Who's really selfish?
David Harsanyi has a few good questions in response to Obama's continued harping on the selfishness of CEOs:
Sounds like selfishness is a trait that isn't limited to the business world.
Then again, what could possibly be more reckless than spending $1 trillion you don't have on a plan that you have no evidence will work?
What could be more irresponsible than doubling the generational debt for your partisan pet projects in a time of crisis?
And what could be more selfish than stifling debate by deploying fear to induce voters into supporting it all?
Sounds like selfishness is a trait that isn't limited to the business world.


31 Comments:
Why are CEOs selfish, but not professional athletes or the Hollywood glitterati? Why is it OK to reap millions for jumping up and down and throwing a ball through a hoop, while simultaeously the rare individual who can increase the wealth of many thousands of shareholders by successfaully guiding a large corporation to sustained growth and profitability should be limited to $500,000? Why do liberal fools fall in love with failed precepts like central economic planning?
"... by successfaully guiding a large corporation to sustained growth and profitability should be limited to $500,000?"
----
The people who guide a large corporation to sustained growth and profitability are not limited to $500,000.
The executives who have driven their company to the brink of bankruptcy, and who then ask for billions of taxpayer money, are limited to $500,000 PLUS any amount of stock the company wants to give them, but the stock can only be redeemed after the company has paid back its debt. AND - that's only to the "primary" borrowers who have come back to the trough more than once (like Bank of America) AND it's not even retroactive, so the executives who nearly bankrupted the company can keep their $10 million bonus from 2008.
I tend towards the right wing / Milton Friedman / Paul Volcker / Ronald Reagan / Ayn Rand, but it amazes me how people want to try to shoehorn some distortion of those notions onto some of the present-day happenings.
The companies with awful management SHOULD be left alone - to go bankrupt. Then the salaries of the managers would be capped at $0 per annum with no stock options.
If a teenager is taking money from dad, I still think that dad gets a say. If the teenager wants complete control, the teenager better get a job.
Same with companies.
The managers should be lucky that a government is in power that wants to shove out taxpayer money like water.
Having their salaries capped at 500k is probably better than salaries capped at 0k (when company rightfully goes belly up).
Politicians are now indignantly comparing their own salaries with those of various excutives...but in reality, of course, the typical Congressman or President makes *far* more money than you would think by looking at his official salary. There are speaking fees, book royalties, consulting fees of various types, and, most important, legal/lobbying billing rates which benefit from the individual's time in "public service."
The wealth of the Clintons, for instance, is far more than their salaries would suggest, yet it is virtually all indirectly attributable to their government jobs. And even before winning the Presidency, Barack Obama had become a very wealthy man..probably more so than if he had pursued a career as a Wall Street lawyer.
Also, what do congressman produce besides more regulations? Whereas executives (usually) increase the value of the companies that they head.
The system breaks down though (like it has in this case) when government gets involved to "help". The driving force behind this current mess is a) the government push to get banks to make questionable loans to unqualified borrowers and b) the government's failure to oversee the two main businesses they empowered to run this house of cards. In both of these cases the main players in the government had (D) after their names and even went out of their way to prevent calls for investigation and oversight when it would have made a positive difference.
TO: All
RE: Heh
From 'Hope and Change' to 'Change and Fear'. All in the span of a fortnight.
That's some kinda 'change'.
Regards,
Chuck(le)
[Statistically speaking, half of all change is not for the better. -- CBPelto]
Well....
.....ever people get the governance they deserve.....
how silly!
1. Obama is not "constantly harpiong."
2. it is our money used to keep alive companies that well-paid executives have helped to fail. Why should we not have a say in what they receive not only from us in money but also in reward? I give my child an allowance so long as he meets certain requirements.
3. the "muzzle" at 500,000 is not exactly overly stringent! (need we mention all the perks that any company can make available if it wants?)
4. It is a temporary cap till the companies get back on their feet...it is not a govt run company that will not revert back to the private sector.
5. Don't like the restraints? alternative: don't accept them and go down the tubes!
God knows what Obama really thinks behind that "swave and deboner" facade. His fear tactics threaten to do tremendous damage that will last for decades.
I say let the weak companies go under and the strong survive. In the future I will avoid as much as possible doing business with companies that receive bailout funds.
