Monday, January 21, 2008

"Some of us still believe that the worth of a CEO should be determined by stockholders rather than the President of the United States."

David Harsanyi, author of The Nanny State, is worried about the expanded role of government that Hillary Clinton proposes:

According to the New York Times, Hillary Clinton says that if she becomes president the federal government will take a more active role in the economy “to address what she called the excesses of the market and of the Bush administration.” Scary stuff for anyone who still believes in the free market.


I agree--scary stuff. What's next? Holding wages down on those people she deems make too much money, taxing the daylights out of those who are successful? What will become of a country that rewards doing poorly with tax rebates and penalizes those who are successful with higher taxes? You get more of what you reward. But then, isn't that the idea? Remember the lyrics to the the old Rainmaker's song, Government Cheese:

They'll turn us all into beggars 'cause they're easier to please
They're feeding our people that Government Cheese ....


Perhaps that should be the new slogan for the Hillary campaign.

49 Comments:

Blogger Bugs said...

Basic Progressivism, I guess. Goes all the way back to Teddy Roosevelt and trust-busting. Trouble is, some Progressives don't know when to quit. I think that's when they become Socialists.

4:54 PM, January 21, 2008  
Blogger gossypol said...

Dr. Helen, you asked, "What's next? Holding wages down on those people she deems make too much money, taxing the daylights out of those who are successful?"

No need to wonder too much. In June of 2004, Hillary reportedly said to a group of rich supporters, "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

And I remember something from the original Hillarycare campaign about how doctors should be allowed to make enough money to buy one Mercedes, but not two. Hillary has tried to make amends recently for telling nurses to get into a different line of work if they wanted to make money consistent with their education and responsibilities.

One concept I find especially troubling is the idea that people shouldn't be allowed to make real money if they are providing goods and services people really need. That's how Venezuela ended up with only luxury goods on supermarket shelves and a bunch of glitzy malls no one can afford to go to.

Demonization of those who make money doing good could be a factor in Chelsea's decision to pursue a career in finance instead of something like medicine. Since ordinary people don't "need" these types of services, it is acceptable to make money providing them. On the other hand, it would be greedy for her to make money saving lives as a doctor or as an employee of a pharmaceutical company.

5:31 PM, January 21, 2008  
Blogger Pixelkiller said...

Socialism: The Road to Serfdom.
(Hayek, University of Chicago Press, 1944)
He said that the extended collectivism towards which free nations are gradually moving is incompatible with democracy, that social planning, as interpreted today, may eventually destroy all individual freedom, political no less than economic.
Gee, and 64 years ago too.
He also said that only if we understand why and how certain kinds of economic controls tend to paralize the driving forces of a free society, and which measures are particularly dangerous in this respect, can we hope that social experimentation will not lead us into situations none of us want.
Yeah! The road to hell is paved with good intentions. . . Or what are preceived as good intentions.
What-the-hell.

6:05 PM, January 21, 2008  
Blogger steven said...

"They'll turn us all into beggars 'cause they're easier to please." I was watching a show on North Korea. In it, foreign doctors were performing simple cataract surgery on some of the North Koreans. Even the most routine kind of health care is not available to these people because of their "dear leader". And the first thing these people do when their sight is restored is to bow down before a picture of their leader and thank him for this great gift he has given them.

6:10 PM, January 21, 2008  
Blogger br549 said...

If she makes a successful bid for the white house, and tries to implement many of the things she has been speaking about all these years, she will be but a one term president.

But our nation is heading in that direction (socialism). And for the life of me I can't understand why. It doesn't make a particle of sense.

6:20 PM, January 21, 2008  
Blogger Patrick said...

Believe me, I am no fan of Hillary. She would be a disaster.

But let's stop pretending that CEO salaries are determined by the market. Wrong. They are set by a board of directors composed of people who themselves are/were/will be CEOs, who have a massive conflict of interest and want to set CEO salaries sky high, in hopes that what goes around comes around.

This of course does not apply to other highly paid people, such as professional athletes, best-selling authors, etc.

6:30 PM, January 21, 2008  
Blogger Pius Aeneas said...

"But our nation is heading in that direction (socialism). And for the life of me I can't understand why. It doesn't make a particle of sense."

Sadly, it makes perfect sense. Government largess is like a drug. Someone who's never had heroin before wouldn't miss it, or even understand why they'd want it. But once you're hooked, it's easy to keep taking more, but nearly impossible to cut back.

Once entitlements and government programs are enacted, they essentially become set in stone. Even though they were never provided or guaranteed to begin with, removing them once they exist becomes a ruthless deprivation to the people. Even trying to reduce the growth of such spending and not the amount itself almost guarantees you a comparison to Ebenezer Scrooge, or worse.

6:54 PM, January 21, 2008  
Blogger David said...

Note that Democrats are much more concerned about CEO pay than about the incomes of movie stars, singers, athletes, and trial lawyers.

