Saturday, November 26, 2005

Vegetarianism

Many people have written to ask me to talk about my vegetarianism when I was younger and why I went back to being a carnivore. Well--here is the story. When I was younger, I thought it wrong to hurt another living thing. I had compassion for flies, ants and anything else that moved. At twelve, I bought myself the book, Diet for a Small Planet. I figured if I was going to be a vegetarian, I might as well be a good one. I made salads, ate fruits and vegetables and tried to eat meals that were comprised of complete proteins.

My parents never balked at this change in my diet and just bought whatever grocery items I needed as long as I prepared most of my own foods. I never asked anyone to share my personal decision nor did I think that eating meat was sacrilegious. At twelve, I had reached the Piagetian stage of formal operations and was able to reason that other people did not all think like me and made their own decisions--which had nothing to do with me. At this time, I lost all idealistic perceptions of others, mainly adults. I had a crush on a male teacher at that time but it evaporated as I realized that he was no different than me, a mere mortal, who was human just like me. I never had a hero after that as I had learned a long time before, that no one could rescue me from pain and anguish but myself.

I had a tremendous amount of free-floating hostility within me as well as downright aggression--I thought being a pacifist (which included being a vegetarian) could control my inner feelings of rage. But it only sublimated those feelings for a while. I sat quietly while peers at school made fun of me. But I learned the truth about what worked when one of my siblings brought down a boy who taunted me about my wild kinky hair on the school bus with threats of violence. My pacifism did not work. It only served to make me angrier. As the years went by, I learned to explore my anger and aggressive feelings and to allow them to come to the surface and not to be afraid of them. By the time I was 24 and walking through the isles of Key Foods in Manhattan looking at rows of tuna fish, I realized that I no longer needed to hang onto my role as a vegetarian to prove that I was a "good" person. I was a decent person all ready. I will never forget the day I tried a can of tuna--it was magnificent.

I still decided for health purposes that I would not eat red meat as I had high cholesterol even in my 20's but I also had anemia. Then at 37, when I had a heart attack, I decided I had had enough of trying so hard to be healthy. It obviously did not work for me. I had run myself into the ground, exercised, given up meat and did everything I could to be healthy and it all backfired. I went to Mortons in Nashville and ate filet mignon and have not stopped since. I still try to eat healthy and have very little meat but it is just because I have to watch cholesterol, not for any psychological reasons.

I now look skeptically at people who preach vegetarianism to others as a type of religion--they are often the same ones who tout peace and brotherhood while trying to mask their feelings of aggression. My husband once said that he did not worry about violence from peace activists but frankly, I would rather hang out with a crowd of hard core gun addicts. I find them more capable of understanding and controlling their own aggression. People who preach peace in the face of appalling violence deny their aggression and target it at others who are not deserving of it or who are trying to protect them. I cannot justify that.

Here is an example of what I mean about using food as a method of virtue and pacifism. Notice that the bloated Americans are eating "fat turkeys" while the innocent peace activists are eating salmon, lentils and rice. With this holier-than-thou attitude, should they be eating salmon at all? Thanks to Professor Althouse for pointing out this article.

117 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hmmm...It's no surprise that Helen is full of aggression. It has nothing to do with meat or not meat. I merely make an observation regarding the self-centeredness of her decision-making process. Being a vegetarian, while initially driven by compassion, quickly became all about her and her needs--to purge herself of agression, for example. And her decision to give it up, again, was a narcissistic one--'it wasn't doing anything for *me*' Ah, yes, the 'what about me?!' cry of every human. We are all so very important; each the center of a universe. I'd ask those considering vegetarianism to look to Helen's original motive of compassion. Perhaps one might choose to become a vegetarian, not for oneself directly, but because one has compassion for all living beings. In particular, given the horrific farming conditions in the U.S., this seems to apply all the more so. We raise animals in, what for them, must seem pain factories. While a first instinct might be to direct one's aggression at those who protest against this by not eating meat, it does no harm, I hope, to exercise that compassion muscle a little and consider others, including animals.

1:18 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I sure hope that was wild salmon, not farm-raised stock that could spread disease to the native population. And that the lentils were grown without pesticides. Oh, and that rice: was it grown and harvested by adult workers earning a reasonable wage, with access to excellent and affordable health care and with equal treatment given to both genders, all religions, sexual preferences, and cultural/racial backgrounds? I'm sure they cooked using solar power, not any source connected however indirectly to fossil fuel.

Once you start declaring yourself holier than the rest of us, be careful: it's harder to balance up there than you expect.

1:24 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Helen said...

To anonymous at 1:18:

Guess you probably had to interupt your semi-veggie dinner with Cindy to write that rant--better hurry so you can get back to your PETA meeting.

1:28 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous M.I. Smith said...

Some animals are here to be eaten by those of us who would eat them. To argue otherwise is to deny reality.

1:32 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just imagine the pain of having your leaf shredded all for the sake being turned into a salad, or having your bean picked from your stem, or your apple riped from your branch! The horror.....gasp!

When are the vegetarians going show a little Compassion for The Living? :)

On that note, the Equalization Movement is insane. Give me Liberty or give me Death.

1:34 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous Beth Donovan said...

Anonymous - we are all self-centered, so go jump in the proverbial lake. You are not only self-centered but unbearabley self-righteous. If you don't like farming methods, then you should support farming that is kinder -
Personally, I have switched to buying free range chickens, eggs, beef and pork. And organic milk.
Mostly because it seems to taste better, especially the eggs.

Helen makes an interesting and valid point. Remember how the peaceniks of the late 60's and early 70's often errupted into violence during their protests?

