Reviewing Trash So You Don't Have to
I am asking my readers not to get angry, but I picked up this week's Star magazine to read about the "Baby Battle's" of the celebrities. I know that I should not be reading this trash but I am only doing so to keep the thinkers of the internet (my readers) up to date on current events in the world of trashy tabloids. Why is this important from a psychological standpoint? Because it shows us how celebrites manipulate the MSM (and vice versa) by using victimhood to get more publicity for their wilting careers--and we fall for it.
Case in point. I discussed Terri Hatcher revealing to the media that she had been sexually abused as a child in a post entitled, "Is this Really Breaking News?" This week's Star has a section called "In & Out" that mentions that the new "In" is Terri Hatcher as the cover girl of Vanity Fair's April issue. The "Out" is Sheryl Crow, Lance Armstrong and Natalie Portman as VF covers--Teri replaced them after revealing she had been sexually molested as a child. In the Vanity Fair article, Ms. Hatcher brings up her sexual abuse:
Well, if you really cared about being the altruistic helper you portray yourself as, you could have waited until Natalie Portman had her chance at the cover of Vanity Fair before you pushed her aside with your tale of woe. When we allow celebrities to use their status as a victim to sell books (Ann Heche), make the cover of magazines or gather other goodies, we cheapen the experience of other victims of abuse and reinforce the idea that victimhood pays--big time.
Case in point. I discussed Terri Hatcher revealing to the media that she had been sexually abused as a child in a post entitled, "Is this Really Breaking News?" This week's Star has a section called "In & Out" that mentions that the new "In" is Terri Hatcher as the cover girl of Vanity Fair's April issue. The "Out" is Sheryl Crow, Lance Armstrong and Natalie Portman as VF covers--Teri replaced them after revealing she had been sexually molested as a child. In the Vanity Fair article, Ms. Hatcher brings up her sexual abuse:
"I didn't intend to talk about this with you," she tells Vanity Fair contributing editor Leslie Bennetts, "but it is something that's been surfacing with me for the past three years. This is something I've tried to hide my whole life."
Hatcher tells Bennetts that, in 2002, when she learned that her uncle was arrested, she hesitated going public with her story of sex abuse, fearing that cynics might accuse her of using it to get attention and resuscitate an expiring career. But Hatcher found herself tormented by the thought of Sarah Van Cleemput, the young girl who had shot herself, and she was wracked with anxiety over whether Stone would be convicted. "I kept thinking, If she'd known me, especially me being famous, if I could have said to her, 'Look, it happened to me!,' if I could just have said to her, 'You're going to be O.K.'—I kept thinking, What do I do with this information I have that no one else has?"
Well, if you really cared about being the altruistic helper you portray yourself as, you could have waited until Natalie Portman had her chance at the cover of Vanity Fair before you pushed her aside with your tale of woe. When we allow celebrities to use their status as a victim to sell books (Ann Heche), make the cover of magazines or gather other goodies, we cheapen the experience of other victims of abuse and reinforce the idea that victimhood pays--big time.
posted by Helen at 2:40 PM
46 Comments:
Not really sure where you're going with this...
...you say that celebrities' experiences are not worth our consideration yet you admit to getting angry at them for exploiting these experiences.
Seems to me you have bought into the celebrity culture hook line and sinker?
Why not just ignore and it and go on with your life? That way seems more healthy than obsessing about the choices made by celebrities?
Or am I missing your point entirely?
First People magazine and now the Star?
Failing a good scandal, the mindless mob loves a sob story. There is injustice and tragedy everywhere, the question is what are these people doing about it besides using it to feed their narcisistic tendencies? What are the odds of Hatcher going on a speaking tour to shelters nationwide? Eh?
I'm with the others, Helen, stop reading this drivel and give us something real to think about.
JD
Women's magazines forever search for tales about women being victims; e.g.
http://www.harrysnews.com/tgSpinSistersSellMisery.htm
Indeed, stories about some kind of 'abuse' are one the most preferred genres when it comes to women's fantasies.
I appreciate Dr. Helen reading this so I don't have to. And I think it's important, even if it's drivel.
Anne Heche's book is at Amazon.com Sales Rank: #526,526 in Books.