The politicians seek office because they seek power, not money. This is one of the biggest power grabs in our country's history and their using our (and children's and grandchildren's) money to do it. Money is a side benefit but power is their main goal. As such, politicians should always be considered a threat to our freedom.
If the gubment is going to dish out money like that, here might be a beter idea:
Why not use the money to promote small, up-and-coming businesses in new technologies? They may be able to replace the jobs that are lost from the big, old, crusty companies that are on the verge of bankruptcy. And it would be a better use of that money to push the United States ahead technologically.
Todd asked: "Also, what do congressman produce besides more regulations?"
Hot air?
Dangerous green house gasses?
Bovine scatology?
Good point, they are not producers.
Trey
JG.."Why not use the money to promote small, up-and-coming businesses in new technologies?"
You can be certain that almost all the money would go to companies that were either (a)politically well-connected or (b)in fields that are highly fashionable at the moment. For example, in 1999, a big government technology-funding program would have surely directed billions to the fashionable Internet, and almost nothing to the boring energy industry.
See my post leaving a trillion on the table.
BTW - I find it ironic that the oil industry and Wal-Mart, both greatly hated by the left, don't seem to need any hand-outs. Wal-Mart announced increased profits yesterday.
Why is it OK to reap millions for jumping up and down and throwing a ball through a hoop, while simultaeously the rare individual who can increase the wealth of many thousands of shareholders by successfaully guiding a large corporation to sustained growth and profitability should be limited to $500,000? Why do liberal fools fall in love with failed precepts like central economic planning?
It's the golden rule. He who has the gold, makes the rules. If they don't want the salary caps, they they can stop coming to the trough for tax payer money. As I have said before, do you really want a third world-style redistribution of wealth (public by taxes->government->connected cronies and businesses)? Why should any CEO whose business is on the dole get to make a big salary?
I'll tell you why, in general, it's ok for sports players to make outrageous salaries: the actual business that pays them is private and supported by its own revenues. The most government subsidies they get are some subsidized stadiums which state governments could easily ban and force them to repay to the local government. In fact, as a libertarian, I'm very much in favor of the states doing precisely that to all subsidized businesses, in part to discourage anyone from ever asking for a subsidy.
When one olil company announced the biggest profits ever and gas buyers were paying close to 4 bucks per gallons I suspect that even those to the right of center got a bit peevbed. Wal-Mart? I ususally shop elsewhere but do not find my liberal friends "hating" that store. I do not eat at McDonalds either. But I do not hate them. Fact: when money is tight for most people, they shop the cheapest way they can, and that means Wal-Mart and fast food places and less expensive drinks etc.
Why are we talking about CEOs increasing the value of their companies and at the same time asking for the tax payer, via the govt, to bail them out lest they fail?
Furthermore, the argument that these businesses need the freedom to give outrageous salaries to management are specious. There is no correlation between extremely high executive pay and performance that favors the meritocratic argument. If anything, the people demanding tens of millions of dollars in compensation have tended to be parasites that harm their companies.
It's none of the government's business what privately funded businesses do in this respect, but any business that is on the dole deserves to have the federal government's hand up its ass like a puppet for taking tax payer money rather than having the decency of going bankrupt.
...and, jist in, under Bush and his pal Paulson, the taxpayers took another beating and got screwed royally
http://www.newser.com/story/50120/panel-paulson-overpaid-for-bank-stocks.html
Why so many comments upon being in govt? If CEO's prefer that, let them run for office. All I know is that guys that take home money in the millions are now asking me (taxpayer)for help because they couldn't run their companies profitably.
Fred wrote: "When one oil company announced the biggest profits ever and gas buyers were paying close to 4 bucks per gallons I suspect that even those to the right of center got a bit peeved."
Fred, do you know the biggest profiteer from oil? Our governments. They do nothing to produce it, but tax it more than the companies that actually make it profit from it.
And why the windfall profits? Because of speculation betting that the price would go up because we are so depending on foreign sources for our energy needs. As those forces (not under the control of the companies) raised the cost of oil through the roof the percentage profit rose with it.
And who benefitted? The CEOs? Yep. And so did millions of people's IRA accounts and other retirement accounts. See, these big companies have shareholders. And the shareholders got some money, and it may have been you! If you have a money market or IRA account, you may have been a party to the obscene profits.
Don't worry, we won't tell.