I also agree that those of us who are 'gun nuts' control our aggression pretty well.

1:36 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous Soak Hinson said...

All those veggie people, anti-gunners and so-called pacifists are at the core of what is wrong with this society today. They should eat a little meat, shoot a .44 Magnum and kick somebody's ass (when necessary) and develop some cojones in the process.

Well, not the females. Most of them already have a set, and too much facial hair.

1:45 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous M.I. Smith said...

What we really need is a predator that will prey on humans. That way we could cull the herd, and prevent the weak and idiotic from breeding.

1:47 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Joe Baby said...

Interesting points re: vegetarianism + aggression. Thx.

And as for Anonymous, funny how I was also thinking that blog comment areas sure seem like "pain factories" on occasion.

1:48 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger steve u. said...

This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

1:55 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Ken Mitchell said...

You write: "Many people have written to ask me to talk about my vegetarianism when I was younger and why I went back to being a carnivore. "

And yet, by your own account you are NOT a "carnivore"; you are, as most human beings are, an "omnivore". We evolved with a firm practice of eating anything that didn't eat us first.

But it isn't so much a matter of WHAT you eat to maintain a healthy diet. The key is to have a balance, with all things in moderation = including moderation!

1:57 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger chuck b. said...

Your observations about aggressive peaceniks seem quite apt.

It’s my long-held theory that some people turn to pacifism and left leaning political sentiments because they feel angry and depressed. (And some people turn turn in the other direction toward various forms of religious fundamentalism and right-leaning politics for the same reason.) Rather than dealing with feelings as emotions, people try to deal with their feelings as thoughts, or products of an intellectual process. People say “I think” and “I feel” interchangeably, but they’re not the same thing. One is inherently rational, and the other is not.

As for eating meat, I managed to eat a mostly vegetarian, almost vegan, diet through most of college, and enjoyed it very much. I had the occasional meat relapse. We had a lot of tasty, inexpensive choices in town, and I fell in with a peer group that made mostly meatless food choices. I ate some great meals back then. It was never any kind of pacifistic or spiritual or health-oriented statement for me. If anything, it was vaguely political and a little sentimental. After college, I’ve found it harder to avoid meat.

I've never had much sympathy for flies or ants (what use would they have for my sympathy?) or even chicken or fish, I do fret about cows and pigs and I find the spectre of factory-farming very distressing--emotionally and intellectually. That said, I still eat the occasional cheeseburger or steak. For the most part, I actually like eating fruit and vegetables and pasta and tofu and I like my bread as wheaty and sprouty as it comes.

Anyhow, thank you for sharing your story; I enjoyed reading it. (sorry to hear about the heart attach, of course!)

1:58 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous Chuck Divine said...

Hmm. I actually was one of those pacifist types for awhile back in the 1960s. We turned violent? Um, no. You must be thinking of Communists and other highly authoritarian leftists. The opposition to the Vietnam War brought out all kinds of people -- some of them pretty disreputable. Just like gun owners. Most of them are fine, decent people. You have noticed a few criminals also own guns, though, I hope. FWIW, while I'm not interested in guns, I'm also an opponent of gun control.

Helen, sorry to hear about your heart attack. That's pretty unusual in someone so young.

1:59 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Svolich said...

Well said, Hellen.

I never went through the Peacenic phase - I was never self assured enough to feel superior. But I was reloading my own and competing in combat shooting when I was 13. I think that really knowing, for sure, that I could blow the bully's head off if I needed to kept me from needing to.

For the veggie phase - I figured I didn't spend 4 million years getting to the top of the food chain just to eat things that couldn't run away.

2:00 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous Liam Colvin said...

-[humor]- I find vegetarianism as an ethical choice rather insulting to my dog and most other carnivores. They are pretty much locked into their fate of eating other animals, no matter what their personal choice is. -[humor]-

And while we are at it, what about bulls? Where is that peace and tranquility that eating nothing but plants gives you?

2:04 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger steve u. said...

You note, "People who preach peace in the face of appalling violence deny their aggression and target it at others who are not deserving of it or who are trying to protect them." Well said. Many times that seems to be the case.

Decent people all want peace. Most adults, however, realize that truly promoting peace sometimes requires stopping, or even waging war, with thugs. Otherwise, thugs rule and destroy the opportunty for decent people to enjoy peace (at least in any meaningful way the term might be regarded).

2:05 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous blackminorca said...

Every leftist saga seems to have its "subhumans" to differentiate them that hold themselves on high. And should they not exist, then they are invented.

It used to be easy - simply discriminate along racial or religious lines. But that has proven futile and here in "anonymous" we have one of the newer strains that too will soon prove to be absurd. In this case, these leftists have arbitrarily determined that some "subhumans" "kill" to eat.

Yes anonymous, you are superior. Feel better now? Lets not consider your arbitrary definition of "killing". Lets not consider the fact that the vegetation you eat is home to far more animals than the single cow that might sustain me for months. Yes, anonymous, you can disregard the hundreds of mites and other exoskeletal creatures that you devour on that head of lettuce because they don't have pretty eyes.

PS: Instawife! Try the metamucil cholesterol regimen. It really works far better for some than popular medications.

2:16 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Helen said...

Hi blackminorca,

I heard that the metamucil cholesterol regimen does work from one of my relatives who tried it--thanks for the recommendation. It just doesn't sound very appealing--but hey, neither does a cow to a vegetarian.

2:27 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous trace boolean said...