7:29 PM, January 21, 2008  
Blogger David said...

gossypol..."Hillary has tried to make amends recently for telling nurses to get into a different line of work if they wanted to make money consistent with their education and responsibilities"...do you by any chance have a link on that?..sounds interesting!

7:34 PM, January 21, 2008  
Blogger The Opinionated Bastard said...

While you quoted the NYT correctly, they didn't quite quote Hillary correctly.

I hate the Borg Queen, but at best she implied that perhaps the financial markets need a little more watching.

She also endorses shifting the tax cut away from the > $250,000 set in order to increase it for people under that, which actually makes a certain amount of sense as a job stimulus package.

7:41 PM, January 21, 2008  
Blogger joe said...

I have no doubt that those who support Hillary/Democrats will do much better in terms of government regulated compensation than those Republican dinosaurs who still support free markets. Her statism will lead to a one party system (see, USSR). This is all of a piece with her attacks on the electoral vote system and federalism in general.

7:49 PM, January 21, 2008  
Blogger Kai Carver said...

You can hear the Government Cheese song here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZVPv9B-ZlM
Mmm, cheese.

7:51 PM, January 21, 2008  
Blogger Kai Carver said...

"Government Cheese" by the Rainmakers (audio only)

7:52 PM, January 21, 2008  
Blogger Some Schmuck said...

Private property regulated heavily regulated by the government. Isn't this the famous "third way"?

Liberal Fascism indeed

8:38 PM, January 21, 2008  
Blogger Vicki said...

Re: tax rebates for people who don't pay taxes - sounds like an incentive for those of us who pay lots of money in taxes to stop being productive...stop working...take government handouts.

TANSTAFL (pron. tans-TAF-l): There ain't no such thing as a free lunch.

9:37 PM, January 21, 2008  
Blogger Dave said...

"She also endorses shifting the tax cut away from the > $250,000 set in order to increase it for people under that, which actually makes a certain amount of sense as a job stimulus package."

Uh, no, it doesn't. It doesn't kick in soon emough to provide any stimulus, it is a slow drip, drip, of money not a stimulus, and it penalizes those who most stimulate the economy.

You might want to check out the infamous "Luxury Boat Tax" of 1992 or so. The idea was to tax new boats that cost more than $200,000 at 10%. This was suppose to raise $15M per year. In fact, sales of big new boats all but stopped, businesses closed and about 5000 boat building jobs were lost. The unemployment alone cost more than $15M and the tax brought in essentially nothing. This is the opposite side of taxing those >$250,000 to provide, what, about $100/person/year in the lower brackets.

I guarantee it'll cost way more than it brings in and it'll not stimulate the economy.

10:10 PM, January 21, 2008  
Blogger gs said...

Patrick wrote, "Believe me, I am no fan of Hillary...(p)But let's stop pretending that CEO salaries are determined by the market."

I agree with both remarks.
********************************
When George W. Bush was inaugurated on January 20, 2001, the S&P 500 was at 1343. Last Friday it closed at 1325. Our stock market was closed today, but as I type the futures market has the S&P 500 at 1268.

Well, at least the index is valued in rock-solid American dollars...nevermind.

10:18 PM, January 21, 2008  
Blogger DADvocate said...

Hillary appeals to the petty, and dangerous, jealousy of the less successful. Take away the incentives to perform at a high level and fewer people will perform at a high level. Whether you like it or not many people excel in order to have big houses, fancy cars, boats, vacation homes, etc.

In the process of excelling they do a lot of good for the rest of us. It is only a recent phenomena that we reward people for sitting around doing nothing, watching big screen TVs and getting fat. I don't begrudge CEOs their salaries or their lifestyle. I'm happy with mine and don't want to wear a suit every day and sit in endless meetings.

Our next president needs to work on making our federal government as productive and efficient as the corporations that Hillary hates so much. Given their recent performances, we certainly pay our Senators, Representatives and President too much. Their pay should be docked. Bringing businesses down is not the answer but raising the performance standards of government is a laudable goal.

Hillary appeals to the base, negative emotions and desires in people. Nothing good comes out of that.

10:48 PM, January 21, 2008  
Blogger SBW said...

I do begrudge CEOs their salaries. Unless all your workers are illiterate jackasses, and you are some brilliant puppet master, your success directly depends on the work ethic, intelligence, and ‘esprit de corps’ of thousands of subordinates. I’m minimalist to say the least, but the hero worship of CEOs among the right is pathetic, and I vote right. I had and have tremendous respect for the Marine generals I served under, but make no mistake, they were nothing without all the competent and dedicated officers and enlisted under their authority. The fact that a lot of people on this thread can’t see the parallel in private companies is astonishing. You are as powerful as the power of the individuals you lead. Government intrusion in salaries? No thanks, but don’t bullshit me on the value of CEOs.

11:16 PM, January 21, 2008  
Blogger tomcal said...

She said it again tonight, a forced re-negotiation of mortgage contracts and a suspension of the foreclosure process.

I expect this kind of thing in the banana republics of Central America, but here in the U.S. a deal has to be a deal. If it is not, then we might as well just throw out more than 2 centuries of the development of our economic system and start over on the basis of Marxist economic theories.