Trey
And the oil companies aren't asking for handouts that our grandchildren will be paying for.
If we will remember, one of Hillary's famous speeches contained a statement (this is not exact), "Exxon made 32 billion in profits last year. I want that money!" The crowd to which she was speaking roared its approval. What she failed to mention is Exxon had already paid 44 billion in taxes that same year.
If I grossed 76 bucks a week and the government kept 44 and allowed me only 32 and wanted more...well. What about pay raises, maintenance, new equipment, growth, stock holders, (401K's for instance). If you have a well managed diversified 401K, it's a cinch you own Exxon stock.
This melt down has slapped me wide awake. All efforts are re-doubled. Regardless of the outcome, even if we explode into growth (HA!) I am done spending a penny not absolutely necessary to spend for the rest of my days. Me thinks, perhaps, that I am not the only one now upon that road. It is also my belief the government knows that. And since I won't spend it, they're taking it from my future, my kids' and their kids' futures - for today. I think it is despicable.
Sorry Tmink. I didn't read your post above dadvocate's before posting. I just sort of repeated what you just said.
The real scam that is going un-noticed is the gap that is increasing between our aristocratic elites, and the rest of us shmucks still forced to live in the free market.
Gee, the government shows us their graciousness by, GASP!, agreeing to a pay freeze! Well, good golly, every free enterprising job I've had I've been at had a "pay freeze." I didn't get an inflation adjusted wage increase each year. You hustle your ass and beg the boss for a raise every couple of years. How nice of the government aristocrats to give up this benefit in tough times!
Also, many government employees recieve VERY generous pensions - inflation adjusted ones - while the rest of the "free market class" has to hustle their ass to eat when they retire. A $60,000/yr pension from a government job is, of course, the equivelant to having $1,000,000 invested at 6%. Is your free market employer going to kick in a million dollars after 20 years so you can take it easy?
Notice what is happening during this "crisis."
We, the free market people, are being told by Hopenchange that tough times are ahead, and we are all going to have to tighten our belts.
Yes, there is going to unemployment... but, FOR WHO?
Certainly not the government employees. Nope. THEIR jobs are secure! In fact, government is EXPANDING during this crisis (and it WON'T shrink after the crisis). So... who is it, REALLY, that Obama is telling to tighten their belts? Yes, again, those working in the free market, whose wages will drop, or those who will lose a job - THEY will have to tighten their belts.
But government employees? Nope. Their jobs and even payscale is guaranteed (albeit, frozen). They WILL NOT cut back on government services and, in fact, government services/spending is being considered as STIMULUS (Good thing!). Of course, government does not make profit. Free enterprise makes profit. So who is it that is DOUBLY suffering? It certainly must be the people who actually provide the money to the government to "welfare out" to its secure government employees.
It is a complete plan to enact class warfare on society.
And for one, I hope that all of us soon to be impoverished free market people, start treating all of these government aristocrats with same contempt and hatred they have stirred up to white males - given that such hatred was only sustainable through the tax dollars the white males provided.
Perhaps a few once normal white men being forced to live under a bridge while watching government funded politically correct teachers, politicians, policeman and so on, carry on with secure above average GDP/Capita jobs, will finally motive the white male to start attacking back against those who have so targeted him with hatred and derision.
I work for a company whose President/CEO/founder has worked for ten years to make it a success. We are now on the verge of monumental growth. Who is to say that any salary this man gives himself is unfair?
I ran my own company for five years in the 90s and ultimately failed. Had I succeeded, though, I would have deeply resented anyone telling me that after scraping by for years, going without health insurance, selling my house, going deeply into debt, that I could give myself a very nice salary and bonuses.
Yeah, there are executives that are worthless. I've worked for more than a few. But there are many that are worth every penny and more.