At the age of 45 I became a vegetarian. Six months later I became a vegan. I did this as the result of a process that involved both reason and emotion. It was my decision for myself. I don't preach to people about it. I don't even discuss it much, unless someone asks, or if, as here, I happen to stumble into a conversation where the issue has been raised. My experience is pretty much the opposite of yours, Helen. I never had a vegan "preach" to me, but I've had plenty of omnivores belittle me or insinuate that I am either full of myself, naive or otherwise impaired.

2:30 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger SarahW said...

When you can take the can of chunklight tuna from the shelf, it will be time for you to leave, Grasshopper.

2:35 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous dave Hardy said...

If we weren't meant to eat animals, they wouldn't be made out of meat (Spinoza, Ethics and Barbecues, ch. 7).

2:36 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous tomWright said...

If you really want to see a bunch of self rightous diet maniacs, chack out the Freegans. I find them totally offensive on so many levels.

They could be working to get donations to food banks, but instead take food from dumpsters that truly needy people could use, and brag about it.

2:38 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous EDH said...

Many of the same things hold true for those who wear their "environmentalism" on their sleeve. No better example was the recent TBS "comedy" special "Earth to America." With few exceptions, E2A was a succession of preening elites who flew into Vegas convinced of their moral and intellectual superiorority based upon their professed concerns, adhesion to totemic beliefs and politically correct allignments.

2:38 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous LittleJ said...

Now I'm really curious: which comes first, anger and depression or pacifism and left-leaning political sentiments? Are they mutually reinforcing?

Glad to read that you were able to break that vicious cycle, Helen.

2:48 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Bujutsu Blogger said...

Well, I'm not a vegetarian, I'm just "veggie-curious". I do eat meat occassionally but I almost never cook it for myself. I do eat a lot of fish, though (Perhaps a more Catholic definition of meat...).

At any rate, this is a health decision and not any moral superiority argument on my part.

I wonder how many pseudo-moral vegetarians have emerged from them simply hearing about the traditional Buddhist injunction against eating meat as it harms living things? Their compassion might be commendable, but I wonder how many of them are seeking to fit a label rather than a deep compassion for all living things.

All the same, I generally don't try and judge people on the basis of their culinary habits. There are probably more relavant things to consider.

2:48 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

When you starting tossing puppies into the blender you will know the transition is complete.

2:54 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger BarbO said...

Once when my husband and I were at a B & B in New Mexico, we sat for a couple hours listening to stories about oddballs he'd known over the years. He said the wierdest people to stay at the B & B were always the vegetarians. He still remembers one of the pickiest ones. When he cleaned her room, he'd always find empty pork rind packages in her garbage.

As for me, when someone tells me they're a vegetarian, I usually can't resist pointing out that Hitler was a vegetarian, too, but it didn't seem to do much to make him a better mammal.

2:54 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Joan said...

Dr. Helen, have you considered the possibility that your high cholesterol and heart attack were caused by your vegetarian diet? There is ample scientific evidence that diets low in animal protein lead to these conditions. One of the benefits of lower carb diets is to regulate the cholesterol mechanism and improve cholesterol profiles.

3:00 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Joan said...

This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

3:04 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Sally said...

I have a lot of friends who are vegetarian and I've met very few who are didactic. Most tend to be on the defensive. People routinely make fun of their choice to avoid meat.

I'm a meat eater myself although I eat it very moderately, about once or twice a week. This is what my body craves and I believe it's healthy for me. I do avoid eggs and meat that are factory farmed. Our current mainstream factory farms are cruel and I am an activist in support of stricter regulations regarding animal cruelty and a big supporter of free range animal farms. I also think meat eaters should acknowledge all animals as sentient beings and give respect to the animals that they eat, something akin to some Buddhist and Native American customs. I truly wish that more meat eating conservatives showed an interest in animal welfare.

3:05 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Recovered Leftist said...

If we're not supposed to eat animals, how come they're made of meat?

3:06 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger mcg said...

The Dalai Lama spoke at Stanford recently about nonviolence. His take caught me by surprise for its pragmatism. (Boldface mine.)

In the two-hour forum titled "The Heart of Nonviolence," the exiled leader of Tibetan Buddhism praised such pacifists as Mohandas Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr., but stopped short of condemning all violence. Actions taken out of compassion - even if lives are lost - can be justified if those actions reduce future suffering, the Dalai Lama told the audience of 1,000 at the university's Memorial Church.

"History shows the second World War protected the Western World - protected democracy," he said, speaking sometimes in English and other times through his longtime principal translator, Geshe Thupten Jinpa. "The Iraq war - it's too early to say, right or wrong."

However, the Dalai Lama cautioned, war and violence generally leads to more war and more violence, more hatred and more resentment. He pointed to the situation of Tibetan people, who he said should not react violently to oppression by the Chinese government, but should instead gather support from the Chinese people for their liberation.


Here's the story. I do not intend to suggest by my boldfacing that The Dalai Lama endorses the Iraq conflict. But many of the supposed pacifists of today might be taken a bit aback by his unwillingness to absolutely condemn it.

3:07 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Recovered Leftist said...

Oops. Looks like someone else already posted the bumper-sticker comment: If we're not supposed to eat animals, how come they're made of meat? I admire that person's keen eye for the very best bumper sticker wit.

3:09 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Helen said...

To Joan,

Yes, I did consider that my vegetarian diet led to my heart attack--that is why I started eating red meat at 37 after I got sick. I go to a cardiac rehabilitation class and they told me that at one point--a number of the heart patients were getting weak and sick because they thought it would be good to avoid meat. The staff told us to include small portions of red meat in our diet each weak to keep from getting anemia etc.