I think wage and price freezes were tested adequately in 1970 - they don't work. A re-negotiation of commercial contracts mandated by government fiat would be a hundred times worse. Why stop at mortgages? Let's force all contracts to be re-negotiated as soon as it becomes apparent that one party made a better deal than the other.

Excuse me while I go throw up.

12:36 AM, January 22, 2008  
Blogger tomcal said...

Correction: 1971.

12:42 AM, January 22, 2008  
Blogger gossypol said...

David,

Hillary Clinton's website has a video called "Nurse for a Day" in which she follows a nurse around to see what nurses do:

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/video/47.aspx

I can't find the original post I read, but the point was made that Hillary apparently did not have a good understanding of nurses' duties during the original Hillarycare campaign, when she was trying implement a government take-over of the entire health care system. Hence her former view that nurses should not expect to be well-paid. With her new appreciation of a nurse's duties, Hillary is now making a big push for the support of nurses' unions.

You should be able to access a series of videos at Hillary's site. I especially like the "Presents" video, about the Christmas gifts she plans to give to America on your dime.

But back to the "gifts" Hugo Chavez is giving to the Venezuelan people:

http://www.chequer-board.net/story/2008/1/21/12320/1932

1:52 AM, January 22, 2008  
Blogger br549 said...

You take a spoonful of 1984, a spoonful of the Communist Manifesto, and season with Saul Alinsky, and you have Hillary Clinton in a lamb suit. Not a whole lot of difference in Obama.

The Democrat party takes over, and becomes "the party". You have the inner members, the rulers - and the outer members, the bureacrats - that goes all the way down the line to include school teachers, water works employees, trash men. And they are all keeping their eyes on everyone else. You know, for the good of the party.

The rest of us? A small class of bourgeoisie, with the rest of us the proletariat.

Naaaaa, it can't happen here.

6:15 AM, January 22, 2008  
Blogger Mary said...

Um, have many of you taken a quick glance at the "free" market lately?

Maybe she just wants to cut away at some of the entitlements, and kickbacks to friendly contributors to make it function efficiently again.

We can't all be insulated from reality, bound and determined to keep a straight face when things seem to be, say, heading south all around the regions.

Romney too, like Teddy Roosevelt, understands that you do what it takes, sometimes taking a more active role no matter how much the more incentive-entitled whine. If you don't like the gov'mint cheese, you learn to make your own fair and square. But conditions have to allow for that. Nobody forces it down your throat, helen, fear not. And y'all's cheese-making skills can't be all that rusty, so don't worry about losing what you have...

8:03 AM, January 22, 2008  
Blogger br549 said...

Yeah.

"Exxon - Mobil made 34 billion dollars last year! I want that money!!" Gee, who said that?

That was after E-M payed 44 billion in taxes.

8:26 AM, January 22, 2008  
Blogger tomcal said...

br549:

The suit Hillary was wearing at last night's debate may have looked like a lamb suit to you, but it looked like a Mao suit to me.

http://hillary666.webpark.pl/mao.jpg

8:55 AM, January 22, 2008  
Blogger Oldsmoblogger said...

Take the following two statements that appear to be the centerpiece of Lady Macbeth's program:

1. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

Is there an echo of "from each...to each..." there?

2. "If you work hard and play by the rules, you can have a good life."

There's an echo there, too, but that's all I'm going to say, lest someone invoke Godwin's Law.

9:36 AM, January 22, 2008  
Blogger br549 said...

I'll bet the Amero won't even be the same size as the dollar bill.

10:37 AM, January 22, 2008  
Blogger tomcal said...

Re: The Amero

No it won't; it will be much bigger so that the picture of Hillary in her Mao suit will be more visible from a distance.

The denominations will be smaller in order to ensure an extremely large number of Hillary portraits in circulation.

1:40 PM, January 22, 2008  
Blogger DADvocate said...

sbw - nothing you say justifies limiting CEO salaries. Begrudging someone their success says much more about you than them.
Envy, perhaps? The Marines have "competent and dedicated officers and enlisted" because they only take a "few good men" and women. Good CEOs do the same.

There's no worship of CEOs here. Just recognition that it's OK for them to get big bucks. They made choices and, for the most part, worked to get where they are. I did the same. I'm rather minimalist also. I don't want to live in an upscale house in an uppity neighborhood or have a mansion somewhere. I like living in the country in a modest house although I want more acreage. But that will come.

BTW - I love Exxon-Mobile. They bring by fuel for my vehicle from across the ocean and sell it in places so convenient that I don't go 10 feet out of my way to buy it. I'm glad they make enough money to motivate them to do this.

Hillary Clinton has no idea how to improve our economy, average income, etc. She just knows how to make empty promised to sucker the truly greedy into voting for her. In the long run, her approach will hurt Americans more than George Bush's ever did.

2:11 PM, January 22, 2008  
Blogger SBW said...