From the Editorial Reviews: "Read this book to know it's possible to grow up sane, compassionate and creative in a crazy, cruel, dictatorial world -- providing you have guides like Anne Heche." Perhaps she is not talking about society, but I hate it when liberals through words around lightly like "dictatorial."
Dave said,
"Seems to me you have bought into the celebrity culture hook line and sinker?
Why not just ignore and it and go on with your life?"
Why be rude to Dr Helen? She is merely addressing a rather important issue concerning the way in which people manage to sell themselves through claiming to have been abused in some way. Further, given that this phenomenon is something with which the mainstream media seem fairly obsessed, I would have thought this was a rather important topic.
As for this remark, "stop reading this drivel and give us something real to think about" - I would suggest that this is a very serious issue well worth thinking about given the enormous negative effects that this unhealthy focus on 'abuse' has on people.
Finally, this particular issue is highly germaine to most of the other issues that Dr Helen addresses.
It is hardly being rude to ask why one is posting on a topic one finds so distasteful.
When did it become rude to ask a question?
Dave: If you cannot see the rudeness in your post, I can't help you.
Dave,
I am posting about this topic because it ties into the other post on victimhood that I wrote about previously. Teri Hatcher is rewarded by our society for playing the victim and talking about her sexual abuse. This encourages other people to use victimhood as a lifestyle. This is what I find distasteful.
I am simply using the "Star" as a vehicle for examining the tendency to reward victimhood (as it points out how it is "in" to be a celebrity who has been sexually abused). I could ignore it but the issue of using victimhood as an attention getter to gain goodies is a problem in our society. That is why I am addressing the issue--I do not buy into celebrity culture--quite the contrary--I am pointing out how the celebrity culture of celebrating victimhood by splashing celebs on the front of magazines for being a victim is not a good role model for any of us. If rewarding victimhood affects the culture and thus, our schools, kids, and our psychological way of viewing the world, I think that it is important to discuss. You may feel differently and believe that people in our country are not affected by what they read or see in these magazines or in the culture. That is your right.
Helen,
Thanks for explaining.
I'm still not sure I see the impact of the celebrity culture of victimhood, however, I will defer to your expertise here.
Apologies if you thought the questions I asked were rude.
If I may, Dr Helen, I would like Dave to read this, ...
http://tinyurl.com/h4nxo
... so that he might see just how truly poisonous is the victim culture and the hysteria that it generates.
Am I the only one who sees these people as our new freak shows. I remember when I was young and the carnival would come to town, there was always a freak show where you could pay a quarter or fifty cents (yes, it was a long time ago) and you could go in and see "freaks". These were usually just poor souls who were born with some deformity and this was their only way to make a living. As I see it, we have replaced these freak shows with the more acceptable modern freak shows of celebrities parading before us and showing us their mental and emotional 'deformities'. I think most of us watch them not because we admire or feel sorry for them, but because we are amused by the show they put on.
Bert
Hello Bert
You said, "I think most of us watch them not because we admire or feel sorry for them, but because we are amused by the show they put on."
I wish that this was true, and that the public merely viewed them in the way that you suggest. But you are underestimating by orders of magnitude the scale of the negative impact that this abuse hysteria is having on western societies. As just one example, men increasingly have to prove their innocence when it comes to allegations of criminal 'abuse'. You also seem to remain blissfully unaware of just how well-funded and well-orchestrated are the attempts by media and academic feminists to raise continually the hysteria over matters to do with 'abuse'.
There are whole industries out there that make a good living out of this hysteria.
Wait. I don't understand.
Hatcher should have kept her mouth shut about being sexually abused as a child so that Natalie Portman could get the Vanity Fair cover? Perhaps you're being ironic. It's hard for me to pick that up sometimes.
And you were definitely being ironic about your original intent for picking up the Star, right?
Even still, assuming all irony, aren't you still falling into the manipulative trap you seem to believe the celebrities and the MSM are setting for us by purchasing such banal material?
I read the Star weekly for a few months: My brother printed it and I worked for him in the gap between ending a job and starting college. I do not understand how or why people would actually PAY to read it.
As for Hatcher? I can see using victimhood to help a disadvantaged group of victims. For instance, to improve the lot of male victims of violence, who generally speaking cannot get help. That would make some sort of sense.
As Hatcher does it though? That goes on into attempting to turn an already bad situation into a worse one.