To anyone else who is a vegetarian--I do not mean to imply from my post that all vegetarians are pacifists who cannot deal with aggression--it is the ones who preach to others that they are bad people if they eat meat. I just do not think that morality goes hand in hand with what we eat--like one commenter said--Hitler was a vegetarian and it sure didn't put him on a moral highground.

3:13 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous trace boolean said...

Not that it really matters, but was Hitler really a vegetarian ?

3:19 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger mcg said...

Actually, my favorite bumper sticker sez: "What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?" But I digress.

3:25 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Being a vegitarian or a pacificst works when it comes from your heart and mind not when it comes from a neuroses or blind obedience to political ideology.

I'm a vegitarian because I like animals and don't want to be responsible for killing them or causing them suffering. I can't understand why anyone would do something to another living creature that they would not want done to themselves. It seems so obvious.

Pacifism is more complicated. It is a tactic that works in specific situations, it is not a universal solution to every problem. Peaceful resistance involves distinct actions to bring about a change by using non violent means. See http://www.aeinstein.org for information on non-violent techniques. In certain situations where peaceful resistance can work it can be the best solution because it can break the cycle of retribution. Examples of successful non-violent movements are the US civil rights movement, and independance movement in India.

Pacifism is not a universal solution. If I knew my neighbor was being burglarized or abusing his family I would call the police. If a dictator is commiting crimes against his people, I would hope that the neighboring nations would get together and intervene. Pacifism would not work against Nazi Germany or Iraq under Saddam Hussein.

Lastly, allowing others to harm you while you take the punishment without reacting is not a superior morality. If someone is maliciously harming you then that person needs help and just taking it silently does not help that person.

3:28 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The late Broda Barnes, M.D. believed that most premature heart attacks have little to do with diet. He believe that an inherited condition of hypothyroidism was the culprit. He explains scientifically why he believe that is the case. So, by supplementing with dessicated thyroid on a daily basis most heart attacks can be avoid until one is at an advanced age. Linus Pauling believed that sugar was far more harmful than fat. I suggest you all look Dr. Barnes up on the net, and read Dr. Paulings book, How to Live Longer and Feel Better (1985) in which he advocates high doses of vitamins including his favorite, of course, vitamin C. Good luck!!

3:32 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Helen said...

To anonymous,

I was told by doctors that I had two odd events happen at once that caused my heart attack--I had an arterial spasm which women are prone to and typically don't cause a lot of harm but a blood clot got caught in it. Why it happened--who the heck knows? The same happened to the runner, Flo Jo.

I have had my thyroid tested and it was normal. The problem is, there are many heart events that happen to women (and men) that are odd and difficult to diagnose such as heart rhythm problems that hit out of the blue. I was lucky because 38% of the women who have a heart attack die with the first one. If you are a vegetarian, it is important to make sure you get enough vitatims and minerals, particularly postassium which the doctors prescribed for me.

3:42 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I was a teenager when I dated my first vegetariaan. Althought she tasted good enoguh to eat, I wanted to know more about veg-roid-ism.

I read a piece by BU philosophy prof Michael Martin on the subject in an early issue of Reason Papers. HE reasoned that the only universally sound reason to be a vegetarian is taste. MY young woman friend concurred, and I've never had to return to the issue. Otherwise, what's an omnivore to do? Deny our nature is not an option.

I've haven't been near a library that has these early journals bu I can recommend it. I've searched the remainder of Martin's corpus without luck. I haven't come accross anything else as straighforward since.

3:46 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Greg Kuperberg said...

Helen: I hope you do keep your cholesterol down. We also eat very little red meat, not because of animal rights, but for environmental and health reasons. One thing that I have learned is that beef is only one animal, but you can easily get ten different species of fish at the store. Variety is the spice of life.

We have a catalog of favorite dinner recipes which are about half fish and vegetarian. I would be happy to send some of it to you if you are interested. (I would prefer not to post all of it on the web since most of it is from cookbooks. I am told that recipes are not copyrighted, but still.)

Also, as the other poster said, Hitler was not vegetarian. According to Jewish vegetarians, the Nazis even banned vegetarian groups in Germany. (I don't know the truth of this last part, but it is an interesting claim.)

3:51 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous trace boolean said...

"If you are a vegetarian, it is important to make sure you get enough vitatims and minerals, particularly postassium which the doctors prescribed for me. "

If you are a vegetarian, that's not particularly difficult to do.

3:57 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Brent Michael Krupp said...

Thanks for sharing your tale.

What I love about "vegetarians" is that on at least a technical level, there is no such thing! It is impossible for humans to live without getting vitamin B-12 in their diet. B-12 is ONLY found in animal meat. Therefore, even the vitamin supplements that "vegetarians" take have B-12 in them that is derived from KILLING animals and harvesting their meat.

Yes, this is a tiny, tiny amount of meat in their diet, but it still makes me laugh at the vegetarianism-as-a-religion ones who insist on allegedly eating zero meat.

3:58 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Helen said...

To Greg,

Yes, I do love fish also--we have some great fish stores in Knoxville and I adore any type of seafood. Perhaps you have a recommendation for a cook book on fish that I could order?

On the Hitler issue, I believe that Hitler was under the care of some quack doctors who monitored his diet due to intestinal problems. They had him eating a vegetarian diet at one point, I thought.

4:00 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Greg Kuperberg said...

The recipe sheets that I'm going to send you will show you the cookbooks that they came from. Two of them are appropriate for you if you have heart disease.