Interesting. My background is in Geology and Geophysics. I know well the risks (monetary and otherwise) of oil exploration, more than many people that complain about gas prices. I for one have no issue with higher market-driven cost, because the actions taken to extract oil are sometimes extraordinary. But the reason that Exxon can bring oil to your neighborhood is that many engineers (petroleum and otherwise), most educated at state schools, and many geologists, most educated at state schools, along with armies of logistics personnel, production platform workers, business personnel, etc make that happen. I would like the CEO to do it armed with 100,00 idiots.

I approve of private companies making money. The more the better. I happen to work for one. Obviously, the big difference between me and you, with the intelligence (perhaps envy!) difference in my favor, is I realize that thousands of people in the organization made it happen, not the CEO.

You obviously believe is charismatic leadership. I do not subscribe to the caudillo factor, don't believe it is in the least bit American, and realize that CEOs, whom you seem to worship--okay, fawn over, are only a minor factor in a successful organization. Can a CEO ruin a company? Sure. Can many average men stewardship a company filled with thousands of educated workers? Damn straight.

CEO salaries will remain high as long as shareholders are convinced they are worth the price. I, as a shareholder, do not think they are worth the amount they are paid, by an order of magnitude. And I obviously hope that many Americans will share my view. Many do, and surprisingly, vote Republican or Libertarian. Love of free market certainly does not mean defending CEOs. I seem to see that all around the blogosphere.

As a postscript, from my view, admittedly, Marine generals have little determination in who makes it into the Marine Corps. Most of the selection process occurs by personnel at the Captain or below level on the officer side, and the GySgt (mainly lower) on the enlisted side. Again, many quality people make the determination, not the leader. But he should be compensated--in all forms--300 - 400 times as much, right? (Generals don't, not by a long shot, but that would be the equivalent in the private sector).

11:51 PM, January 22, 2008  
Blogger tomcal said...

sbw:

Your comment about the "Caudillo Factor" is interesting.

The word "Caudillo" is widely used in Latin America, where I have a lot of experience. I really don't know whether it has a true English translation - it may, but if it does, I dont know it. If it is commonly used outside of the Spanish language, I was unaware.

In any case, a "Caudillo" is basically the top guy in what we call rule by hegemony - "a kind of domination that implies a measure of consent by those at the bottom" (Chasteen, "Born In Blood And Fire", W.W. Norton, 2001).

I would agree with you if this conversation were taking place in the mid-1980's, when corporate governance was indeed hegemonistic. In the mid to late 1980's, however, the advent of the "leveraged buyout" essentialy put an end to hegemonistic corporate leadership. From that point forward, corporate leaders who were not providing value to their shareholders were easy Pickens for corporate raiders who maximized shareholder value.

From that point forward, in my humble opinion, it became very difficult for entrenched executives to enrich themselves (over the long term) to the detriment of shareholders.

Nowadays, if a CEO is not providing value in excess of his compensation to his shareholders (or even his "stakeholders" if you subscribe to PCBS) he will be replaced very quickly.

12:40 AM, January 23, 2008  
Blogger Bruce Hayden said...

The problem with a lot of CEO salaries is that many of them are not driven by profits and the like, but rather by the incestuous relationship between them and their boards of directors. First, many CEOs have at least some power over who sits on their boards. Secondly, many boards have CEOs from other companies, and the CEO of one company is often on the board of another.

But the solution is not to limit CEO pay, per se, but rather, reform corporate governance. There are CEOs who are worth huge amounts of money. The big issue is with CEOs making such as they lay off line workers and force pay cuts below them. A lot of this though can probably be solved by limiting the incestuous nature between boards and CEOs.

I would suggest more pay through stock appreciation - except that we have seen a lot of cheating in that area, with back-dating of stock options, etc. But if the stock is going up quickly (and legally), there shouldn't be the problem of rewarding the CEO while the ship sinks.

2:17 PM, January 23, 2008  
Blogger DADvocate said...

You obviously believe is charismatic leadership.

Since I don't believe in "charismatic leadership" per se, I'm not sure why you think it is obvious I do. I believe in competent, honest leadership. One of the best bosses I ever had had the personality of a rock. But he told you exactly what he wanted and rewarded you exactly as he said he would when you performance met his standards, which were reasonable.

The CEOs of Enron weren't honest nor competent. Robert McNamara was an imcompetent who somehow managed to keep getting high paying positions. Jack Welch was worth it at GE.

I agree with bruce hayden for the most part. In general I don't have a problem with the salaries until, due to those incestuous relationships, CEOs are getting paid big bucks for failing.

2:51 PM, January 24, 2008  
Blogger Kurt said...

Lately Chairman Hillary has been talking in ads about putting a moratorium or a freeze on foreclosures if she's elected. While I thought that the Bush housing bailout plan was a bad idea, this idea is simply atrocious. I can't imagine what sort of damage that would do to the economy. I wonder how many financial institutions would have to go out of business because they couldn't put an end to their losses through foreclosure. And the sad truth is that many Americans are so ignorant about economics (not to mention history) that they think this sort of pandering sounds like a good idea.