There's some fairly good evidence that our feeding frenzy about abuse already hurts children. One of the rpofessors at the University of Guelph was on the radio a few weeks ago with convincing evidence that our worry about abuse causes more harm to children than the risk of being abused ever did.
Our MSM, in that way, cause harm to children.
Just to be a little contrarian here, I think it's a good thing to read the gossip 'zines. Sometimes the clerks will make jokes when I stock up on the National Enquirer, Globe, and People Magazine on Friday evening at the grocery store. I just laugh along with them, telling them I'm getting my intellectual reading for the week. In real life, though, I'm a professor of engineering, specializing in electromagnetics. Like as not, I've spent the day doing triple integrals or messing around with high power equipment in the lab related to my research. I like reading 'zines like the National Enquirer because I feel it keeps me in touch with things my students know about. Surprisingly, Newsweek and Time wrote articles about the excellent reporting of the National Enquirer after the OJ scandal--the Enquirer often does a better job of reporting its news than the New York Times does of its news. (Okay, so that's easy, but still.) I value blogs because they allow me to discerningly look at the news. But Dr. Helen's blog is the first place that I've seen that has taken gossip rags seriously, on their terms, and analyzed them. This is nothing to apologize for--it's terrific! Incidentally, I do lots of other reading, also--including Dr. Helen's excellent "The Scarred Heart: Understanding and Identifying Kids Who Kill," and Glenn's "An Army of Davids." (Right now I'm reading Sober & Wilson's "Unto Others: the Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior," alongside George Vaillant's "The Wisdom of the Ego.") I feel the 'zines provide a very different perspective on humanity that is fun, often easily deconstructed for amusement purposes, but no less enlightening once the limitations are understood.
Barb O,
I actually like the National Enquirer best as it does a good job of making fun of some of the celebrity causes and makes important points such as how anti-American some of the celebrities are so they have their place. I believe some of their reporting before I do the NYT etc.
I started reading the Star and National Enquirer etc. when I became sick and tired of dealing with serious matters all of the time and wanted some light entertainment. But on a larger scale, I think it is important to understand how the media that is consumed by mainstream America shapes the way that people think about issues. It all plays a significant role and to downplay it as drivel etc. is to miss the point entirely of the impact that such entertainment shows and media such as Oprah, etc. have on our society--one area being the focus on sexual abuse as a way of gaining sympathy and status (and magazine covers). The more emphasis on sexual abuse and women, the more draconian laws we put in place for those who are even suspected of looking at someone the wrong way.
I absolutely agree with your thinking, Helen. I think the, well, call them the "gossip media," play a far larger role than people think in shaping public opinion. But that opinion shaping often flies under pundits' radar screens. I, too, often enjoy stories such as the one about Sean Penn's boat sinking under the weight of his publicity crew during his "helping" mission for the Katrina victims. But before I read your blog, I hadn't thought about how self-serving stories like that of Terri Hatcher might help produce an overreaction that relates to law-making. That's a perceptive, useful insight. In fact, it's exactly the kind of reason I'm so glad that you are willing to do gossip media dumpster diving. I'd love to see you gradually expand your commentary in this area.
Seems to me I remember a congresswoman who got a lot of attention when she brain-dumped her childhood abuse at a hearing. Sheesh, what a cheap way to get attention. I'm running for legislative office and I have made a vow to myself NEVER to go the personal-confessional route on the stump. It's just too easy, too tempting, and so pervasive in our Oprah-infused culture to pull this stunt just because you need some publicity or some "different" message.
Helen says...
I am posting about this topic because it ties into the other post on victimhood that I wrote about previously. Teri Hatcher is rewarded by our society for playing the victim and talking about her sexual abuse. This encourages other people to use victimhood as a lifestyle. This is what I find distasteful.
I honestly don't see how -- at least in this case -- the dots connect up. Do you have direct evidence/knowledge that her story was nothing more than a publicity stunt? Or, are you merely assuming it was?
If the former then I think you are quite correct in your criticism, but if the latter I think you are being unfair. I say that because the latter implies you are using a definition where most anyone whose stories of sexual abuse et al get published is using "victimhood" to get ahead. Is that by definition always the case? Is it not possible that someone might be motivated by a sincere desire to help others? And, can't one accuse someone of using their "vicitmization" to hijack the spotlight from someone else regardless of when their story gets published?