The page that "trace boolean" linked, and the link that I found from that link, say that Hitler was put on a vegetarian diet for a period by his doctors. I do not know whether those particular doctors were quacks. Whoever they were, some of their treatment had to be substandard, because Hitler eventually trashed his own health and he was willing to execute anyone who criticized him too much. In any case, to the extent that Hitler was vegeterian, it had nothing to do with pacifism, environmentalism, or animal rights. Hitler despised liberals in general and pacifists in particular.

4:12 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

trace boolean,

As a cattle rancher let me say congratulations on walking the talk. I respect vegans because they put a lot of thought and effort into eating ethically. If you are honestly concerned about ethical eating and want to avoid products that have any animal input vegan is the way to go.

Unfortunately, the average ethical non meat eater actually makes the overall condition of animals worse because they tend to change from eating animal products that are raised under more natural conditions (beef and lamb) to animal products that are raised under much more intensive and non natural settings (chicken, eggs, and dairy products).

TJIT

4:17 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Good Ole Charlie said...

Hitler WAS a vegetarian. See Speer's Inside The Third Reich. People, especially Goering, avoided eating with Adolf.

A professor of mine once had lunch with AHitler (another long story). Adolf brown-bagged it: he had this thing about other people's cooking. He employed a vegetarian cook...see above reference.

Also, Some dictators are more equal than others. What applies to the hoi polloi does not apply to the archon.

4:17 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Interesting comments!

I drifted into a sort of vegetarian lifestyle first through triathlons, where I discovered a "meat hangover" was worse than the alcohol variety (and god forbid I should give up drinking!) then through my significant other, who is a vegetarian/fish person.

Given a family with a HUGE history of heart disease, I watch my diet pretty closely by necessity. I recently, however, declared turkey a vegetable, thankfully in time for Thanksgiving.

I was once on a radio show being interviewed about guns when the host popped the "you don't eat meat, yet you teach and preach armed self-defense" question on me. "I like animals," I told her.

Michael Bane
SHOOTING GALLERY
Only on the Outdoor Channel

4:20 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

BarbO,

You said, "As for me, when someone tells me they're a vegetarian, I usually can't resist pointing out that Hitler was a vegetarian, too"

That seems like a harsh way to open and end a conversation in one easy sentence. It might be better to save that line for someone who is being truly obnoxious to you.

Just a thought.

TJIT

4:27 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous Teresa said...

I have always eaten meat because I happen to like it. I know several people who are vegitarians because they don't like meat... not because they feel bad for certain animals. And I know other people who are vegitarians for other reasons. As long as they don't preach to me - I don't preach to them and we can all be happy.

I've never found vegitarians to be more healthy than I am nor do I notice that they look any better or worse (skin, hair, weight).

Over the years I have had some delightful vegitarian meals... but my thought has always been that people should eat what they enjoy eating - not eat in certain ways because they are made to feel guilty.

What I find most humorous though are the vegitarian items made to look and supposedly taste like real meat. The vegie burgers and some sort of tofu turkey stuff. If you want to be a vegitarian - then I see no point in eating something that is "fake meat". But maybe it's a variety thing that I just don't understand.

4:35 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger ed said...

Hmmm.

I think there's a lot of value that vegetarians could offer the average American, but a lot of it is blocked by attitudes on both sides. As someone who grew up in a household of soggy overcooked mushy vegetables, and we had a 1.5 acre organic garden too, I can certainly appreciate the many very tasty vegetarian dishes I've come across. Considering that traditional New England cooking, where I grew up, involves boiling food until it surrenders, anything that could improve it is highly welcome.

If the whole carnivore, omnivore and herbivore nonsense could be left out of it, that would be even more welcome.

4:39 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm 46, live in work in the most liberal place in America (Cambridge, MA), and have never had anyone "preach" vegetarianism to me. People I know make decisions about food overwhelmingly for two reasons--taste and health. (Though I do know a number of people who care about how the food is picked and processed, and whether fair labor practices are employed.) So I can't identify with the original posts or many of the comments at all. Sounds like a stereotype to me, and is certainly not borne out by my experience.

I do wish the author continued good luck in her recovery from her health issues.

4:58 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous David Crawford said...

Dr. Helen,

That article at BREITBART.COM you link to has to be a joke, right? I mean, look at this sentence in it:

"Before Sheehan's arrival, more than 100 protesters at the camp ate a traditional Iraqi meal for Thanksgiving _ salmon, lentils, rice with almonds and a salad of parsley, tomatoes, cucumbers and bulgur wheat."

Salmon? SALMON??!?!??

I seriously doubt that there has ever been a salmon caught in Iraq. Salmon are a cold water fish. Very cold water. On the west coast of the US the rivers that salmon spawn in runs from Alaska to northern California.

Finally, to a lefty it seems that eating salmon is a way to "... call attention to the innocent Iraqi victims in addition to the more than 2,100 U.S. soldiers killed since the war began in March 2003." Well isn't that special.

What next, they'll eat King crab to call attention to global warming? Or eat abalone to call attention to the evils of globalization? Or eat lobster to call attention to the burden of debt crushing third world countries.

Me, I don't need no stupid reason to eat salmon, I just eat it. ($3.00 - $4.00 a pound from the local Indians, caught fresh that day. Mmmmmm.)

5:02 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger mcg said...

I can't understand why anyone would do something to another living creature that they would not want done to themselves.

I'm against eating living creatures, too. I think they should only be eaten after they are killed.

5:15 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous Julian Morrison said...

There's pacifism and pacifism. Specifically, I'd distinguish peaceful pacifism from the emotion-suppressing variety. I suspect that honest peacefulness is actually rather a good defense - aggression is a feedback loop via the other party's response. If the target is responding with none of anger, defensiveness, or hurt, the loop doesn't close. This would require the patience and maturity of a buddha, which is why it strikes me as particularly stupid that "don't fight" gets taught to all kids as a cultural default. Of course they should fight, if the situation calls for it!