5:23 PM, January 24, 2008  
Blogger tomcal said...

Well I hope she changes the terms of my mortgages, both residential and commercial. I would save a lot of money if I didn't have to pay the bank back.

But on the other hand, it would put the banks out of business. I have banks as tenants - if they go out of business I'll have a vacancy problem. Also, since the banks would be out of business I would never be able to get new loan to finance the growth of my business. Maybe I should reconsider...

Fortunately this whole foreclosure freeze idea is just campaign rhetoric to get the Clintons back in the White House after their 8 year hiatus. It is a lie just like all their other lies, a play to get the ignoramus vote. They know full well what a freeze would do to the economy and would never actually put it in place. So short-term, they really don’t worry me.

Long-term is another issue. They clearly intend to put insidious long term policies, with the following goals, in place:

Chelsea, born in February 1980, will turn 35 in February 2015 (making her eligible to run in the 2016 elections with her mother and father at her side). She will be elected and will formally establish the dynasty in 2017. She will accomplish this by using seemingly innocuous legislation which her parents intend to push through Congress during the next 9 years. The legislation will be contained in riders to a number of bills, any one not appearing threatening, but the sum total changing enough rules to guarantee her election.

Just a thought…

11:35 PM, January 24, 2008  
Blogger serket said...

I first saw Hillary's quote in Glenn Beck's newsletter yesterday. Not only do the socialists fear the free market, but they want the government to have an even bigger budget than it already has. It is very scary and we are definitely in danger of economic collapse. I also think it is interesting how she uses hatred of Bush to promote her agenda. Want to implement a new policy? Just say that Bush oppposes it.

Gossypol - I am surprised that with parents like these, Chelsea became an important figure at an investment company, but your explanation is intriguing.

Steven - I heard there was flooding in some areas of North Korea and the people were risking their lives to save pictures of their Dear Leader. I have an uncle who was adopted from South Korea, near the northern border.

the ob: She also endorses shifting the tax cut away from the > $250,000 set in order to increase it for people under that, which actually makes a certain amount of sense as a job stimulus package.

While poor people are more likely to buy goods, rich people are more likely to create jobs. I believe Bush has tried the stimulus approach twice and it led to success. A "bonus" for the poor people will create a temporary boon, but allowing a better environment for new jobs will create long term improvement.

Mitt Romney is falsely perceived as being good with the economy. During his term taxes were raised and job growth was ranked 46th in the nation. I imagine the misunderstanding comes from his wealth, but would George Soros make sound economic policies?

I've noticed that there seems to be an increasing amount of Republicans who oppose free trade agreements and do not trust the Federal Reserve.

br549, I remember one of my professors talking about the Democrats wanting oil profits and at the time McDonalds had a really profitable year and he wondered why there weren't clamoring for that money.

6:10 PM, January 25, 2008  
Blogger br549 said...

serket:

Eating at McDonald's contributes to an earlier than natural death. Less people reaching S.S. age.

8:47 PM, January 25, 2008  
Blogger tomcal said...

The earlier death caused by eating at McDonalds will also provide years of employment for lawyers working "American Obese vs. McDonald's Corporation". The massive body of plaintiffs in this soon to be filed case will dwarf all previous classes in class-actions.

3:15 AM, January 26, 2008  
Blogger the green goober said...

CEOs demand the salaries they are given because you need someone with that level of experience running your company. And if you don't pay them competitively they will be snatched by a head hunter for another company. It's really that simple- the economy naturally figures this out on it's own. Hillary needs to be tied to a chair in an economics class before speaking again.

1:29 PM, January 26, 2008  
Blogger look said...

情趣用品,
性感睡衣,
免費視訊聊天,
視訊交友網,
美姬圖影,
情境坊歡愉用品,
花美姬情趣用品,
成人圖片,
臺灣情色網,
嘟嘟情人色網,
色情網站,
情境坊歡愉用品,
徵信,
徵信公司,
徵信,
外遇,
徵信,
徵信,
抓姦,
徵信,
外遇,
徵信,
徵信社,
徵信社,
抓姦,
徵信社,
徵信社,
徵信社,
,
,
整型,
視訊聊天,
視訊交友,
AV女優,
色情,
A片,
A片,
情趣用品,
情色,
A片,
色情影片,
情趣用品,
A片,
AV女優,
視訊聊天室,
聊天,
情趣用品,
情惑用品性易購,
情侶歡愉用品,
A片,
情趣,
情惑用品性易購,
辣妹視訊,
自慰套,
情侶歡愉用品,
寄情築園小遊戲,
aio交友愛情館,
美女視訊,
色情A片,
情趣用品,
徵信社,
情趣用品,
A片,
美女視訊,
色情A片,
AV女優,
A片,
辣妹視訊,
自慰套,
情侶歡愉用品,

2:31 PM, March 15, 2009  
Blogger nini said...