情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,美國aneros,rudeboy,英國rudeboy,英國Rocksoff,德國Fun Factory,Fun Factory,英國甜筒造型按摩座,甜筒造型按摩座,英國Rock Chic ,瑞典 Lelo ,英國Emotional Bliss,英國 E.B,荷蘭 Natural Contours,荷蘭 N C,美國 OhMiBod,美國 OMB,Naughti Nano ,音樂按摩棒,ipod按摩棒,美國 The Screaming O,美國TSO,美國TOPCO,美國Doc Johnson,美國CA Exotic,美國CEN,美國Nasstoy,美國Tonguejoy,英國Je Joue,美國Pipe Dream,美國California Exotic,美國NassToys,美國Vibropod,美國Penthouse,仿真按摩棒,矽膠按摩棒,猛男倒模,真人倒模,仿真倒模,PJUR,Zestra,適趣液,穿戴套具,日本NPG,雙頭龍,FANCARNAL,日本NIPPORI,日本GEL,日本Aqua Style,美國WET,費洛蒙,費洛蒙香水,仿真名器,av女優,打炮,做愛,性愛,口交,吹喇叭,肛交,魔女訓練大師,無線跳蛋,有線跳蛋,震動棒,震動保險套,震動套,TOY-情趣用品,情趣用品網,情趣購物網,成人用品網,情趣用品討論,成人購物網,鎖精套,鎖精環,持久環,持久套,拉珠,逼真按摩棒,名器,超名器,逼真老二,電動自慰,自慰,打手槍,仿真女郎,SM道具,SM,性感內褲,仿真按摩棒,pornograph,hunter系列,h動畫,成人動畫,成人卡通,情色動畫,情色卡通,色情動畫,色情卡通,無修正,禁斷,人妻,極悪調教,姦淫,近親相姦,顏射,盜攝,偷拍,本土自拍,素人自拍,公園露出,街道露出,野外露出,誘姦,迷姦,輪姦,凌辱,痴漢,痴女,素人娘,中出,巨乳,調教,潮吹,av,a片,成人影片,成人影音,線上影片,成人光碟,成人無碼,成人dvd,情色影音,情色影片,情色dvd,情色光碟,航空版,薄碼,色情dvd,色情影音,色情光碟,線上A片,免費A片,A片下載,成人電影,色情電影,TOKYO HOT,SKY ANGEL,一本道,SOD,S1,ALICE JAPAN,皇冠系列,老虎系列,東京熱,亞熱,武士系列,新潮館,情趣用品,情趣,情趣商品,情趣網站,跳蛋,按摩棒,充氣娃娃,自慰套,G點,性感內衣,情趣內衣,角色扮演,生日禮物,生日精品,自慰,打手槍,潮吹,高潮,後庭,情色論譠,影片下載,遊戲下載,手機鈴聲,音樂下載,開獎號碼,統一發票號碼,夜市,統一發票對獎,保險套,做愛,減肥,美容,瘦身,當舖,軟體下載,汽車,機車,手機,來電答鈴,週年慶,美食,徵信社,網頁設計,網站設計,室內設計,靈異照片,同志,聊天室,運動彩券,大樂透,威力彩,搬家公司,除蟲,偷拍,自拍,無名破解,av女優,小說,民宿,大樂透開獎號碼,大樂透中獎號碼,威力彩開獎號碼,討論區,痴漢,懷孕,美女交友,交友,日本av,日本,機票,香水,股市,股市行情, 股市分析,租房子,成人影片,免費影片,醫學美容,免費算命,算命,姓名配對,姓名學,姓名學免費,遊戲,好玩遊戲,好玩遊戲區,線上遊戲,新遊戲,漫畫,線上漫畫,動畫,成人圖片,桌布,桌布下載,電視節目表,線上電視,線上a片,線上掃毒,線上翻譯,購物車,身分證製造機,身分證產生器,手機,二手車,中古車,法拍屋,歌詞,音樂,音樂網,火車,房屋,情趣用品,情趣,情趣商品,情趣網站,跳蛋,按摩棒,充氣娃娃,自慰套, G點,性感內衣,情趣內衣,角色扮演,生日禮物,精品,禮品,自慰,打手槍,潮吹,高潮,後庭,情色論譠,影片下載,遊戲下載,手機鈴聲,音樂下載,開獎號碼,統一發票,夜市,保險套,做愛,減肥,美容,瘦身,當舖,軟體下載,汽車,機車,手機,來電答鈴,週年慶,美食,徵信社,網頁設計,網站設計,室內設計,靈異照片,同志,聊天室,運動彩券,,大樂透,威力彩,搬家公司,除蟲,偷拍,自拍,無名破解, av女優,小說,民宿,大樂透開獎號碼,大樂透中獎號碼,威力彩開獎號碼,討論區,痴漢,懷孕,美女交友,交友,日本av ,日本,機票,香水,股市,股市行情,股市分析,租房子,成人影片,免費影片,醫學美容,免費算命,算命,姓名配對,姓名學,姓名學免費,遊戲,好玩遊戲,好玩遊戲區,線上遊戲,新遊戲,漫畫,線上漫畫,動畫,成人圖片,桌布,桌布下載,電視節目表,線上電視,線上a片,線上a片,線上翻譯,購物車,身分證製造機,身分證產生器,手機,二手車,中古車,法拍屋,歌詞,音樂,音樂網,借錢,房屋,街頭籃球,找工作,旅行社,六合彩,水噹噹,台中隆鼻,果凍隆乳,改運整型,自體脂肪移植,新娘造型,婚禮顧問,下川島,常平,常平,珠海,澳門機票,香港機票,貸款,貸款,信用貸款,宜蘭民宿,花蓮民宿,未婚聯誼,網路購物,婚友,婚友社,未婚聯誼,交友,婚友,婚友社,單身聯誼,未婚聯誼,未婚聯誼, 婚友社,婚友,婚友社,單身聯誼,婚友,未婚聯誼,婚友社,未婚聯誼,單身聯誼,單身聯誼,白蟻,白蟻,除蟲,老鼠,減肥,減肥,在家工作,在家工作,水噹噹,台中隆鼻,果凍隆乳,改運整型,自體脂肪移植,新娘造型,婚禮顧問,下川島,常平,常平,珠海,澳門機票,香港機票,貸款,貸款,信用貸款,宜蘭民宿,花蓮民宿,未婚聯誼,網路購物,婚友,婚友社,未婚聯誼,交友,婚友,婚友社,單身聯誼,未婚聯誼,未婚聯誼, 婚友社,婚友,婚友社,單身聯誼,婚友,未婚聯誼,婚友社,未婚聯誼,單身聯誼,單身聯誼,白蟻,白蟻,除蟲,老鼠,減肥,減肥,在家工作,在家工作,婚友,單身聯誼,未婚聯誼,婚友,交友,交友,婚友社,婚友社,婚友社,大陸新娘,大陸新娘,越南新娘,越南新娘,外籍新娘,外籍新娘,台中坐月子中心,搬家公司,搬家公司,中和搬家,台北搬家,板橋搬家,新店搬家,線上客服,網頁設計,線上客服,網頁設計,植牙,關鍵字,關鍵字,seo,seo,網路排名,自然排序,網路排名軟體,交友,越南新娘,婚友社,外籍新娘,大陸新娘,越南新娘,交友,外籍新娘,視訊聊天,大陸新娘,婚友社,婚友,越南新娘,大陸新娘,越南新娘,視訊交友,外籍新娘,網路排名,網路排名軟體,網站排名優化大師,關鍵字排名大師,網站排名seo大師,關鍵字行銷專家,關鍵字,seo,關鍵字行銷,網頁排序,網頁排名,關鍵字大師,seo大,自然排名,網站排序,網路行銷創業,汽車借款,汽車借錢,汽車貸款,汽車貸款,拉皮,抽脂,近視雷射,隆乳,隆鼻,變性,雙眼皮,眼袋,牙齒,下巴,植牙,人工植牙,植髮,雷射美容,膠原蛋白,皮膚科,醫學美容,玻尿酸,肉毒桿菌,微晶瓷,電波拉皮,脈衝光,關鍵字,關鍵字,seo,seo,網路排名,自然排序,網路排名軟體,英語演講,托福,Toastmaster,汽車借款,汽車借款,汽車借款,汽車貸款,汽車貸款,借錢,借貸,當舖,借款,借貸,借錢,週轉,
Our Host said: "What could be more irresponsible than doubling the generational debt for your partisan pet projects in a time of crisis?"
I dunno. Let's ask George W. Bush., who took it from 6 Trillion(!) dollars to 10 Trillion (!!).
Rob Fedders said: "Also, many government employees recieve VERY generous pensions - inflation adjusted ones - while the rest of the "free market class" has to hustle their ass to eat when they retire."
Maybe you should unionize.