5:23 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi Dr. Helen:

So I leave the computer for a couple of hours, and there is a wild blogging feeding frenzy over vegetarianism!

Even Adolph Hitler made his appearance. He was indeed quite the vegetarian. He was also much opposed to tobacco smoking---he used to offer gold watches to staff members who quit. And he was an ardent animal rights enthusiast (despite his feelings about Jews and other groups of humans he disliked). Sort of makes you think.

No, I am not claiming that nonsmoking vegetarian animal rights people are Nazis. It is just interesting to note how many things we think of as "good" are associated with people we know are "bad."

Fascinating posts---you have attracted some interesting and informative posters. Congratulations! And you brought my undergraduate minor in psychology to the surface with your mention of one of my favorite thinkers in that area, though not considered to be PC today: Piaget.

Heck, looking at the MSM, I can only conclude that most journalists haven't finished the formal operational stage of cognitive development.

I found your original post thought provoking. Fanaticism seems to be a general property of some people, and it pokes its head up out of such psyche's in an interesting way. *I* think it is all about people who want to impose their will on others.

I have known plenty of people from India who are vegetarian for religious and cultural reasons, and they know a great deal about the pros and cons of their diet.

But why do some people get so "pushy" about it, trying to make the non-vegetarian feel as if they personally are destroying the environment or contributing to the decay of society?

Such people think their way is the ONLY way, and folks who don't follow those rules are evil. Soon, anything that you can do to stop them---lie, steal, even commit violence---becomes acceptable. Pretty soon, you are in Dan Rather country: it doesn't matter that the documents you talked about on television are forged; they ought to be right, so they are.

Thus, I think you are right: fanatics are fanatical. They want to push that fanaticism onto others. And their fanaticism takes them some very dark places.

Me, I am fanatical about having another slice of pumpkin pie for a snack. Hope everyone is having a good weekend!

"Eric Blair"

5:26 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Helen said...

To Mr. Blair,

What--you dare leave your computer for hours at a time--you mean you have better things to do like eat pumpkin pie?--Hmmm, sounds like a good idea. Although do not get me started on pumpkin pie as I have a whole story about that which I would never post.

I loved the writings of Piaget in graduate school--I find myself referring to his work at times as his theory of intellectual development is quite interesting. For those readers who are interested in his work--try reading "Piaget's Theory of Intellectual Development". Piaget is a psychologist who studied the thinking processes of children.

5:47 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger chuck b. said...

This is my favorite fish recipe:

Chutney Broiled Fish by Sudha Koul, from Curries Without Worries.

2 lbs of any mild white fish, cut into 3" x 3" pieces

2 cloves garlic

2 cups chopped coriander leaves

4 hot green peppers (2-3 are fine, imo)

1 teaspoon whole cumin seeds

1 tablespoon chopped coconut (at least!--tho' it's a saturated fat, so beware)

3/4 teaspoon ground tumeric

1/3 cup lemon juice

1/2 cup oil (too much, I a couple tablespoons)

Pat fish dry and set aside (getting it dry is important).

Make a paste of the other ingredients.

Apply thickly on both sides of fish.

Broil for ten minutes on either side.

I like it flaky and lightly blackened.

6:21 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger chuck b. said...

And I like vegetarian sausages. Boca is my favorite.

And one last thing, vegan farts smell terrible!

6:23 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Helen said...

Hi Chuck,

Thanks--it sounds great--I am going to try it.

6:24 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Helen said...

Chuck,

The fish--only the fish.

6:25 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger KA said...

I was a vegetarian for a couple of years in high school in the 1970s. I did it because I had a crush on a girl at school - in the granola crunch years - who was a vegetarian. It worked, too, and I learned important things about good girls of the left. But I hated vegetables and pretty much ate bread and cheese, got constipated and anemic and wound up at my doctor's office - he was, at various times, my pediatrician, my scoutmaster at the local church, the pastor of the church, and a harpsichordist who harrassed me into playing cello with his recorder ensemble, so he knew pretty much everything there was to know about me. He told me I was anemic, and that I was ending my vegetarian career. He then took me to lunch at the local Chinese restaurant near his office and ordered me Peking duck. And that, as they say, was that. He is still alive, in his eighties, unfortunately suffering from Alzheimers. Kenneth Anderson at http://kennethandersonlawofwar.blogspot.com

6:29 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous trace boolean said...

TJIT - thanks. I do what I can (and also realize I still could do more). I reached the same conclusions as you state about eggs and dairy, which is why I took the next step 6 months after I stopped eating meat. It's interesting to me that you're a rancher, and I'm pleased to hear you think about these things. I imagine that informs your practices, so more power to ya.

Brent - you wrote:
What I love about "vegetarians" is that on at least a technical level, there is no such thing! It is impossible for humans to live without getting vitamin B-12 in their diet. B-12 is ONLY found in animal meat. Therefore, even the vitamin supplements that "vegetarians" take have B-12 in them that is derived from KILLING animals and harvesting their meat..

Actually, no.

Vitamin B12 was first isolated in 1948. It is derived exclusively from bacteria...Most people obtain the majority of their vitamin B12 intake from animal products. Although most people associate vitamin B12 deficiency with vegan diets, the majority of cases occur among people who regularly consume animal products... in a more primitive setting, human beings almost certainly would have obtained an abundance of vitamin B12 from the bacterial “contamination” of unwashed fresh fruits and vegetables—regardless of their intake of animal products.