85cc免費影城 愛情公寓正妹牆川藏第一美女 成人影片 情色交友網 美女視訊 美女視訊 視訊情人高雄網 JP成人影城 383成人影城 aa片免費a片下載 a片線上看aa片免費看 ※a片線上試看※sex520免費影片※ aa片免費看 BT成人論壇 金瓶影片交流區 自拍美女聊天室 aa片免費a片下載 SEX520免費影片 免費a片 日本美女寫真集 sex520aa免費影片 sex520aa免費影片 BT成人網 Hotsee免費視訊交友 百分百貼影片區 SEX520免費影片 免費視訊聊天室 情人視訊高雄網 星光情色討論版 正妹牆 383成人影城 線上85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 ※免費視訊聊天室※ ※免費視訊聊天室※ 免費視訊聊天室 85cc免費影片 85cc免費影片 080苗栗人聊天室 080苗栗人聊天室 080中部人聊天室 080中部人聊天室 免費a片下載 免費a片 AA片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 日本av女優影片 av女優 av女優無碼影城 av女優 av女優 百分百成人圖片 百分百成人圖片 視訊情人高雄網 電話交友 影音電話交友 絕色影城 絕色影城 夜未眠成人影城 夜未眠成人影城 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 免費色咪咪貼影片 免費色咪咪貼影片 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 影音視訊交友網 視訊交友網 080視訊聊天室 ※免費視訊聊天室※ ※免費視訊聊天室※ 視訊聊天室 成人影音視訊聊天室 ut影音視訊聊天室 ※免費視訊聊天室※ 視訊ukiss聊天室視訊ukiss聊天室 視訊交友90739 視訊交友90739 情人視訊網 168視訊美女 168視訊美女 168視訊美女 視訊美女館 視訊美女館 免費視訊美女網 小高聊天室 小高聊天室 aio交友聊天室 aio交友聊天室 交友聊天室 交友聊天室 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 免費線上a片 免費線上a片 嘟嘟成人網站 成人漫畫 情色文學 嘟嘟成人網 成人貼圖區 情色文學成人小說 微風成人區 情色貼圖區 免費視訊聊天 免費成人圖片區 愛情公寓 愛情公寓聊天室 寄情築園小遊戲 免費aa片線上看 aa片免費看 情色SXE聊天室 SEX情色遊戲 色情A片 免費下載 av女優 俱樂部 情色論壇 辣妹視訊 情色貼圖網 免費色情 聊天室 情人視訊聊天室 免費a片成人影城 免費a片-aa片免費看 0204貼圖區 SEX情色 交友聊天-線上免費 女優天堂 成人交友網 成人情色貼圖區 18禁 -女優王國 080視訊美女聊天室 080視訊聊天室 視訊交友90739 免費a片 aio 視訊交友網 成人影城-免費a片※免費視訊聊天※85cc免費影片日本線上免費a片 免費色咪咪影片免費色咪咪影片aaa片免費看影片aaa片免費看成人影城免費色咪咪影片

2:57 PM, April 06, 2009  
Blogger 123456 said...

广州托盘复合托盘食品托盘天津木托盘胶合板托盘蜂窝纸托盘塑木托盘熏蒸木托盘木制托盘广东塑料托盘钢托盘钢制托盘栈板塑料栈板木栈板垫仓板托盘包装求购托盘天津托盘温州托盘山东托盘北京托盘上海木托盘塑胶托盘卡板纸卡板塑料卡板手推车推车机场手推车好孩子手推车液压手推车超市手推车医用手推车康贝手推车不锈钢手推车平板车电动平板车老虎车静音手推车平板手推车小推车模具架置物架堆垛架巧固架整理架物料整理架挂板架整理柜零件柜零件整理柜文件整理柜仓储笼仓库笼料箱塑料箱钢制料箱货箱整理箱塑料整理箱周转箱塑料周转箱防静电周转箱求购周转箱物流箱物料盒零件盒塑料零件盒卡板箱周转筐塑料周转筐周转箩登高车物流台车台车密集架档案密集架文件柜办公文件柜北京文件柜广州文件柜上海文件柜南京文件柜深圳文件柜钢制文件柜铁皮文件柜档案柜文件柜厂底图柜档案柜鞋柜储物柜更衣柜防火防磁柜防磁柜防火防磁文件柜图书架资料柜工具柜

7:40 AM, April 13, 2009  
Blogger 天天看正妹 said...