Let me be clear -- I'm not saying that you are wrong, I'm just not seeing compelling evidence that you right.
This from the chick in the "Death, Been there done tha shirt". You're a hack.
JN
JN, you remind me of the worst professor I ever had. This man would confuse himself and the class through endless equations that he clearly had no physical feel whatsoever for. Someone asked this professor once if he had seen the latest episode of Seinfeld. He drew himself up in a huff and puffed "I don't watch television. Ever." I thought to myself--buddy--that's part of why you're such a bad teacher. You won't stoop to spending time with ordinary means of communication.
Barbo, you gleaned all this from a single typo-ridden sentence? You are a perfect fit for this blog of made up bs.
JN
Actually, JN, if you'd read carefully, you'd have understood that I gleaned what I gleaned from sitting in the classroom those many years ago. Your "typo-ridden" sentence was just an echo. If you are able to stop your automatic and clearly emotionally-grounded judgements while reading this blog, you might encounter some interesting alternative opinions that are not at all as goofy as they may first appear to you to be. Since you're reading this blog, I guess there is hope for you. :)
there is a using mentality a feeling of look at me, which when done out of an altruistic motive is good, but when its done out of a self publicising angle, then thats bad.
it all depends on the personality, and in the situation (btw i am glad dr helen said this as since i live in the UK we dont get the same news as there so good on you dr helen).
where does the self publication begin and the altruistic motive end, we cant say unless we know more about the people involved. if teri hatcher had no job and used this to put her face into the public awareness then that would be wrong, many other actors seem to do this, they have a slump then they have a revelation, a story etc.. or they joined a new religion or whatever.
Barbo, you have issues. I point out the hypocrisy of this post and you want to make me out to be some sort of disconnected elitist based on nothing. Says a lot about you.
JN
Oops. I forgot I'm not supposed to feed the trolls.
Here's my problem with the Teri Hatcher story in Vanity Fair...
First I have to say I have not read the story and probably won't as I won't shell out money for VF.
That being said - from the one news article I've seen about it - describing how she got involved in the Sarah Van Cleemput case - my immediate reaction was - it was good of her to come forward and give her statement so the creep could be put away. I could wish she had done something like this before Sarah died... but I don't know how difficult that would have been legally.
However, this interview was calculated to draw attention to her victim status. There was no compelling reason for her to talk about this in VF. And the cover shot seems rather creepy in light of the revelations in the story. (I've seen it at checkout counters)
I would have had far more respect for her if she had put that topic off limits for the interview and let Natalie Portman get a cover shot in... then again I'm not narcissistic enough to be a Hollywood star.
She could have come out about this earlier, when she wasn't getting any work, but she waited until she was back on top, with a hit show, so that people wouldn't think she was being opportunistic.
I'm not entirely sure that this is super-important, but I think it's worth noting, since we are accusing her of exploiting her abuse for personal gain.
The idea that Teri Hatcher wanted to give the public this story for anything other than her **own** benefit seems unlikely - to say the least. And I doubt that either she or her agent are unaware of how much mileage can be gained by being a 'victim' these days. The feminists, the women's groups and the victim-loving media will adore her, and I am sure that she will be invited all over the place to pontificate about all sorts of issues associated with her victimhood.
Was it not Woody allen who said that, these days, if one is taken as a hostage by a criminal gang then the media will thereafter see you as an exepert on everything from economics to foreign policy?
I think that Teri Hatcher knows the score when it comes to furthering her publicity quotient.
Christ almighty. Nobody here seems to doubt the validity of Hatcher's accusations. She was molested as a child by her uncle, people. Sure, she could have kept this horrible bit of information to herself. I certainly would have. But you sure are jumping to alot of conclusions about her motivations. And this all seems in awfully poor taste, considering the nature of what happened to her.
Some people have difficulties in their lives (you know, like heart attacks for instance) and they want to talk about it alot. You know, always making references to it, going on TV to talk about it, wearing t-shirts announcing the experience to anyone with vision. Sure, it's most likely a pathetic ploy for attention and sympathy. But not necessarily.
While nothing requires you to actually feel any sympathy for such people, I think turning on the offensive is unbelievably rude. Oh... wait...
And once again, I ask: You feel bad for Natalie Portman because she didn't get her little picture on the cover but you don't feel anything for Hatcher?