More at the link.

6:54 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger BarbO said...

What an interesting discussion!

There's plenty of evidence that the enlarged human brain seems to have come about in conjunction with the diet switch by human ancestors towards consumption of protein, which provides a much more concentrated form of energy. See http://www.beyondveg.com/nicholson-w/hb/hb-interview1a.shtml for an excellent discussion (if you follow the links) of the genetic changes that have occurred in humans that allow them to digest protein. I'm not a biologist, but I am a professor whose research is centered around bioengineering--the info at that website is quite good from a scientific perspective.

6:54 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous trace boolean said...

chuck wrote: "And one last thing, vegan farts smell terrible!"


You have me there.

6:55 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger BarbO said...

Oh yes--Anonymous--when I make the comment to vegetarians about Hitler having been a vegetarian, I say it with a nice grin. It always seems to start a nice conversation rather than end it.

7:03 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous trace boolean said...

Funny how persistent that "Hitler was a vegetarian" meme is.

7:09 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi Doc,

I'm much more right-wing than you or your husband and I'm a 100% vegan for ethical reasons. It has nothing to do with holier-than-thou feel goodism on my part. Right-wingers make the mistake of conflating a person's concern with alleviating the suffering of innocent beings with liberal politics. It's not necessarily so - see Matthew Scully's books for an example. I'll just say that just as the abolitionist movement did not consist of a monolithic ideology, neither do ethical vegetarians, and our view will come to be seen just as morally true when viewed from the future as slavery does now.

7:12 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well, you see, you obviously were not vegetarian enough. When vegetarianism fails to deliver the benefits of omnivorous living, the answer to your problems must be a more fundamental purity of vegetarianism.

How do you call yourself a vegetarian unless you embrace the provisions of barefoot, ragged, homeless starvation?

Drinking water is theft by the way. God made that water for the flies to piss in.

So perhaps we should all just drink the Koolade....

Monty

7:28 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous blackminorca said...

"something akin to some Buddhist and Native American customs"

Native Americans are not the holistic sages that the are portrayed to be. In Wellesboro, Pa there are cliffs over which the indians would drive herds of deer and elk. And the same practice was used throughout the continent often with the indians taking just the tongues if the kill was more than they needed.

And forest fires they set would darken whole sections of the country for days. It had some benefits in promoting forage for game but the indians where ecological renegades.
----------------------
""To find some truth about the Indians' doings, we can consult a primary source: the journal of Meriwether Lewis, one of the leaders of the Lewis and Clark Expedition. Here (with his own spelling) is an item that Lewis recorded on 29 May 1805:


today we passed, on the star.d [starboard] side, the remains of a vast many mangled carcases of Buffalow which had been driven over a precipice of 120 feet by the Indians and perished; the water appeared to have washed away a part of this immence pile of slaughter and still their remained the fragments of at least a hundred carcases [and these] created a most horrid stench. in this manner, the Indians of the Missouri distroy vast herds of buffaloe at a stroke; . . . ."
--------

7:42 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"At twelve, I had reached the Piagetian stage of formal operations and was able to reason that other people did not all think like me and made their own decisions--which had nothing to do with me. At this time, I lost all idealistic perceptions of others, mainly adults.... I never had a hero after that as I had learned a long time before, that no one could rescue me from pain and anguish but myself."

Maybe I am not at formal stage of operations, but you and your husband are both heroic figures to me. Don't worry - I don't expect you to rescue me from anything!:-)

7:53 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Glenn and Helen are just a couple in love.
Heroes come in all shapes, sizes, fashions, and forms.

8:33 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Otis Wildflower said...

This reminds me of Rumpole of the Bailey, Lewis Black and Jim Fixx...

Some people can smoke and drink and eat bacon & eggs, and live past 80 or 90. Some folks eat "right" and exercise daily, and drop dead whilst jogging. People are engineered different, that's just the way it is.

As Rumpole would say, "It's the quality of life that matters."

And if people weren't supposed to eat meat, it wouldn't be so darned tasty!

9:08 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Helen said...

To anonymous 7:53 and 8:33:

What a lovely thing to say.

9:37 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger jau said...

Holy f'ing mackerel!! (I mean green bean.) I haven't been here in a whole day and .... Piaget is awesome but I'm not entirely clear on the connection to your eating (or not eating) meat. The evolution of your aggression and non-aggression are fascinating. You think a lot too, clearly.

So what would you say about a 14-year-old who declares herself to be a vegan because she thinks all adults are stupid? That's really truly her reason. Plus, her mother's letting her stop going to school because "all the teachers are stupid" and "none of the kids like me".

9:59 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Helen said...

Hi aup,

The connection to Piaget was that at 12 or so, I finally reached the stage of logical thinking where I understood that other people made their own decisions and could decide for themselves if vegetarianism was for them--in other words, I understood the abstract concept of separateness and that others were separate beings who decided what they wanted for themselves.

You know, I think many teenagers go through a period of vegetarianism to set themselves apart from others and to give them a sense of identity--especially girls as they can control food even if they can control nothing else such as going to school or whether or not kids like them.

10:07 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous zuzu said...

Earlier on, someone posted about the link between hypothyroidism and heart disease. That was very interesting to me.

