Yes, seems like Pitt is hardly the epitome of John Galt, just the opposite really. He strikes me as rather conformist and I could hardly see him striking for businesses. But stranger things have happened. I personally think Harrison Ford would have been better in the role. But perhaps actors like to play the opposite of what they are personality wise or act out some part of their personality that they subvert to society.
I'm just concerned that they're going to slaughter the original intent of the book. It would truly be work of irony that Hollywood, who's elite class are staunch advocates of government interference in our lives would put out of movie that completely trashes their world view.
I'm sure the estate of Ayn Rand is going to do their best to make sure the movie hold true (with some artistic license of course) but I'll be shocked if the movie makes the socialists look like the bad guys.
I can actually see Angelina playing Dagny -- she's the right age and has the right coloring. And I don't think Brad Pitt is a bad actor, but he's better at playing roguish charmers than, well, someone as hard as John Galt.
Daniel Craig = big-time hottie ;) And a rare specimen: a modern actor who actually looks, you know, masculine. I don't know what's up with the whole wimpy-androgynous look, but it's so not appealing. I think I have more testosterone than the average Hollywood actor...
11 Comments:
Apparently, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are both fans of Ayn Rand.
Or you were referring to a mismatch in personality?
Kevin,
Yes, seems like Pitt is hardly the epitome of John Galt, just the opposite really. He strikes me as rather conformist and I could hardly see him striking for businesses. But stranger things have happened. I personally think Harrison Ford would have been better in the role. But perhaps actors like to play the opposite of what they are personality wise or act out some part of their personality that they subvert to society.
Hey, at least it wasn't Alec Baldwin!
On the one hand, if you're playing a part that is you, it's not acting.
On the other hand, come on...
I'm just concerned that they're going to slaughter the original intent of the book. It would truly be work of irony that Hollywood, who's elite class are staunch advocates of government interference in our lives would put out of movie that completely trashes their world view.
I'm sure the estate of Ayn Rand is going to do their best to make sure the movie hold true (with some artistic license of course) but I'll be shocked if the movie makes the socialists look like the bad guys.
"Apparently, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are both fans of Ayn Rand."
From this, should I infer that they haven't read her books or that they have read her books, but do not understand what they are about?
I can actually see Angelina playing Dagny -- she's the right age and has the right coloring. And I don't think Brad Pitt is a bad actor, but he's better at playing roguish charmers than, well, someone as hard as John Galt.
I could easily see Daniel Craig as Galt, though.
Who's Daniel Craig? (humor!)
br549:
Daniel Craig = big-time hottie ;) And a rare specimen: a modern actor who actually looks, you know, masculine. I don't know what's up with the whole wimpy-androgynous look, but it's so not appealing. I think I have more testosterone than the average Hollywood actor...
Er. Right. Topic...
視訊做愛聊天室avdvd-情色網ut13077視訊聊天A片-無碼援交東京熱一本道aaa免費看影片免費視訊聊天室微風成人ut聊天室av1688影音視訊天堂85cc免費影城亞洲禁果影城微風成人av論壇sex520免費影片JP成人網免費成人視訊aaa影片下載城免費a片 ut交友成人視訊85cc成人影城免費A片aa的滿18歲影片小魔女免費影片小魔女免費影城免費看 aa的滿18歲影片sex383線上娛樂場kk777視訊俱樂部aa的滿18歲影片85cc免費影片a片免費看A片-sex520plus論壇sex520免費影片85cc免費影片aaa片免費看短片aa影片下載城aaaaa片俱樂部影片aaaaa片俱樂部aa的滿18歲影片小魔女免費影片台灣論壇免費影片免費卡通影片線上觀看線上免費a片觀看85cc免費影片免費A片aa影片下載城ut聊天室辣妹視訊UT影音視訊聊天室 日本免費視訊aaaa 片俱樂部aaa片免費看短片aaaa片免費看影片aaa片免費看短片免費視訊78論壇情色偷拍免費A片免費aaaaa片俱樂部影片後宮0204movie免費影片av俱樂部aaaa彩虹頻道免費影片 杜蕾斯成人免費卡通影片線上觀看85cc免費影片線上觀賞免費線上歐美A片觀看免費a片卡通aaa的滿18歲卡通影片sex520免費影片免費 a 片免費視訊聊天jp成人sex520免費影片
視訊做愛視訊美女無碼A片情色影劇kyo成人動漫tt1069同志交友網ut同志交友網微風成人論壇6k聊天室日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞UT視訊美女交友..........................
Post a Comment
<< Home