdvd-情色網qq美美色網ut13077視訊聊天sex383線上娛樂場sex888sex520免費影片sex999免費影片情色貼圖情色視訊sexaaa片免費看短片aa影片下載城aaaaa片俱樂部影片小魔女免費影片台灣論壇免費影片免費影片 - aa的滿18歲影片線上免費a片觀看sex520免費影片85cc免費影片免費 a 片免費A片aa影片下載城ut聊天室-視訊日本免費視訊aaaaa片俱樂部aaaa 片俱樂部aa的滿18歲影片aa免費看aaaa片免費看影片aaa片免費看短片jp成人5278論壇 sex888影片分享區情色偷拍免費A片sex520免費影片後宮0204movie免費影片av俱樂部aaaa彩虹頻道免費影片免費卡通影片線上觀看85cc免費影片線上觀賞免費a片卡通sex888影片分享區aaa的滿18歲卡通影片

12:41 PM, April 29, 2009  
Blogger 1314 said...

視訊做愛視訊美女無碼A片情色影劇kyo成人動漫tt1069同志交友網ut同志交友網微風成人論壇6k聊天室日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞UT視訊美女交友..........................

10:09 PM, May 19, 2009  
Blogger 1122 said...

嘟嘟貼圖區貼圖片區一葉情貼圖片區漫畫貼圖6k聊天室成人貼圖站貼圖區百分百貼圖色情貼圖免費aa片試看一葉情貼圖片區 av127自拍貼圖性愛貼圖kiss911貼圖片區成人貼圖區百分百貼圖區日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞一葉晴貼圖片區天下貼圖天下貼圖網免費a片線上看男男貼圖情色貼圖區月宮貼圖台灣美女貼圖區嘟嘟貼圖本土自拍貼圖sex520免費影片一夜情視訊s383視訊 a片85cc免費影片歐美免費影片77p2p影片網youtube影片sex888影片分享區成人影片

9:52 PM, June 07, 2009  

Post a Comment

<< Home