When I was 28, I had my cholesterol tested for the first time at my annual exam. It was 240. I ate everything in moderation. My cholesterol continued to be high over the next couple of years. At the time I was initially tested, I also had my thyroid tested because I was so tired and my hair was falling out. My thyroid test came back normal.
Over time, my doctor started shifting her practice with a new emphasis on natural horomone replacement, and I came back to her with all of the same problems, and although my thyroid tests continued to be normal, she prescribed natural thyroid for me to see what would happen.
Well, my cholesterol is at a normal level now and I have not changed my diet. She says the traditional thyroid tests are not reliable because what is a normal thyroid level for one person, may be very low for another. And there's such a broad range between what constitutes a high level and a low level, the tests just aren't specific enough.( My mother also had a diagnosis of hypothyroid when I did.)

Anyway, I wonder how many women with high cholesterol or heart problems could benifit from this kind of therapy, and if it would help to prevent heart attacks?
(She's a knoxville doc. I like her very much.)

10:25 PM, November 26, 2005  
Blogger Helen said...

Hi Zuzu,

I have read that thyroid levels that look normal may not be and have always wondered if I needed to address these concerns. My doctors do not seem to think I need to look into this avenue. If you get a chance--let me know the name of the doctor if she is in Knoxville--or you can email me her name at drhelen@violentkids.com

10:53 PM, November 26, 2005  
Anonymous Elliot1 said...

There are multiple eating programs, and vegetarianism is just one. Some programs work well for some folks, but don't work well for others.

For example, Eskimos have a very high intake of fat and very low intake of fruit and vegetables. But they are very healthy. If I ate that diet, I would be a physical wreck because my genetics are not adapted for that diet.

The task each of us faces is to discover the eating program that is most compatible with our own individual physical system. However, I don't think political beliefs have any relevance

12:28 AM, November 27, 2005  
Anonymous King Jack said...

Helen:

Although the comments have moved firmly into vegetarianism territory (about which I am unconcerned), the part of your original post that grabbed me was:

"People who preach peace in the face of appalling violence deny their aggression and target it at others who are not deserving of it or who are trying to protect them."

In my opinion, most of the current crop of pacifists are not manifesting any form of aggression at all; they are giving themselves permission to evade the responsibility inherent in facing down real evil or muddying your hands with realpolitik. This leaves you squeaky clean with all the moral superiority you crave. You don't have to solve the problem if you insist there isn't one or that it's not your job to address it.

I would also be inclined to consider the wonderful, soft life so many us (peaceniks included) have been blessed with here in the USA since WWII, and our society's loss since then of institutionally positive representations of individual sacrifice at ANY level.
Also, when the children actually WON, slaying their Johnson/Nixonian fathers when we skulked out of Vietnam, it set the precedent for many of those same adult children to try to re-experience that battle thru today's war in Iraq (in spite of demonstratively differing circumstances). Or more bluntly: many peaceniks willfully choose to be babies. Mind you, I'm not saying you have to fight to be a "man," I'm saying you have to fight to win a battle, and take responsibility for determining when a battle must be fought. If nothing is worth fighting for, you never have to decide -- OR fight.

And last, I think a lot of icons of peace and non-agression are not well understood by peaceniks. The last 40 years have seen a concerted effort to create & spread respect for Martin Luther King and his nonviolent strategies during the civil rights movement. That's OK with me, and I'm mostly pleased with the outcomes of that. But peaceniks fail to see that the success of such nonviolent tactics are predicated on the basic decency of the larger community/government/nation witnessing the nonviolent behavior. If you're dealing with the Anglosphere like King and Gandhi were, it can work. If you're dealing with ancient Rome, Mohammed, Huns, Celts, Stalin, Mao, Che, Saddam Hussein, etc. they just slaughter you. End of unsuccessful nonviolent protest.

Peaceniks who love to point to Gandhi are ignorant of the fact that Gandhi knew this and admitted to it. Neither do such peaceniks realize that many of Gandhi's "nonviolent" fasts carried with them the implicit threat of staggeringly huge civil strife and slaughter that would issue from his followers should he actually fast unto death. This fact was not lost on the Brits before they pulled out; but it is on peaceniks who point to Gandhi's methods. Neither do they seem to care that he later became as dogmatically rigid in his prescriptions for nonviolent protest as any bloodthirsty Mao or Pol Pot was in demanding "reeducation" or "great leap forward" or any cleansing thru slaughter. In fact, when asked about the ongoing genocide of the Jews during WWII, his advice to them was to show their superiority to their oppressors by "dying a good death." Oh, please.

I am also reminded of watching A Few Good Men and wondering why I wasn't as thrilled at Col. Jessup's takedown as was the rest of the audience. Is this Vietnam and smacking down daddy again? Well, since Rob Reiner was directing I guess my differing from the expected response was prescient. Compare this to a similar takedown of Capt. Queeg in the Caine Mutiny, after which Lt. Greenwald chastised the celebrants, reminding them that Queeg -- warts and all -- contributed to the existence and continuance of an important American military organization, and had value on that basis alone. "Sophisticated" liberal audiences would have never seen validity in Greenwald's final speech AFTER Vietnam. Too much like "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." Which, of course, was Col. Jessup's belief. And mine.

Well, I'm not used to pounding out this much copy. I hope it makes some sense.
Jack

2:30 AM, November 27, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I began reading "Jack" with a sigh of "oh geez" and ended up thinking he's onto something. We have had decades of fairly comfy living and I definitely sense that element of childishness in the anger and resistance to dealing strongly with anything - from adolescent acting out to terrorism. Thanks for the food for thought, Jack. (Heh - another food comment.)

2:42 AM, November 27, 2005  
Blogger Helen said...

To king jack,

Yes, I do think that many people--particularly those who preach peace at any cost-are also trying to evade responsibility. They do not want to be responsible for anything and feel a sense of superiority as a result. I have a colleague like this.

We worked together in a