Not only is Mary one sick puppy but some of the people defending her have the morality of an alley cat. Hallerin Hill, our local talk show was just on and a male caller jcame on to defend her. I really wonder what in the world people are thinking. I do think it is some type of turn-the-other cheek thinking that is resulting in murderers getting off for unbelievable crimes. Now, even Phil Spector who shot a woman three years ago is in court with discussion of dropping his charge to manslaughter. What is wrong with our society that people who kill others are given this type of kid glove treatment?
The Phil Spector case has gone into the ridiculous too. Where do they find these jurors?
The other aspect of the Winkler abuse claims is that shooting someone in the back while they sleep is the ultimate abuse. Winkler sounds like a woman without a conscious.
As for Winkler, this is symptomatic of our legal system treating female perpetrators of violent crime as if they are afflicted with some mental infirmity that reduces their culpability. The implicit thinking is that their evil acts are not prompted by rational thought, as is a male's; rather, their vile acts are prompted by some irrational emotion, and that emotion (whether fear, love, hate) is viewed to be completely understandable under the circumstances -- given the woman's more "fragile" state. This accounts for the difference in charges and, especially, sentences between male and female sex offenders. (From a legal perspective, of course, the differential treament is generally wrong because intent to commit the act, not the motive, should be the overriding consideration.) Why did Mrs. Bobbitt not serve a single night in jail? The act of mutilating her husband was deemed to be an emotional resonse to her husband's supposed prolonged abuse.
In any event, this thinking is, of course, a vestige of an era when women were not deemed capable of owning property or cutting business deals -- because they supposedly could not make rational decisions. This sort of thinking is as insulting and patronizing to women now as it was then, and NOW ought to be leading the charge to change the way we view female violent crime.
I believe you'll find that female perpetrators of fraud are treated similar to male perpetrators -- because fraud clearly is not driven by emotion, but rather by cold, calculated greed.
6 Comments:
Read the article. Mary Winkler is one sick puppy. How much do you want to bet the kids would develop a sleep disorder if they have to go back to her?
Dadvocate,
Not only is Mary one sick puppy but some of the people defending her have the morality of an alley cat. Hallerin Hill, our local talk show was just on and a male caller jcame on to defend her. I really wonder what in the world people are thinking. I do think it is some type of turn-the-other cheek thinking that is resulting in murderers getting off for unbelievable crimes. Now, even Phil Spector who shot a woman three years ago is in court with discussion of dropping his charge to manslaughter. What is wrong with our society that people who kill others are given this type of kid glove treatment?
The Phil Spector case has gone into the ridiculous too. Where do they find these jurors?
The other aspect of the Winkler abuse claims is that shooting someone in the back while they sleep is the ultimate abuse. Winkler sounds like a woman without a conscious.
As for Winkler, this is symptomatic of our legal system treating female perpetrators of violent crime as if they are afflicted with some mental infirmity that reduces their culpability. The implicit thinking is that their evil acts are not prompted by rational thought, as is a male's; rather, their vile acts are prompted by some irrational emotion, and that emotion (whether fear, love, hate) is viewed to be completely understandable under the circumstances -- given the woman's more "fragile" state. This accounts for the difference in charges and, especially, sentences between male and female sex offenders. (From a legal perspective, of course, the differential treament is generally wrong because intent to commit the act, not the motive, should be the overriding consideration.) Why did Mrs. Bobbitt not serve a single night in jail? The act of mutilating her husband was deemed to be an emotional resonse to her husband's supposed prolonged abuse.
In any event, this thinking is, of course, a vestige of an era when women were not deemed capable of owning property or cutting business deals -- because they supposedly could not make rational decisions. This sort of thinking is as insulting and patronizing to women now as it was then, and NOW ought to be leading the charge to change the way we view female violent crime.
I believe you'll find that female perpetrators of fraud are treated similar to male perpetrators -- because fraud clearly is not driven by emotion, but rather by cold, calculated greed.
85cc免費影片85cc免費影片sex520免費影片免費 a 片85cc免費影片台灣論壇免費影片免費看 aa的滿18歲影片85cc免費影片線上觀賞免費A片線上免費a片觀看a片免費看小魔女免費影城A片-sex520aaa片免費看短片aaaaa片俱樂部sex888免費看影片sex520免費影片sex免費成人影片馬子免費影片免費線上a片成人圖片區18成人avooo520sex貼片區臺灣情色網線上免費a長片免費卡通影片線上觀看gogo2sex免費 a 片sex520免費影片援交av080影片免費線上avdvd免費 aa 片試看,成人影片分享後宮0204movie免費影片免費線上歐美A片觀看sex888影片分享區微風成人av論壇plus論壇自拍情色0204movie免費影片aaa片免費看短片免費色咪咪影片網aaaa彩虹頻道免費影片日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞85cc免費影城5278論壇倉井空免費a影片bbs x693 com sex888a片免費觀賞sexy girls get fucked吉澤明步彩虹頻道免費短片sex520-卡通影片台灣情色網無碼avdvdaaa影片下載城彩虹頻道免費影片 sex383線上娛樂場一本道 a片 東京熱情色影片彩虹成人avdvd洪爺影城高中生援交偷拍自拍限制級色情 片
視訊做愛視訊美女無碼A片情色影劇kyo成人動漫tt1069同志交友網ut同志交友網微風成人論壇6k聊天室日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞UT視訊美女交友..........................
Post a Comment
<< Home