And once again, I ask: Why would you criticize the "MSM" and the celebrities for selling this crap (victimization chic) when you're buying it??? That's why they sell it--because so many Americans, (like yourself) fall for it. You are supporting the very behavior you criticize.
Physician, heal thyself!
anonymous 1.54, are you saying that famous people never do anything out of any other motive that altruism.
there is a point where altruism, becomes self publicity. the cynicism in me says 75% of these actors use this type of thing to publicise their new job, new baby, new whatever. look at tom cruise on oprah, he publicised scientology when he spoke about his marriage plans. the words "i was a victim" have become synonymous with look at me, this is the fault of those in the public eye using it to publicise themselves.
they damn all the true altruistic ones, with the same brush. like all the false rape allegations, they cause a more cynical beleif in everyday populations towards real victims of rape.
victim hood sells. and who would be surprised that the press in selling papers or tv shows or films, would us such a thing.
Hi, I live in the UK and there is a nice little publication here (a paper product) called "The Week". It is a summary/analysis of all the week's happenings in the world -- news, books, plays, financial etc.
It carries this one little column called "It must be true, I read it in the tabloids". The editors post there the most outrageous quotes from the world's media. Maybe you could try something like that on your blog!
This is a long-winded way of saying "don't believe anything you read in these magazines (and some newspapers)". As you imply in your original post, Dr Helen, subjects of interviews make things up, or interviewers make things up, or both, for a gullible audience. I think it's best just not to believe any of it and read an improving book instead ;-)
(or label it "fun but fiction" as does the Week.)
all best
Maxine.
Again, just to be a bit contrarian--everybody likes to disrespect the tabloids. But sometimes they report useful info that no one else will touch (remember Gary Hart?). Rather than cherry pick the worst of the tabloids, which is like shooting fish in a barrel, why not attempt a more balanced discussion? I, for one, am still left scratching my head about the Enquirer headlines saying that Bush has returned to drinking. Was it true? (The National Enquirer usually gets its facts right, although they naturally skew them to gain more readers.) A month later, those headlines about Bush drinking disappeared. Will we be reading in a Bush biography twenty years hence that this period really was tough, Bush did return briefly to drinking, and that it affected his focus on policy? Tabloids give us clues about these things. It's funny--we had a guest scholar from P. R. China living with us for a few months last year. She was absolutely wide-eyed when I explained American tabloids to her. Such a thing would never be allowed in China, she said. That's (a small part of) why the Chinese never learned the facts about Mao's private perversities. 70 million died as a consequence.
What does this revelation of abuse get her directly, except more publicity? That is to say, how is being a "victim" going to get her any more actual work? (As opposed to gossip column inches.)
Women Ms. Hatcher's age (don't get me started) often have a tough time finding roles that are worth playing. Scripts don't magically appear overnight that are worth performing in. I'm willing to give her the benefit of the doubt regarding her own motives, because all this revelation qualifies her for are Lifetime victim-of-the-week movies, which aren't exactly on actresses' shortlists as hot career builders.
Publicity for its own sake may augment fame, but it doesn't ensure any more tangible benefit.
Given that we now know that there has been something of an orchestrated conspiracy by feminist media women for three decades to highlight as much as possible issues of 'abuse' against women - wherever they can find it - I think that Ms Hatcher, her agent, and her publishers are fully aware of the publicity benefits of claiming to be a victim.
And the very idea that these professionals are unaware of such benefits is risible.
...While the doctor raises a good point about "victimhood" being used these days for all kinds of purposes, one must remember that more often than not the victims are real. The little girl that lead Teri Hatcher to tell her story was my little sister. Her suffering was real. Thanks to Ms. Hatcher her abuser is in jail. While one can debate Ms. Hatcher's antics as much as one wants, the fact of the matter is that thanks to her one more dispicable monster is in jail. And that's all that matters to me.