看房子,買房子,建商自售,自售,台北新成屋,台北豪宅,新成屋,豪宅,美髮儀器,美髮,儀器,髮型,EMBA,MBA,學位,EMBA,專業認證,認證課程,博士學位,DBA,PHD,在職進修,碩士學位,推廣教育,DBA,進修課程,碩士學位,網路廣告,關鍵字廣告,關鍵字,廣告,課程介紹,學分班,文憑,牛樟芝,段木,牛樟菇,日式料理, 台北居酒屋,燒肉,結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,台北住宿,國內訂房,台北HOTEL,台北婚宴,飯店優惠,台北結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,住宿,訂房,HOTEL,飯店,造型系列,學位,牛樟芝,腦磷脂,磷脂絲胺酸,SEO,婚宴,捷運,學區,美髮,儀器,髮型,牛樟芝,腦磷脂,磷脂絲胺酸,看房子,買房子,建商自售,自售,房子,捷運,學區,台北新成屋,台北豪宅,新成屋,豪宅,學位,碩士學位,進修,在職進修, 課程,教育,學位,證照,mba,文憑,學分班,網路廣告,關鍵字廣告,關鍵字,SEO,关键词,网络广告,关键词广告,SEO,关键词,网络广告,关键词广告,SEO,台北住宿,國內訂房,台北HOTEL,台北婚宴,飯店優惠,住宿,訂房,HOTEL,飯店,婚宴,台北住宿,國內訂房,台北HOTEL,台北婚宴,飯店優惠,住宿,訂房,HOTEL,飯店,婚宴,台北住宿,國內訂房,台北HOTEL,台北婚宴,飯店優惠,住宿,訂房,HOTEL,飯店,婚宴,結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,台北結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,台北結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,台北結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,居酒屋,燒烤,美髮,儀器,髮型,美髮,儀器,髮型,美髮,儀器,髮型,美髮,儀器,髮型,小套房,小套房,進修,在職進修,留學,證照,MBA,EMBA,留學,MBA,EMBA,留學,進修,在職進修,牛樟芝,段木,牛樟菇,住宿,民宿,飯宿,旅遊,住宿,民宿,飯宿,旅遊,住宿,民宿,飯宿,旅遊,住宿,民宿,飯宿,旅遊,住宿,民宿,飯宿,旅遊,住宿,民宿,飯宿,旅遊,住宿,民宿,飯宿,旅遊,美容,美髮,整形,造型,美容,美髮,整形,造型,美容,美髮,整形,造型,美容,美髮,整形,造型,美容,美髮,整形,造型,美容,美髮,整形,造型,美容,美髮,整形,造型,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA,住宿,民宿,飯店,旅遊,美容,美髮,整形,造型,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA
情趣用品,
性感睡衣,
免費視訊聊天,
視訊交友網,
美姬圖影,
情境坊歡愉用品,
花美姬情趣用品,
成人圖片,
臺灣情色網,
嘟嘟情人色網,
色情網站,
情境坊歡愉用品,
徵信,
徵信公司,
徵信,
外遇,
徵信,
徵信,
抓姦,
徵信,
外遇,
徵信,
徵信社,
徵信社,
抓姦,
徵信社,
徵信社,
徵信社,
趣,
趣,
整型,
視訊聊天,
視訊交友,
AV女優,
色情,
A片,
A片,
情趣用品,
情色,
A片,
色情影片,
情趣用品,
A片,
AV女優,
視訊聊天室,
聊天,
情趣用品,
情惑用品性易購,
情侶歡愉用品,
A片,
情趣,
情惑用品性易購,
辣妹視訊,
自慰套,
情侶歡愉用品,
寄情築園小遊戲,
aio交友愛情館,
美女視訊,
色情A片,
情趣用品,
徵信社,
情趣用品,
A片,
美女視訊,
色情A片,
AV女優,
A片,
辣妹視訊,
自慰套,
情侶歡愉用品,
視訊做愛視訊美女無碼A片情色影劇kyo成人動漫tt1069同志交友網ut同志交友網微風成人論壇6k聊天室日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞UT視訊美女交友..........................
qq 視訊交友qq 視訊交友免費 msn 視訊交友 0982免費 msn 視訊交友 0982club 意難忘視訊交友club 意難忘視訊交友免費視訊聊天室免費視訊聊天室546 視訊聊天室546 視訊聊天室uthome 視訊聊天室uthome 視訊聊天室168 視訊聊天室168 視訊聊天室0401 影音視訊聊天室0401 影音視訊聊天室
Post a Comment
<< Home