免費視訊聊天 ut聊天室辣妹視訊UT影音視訊聊天室 吉澤明步QQ美女視訊秀 85cc免費影片aa影片下載城sex免費成人影片aaa片免費看短片美女視訊 sex383線上娛樂場av969 免費短片日本免費視訊aa影片下載城視訊網愛聊天室影音視訊交友 咆哮小老鼠分享論壇sex520免費影片aa免費影片下載城aio辣妺視訊 aio辣妹交友愛情館 jp成人影片aio交友愛情館馬子免費影片免費線上a片18成人85cc影城0204movie免費色咪咪視訊網pc交友s383視訊玩美女人34c高雄視訊聊天jp成人免費視訊辣妹 kk777視訊俱樂部xxxpandalive173影音視訊聊天室 sex520-卡通影片成人免費視訊 完美女人13060 免費視訊聊天sexy girl video movie辣妹妹影音視訊聊天室UT視訊美女交友視訊情色網百事無碼a片dvd線上aa片免費看18禁成人網ut聊天室kk俱樂部視訊激情網愛聊天 情人小魔女自拍卡通aa片免費看夜未眠成人影城aio性愛dvd辣妹影片直播拓網視訊交友視訊聊天室ggoo168論壇視訊辣妹love104影音live秀 美女show-live視訊情色yam交友辣妹妹影音視訊聊天室s383情色大網咖視訊aaa俱樂部台灣情色網無碼avdvdsexy diamond sex888入口Show-live視訊聊天室

6:22 AM, April 14, 2009  
Blogger 天天看正妹 said...

免費 a 片aaaaa片俱樂部影片aaaaa片俱樂部dodo豆豆聊天室sex520網路自拍美女聊天室天堂免費線上avdvd援交av080影片aa影片下載城aaa片免費看短片成人圖片區18成人avooogo2av免費影片sexdiy影城免費線上成人影片bonbonsex0951影片下載日本av女優sex888免費看影片免費視訊78論壇辣妹有約辣妹no31314視訊dudu sex免費影片avdvd情色影片免費色咪咪影片網av080免費試看日本美女寫真集辣妹脫衣麻將視訊聊天室性福免費影片分享日本美女寫真集,kk視訊aio交友愛情館免費成人美女視訊bt論壇色情自拍免費a片卡通tw 18 net卡通18美少女圖色情漫畫777美女小護士免費 aa 片試看百分百成人情色圖片a片免費觀賞sexy girls get fuckedsexy girl video movie情色文學成人小說sex888免費看eyny 伊莉論壇sexdiy影城自拍情色0204movie免費影片aio免費aa片試看s383情色大網咖sexy girl video movie草莓牛奶AV論壇台灣論壇18禁遊戲區環球辣妹聊天室 90691拓網aio交友愛情館拓網學生族視訊777美女 sex888影片分享區hi5 tv免費影片aa的滿18歲卡通影片sex383線上娛樂場sexdiy影城免費a片線上觀看真人美女辣妹鋼管脫衣秀比基尼辣妹一夜情視訊aio交友愛情館

6:22 AM, April 14, 2009  
Blogger 天天看正妹 said...

小魔女免費影城免費看 aa的滿18歲影片sex383線上娛樂場kk777視訊俱樂部aa的滿18歲影片85cc免費影片a片免費看A片-sex520視訊聊天室v6 0plus論壇sex520免費影片avdvd-情色網qq美美色網ut13077視訊聊天A片-無碼援交東京熱一本道aaa免費看影片免費視訊聊天室微風成人免費視訊聊天 ut聊天室av1688影音視訊天堂免費 a 片85cc免費影城亞洲禁果影城微風成人av論壇sex520免費影片JP成人網免費成人視訊aaa影片下載城免費a片 ut交友成人視訊85cc成人影城免費A片aa的滿18歲影片小魔女免費影片85cc免費影片aaa片免費看短片aa影片下載城aaaaa片俱樂部影片aaaaa片俱樂部aa的滿18歲影片小魔女免費影片台灣論壇免費影片後宮0204movie免費影片免費卡通影片線上觀看線上免費a片觀看85cc免費影片免費A片aa影片下載城ut聊天室辣妹視訊UT影音視訊聊天室 日本免費視訊aaaa 片俱樂部aaaa片免費看影片免費視訊78論壇情色偷拍免費A片免費aaaaa片俱樂部影片aa影片下載城色漫畫帝國av俱樂部aaaa彩虹頻道免費影片 杜蕾斯成人免費卡通影片線上觀看85cc免費影片線上觀賞免費線上歐美A片觀看免費a片卡通aaa的滿18歲卡通影片sex520免費影片免費 a 片

6:22 AM, April 14, 2009  
Blogger 徵信 said...

外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇 外遇
外遇


外遇 外遇
外遇
外遇 外遇外遇
外遇

外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 ,
外遇 外遇 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇

外遇 外遇

外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿喜帖囍帖卡片外遇外遇 外遇 外遇外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇剖析 外遇調查 外遇案例 外遇諮詢 偷情 第三者外遇話題 外遇發洩 感情挽回 徵信社 外遇心態 外遇 通姦 通姦罪 外遇徵信社徵信社外遇 外遇 抓姦徵信協會徵信公司 包二奶 徵信社 徵信 徵信社 徵信社 徵信社 徵信社 徵信 徵信 婚姻 婚前徵信 前科 個人資料 外遇 第三者 徵信社 偵探社 抓姦 偵探社 偵探社婚 偵探社 偵探社偵探家事服務家事服務家電維修家事服務家事服務家事服務家事服務家事服務持久持久持久持久持久持久持久離婚網頁設計徵信社徵信社徵信徵信社外遇離婚協議書劈腿持久持久持久持久持久劈腿剖析徵信徵信社外遇外遇外遇外遇徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿

5:18 AM, April 21, 2009  
Blogger 9988 said...