情趣用品,
性感睡衣,
免費視訊聊天,
視訊交友網,
美姬圖影,
情境坊歡愉用品,
花美姬情趣用品,
成人圖片,
臺灣情色網,
嘟嘟情人色網,
色情網站,
情境坊歡愉用品,
徵信,
徵信公司,
徵信,
外遇,
徵信,
徵信,
抓姦,
徵信,
外遇,
徵信,
徵信社,
徵信社,
抓姦,
徵信社,
徵信社,
徵信社,
趣,
趣,
整型,
視訊聊天,
視訊交友,
AV女優,
色情,
A片,
A片,
情趣用品,
情色,
A片,
色情影片,
情趣用品,
A片,
AV女優,
視訊聊天室,
聊天,
情趣用品,
情惑用品性易購,
情侶歡愉用品,
A片,
情趣,
情惑用品性易購,
辣妹視訊,
自慰套,
情侶歡愉用品,
寄情築園小遊戲,
aio交友愛情館,
美女視訊,
色情A片,
情趣用品,
徵信社,
情趣用品,
A片,
美女視訊,
色情A片,
AV女優,
A片,
辣妹視訊,
自慰套,
情侶歡愉用品,
85cc免費影城 愛情公寓正妹牆川藏第一美女 成人影片 情色交友網 美女視訊 美女視訊 視訊情人高雄網 JP成人影城 383成人影城 aa片免費a片下載 a片線上看aa片免費看 ※a片線上試看※sex520免費影片※ aa片免費看 BT成人論壇 金瓶影片交流區 自拍美女聊天室 aa片免費a片下載 SEX520免費影片 免費a片 日本美女寫真集 sex520aa免費影片 sex520aa免費影片 BT成人網 Hotsee免費視訊交友 百分百貼影片區 SEX520免費影片 免費視訊聊天室 情人視訊高雄網 星光情色討論版 正妹牆 383成人影城 線上85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 85cc免費影城 ※免費視訊聊天室※ ※免費視訊聊天室※ 免費視訊聊天室 85cc免費影片 85cc免費影片 080苗栗人聊天室 080苗栗人聊天室 080中部人聊天室 080中部人聊天室 免費a片下載 免費a片 AA片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 aa片免費看 日本av女優影片 av女優 av女優無碼影城 av女優 av女優 百分百成人圖片 百分百成人圖片 視訊情人高雄網 電話交友 影音電話交友 絕色影城 絕色影城 夜未眠成人影城 夜未眠成人影城 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 色咪咪影片網 免費色咪咪貼影片 免費色咪咪貼影片 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 色情遊戲 影音視訊交友網 視訊交友網 080視訊聊天室 ※免費視訊聊天室※ ※免費視訊聊天室※ 視訊聊天室 成人影音視訊聊天室 ut影音視訊聊天室 ※免費視訊聊天室※ 視訊ukiss聊天室視訊ukiss聊天室 視訊交友90739 視訊交友90739 情人視訊網 168視訊美女 168視訊美女 168視訊美女 視訊美女館 視訊美女館 免費視訊美女網 小高聊天室 小高聊天室 aio交友聊天室 aio交友聊天室 交友聊天室 交友聊天室 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 線上a片 免費線上a片 免費線上a片 嘟嘟成人網站 成人漫畫 情色文學 嘟嘟成人網 成人貼圖區 情色文學成人小說 微風成人區 情色貼圖區 免費視訊聊天 免費成人圖片區 愛情公寓 愛情公寓聊天室 寄情築園小遊戲 免費aa片線上看 aa片免費看 情色SXE聊天室 SEX情色遊戲 色情A片 免費下載 av女優 俱樂部 情色論壇 辣妹視訊 情色貼圖網 免費色情 聊天室 情人視訊聊天室 免費a片成人影城 免費a片-aa片免費看 0204貼圖區 SEX情色 交友聊天-線上免費 女優天堂 成人交友網 成人情色貼圖區 18禁 -女優王國 080視訊美女聊天室 080視訊聊天室 視訊交友90739 免費a片 aio 視訊交友網 成人影城-免費a片※免費視訊聊天※85cc免費影片日本線上免費a片 免費色咪咪影片免費色咪咪影片aaa片免費看影片aaa片免費看成人影城免費色咪咪影片