激情網愛聊天 激情網愛 伊利討論區 亞洲情色視訊交友 亞洲成人圖片區 伊莉論壇 一夜情聊天室 浪漫月光論壇 一葉情貼圖片區 正妹牆-校園版 水都情色論壇 洪爺色情電影 波波情色貼圖 洪爺 影城 櫻桃不夜城 歐美 a片 歐美模特兒寫真 東東成人論壇 楓之谷小遊戲 曼雪兒 免費小說 星光情色討論版 本土自拍網 日本a片 搜樂論壇 新6k聊天室 日本美女寫真集 日本av女優色色網 成人影城 成人交友 成人微風論壇 成人哈啦聊天室 成人卡通影片 成人視訊交友聊天 成人電影下載 成人免費視訊聊天 成人貼圖站 成人聊天網 成人網站- 嘟嘟情人色網 情人視訊聊天室 情人影音視訊網 情人視訊高雄網 情色交友網 情色小遊戲 情色交友聊天小站 情色視訊聊天 情色電影院 情色網 情色自拍 情色貼圖區 情色 後宮電影院 後宮成人影城 微風成人區 微風成人短片區 影音Live秀 彩虹hi視訊交友網 影音視訊聊天室 巨乳辣妹寫真視訊 平水相逢遊戲區 小魔女自拍天堂 小魔女影片交流 小弟弟貼影片 小潘潘寫真圖片 小弟弟貼影片區 小魔女免費影片 小高 聊天室 小莉影像館 小高深情聊天室 寄情築園小遊戲 尋夢園聊天室 小瓢蟲情色論壇 尋夢園聊天室聯盟 女優成人情色網 女優報報 女人色色網 大奶美女視訊 天堂情色網 天下第一色站 夢幻家族聊天室 失敗論壇 土豆網 - 影片下載 嘟嘟情人色網 壞朋友論壇fliendo 嘟嘟情人色網影片 嘟嘟成年人網 哈啦聊天室 嗡嗡嗡論壇 嘟嘟 貼圖區 嘟嘟影城 咆哮小老鼠分享論壇 台灣成人貼圖 台灣美女寫真貼圖區 台灣原住民聊天室 台灣論壇 台灣kiss 台灣kiss文學區 原住民聊天室-視訊網 台灣a片王 原住民聊天室 八國成人情色網 卡通a片 免費曼雪兒小說 免費檳榔西施摸奶影片 免費情色電影分享區 免費影音視訊聊天 免費貼圖區 免費辣妹視訊聊天網 免費辣妺視訊 免費視訊美女網 免費視訊聊天室入口 免費視訊辣妹脫衣秀 免費視訊聊天 免費視訊聊天室 免費視訊成人聊天室 免費色咪咪影片網 免費線上a片 免費a片欣賞 免費av18禁影片 免費a片 偷窺大本營 yymp3 音樂網站 watchshow情色視訊聊天室 t聊天聯盟 taiwankiss文學區 sex女優王國 sex999 免費影片 sex888免費影片城 s383情色大網咖 QQ美美色網 kiss影音視訊聊天室 JP成人影城 jojo 漫畫連載 hilive tv免費電影 fhm男人幫 Hotsee 免費視訊 聊天室 friendster交友社群部落 辣妹視訊秀 豆豆聊天室 麗的免費情色遊戲 貓貓論壇 視訊ukiss聊天室 視訊交友90739 視訊交友 視訊聊天 視訊聊天交友 視訊聊天室 視訊美女34c 電話交友 色情遊戲 色色網 色美媚部落格 都會男女視訊聊天室 自拍美女聊天室 金瓶影片交流區 聊天室080 美女視訊聊天 美女交友聊天室 線上免費a片 線上a片 網路交友聊天室 絕色成人影城 百分百貼影片區 童顏巨乳美女圖片 男人幫論壇 癡漢論壇 甜心寶貝貼影區 無名 正妹牆 熊貓情色貼圖 熊貓貼圖區 BT成人論壇 av女優報報 av博物館 aio男女交友愛情館 aio交友戀愛館 aa免費看 aa的滿18歲影片 aaaa片俱樂部 a383成人影城 85cc免費影片 6k聊天館 18成人dvd 383成人論壇 4u成人論壇 18成人av影城 3a情色網 18禁小遊戲 080原住民聊天室 080聊天室 080視訊聊天室 080中部人聊天室 0401影音視訊聊天室 080 聊天室 6k 0204貼圖區 0204movie - 18成人影城 007色色網kk777視訊俱樂部正妹視訊ggoo

11:30 AM, May 05, 2009  
Blogger 1798 said...

視訊做愛視訊美女無碼A片情色影劇kyo成人動漫tt1069同志交友網ut同志交友網微風成人論壇6k聊天室日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞UT視訊美女交友..........................

5:45 AM, May 20, 2009  

Post a Comment

<< Home