免費視訊聊天 ut聊天室辣妹視訊UT影音視訊聊天室 吉澤明步QQ美女視訊秀 85cc免費影片aa影片下載城sex免費成人影片aaa片免費看短片美女視訊 sex383線上娛樂場av969 免費短片日本免費視訊aa影片下載城視訊網愛聊天室影音視訊交友 咆哮小老鼠分享論壇sex520免費影片aa免費影片下載城aio辣妺視訊 aio辣妹交友愛情館 jp成人影片aio交友愛情館馬子免費影片免費線上a片18成人85cc影城0204movie免費色咪咪視訊網pc交友s383視訊玩美女人34c高雄視訊聊天jp成人免費視訊辣妹 kk777視訊俱樂部xxxpandalive173影音視訊聊天室 sex520-卡通影片成人免費視訊 完美女人13060 免費視訊聊天sexy girl video movie辣妹妹影音視訊聊天室UT視訊美女交友視訊情色網百事無碼a片dvd線上aa片免費看18禁成人網ut聊天室kk俱樂部視訊激情網愛聊天 情人小魔女自拍卡通aa片免費看夜未眠成人影城aio性愛dvd辣妹影片直播拓網視訊交友視訊聊天室ggoo168論壇視訊辣妹love104影音live秀 美女show-live視訊情色yam交友辣妹妹影音視訊聊天室s383情色大網咖視訊aaa俱樂部台灣情色網無碼avdvdsexy diamond sex888入口Show-live視訊聊天室
免費 a 片aaaaa片俱樂部影片aaaaa片俱樂部dodo豆豆聊天室sex520網路自拍美女聊天室天堂免費線上avdvd援交av080影片aa影片下載城aaa片免費看短片成人圖片區18成人avooogo2av免費影片sexdiy影城免費線上成人影片bonbonsex0951影片下載日本av女優sex888免費看影片免費視訊78論壇辣妹有約辣妹no31314視訊dudu sex免費影片avdvd情色影片免費色咪咪影片網av080免費試看日本美女寫真集辣妹脫衣麻將視訊聊天室性福免費影片分享日本美女寫真集,kk視訊aio交友愛情館免費成人美女視訊bt論壇色情自拍免費a片卡通tw 18 net卡通18美少女圖色情漫畫777美女小護士免費 aa 片試看百分百成人情色圖片a片免費觀賞sexy girls get fuckedsexy girl video movie情色文學成人小說sex888免費看eyny 伊莉論壇sexdiy影城自拍情色0204movie免費影片aio免費aa片試看s383情色大網咖sexy girl video movie草莓牛奶AV論壇台灣論壇18禁遊戲區環球辣妹聊天室 90691拓網aio交友愛情館拓網學生族視訊777美女 sex888影片分享區hi5 tv免費影片aa的滿18歲卡通影片sex383線上娛樂場sexdiy影城免費a片線上觀看真人美女辣妹鋼管脫衣秀比基尼辣妹一夜情視訊aio交友愛情館
外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇 外遇
外遇
外遇 外遇
外遇
外遇 外遇外遇
外遇
外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 ,
外遇 外遇 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇
外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿喜帖囍帖卡片外遇外遇 外遇 外遇外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇剖析 外遇調查 外遇案例 外遇諮詢 偷情 第三者外遇話題 外遇發洩 感情挽回 徵信社 外遇心態 外遇 通姦 通姦罪 外遇徵信社徵信社外遇 外遇 抓姦徵信協會徵信公司 包二奶 徵信社 徵信 徵信社 徵信社 徵信社 徵信社 徵信 徵信 婚姻 婚前徵信 前科 個人資料 外遇 第三者 徵信社 偵探社 抓姦 偵探社 偵探社婚 偵探社 偵探社偵探家事服務家事服務家電維修家事服務家事服務家事服務家事服務家事服務持久持久持久持久持久持久持久離婚網頁設計徵信社徵信社徵信徵信社外遇離婚協議書劈腿持久持久持久持久持久劈腿剖析徵信徵信社外遇外遇外遇外遇徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信公會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 徵信協會 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿 劈腿
視訊做愛視訊美女無碼A片情色影劇kyo成人動漫tt1069同志交友網ut同志交友網微風成人論壇6k聊天室日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞UT視訊美女交友..........................
sex520免費影片一夜情視訊s383視訊 a片85cc免費影片歐美免費影片77p2p影片網youtube影片sex888影片分享區成人影片影片土豆網影片終極三國影片小魔女免費影片UT視訊美女交友a片免費下載守護甜心影片楓之谷影片sex999免費影片youtube影片下載色情影片一葉晴貼影片區性感影片
Post a Comment
<< Home